目的:重要的是,卫生服务部门建立了员工强制性培训系统,以达到安全的质量健康结果。本次审查的目的是确定支持员工参加强制性培训(包括BLS)的推动者,以及对员工参加强制性培训构成挑战的障碍,这些障碍将用于为在IPE环境中制定结构化的强制性员工培训计划提供信息。
方法:寻求综合文献综述来回答以下问题:在IPE环境中,影响健康专业人员出勤和成功完成强制性培训(包括BLS)的因素和障碍是什么?
方法:使用数据库的预先搜索进行了国际文献检索:Medline,CINAHL,谷歌学者和WebofScience(WoS)。英语语言,检索并筛选了2010年至2022年发表的同行评审文章的相关性.
方法:对论文的综合综述包括系统综述,一个案例研究,定量和定性研究,RCT,混合方法研究和专家意见文件。
结果:根据与员工参加强制性培训(包括BLS)的相关性,只有34篇文章有资格纳入审查。文献分析确定了四个关键主题:“强制性培训”和“认证”;“知识和技能”;“强制性培训(包括BLS)出勤”和“IPE”的“推动者”和“障碍”。文献强调,IPE是提供重新设计教育/培训过程的适当手段,可以增加强制性培训的出勤率,并建议增加包容性和互动性,并提供有用的后勤信息。
结论:审查的结果可以为制定卫生服务中的IPE实施策略提供信息,旨在改善参加和参与强制性培训的员工。这些发现对寻求改善和实现强制性和认证目标的其他卫生服务机构很有价值。
OBJECTIVE: It is vital health services have systems in place for staff mandatory training to meet safe quality health outcomes. The aim of this review is to identify enablers supporting staff attendance at mandatory training (including BLS) and barriers that pose challenges for staff participation in mandatory training that will be used to inform the development of a structured mandatory staff training program in an IPE environment.
METHODS: An integrative literature review was sought to answer the question: What are the enablers and barriers that influence health professional attendance and successful completion of mandatory training (including BLS) in an IPE environment?
METHODS: An international literature search was undertaken using advance search of the databases: Medline, CINAHL, Google Scholar and Web of Science (WoS). English language, peer reviewed articles published from 2010 to 2022 were retrieved and screened for relevance.
METHODS: An integrative review of papers included systematic reviews, a case study, quantitative and qualitative studies, RCT, mixed method studies and expert opinion papers.
RESULTS: Only 34 articles were eligible for inclusion in the review based on their relevance to staff attendance at mandatory training (including BLS). Analysis of literature identified four key themes: \'mandatory training\' and \'certification\'; \'knowledge and skills\'; \'enablers\' and \'barriers\' for \'mandatory training (including BLS) attendance\' and \'IPE\'. The literature highlighted that IPE is an appropriate means of delivering a redesign education/training process that may increase attendance at mandatory training with recommendations for increased inclusivity and interactivity as well as providing useful logistic information.
CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of the review can inform development of an IPE Implementation Strategy in a health service aiming to improve staff attending and engaging in mandatory training. The findings are valuable to other health services seeking to improve and achieve mandatory and accreditation targets.