目的:本研究旨在使用肺超声(LUS)评估Supreme™喉罩与气管导管对全身麻醉期间肺不张的影响,并为呼吸管理提供证据。
方法:单中心,双盲,进行了随机对照试验.
方法:该研究在手术室和麻醉后监护病房进行,在病房进行随访评估。
方法:纳入180例妇科非腹腔镜手术,泌尿科,和矫形肢体手术。
方法:患者随机分为1:1气管插管组或喉罩组。
方法:在基线时记录12个肺区域的LUS评分,气道建立后15分钟,手术结束时,和30分钟后去除气道。结果指标包括氧合指数,动态肺顺应性,术后肺部并发症的发生率,喉咙疼痛,和其他术后并发症在术后24和48h评估。主要结果集中在气道建立后15分钟的所有12个肺区域的LUS评分。
结果:对177名受试者的意向治疗分析显示,气管插管导致15分钟时LUS评分明显升高{P<0.001,平均差异4.15±0.60,95%CI[2.97,5.33]},手术结束(P<0.001,平均差异3.37±0.68,95%CI[2.02,4.72]),去除后30分钟(P<0.001,平均差2.63±0.48,95%CI[1.68,3.58])。两组患者均无重大并发症发生。
结论:与气管插管相比,喉罩有效减少妇科肺不张的形成和进展,泌尿外科非腹腔镜,和矫形肢体手术。然而,将这些发现推广到喉罩渗漏风险较高的手术或肥胖患者时,应谨慎行事。此外,当采用全面监测肌肉松弛和逆转治疗时,喉罩在减少术后肺不张方面的疗效仍不确定。
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the impact of Supreme™ laryngeal masks versus endotracheal tubes on
atelectasis during general anesthesia using lung ultrasound (LUS), and provide evidence for respiratory management.
METHODS: A single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted.
METHODS: The study was conducted in both the operating room and the post-anesthesia care unit, with follow-up assessments performed in the ward.
METHODS: Enrollment included 180 cases undergoing non-laparoscopic surgeries in gynecology, urology, and orthopedic limb surgeries.
METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to the endotracheal intubation or laryngeal mask group.
METHODS: LUS scores were recorded across 12 lung regions at baseline, 15 min after airway establishment, at the end of surgery, and 30 min following airway removal. Outcome measures encompassed the oxygenation index, dynamic lung compliance, incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, throat pain, and other postoperative complications assessed at 24 and 48 h postoperatively. The primary outcome focused on the LUS score in all 12 lung regions at 15 min after airway establishment.
RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis of 177 subjects revealed endotracheal intubation led to significantly higher LUS scores at 15 min {P < 0.001, mean difference 4.15 ± 0.60, 95% CI [2.97, 5.33]}, end of surgery (P < 0.001, mean difference 3.37 ± 0.68, 95% CI [2.02, 4.72]), and 30 min post-removal (P < 0.001, mean difference 2.63 ± 0.48, 95% CI [1.68, 3.58]). No major complications occurred in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to endotracheal intubation, laryngeal masks effectively reduce
atelectasis formation and progression in gynecological, urological non-laparoscopic, and orthopedic limb surgeries. However, caution is warranted when generalizing these findings to surgeries with a higher risk of laryngeal mask leakage or obese patients. Additionally, the efficacy of laryngeal masks in reducing postoperative
atelectasis remains uncertain when comprehensive monitoring of muscle relaxation and reversal therapy is employed.