BTK inhibitor

BTK 抑制剂
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    这是一例中枢神经系统(CNS)受累的噬血细胞性血管内大B细胞淋巴瘤(IVLBCL)。虽然R-CHOP化疗方案已被证明在生存率上有显著的改善。预后和结果仍然不令人满意,这被认为是突出的挑战,需要解决方案。基因和分子谱分析研究可能提供新的治疗策略,尤其是IVLBCL中的BCR/TLR/IL-1R/NF-κB信号通路。这里,我们用Bruton酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(BTKi)阻断NF-κB通路治疗吞血性IVLBCL中枢神经系统受累患者,并表明第二代BTKizanubrutinib治疗是可行和有效的。
    This is a case of hemophagocytic intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) with central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Although R-CHOP chemotherapy regimen has been shown significant improvement in survival rate. The prognosis and outcomes remain unsatisfactory, which is identified as outstanding challenges and need solutions. Gene and molecular profiling studies may provide new therapeutic strategies, especially the BCR/TLR/IL-1R/NF-κB signaling pathway in IVLBCL. Here, we treated the hemophagocytic IVLBCL CNS-involved patient with the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) to block NF-κB pathway, and indicated that the second-generation BTKi zanubrutinib-based treatment was feasible and efficient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    嵌合抗原受体T细胞(CAR-T细胞)疗法的引入改变了弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的治疗前景。然而,这种治疗后复发的最佳治疗策略仍需阐明.在这份报告中,我们描述了一例67岁的男性,他在使用tisagenlecleucel作为三线治疗后复发.我们提出了复发后的治疗方法,我们试图维持循环中的嵌合抗原受体T细胞。这通过这些治疗期间嵌合抗原受体T细胞的动力学来反映。
    The introduction of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T cell) therapy has changed the treatment landscape of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the optimal treatment strategy after relapse after this therapy still needs to be elucidated. In this report, we describe the case of a 67-year-old male who relapsed after treatment with tisagenlecleucel as a third-line therapy. We present our approach to treatment after relapse, in which we tried to sustain the circulating chimeric antigen receptor T-cells. This is reflected by the kinetics of the chimeric antigen receptor T-cells during these treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    布鲁顿的酪氨酸激酶(BTK)抑制剂彻底改变了B细胞淋巴瘤如慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的治疗前景。一流的BTK抑制剂依鲁替尼最近通过更安全但仍面临抗性突变挑战的共价BTK抑制剂获得了成功。非共价BTK抑制剂pirtobrutinib最近被批准用于复发和难治性CLL,以及非共价BTK抑制剂是否会取代共价BTK抑制剂作为单独或组合的前期治疗选择将被确定。同时,新的BTK抑制剂和BTK降解剂正在争夺其在B细胞癌和自身免疫性疾病的潜在未来格局中的地位。这篇综述将涵盖BTK抑制剂开发的最新进展,以及根据这些最新发现,该领域正在发展的领域。
    Bruton\'s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment landscape for B cell lymphomas such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The first-in-class BTK inhibitor ibrutinib has recently been succeeded by covalent BTK inhibitors that are safer but still face challenges of resistance mutations. The noncovalent BTK inhibitor pirtobrutinib was recently approved for relapsed and refractory CLL, and whether noncovalent BTK inhibitors will supplant covalent BTK inhibitors as upfront treatment options either alone or in combination will be determined. Meanwhile, newer BTK inhibitors and BTK degraders are vying for their place in the potential future landscape of B cell cancers as well as autoimmune diseases. This review will cover the latest progress in BTK inhibitor development and where the field is moving in light of these recent discoveries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶(BTK)抑制剂是慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)最广泛使用的治疗方法之一,并对该疾病的疗效和安全性提出了新的期望。目前有3种BTK共价抑制剂被批准用于治疗CLL:ibrutinib,阿卡拉布替尼,和扎努布替尼。一流的共价BTK抑制剂是ibrutinib,单药治疗在一线治疗中具有出色的疗效,7年无进展生存期(PFS)为59%。基于依鲁替尼的疗法在一线和复发/难治性环境中也显示出优于标准化学免疫疗法的优势。阿卡拉布替尼是第二代BTK抑制剂,对BTK具有更高的选择性。阿卡拉布替尼对一线和复发性CLL均有效,与伊布替尼相比,与房颤和高血压的发生率降低相关。像阿卡拉布替尼一样,zanubrutinib被设计为比ibrutinib对BTK更具选择性,并最大限度地抑制组织中的BTK.Zanubrutinib已在一线和复发/难治性环境中证明了临床疗效。这些药物被称为单一疗法,给药直到疾病进展或不可耐受的毒性,主要通过安全性来区分,虽然疗效差异也可能存在。与CD20单克隆抗体和/或BCL2抑制剂的组合是备选的使用选择。在这里,我们将回顾这些药物的疗效和安全性考虑。
    Inhibitors of Bruton\'s tyrosine kinase (BTK) are among the most widely used therapies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and established a new expectation for efficacy and safety in the treatment of this disease. Currently there are 3 covalent inhibitors of BTK approved for the treatment of CLL: ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib. The first-in-class covalent BTK inhibitor is ibrutinib, which as monotherapy has excellent efficacy in the front-line setting with a 7-year progression free survival (PFS) of 59%. Ibrutinib-based therapies have also demonstrated superiority over standard chemoimmunotherapy in the front-line and the relapsed/refractory setting. Acalabrutinib is a second-generation BTK inhibitor that has higher selectivity to BTK. Acalabrutinib has efficacy in both frontline and relapsed CLL and is associated with a decreased incidence of atrial fibrillation and hypertension when compared to ibrutinib. Like acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib was designed to be more selective for BTK than ibrutinib and to maximize BTK inhibition in tissues. Zanubrutinib has demonstrated clinical efficacy in first line and relapsed/refractory setting. These agents are indicated as monotherapy, with dosing until disease progression or intolerable toxicity, and are mainly differentiated by safety profile, although efficacy differences may exist as well. Combination with CD20 monoclonal antibodies and/or BCL2 inhibitors are alternative options for use. Here we will review efficacy and safety considerations with these agents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Ibrutinib是第一个被批准用于治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者的布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶(BTK)抑制剂。在产生持久反应和延长生存期的同时,大约20-25%的患者经历剂量限制性副作用,主要由严重高血压和心房颤动等心血管毒性组成。虽然已经提出了BTK抑制剂相关心脏毒性的临床预测因子,并且可能有助于风险分层,目前在临床实践中没有常规的风险模型来识别高危患者.最近的一项研究调查了依鲁替尼相关心脏毒性的遗传预测因子,发现KCNQ1和GATA4的单核苷酸多态性与心脏毒性事件显着相关。如果在更大的研究中复制,这些生物标志物可结合临床因素改善风险分层.临床基因组风险模型可能有助于识别发生BTK抑制剂相关心脏毒性的最高风险患者,其中可以探索进一步的风险缓解策略。
    Ibrutinib was the first Bruton\'s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). While producing durable responses and prolonging survival, roughly 20-25% of patients experience dose limiting side effects, mostly consisting of cardiovascular toxicities like severe hypertension and atrial fibrillation. While clinical predictors of BTK inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity have been proposed and may aid in risk stratification, there is no routine risk model used in clinical practice today to identify patients at highest risk. A recent study investigating genetic predictors of ibrutinib-related cardiotoxicity found that single nucleotide polymorphisms in KCNQ1 and GATA4 were significantly associated with cardiotoxic events. If replicated in larger studies, these biomarkers may improve risk stratification in combination with clinical factors. A clinicogenomic risk model may aid in identifying patients at highest risk of developing BTK inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity in which further risk mitigation strategies may be explored.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)是一种罕见的,异质性B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤。标准的一线治疗利用化疗,通常伴随着自体造血细胞移植的巩固;然而,在大多数患者中,淋巴瘤会复发,需要后续治疗.此外,套细胞淋巴瘤主要影响老年患者,并且经常对化疗耐药,这进一步促进了新的必要性,无化疗的治疗选择。在过去的十年里,套细胞淋巴瘤的靶向治疗已经改变了实践,因为治疗模式已经从主要依赖细胞毒性药物转移到了更远的地方.这里,我们将回顾套细胞淋巴瘤的病理生理学,并讨论靶向,无化疗治疗旨在破坏异常生物学驱动其淋巴生成。靶向NF-kB组成型激活的治疗,布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶信号,抗凋亡将是我们讨论其临床数据和毒性的主要焦点。我们的审查还将主要集中在复发/难治性背景下靶向治疗的出现和使用,但也将讨论其在一线治疗和与其他药物联合使用的出现。
    Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, heterogeneous B-cell non-Hodgkin\'s lymphoma. The standard front-line treatment utilizes chemotherapy, often followed by consolidation with an autologous hematopoietic cell transplant; however, in most patients, the lymphoma will recur and require subsequent treatments. Additionally, mantle cell lymphoma primarily affects older patients and is frequently chemotherapy-resistant, which has further fostered the necessity for new, chemotherapy-free treatment options. In the past decade, targeted therapies in mantle cell lymphoma have been practice-changing as the treatment paradigm shifts further away from relying primarily on cytotoxic agents. Here, we will review the pathophysiology of mantle cell lymphoma and discuss the emergence of targeted, chemotherapy-free treatments aimed at disrupting the abnormal biology driving its lymphomagenesis. Treatments targeting the constitutive activation of NF-kB, Bruton\'s Tyrosine Kinase signaling, and anti-apoptosis will be the primary focus as we discuss their clinical data and toxicities. Our review will also focus primarily on the emergence and use of targeted therapies in the relapsed/refractory setting but will also discuss the emergence of their use in front-line therapy and in combination with other agents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Brentuximabvedotin(BV)是一种抗体-药物偶联物,可将单甲基奥瑞他汀E(MMAE)递送至CD30细胞,在复发性/难治性(r/r)霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)中是安全有效的。虽然大多数患者对BV有反应,只有少数人会获得完整的回应(CR),几乎所有患者最终都会进展。Ibrutinib是布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶(BTK)抑制剂,在非霍奇金淋巴瘤的多种亚型中具有高活性;关于其在HL中的使用的数据有限。它以基于Th1的免疫应答不可逆地抑制白细胞介素-2诱导激酶(ITK)。正如我们之前观察到的ibrutinib和BV之间的临床前协同作用,我们假设伊布鲁替尼可能增强HL中BV的抗肿瘤活性.我们在R/RHL患者中设计并进行了ibrutinib加BV的II期试验,并在此报告安全性和有效性的最终主要分析。
    方法:这是一项多中心II期试验,在r/rHL患者中引入队列。合格标准包括年龄≥15岁,至少接受过一次治疗后出现r/rHL。治疗包括每3周静脉注射1.8mg/kgBV和依鲁替尼每日560mgPO(在导入队列中每日420mgPO)。如果患者不难治性,则允许先前的BV。主要终点是根据卢加诺2014的CR率。次要终点包括毒性,总反应率(ORR),和响应持续时间(DOR)。
    结果:39名患者被纳入研究,其中67%为男性;中位年龄为33岁(范围:17-71)。38%的人在基线时患有结外疾病,51%患有晚期疾病,51%对先前的治疗无效,21%以前有BV。在可评估反应的36名患者中,CR率为33%,ORR为64%;DOR中位数为25.5个月.反应后,有13例患者进行了自体移植,有3例患者进行了同种异体移植以进行巩固。最常见的不良事件是恶心(67%),周围神经病变(62%),腹泻(59%),疲劳(46%),血小板减少症(46%),头痛(41%),皮疹(41%),ALT升高(38%),贫血(36%),呕吐(36%),腹痛(33%),发烧(33%),高血压(33%)。六名患者出现了不可接受的毒性,定义为Gr3/4非血液学毒性或未解决的Gr3/4血液学毒性,包括一名在第1周期中死于疑似COVID-19感染的多器官功能衰竭的患者。
    结论:BV和依鲁替尼的组合在r/rHL中具有活性;但是,鉴于显著的毒性,它不能被推荐用于未来的发展。
    BACKGROUND: Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an antibody-drug conjugate that delivers monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) to CD30+ cells and is safe and effective in relapsed/refractory (r/r) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Although most patients respond to BV, only a minority will obtain a complete response (CR), and almost all patients eventually progress. Ibrutinib is a Bruton\'s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor highly active in multiple subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma; limited data exist regarding its use in HL. It irreversibly inhibits interleukin-2-inducible kinase (ITK) with Th1 based immune responses. As we previously observed preclinical synergy between ibrutinib and BV, we hypothesized ibrutinib may enhance the antitumor activity of BV in HL. We designed and conducted a phase II trial of ibrutinib plus BV in patients with R/R HL, and herein report the final primary analysis of safety and efficacy.
    METHODS: This was a multicenter phase II trial with a lead-in cohort in patients with r/r HL. Eligibility criteria included age ≥ 15 years with r/r HL after at least one prior line of therapy. Treatment consisted of 1.8 mg/kg BV intravenously every 3 weeks and ibrutinib 560 mg PO daily (420 mg PO daily in the lead-in cohort). Prior BV was allowed if patients were not refractory. The primary endpoint was the CR rate according to Lugano 2014. Secondary endpoints included toxicities, overall response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR).
    RESULTS: The 39 patients were enrolled onto the study, of which 67% were male; the median age was 33 (range: 17-71). 38% had extranodal disease at baseline, 51% had advanced stage disease, 51% were refractory to the prior therapy, and 21% had prior BV. Of 36 patients who were evaluable for response, the CR rate was 33% and ORR 64%; median DOR was 25.5 months. Thirteen patients proceeded to autologous transplant and 3 patients proceeded to allogeneic transplant for consolidation after response. The most common adverse events were nausea (67%), peripheral neuropathy (62%), diarrhea (59%), fatigue (46%), thrombocytopenia (46%), headache (41%), rash (41%), elevated ALT (38%), anemia (36%), vomiting (36%), abdominal pain (33%), fever (33%), and hypertension (33%). Six patients experienced unacceptable toxicity, defined as Gr 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity or non-resolving Gr 3/4 hematologic toxicity including one patient who died of multiorgan failure from suspected COVID-19 infection during cycle 1.
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination of BV and ibrutinib was active in r/r HL; however, given significant toxicity, it cannot be recommended for future development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)是一种单克隆B细胞淋巴增殖性疾病,在西方国家每年发病率很高。由于B细胞受体(BCR)信号和内在的凋亡抵抗在CLL细胞的发育和存活中起关键作用,针对这些途径的治疗方法已经被广泛研究,以解决这种无法治愈的疾病.在过去的十年里,几个3期试验已经证实了共价Bruton酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(cBTKis)和venetoclax的优异疗效,选择性B细胞淋巴瘤2(BCL2)抑制剂,超过化学免疫疗法。这已经在未治疗和复发/难治性(RR)设置中得到证实,包括具有高风险分子特征的患者。然而,这些药物没有疗效,患者在接受cBTKis和BCL2is治疗后继续复发,这些患者的最佳治疗策略尚未确定。最近已经开发了几种具有不同机制的新型药物用于CLL,其已经在先前接受cBTKis和BCL2i的患者中证明了功效。特别是,新型BCR信号靶向药物在RR-CLL的早期临床试验中显示出有希望的疗效.此外,双特异性抗体和嵌合抗原受体T细胞等癌症免疫疗法在接受重度RR-CLL预处理的患者中也显示出抗肿瘤活性.基于对耐药机制的理解,采用这些新型药物和组合策略的个性化方法有可能克服已经患有cBTKi和venetoclax的患者下一步该怎么做的临床挑战。
    Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a monoclonal B-cell lymphoproliferative disease with a high annual incidence in Western countries. As B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling and intrinsic apoptotic resistance play critical roles in the development and survival of CLL cells, therapeutic approaches targeting these pathways have been extensively investigated to tackle this incurable disease. Over the last decade, several Phase 3 trials have confirmed the superior efficacy of covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cBTKis) and venetoclax, a selective B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor, over chemoimmunotherapy. This has been demonstrated in both the treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory (RR) settings and includes patients with high-risk molecular features. However, these drugs are not curative, with patients continuing to relapse after treatment with both cBTKis and BCL2is, and the optimal treatment strategy for these patients has not been defined. Several novel agents with distinct mechanisms have recently been developed for CLL which have demonstrated efficacy in patients who have previously received cBTKis and BCL2i. In particular, novel BCR-signaling targeting agents have shown promising efficacy in early-phase clinical trials for RR-CLL. Furthermore, cancer immunotherapies such as bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells have also shown anti-tumor activity in patients with heavily pretreated RR-CLL. Personalised approaches with these novel agents and combination strategies based on the understanding of resistance mechanisms have the potential to overcome the clinical challenge of what to do next for a patient who has already had a cBTKi and venetoclax.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨青年未经治疗的套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)的最佳治疗方法,我们比较了R-CHOP/R-DHAP(利妥昔单抗,环磷酰胺,阿霉素,长春新碱和泼尼松/利妥昔单抗,地塞米松,阿糖胞苷和顺铂)和R-BAP(利妥昔单抗,苯达莫司汀,阿糖胞苷,和泼尼松)加BTK(布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶)抑制剂治疗新诊断患者。本研究评估了2014年1月1日至2023年6月1日郑州大学第一附属医院收治的83例新诊断的MCL青年患者(≤65岁),使用R-CHOP/R-DHAP或R-BAP联合BTK抑制剂。83例患者的中位年龄为60(42-65)岁,男64例,女19例;59例采用R-CHOP/R-DHAP方案化疗,24例接受R-BAP联合BTK抑制剂方案治疗。83例患者中位随访时间为17个月(2-86个月),未达到中位PFS(无进展生存期)时间.R-BAP组的CRR(完全缓解率)高于R-CHOP/R-DHAP组(87.5%vs.54.2%,P=0.005)。两组之间的ORR(总体反应率)没有显着差异(ORR:91.7%vs.84.7%,P=0.497)。R-BAP组的无进展生存期(PFS)长于R-CHOP/R-DHAP组(P=0.013),而OS在两组间无显著差异(P=0.499)。两组中最常见的不良反应是血液毒性,与R-CHOP/R-DHAP组相比,R-BAP组的3-4级淋巴细胞减少和3-4级血小板减少的发生率更高(P=0.015和P=0.039)。男性(HR=4.257,P=0.013),LDH(乳酸脱氢酶)≥245U/L(HR=3.221,P=0.012),多形囊样(HR=2.802,P=0.043)和R-CHOP/R-DHAP方案(HR=7.704,P=0.047)是影响PFS的独立危险因素。Ki67≥30%(HR=8.539,P=0.005)是OS的独立危险因素。R-BAP与BTK抑制剂联合一线治疗可改善年轻套细胞淋巴瘤患者的CRR和延长PFS,不良事件可耐受。
    To explore the optimal treatment for young patients with untreated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), we compared the efficacy and safety of R-CHOP/R-DHAP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone/rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine and cisplatin) and R-BAP (rituximab, bendamustine, cytarabine, and prednisone) plus BTK (Bruton\'s tyrosine kinase) inhibitors in newly diagnosed patients. Eighty-three young patients (≤ 65 years old) with newly diagnosed MCL admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 1, 2014, to June 1, 2023, using R-CHOP/R-DHAP or R-BAP plus BTK inhibitor were assessed in this study. The median age at presentation was 60 (42-65) years in 83 patients, including 64 males and 19 females; 59 were treated with R-CHOP/R-DHAP regimen chemotherapy, and 24 were treated with R-BAP in combination with the BTK inhibitor regimen. The median follow-up was 17 months (2-86 months) in 83 patients, and the median PFS (progression-free survival) time was not reached. The CRR (complete response rate) of the R-BAP group was higher than that of the R-CHOP/R-DHAP group (87.5% vs. 54.2%, P = 0.005). The ORR (overall response rate) was not significantly different between the two groups (ORR: 91.7% vs. 84.7%, P = 0.497). The PFS (progression-free survival) of the R-BAP group was longer than that of the R-CHOP/R-DHAP group (P = 0.013), whereas OS was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.499). The most common adverse effect in both groups was hematotoxicity, with a higher incidence of grade 3-4 lymphopenia and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in the R-BAP group than in the R-CHOP/R-DHAP group (P = 0.015 and P = 0.039). Male sex (HR = 4.257, P = 0.013), LDH (lactate dehydrogenase) ≥ 245 U/L (HR = 3.221, P = 0.012), pleomorphic-blastoid (HR = 2.802, P = 0.043) and R-CHOP/R-DHAP regimen (HR = 7.704, P = 0.047) were independent risk factors for PFS. Ki67 ≥ 30% (HR = 8.539, P = 0.005) was an independent risk factor for OS. First-line treatment with R-BAP in combination with BTK inhibitor improved CRR and prolonged PFS in young patients with mantle cell lymphoma and adverse events were tolerable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号