Atrophy patterns

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种进行性神经退行性疾病,其病理生理变化在临床症状发作前几十年开始。使用结构MRI和多变量数据分析对脑萎缩模式的分析是识别患有主观认知下降(SCD)的患者进展为AD痴呆的高风险的有效工具。从训练过的模型中获得的萎缩模式对晚期AD和正常受试者进行分类,对于早期的受试者来说可能不是最佳的,比如SCD.在这项研究中,我们比较了使用"严重程度指数"预测SCD进展的准确性,该指数是在AD痴呆患者身上训练的标准分类模型与在遗忘型轻度认知障碍(aMCI)的β-淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)阳性患者身上训练的新模型.
    方法:我们使用了来自瑞典BioFINDER-1研究队列的504例患者的结构MRI数据(认知正常(CN),Aβ-阴性=220;SCD,Aβ阳性和阴性=139;aMCI,Aβ阳性=106;AD痴呆=39)。我们应用多变量数据分析来创建两个预测模型,这些模型被训练来区分CN个体与Aβ阳性aMCI或AD痴呆的个体。将模型应用于患有SCD的个体,将其萎缩模式分类为高风险“类疾病”或低风险“类CN”。使用8年的纵向数据评估临床轨迹和模型准确性。
    结果:在预测从SCD到MCI或痴呆的进展方面,标准,基于痴呆症的模型,特异性达到100%,但灵敏度仅为10.6%,而新的,基于aMCI的模型,敏感性为72.3%,特异性为60.9%。基于aMCI的模型在预测从SCD到MCI或痴呆的进展方面具有优势,与基于痴呆症的模型(AUC=0.57)相比,达到更高的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC=0.72;P=0.037)。
    结论:当使用结构MRI数据预测从SCD到MCI或痴呆的转化时,与基于标准痴呆的模型相比,基于轻度萎缩(即aMCI)个体的预测模型可能提供更优越的临床价值.
    Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder where pathophysiological changes begin decades before the onset of clinical symptoms. Analysis of brain atrophy patterns using structural MRI and multivariate data analysis are an effective tool in identifying patients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) at higher risk of progression to AD dementia. Atrophy patterns obtained from models trained to classify advanced AD versus normal subjects, may not be optimal for subjects at an early stage, like SCD. In this study, we compared the accuracy of the SCD progression prediction using the \'severity index\' generated using a standard classification model trained on patients with AD dementia versus a new model trained on β-amyloid (Aβ) positive patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI).
    We used structural MRI data of 504 patients from the Swedish BioFINDER-1 study cohort (cognitively normal (CN), Aβ-negative = 220; SCD, Aβ positive and negative = 139; aMCI, Aβ-positive = 106; AD dementia = 39). We applied multivariate data analysis to create two predictive models trained to discriminate CN individuals from either individuals with Aβ positive aMCI or AD dementia. Models were applied to individuals with SCD to classify their atrophy patterns as either high-risk \"disease-like\" or low-risk \"CN-like\". Clinical trajectory and model accuracy were evaluated using 8 years of longitudinal data.
    In predicting progression from SCD to MCI or dementia, the standard, dementia-based model, reached 100% specificity but only 10.6% sensitivity, while the new, aMCI-based model, reached 72.3% sensitivity and 60.9% specificity. The aMCI-based model was superior in predicting progression from SCD to MCI or dementia, reaching a higher receiver operating characteristic area under curve (AUC = 0.72; P = 0.037) in comparison with the dementia-based model (AUC = 0.57).
    When predicting conversion from SCD to MCI or dementia using structural MRI data, prediction models based on individuals with milder levels of atrophy (i.e. aMCI) may offer superior clinical value compared to standard dementia-based models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阿尔茨海默病(AD)下游萎缩的异质性主要与病理标志有关(Aβ,tau)和共病(脑血管负担)独立。然而,每种病理在确定萎缩模式方面的比例贡献尚不清楚.我们使用两个最近概念化的维度评估了萎缩的异质性:与Aβ相关的典型性(中心的典型AD萎缩和极端的异常非典型萎缩,包括海马保留模式的边缘)和严重程度(从最小萎缩到弥漫性典型AD萎缩的总体神经变性),tau,和脑血管负担。
    我们在AD连续体上纳入了149个Aβ+个体(认知正常,前驱AD,AD痴呆)和来自ADNI的163个Aβ-认知正常个体。我们对基于MRI的萎缩的异质性进行了建模,并具有典型性(海马与皮质体积之比)和严重程度(总灰质体积)的连续尺度。偏相关模型研究了典型性/严重程度与(a)Aβ(全局AβPETcentloid)的关联,tau(全球tauPETSUVR),脑血管(总脑白质低张量)负担(B)四个认知域(记忆,执行功能,语言,视觉空间复合材料)。使用多元回归,我们评估了每种病理负荷和典型性/严重程度与认知的相关性.
    (A)在AD连续体中,控制Aβ后,典型性(r=-0.31,p<0.001)和严重性(r=-0.37,p<0.001)与tau负荷相关,脑血管负担和年龄。研究结果表明,在边缘占优势的萎缩和弥漫性萎缩中,tau病理更大。(b)典型性与记忆(r=0.49,p<0.001)和语言评分(r=0.19,p=0.02)相关。严重程度与记忆有关(r=0.26,p<0.001),执行功能(r=0.24,p=0.003)和语言得分(r=0.29,p<0.001)。研究结果暗示海马保留和最小萎缩模式的认知表现更好。超越典型性/严重性,tau负担而不是Aβ和脑血管负担解释了认知。
    在AD连续体中,在考虑Aβ和脑血管负担后,基于萎缩的严重程度与tau负担的相关性强于典型性。记忆中的认知表现,执行功能和语言领域由典型性和/或严重性以及tau病理学解释。典型性和严重程度可能不同地反映了由tau病理学引起的负担,而不是在研究AD异质性时需要考虑的Aβ或脑血管病理学。
    UNASSIGNED: Heterogeneity in downstream atrophy in Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) is predominantly investigated in relation to pathological hallmarks (Aβ, tau) and co-pathologies (cerebrovascular burden) independently. However, the proportional contribution of each pathology in determining atrophy pattern remains unclear. We assessed heterogeneity in atrophy using two recently conceptualized dimensions: typicality (typical AD atrophy at the center and deviant atypical atrophy on either extreme including limbic predominant to hippocampal sparing patterns) and severity (overall neurodegeneration spanning minimal atrophy to diffuse typical AD atrophy) in relation to Aβ, tau, and cerebrovascular burden.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 149 Aβ + individuals on the AD continuum (cognitively normal, prodromal AD, AD dementia) and 163 Aβ- cognitively normal individuals from the ADNI. We modeled heterogeneity in MRI-based atrophy with continuous-scales of typicality (ratio of hippocampus to cortical volume) and severity (total gray matter volume). Partial correlation models investigated the association of typicality/severity with (a) Aβ (global Aβ PET centiloid), tau (global tau PET SUVR), cerebrovascular (total white matter hypointensity volume) burden (b) four cognitive domains (memory, executive function, language, visuospatial composites). Using multiple regression, we assessed the association of each pathological burden and typicality/severity with cognition.
    UNASSIGNED: (a) In the AD continuum, typicality (r = -0.31, p < 0.001) and severity (r = -0.37, p < 0.001) were associated with tau burden after controlling for Aβ, cerebrovascular burden and age. Findings imply greater tau pathology in limbic predominant atrophy and diffuse atrophy. (b) Typicality was associated with memory (r = 0.49, p < 0.001) and language scores (r = 0.19, p = 0.02). Severity was associated with memory (r = 0.26, p < 0.001), executive function (r = 0.24, p = 0.003) and language scores (r = 0.29, p < 0.001). Findings imply better cognitive performance in hippocampal sparing and minimal atrophy patterns. Beyond typicality/severity, tau burden but not Aβ and cerebrovascular burden explained cognition.
    UNASSIGNED: In the AD continuum, atrophy-based severity was more strongly associated with tau burden than typicality after accounting for Aβ and cerebrovascular burden. Cognitive performance in memory, executive function and language domains was explained by typicality and/or severity and additionally tau pathology. Typicality and severity may differentially reflect burden arising from tau pathology but not Aβ or cerebrovascular pathologies which need to be accounted for when investigating AD heterogeneity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Clinical differentiation between Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) and behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is challenging due to overlapping clinical features at presentation. Whilst diagnostic criteria for both disorders incorporate evidence of frontal and temporal cortical atrophy, understanding of the progression of atrophy in these disorders is limited. This study aimed to elucidate common and disease-specific progressive changes in cortical and subcortical brain structures in AD and bvFTD.
    Forty-one AD, 37 bvFTD and 33 healthy controls underwent baseline MRI and of these longitudinal follow-up was obtained for 20AD and 20 bvFTD (1 to 4years). A total of 87 AD and 70 bvFTD consecutive scans were included in the study. The trajectories of progression in cortical and subcortical structures were identified with FreeSurfer and linear mixed effect modelling.
    The results uncovered cortical and subcortical disease-specific trajectories of neurodegeneration in AD and bvFTD. Specifically, direct comparisons between patient groups revealed that over time AD showed greater cortical atrophy in the inferior parietal and posterior cingulate cortex than bvFTD. Conversely, bvFTD patients showed greater atrophy in the striatum than AD over time.
    These results indicate that atrophy in the posterior cingulate and the striatum diverges with disease progression in these dementia syndromes and may represent a potential diagnostic biomarker for tracking rates of progression of AD and bvFTD. These findings may help inform future drug trials by identifying appropriate outcome measures to quantify drug efficacy and their ability to modulate disease progression over time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号