Avoidant personality disorder

回避型人格障碍
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在探讨在参加为AvPD开发的治疗计划后,被诊断为回避型人格障碍(AvPD)的人的主观经历和改变的意义。
    18名AvPD患者在完成治疗1年后使用半结构化访谈指南进行访谈。访谈是通过反身性主题分析进行分析的。
    发现了三个主要主题来捕捉变化的各种主观体验。第一个主题“更有活力”包括子主题“一起说话和倾听”和“向自己敞开心扉”。“第二个主题是”仍然渴望更多,”和第三个主要主题“我什至无法管理治疗”包括子主题“好像我们在一起”和“投降”。\"
    尽管这些发现可能不是针对AvPD的,他们阐明了参与主体间性的动态相互作用的重要性,社会动机,和治疗背景下的代理。在患者感到联系的人际环境中发现一种代理感可能会导致他们根据其社会动机意图开放发展。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to inquire into the subjective experiences and meaning-making of change of people diagnosed with avoidant personality disorder (AvPD) after attending a treatment program developed for AvPD.
    UNASSIGNED: Eighteen AvPD patients were interviewed 1 year after completing their treatment using a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Three main themes were found to capture the various subjective experiences of change. The first main theme \"being more alive\" included the subthemes \"talking and listening together\" and \"opening up and grounding into myself.\" The second main theme was \"still longing for more,\" and the third main theme \"I cannot even manage therapy\" included the subthemes \"as if we were together\" and \"capitulation.\"
    UNASSIGNED: Although these findings may not be specific to AvPD, they shed light on the importance of attending to the dynamic interplay of intersubjectivity, social motivations, and agency in a therapeutic context. Discovering a sense of agency within an interpersonal context in which the patient feels connected may lead to them opening up for development in accordance with their social motivational intentions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社交焦虑(SAD)和共病回避型人格障碍(AVPD)患者严重受损。团体认知行为疗法(GCBT)被认为是SAD的有效治疗方法。需要更多关于合并AVPD的SAD治疗的知识。图式疗法,为人格和慢性精神障碍而发展,可能是一种有希望的治疗方法。
    方法:我们在患有SAD和AVPD的门诊人群(n=154)中进行了一项随机对照试验。比较了团体图式治疗(GST)和GCBT的SAD症状(Liebowitz社交焦虑量表)和AVPD(回避性人格障碍严重程度指数)的表现。
    结果:意向治疗分析显示,在治疗后3个月和1年随访时,治疗之间没有显着差异。这两种方式都带来了重大和实质性的改进。在抑郁症状(抑郁症状清单)和生活质量(世界卫生组织生活质量-BREF)中没有发现显着差异。按照方案分析显示类似的结果,从SAD和AVPD的恢复没有显着差异。更多的患者完成了GST。
    结论:GST和GCBT是SAD合并AVPD的有价值的治疗方法。ST中较高的治疗保留表明ST比GCBT更可接受。未来的研究应集中在提高治疗效果和改善对GCBT的保留。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with social anxiety (SAD) and comorbid avoidant personality disorder (AVPD) are severely impaired. Group cognitive behavioral therapy (GCBT) is considered an effective treatment for SAD. More knowledge on treatment of SAD with comorbid AVPD is needed. Schema therapy, developed for personality and chronic mental disorders, may be a promising treatment.
    METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in an outpatient population (n = 154) with both SAD and AVPD. Group Schema Therapy (GST) and GCBT were compared on SAD symptoms (Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale) and manifestations of AVPD (Avoidant Personality Disorder Severity Index).
    RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant differences between treatments at 3 months post-treatment and one-year follow-up. Both modalities led to significant and substantial improvements. No significant between-differences were found in depressive symptoms (Inventory of Depressive Symptoms) and quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF). Per-protocol analysis showed similar outcomes and no significant differences in recovery from SAD and AVPD. Significantly more patients completed GST.
    CONCLUSIONS: GST and GCBT are valuable treatments for SAD with comorbid AVPD. The higher treatment retention in ST indicates ST is more acceptable than GCBT. Future studies should focus on enhancing treatment effects and improving retention to GCBT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)与边缘性人格障碍(BPD)和/或C型人格障碍(CPD)的合并症很常见,这种共病的神经相关性未知.
    方法:我们在PTSD+CPD参与者的情绪面部任务期间获得了功能性MRI扫描(n=34),PTSD+BPD(n=24),PTSD+BPD+CPD(n=18)和对照(n=30)。我们在恐惧与恐惧的情况下对特定ROI进行了ANCOVA和贝叶斯分析。打乱的脸对比。我们还调查了与临床措施的关联。
    结果:ANCOVA组之间的脑激活没有明显差异。在诊断上,我们发现解离的严重程度与右侧脑岛和右侧dmPFC激活之间呈负相关,和正确的dmPFC激活的情绪调节问题。贝叶斯分析显示,与PTSDBPD和PTSDCPD相比,PTSDBPDCPD组中所有ROI的激活程度更高。
    结论:我们的贝叶斯和相关性分析支持人格障碍的新维度概念化。
    BACKGROUND: Although comorbidity of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and/or cluster C personality disorders (CPD) is common, neural correlates of this comorbidity are unknown.
    METHODS: We acquired functional MRI scans during an emotional face task in participants with PTSD + CPD (n = 34), PTSD + BPD (n = 24), PTSD + BPD + CPD (n = 18) and controls (n = 30). We used ANCOVAs and Bayesian analyses on specific ROIs in a fearful vs. scrambled faces contrast. We also investigated associations with clinical measures.
    RESULTS: There were no robust differences in brain activation between the groups with ANCOVAs. Transdiagnostically, we found a negative association between severity of dissociation and right insula and right dmPFC activation, and emotion regulation problems with right dmPFC activation. Bayesian analyses showed credible evidence for higher activation in all ROIs in the PTSD + BPD + CPD group compared to PTSD + BPD and PTSD + CPD.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our Bayesian and correlation analyses support new dimensional conceptualizations of personality disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是检查患有和不患有回避性人格障碍(AvPD)合并症的社交焦虑症(SAD)患者的心理理论(ToM)能力。
    共有55名SAD患者,25例AvPD和SAD患者,谁出现在Diskapi教学和研究医院精神病学门诊部,并根据DSM-5的结构化临床访谈诊断标准诊断为SAD,研究中包括30名健康对照。SAD的社会人口统计学数据表单,自闭症频谱商(ASQ),利博维茨社交焦虑量表(LSAS),在眼睛测试中阅读心灵(RMET),使用了DokuzEylül心理指数理论(DEToMI)。
    通过RMET测量的ToM积极情绪评分在对照组中高于SAD和SADAvPD组。SAD+AvPD组的ToM负性情绪评分低于SAD组和对照组。所有三组的ToM中性情绪评分相似。三组间DEToMI总分及其分检验均有统计学差异,有利于对照组。在假人理解测试中,三组之间没有差异。
    我们的研究结果表明,AvPD合并症与许多ToM技能的下降有关,在解码和推理方面,这种减少主要与对情绪负荷的精神状态的感知有关。对于在SAD和AvPD患者中观察到的ToM问题,需要更具体的方法。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to examine Theory of Mind (ToM) abilities in patients with Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) with and without Avoidant Personality Disorder (AvPD) comorbidity.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 55 patients with SAD, 25 patients with AvPD and SAD, who presented to the Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital Psychiatry Outpatient Unit and were diagnosed with SAD according to the Structured Clinical Interview Diagnostic Criteria for DSM-5 and 30 healthy controls were included in the study. Sociodemographic data form for SAD, Autism Spectrum Quotient (ASQ), Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), and Dokuz Eylül Theory of Mind Index (DEToMI) were used.
    UNASSIGNED: The ToM positive-emotion scores measured by the RMET were higher in the control group than in the SAD and SAD+AvPD groups. The ToM negative-emotion scores were lower in the SAD+AvPD group than in the SAD and control groups. The ToM neutral-emotion scores were similar in all three groups. There were statistically significant differences in favor of the control group in the total score of DEToMI and its subtests among the three groups. There was no difference among the three groups in the faux pas comprehension test.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings suggest that AvPD comorbidity is associated with a decrease in many ToM skills, both in decoding and reasoning, and that this decrease is mainly related to the perception of mental states with an emotional load. More specific methods are needed for ToM problems observed in patients with SAD and AvPD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    回避性人格障碍(AvPD)是一种非常普遍的人格障碍,尤其是在临床环境中,但几乎没有研究。被诊断为AvPD的人在功能上有严重的障碍,并且遭受很大的痛苦,然而,我们仍然缺乏治疗的荟萃分析证据,仅进行了少数随机对照试验.患者因素对治疗结果最重要,总的来说。缺乏代理可能是被诊断患有AvPD的人的核心缺陷。如果我们更好地了解他们的机构,他们的状况可能会得到改善。我们回顾了先前关于在日常生活和心理治疗中促进或阻碍AvPD代理的心理机制和人际关系的研究。
    在具有反身性主题分析的叙事评论中总结原始文献。
    被诊断患有AvPD的人似乎由于缺乏情感意识而在他们的代理感上有明显的障碍,抑制与超重激活情绪,和调节情绪的困难。困难似乎也与高度的依恋回避和恐惧有关,在社会需求中产生强烈的矛盾情绪,除了强烈的服从他人的倾向。一种软弱的自我意识和糟糕的叙述,自我怀疑,苛刻的自我批评使这些人的反身和有意的立场越来越困难。
    这篇综述对AvPD人格功能的核心优势和缺陷进行了有临床意义的理解,可以帮助临床医生制定重要的治疗工作,确定治疗中客户代理的障碍,并克服治疗联盟中的关系困难。
    UNASSIGNED: Avoidant personality disorder (AvPD) is a highly prevalent personality disorder, especially in clinical settings, yet scarcely researched. People diagnosed with AvPD have severe impairments in functioning and suffer greatly, yet we still lack meta-analytic evidence for therapy and only a few RCTs are conducted. Patient factors are the most important for outcome in therapy, in general. Lack of agency might be a core deficit in people diagnosed with AvPD. Their conditions might be improved if we understand their agency better. We review previous research regarding psychological mechanisms and interpersonal relationships that facilitate or hinder agency in AvPD in daily life and psychotherapy.
    UNASSIGNED: Summarizing original literature in a narrative review with reflexive thematic analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: People diagnosed with AvPD seem to have significant impairments in their sense of agency due to a lack of emotional awareness, an overweight of inhibiting vs. activating emotions, and difficulties regulating emotions. Difficulties also seem related to high levels of attachment avoidance and fear, creating strong ambivalence in social needs, in addition to a strong tendency to subordinate to others. A weak sense of self with a poor narrative, self-doubt, and harsh self-critique makes a reflexive and intentional stand increasingly difficult for these people.
    UNASSIGNED: This review gives a clinically meaningful understanding of core strengths and deficits in the personality functioning of AvPD that can help clinicians map out important therapeutic work, identify barriers to client-agency in therapy, and work through relational difficulties in the therapeutic alliance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    回避性人格障碍(AvPD)是精神卫生服务机构中的一种常见障碍,与显著的心理社会损害有关。该疾病在研究中被忽略。目前没有针对AvPD的循证治疗方法,并且需要特别关注这种形式的人格病理学的治疗研究。本研究是对AvPD患者进行联合组和个体治疗的初步研究,基于心理化和元认知人际治疗。目的是研究治疗方案的可行性以及治疗和1年随访期间症状和人格功能的过程。
    该研究包括28名患者。基线时的临床评估包括结构化诊断访谈和患者症状自我报告,社会心理功能,人际关系问题,人格功能,述情障碍,自尊,附件样式,治疗联盟,和客户满意度。在治疗结束和1年随访时重复患者的自我报告。
    脱落率为14%。22名治疗完成者的平均治疗时间为17个月。治疗联盟的平均水平和客户满意度令人满意。对于全球症状困扰,效应大小很大,抑郁症,焦虑,和心理社会适应,在人格功能方面处于中等范围内。然而,结果显示患者的结局范围很广.
    这项初步研究显示了对中度至重度损伤的AvPD患者进行分组和个体联合治疗的有希望的结果。应进行更大规模的研究,以增加基于经验的知识,以指导适应患者不同水平的AvPD严重程度和人格障碍的发展。
    UNASSIGNED: Avoidant personality disorder (AvPD) is a common disorder within mental health services, associated with significant psychosocial impairment. The disorder has been neglected in research. There are currently no evidence-based treatments for AvPD, and there is a need for treatment studies focusing particularly on this form of personality pathology. The present study was a pilot study of combined group and individual therapy for patients with AvPD, based on mentalization-based and metacognitive interpersonal therapy. The aim was to investigate the feasibility of the treatment program and the course of symptoms and personality functioning during treatment and 1-year follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included 28 patients. Clinical evaluation at baseline comprised structured diagnostic interviews and patients\' self-report of symptoms, psychosocial function, interpersonal problems, personality functioning, alexithymia, self-esteem, attachment style, therapeutic alliance, and client satisfaction. Patients\' self-report were repeated at the end of treatment and 1-year follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: The drop-out rate was 14%. Average treatment length among the 22 treatment completers was 17 months. Mean levels of therapeutic alliance and client satisfaction were satisfactory. Effect sizes were large for global symptom distress, depression, anxiety, and psychosocial adjustment, and in the moderate range for aspects of personality functioning. Yet, the results showed a wide range of outcomes among the patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This pilot study shows promising results for combined group- and individual therapy for AvPD patients with moderate to severe impairment. Larger scale studies should be conducted to increase empirically based knowledge to guide development of differentiated treatments adapted to patients\' various levels of AvPD severity and profiles of personality dysfunction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    回避性人格障碍(AvPD)的特征是害羞的感觉,不足,和亲密关系中的克制,并与叙事身份的干扰有关,这是过去的内化和演变的故事,present,和未来的经验。研究结果表明,通过心理治疗改善整体心理健康可能会增加叙事认同。然而,缺乏不仅包括心理治疗前后叙事身份发展的研究,还包括心理治疗会议中的研究。此案例研究检查了AvPD患者的短期心理动力学心理治疗治疗中叙事身份的发展,之前使用治疗记录和生活叙事访谈,之后,治疗终止后6个月。叙事身份发展是根据代理进行评估的,圣餐履行,和连贯性。结果显示,在治疗过程中,患者的能动性和连贯性增加,而圣餐履行减少。在六个月的随访中,代理和圣餐履行增加,而连贯性保持稳定。该案例研究的结果表明,接受短期心理动力学治疗后,患者的叙事代理感和叙事能力得到了连贯的改善。在心理治疗期间,共融履行的减少和终止后的增加表明患者更加意识到他们关系中的冲突模式,因此,意识到他们的愿望和欲望没有在他们目前的关系中得到满足。本案例研究显示了短期心理动力疗法可能通过帮助AvPD患者发展叙事身份而产生的影响。
    Avoidant personality disorder (AvPD) is characterized by feelings of shyness, inadequacy, and restraint in intimate relationships and has been associated with a disturbance in narrative identity, which is the internalized and evolving story of past, present, and future experiences. Study findings have indicated that an improvement in overall mental health through psychotherapy may increase narrative identity. However, there is a lack of studies incorporating not only the examination of narrative identity development before and after psychotherapy but also within psychotherapy sessions. This case study examined the development of narrative identity in short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy treatment of a patient with AvPD, using therapy transcripts and life narrative interviews before, after, and 6 months following treatment termination. Narrative identity development was assessed in terms of agency, communion fulfillment, and coherence. Results showed that the patient\'s agency and coherence increased over the course of therapy, whereas communion fulfillment decreased. At the six-month follow-up, agency and communion fulfillment increased, whereas coherence remained stable. The results of this case study suggest that the patient\'s sense of narrative agency and ability to narrate coherently improved after undergoing short-term psychodynamic therapy. The decrease of communion fulfillment during psychotherapy and later increase after termination suggests that the patient became more aware of conflictual patterns in their relationships, therefore realizing that their wishes and desires were not being fulfilled in their current relationships. This case study displays the possible impact short-term psychodynamic therapy may have by helping patients with AvPD develop a narrative identity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有人格障碍(PD)的患者通常具有不安全的依恋模式,并且可能特别容易受到突然的治疗变化的影响。患有临界PD(BPD)的患者通常被认为由于长期害怕放弃而容易受到治疗中断的影响。尽管如此,其他PD的调查不充分。在挪威的第一波Covid-19浪潮中,从2020年3月12日至5月/6月,现场治疗设施和团体治疗受到严格限制.
    为了检查和比较挪威第一次Covid-19波中回避型(AvPD)和BPD患者的门诊治疗变化,以及患者对这些变化的反应。
    该研究是基于一项横断面调查,该调查分发给了1120名患者,这些患者在挪威人格障碍网络内的12个不同的PD治疗单位中进行了专门的心理健康服务水平。调查包括有关治疗情况的问题,立即反应,危机期间的变化。来自133名反应者(反应率12%),40例患者报告BPD和30AvPD作为诊断。
    所有患者在3月12日之后从他们的治疗师那里进行随访。两组中几乎所有患者在新情况下都表示满意。两组都经历了与以前相同的规律性,但更多的AvPD患者报告的咨询次数少于每周一次。AvPD患者报告了更多关于治疗变化的负面感受,与BPD组相比,错过了治疗和组成员。
    锁定后,BPD患者比AvPD患者接受了更密切的随访,后者报告了与他们治疗情况变化有关的更多负面情绪。
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with personality disorders (PDs) often have insecure attachment patterns and may be especially vulnerable to abrupt treatment changes. Patients with borderline PD (BPD) are often considered vulnerable to treatment interruption due to chronic fear of abandonment. Nonetheless, other PDs are poorly investigated. In the first Covid-19 wave in Norway, in-person treatment facilities and group treatments were strongly restricted from March 12th until May/June 2020.
    UNASSIGNED: To examine and compare changes in outpatient treatment for patients with avoidant (AvPD) and BPD during the first Covid-19 wave in Norway, and patients\' reactions to these changes.
    UNASSIGNED: The study is based on a cross-sectional survey distributed to 1120 patients referred to 12 different PD treatment units on a specialist mental health service level within the Norwegian Network for Personality Disorders. The survey included questions on treatment situation, immediate reactions, and changes during the crisis. From 133 responders (response rate 12%), 40 patients reported BPD and 30 AvPD as diagnosis.
    UNASSIGNED: All patients were followed up from their therapist after March 12th. Almost all patients in both groups expressed satisfaction under the new circumstances. Both groups experienced the same regularity as before, but more AvPD patients reported less than weekly consultations. AvPD patients reported more negative feelings about changes in therapy, and missed the therapy and group members more than the BPD group.
    UNASSIGNED: After the lockdown, BPD patients received a closer follow-up than AvPD patients, and the latter reported more negative feelings related to change in their treatment situation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    世界卫生组织(WHO)国际疾病分类(ICD-11)的第11次修订包括一种针对人格障碍(PD)的全新方法。ICD-11预计将首先在欧洲国家实施,然后在其他世卫组织成员国实施。本文概述了这种新的ICD-11模型,包括PD严重程度分类,性状域说明符,和额外的边界模式说明符。我们讨论了使用ICD-11方法所面临的挑战和机遇,特别关注其与熟悉的PD类别(例如回避性PD和自恋性PD)的连续性和不连续性。ICD-11PD分类的出现涉及医护人员的重大变化,研究人员,管理员,和服务提供者以及患者和家庭参与。预期的挑战和机遇是从具体的未解决的问题提出来的。我们希望这些问题将在未来几年激发研究人员和临床医生之间的进一步研究和讨论。
    The 11th revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) includes a fundamentally new approach to Personality Disorders (PD). ICD-11 is expected to be implemented first in European countries before other WHO member states. The present paper provides an overview of this new ICD-11 model including PD severity classification, trait domain specifiers, and the additional borderline pattern specifier. We discuss the perceived challenges and opportunities of using the ICD-11 approach with particular focus on its continuity and discontinuity with familiar PD categories such as avoidant PD and narcissistic PD. The advent of the ICD-11 PD classification involves major changes for health care workers, researchers, administrators, and service providers as well as patients and families involved. The anticipated challenges and opportunities are put forward in terms of specific unanswered questions. It is our hope that these questions will stimulate further research and discussion among researchers and clinicians in the coming years.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    根据文献,回避型人格障碍(APD)在人格障碍的研究中经常被忽视。在本研究中,APD患者与边缘性人格障碍(BPD)患者在情绪功能障碍方面进行了比较.情绪障碍通过情感整合量表进行操作。61名患者在专业门诊医院接受BPD(n=25)或APD(n=36)的治疗(精神疾病诊断和统计手册,第五版)纳入横断面研究。支持我们对全球群体之间影响整合能力没有差异的期望,估计差异为0.00(95%置信区间[CI][-0.53,0.53]).另一方面,无法证实APD中关于表达的预期功能障碍增加。此外,具有特定影响的问题区分了群体;APD中的兴趣整合更差(p=0.01),而嫉妒的整合在BPD中更差(p=0.04)。就体验情感的典型模式而言,APD的特点是对兴趣动机特性的获取减少(p<0.01),而BPD更多是由利息驱动(p<0.01),愤怒(p<0.01),嫉妒(p=0.01)。总之,尽管这两种疾病的特征是情绪功能障碍的总体水平相似,它们在具体影响和体验模式方面存在系统性和可预见的差异。这些发现对理解APD和BPD中的情绪功能障碍具有重要意义。提示情绪功能障碍的特定领域,可以在量身定制的心理治疗干预措施中作为目标。
    According to the literature, avoidant personality disorder (APD) is often overlooked in research on personality disorders. In the present study, patients with APD were compared to patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) with respect to emotional dysfunction. Emotional dysfunction was operationalized through the Affect Integration Inventory. Sixty-one patients receiving treatment at specialized outpatient hospital facilities for either BPD (n = 25) or APD (n = 36) (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition) were included in a cross-sectional study. Supporting our expectations of no difference in the global capacity for affect integration between groups, the estimated difference was 0.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.53, 0.53]). On the other hand, the expected increased dysfunction in APD regarding Expression could not be confirmed. Furthermore, problems with specific affects distinguished the groups; integration of Interest was worse in APD (p = 0.01), whereas integration of Jealousy was worse in BPD (p = 0.04). In terms of prototypical modes of experiencing affects, APD was characterized by decreased access to the motivational properties of Interest (p < 0.01), while BPD was more driven by Interest (p < 0.01), Anger (p < 0.01), and Jealousy (p = 0.01). In conclusion, even though the two disorders are characterized by similar overall levels of emotional dysfunction, they differ systematically and predictably regarding specific affects and modes of experiencing. These findings carry implications for the understanding of emotional dysfunction in APD and BPD, suggesting specific areas of emotional dysfunction that could be targeted in tailored psychotherapeutic interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号