Artificial intelligence (AI)

人工智能 (AI)
  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    BACKGROUND: The timely allocation of appointments for new patients is a daily challenge in rheumatological practice, which can be supported by digital solutions. The question is to find the simplest and most effective possible method for prioritization when allocating appointments.
    METHODS: Using a registration form for new patients, standardized symptoms and laboratory results were collated. After reviewing this information by a medical specialist the allocation of appointments was carried out in three categories: a) < 6 weeks, b) 6 weeks up to 3 months and c) > 3 months. The waiting time between the time of registration and the presentation appointment was calculated and compared between patients with and without a diagnosis of an inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD). In addition a decision tree (DT), a method taken from the field of supervised learning within artificial intelligence (AI), was established and the resulting classification was compared with respect to the accuracy and calculated saving in waiting time.
    RESULTS: In this study 800 appointments between 2020 and 2023 (including 555 women, 69.4%, median age 53 years, interquartile range, IQR 39-63 years) were analyzed. An IRD could be confirmed in 409 (51.1%) cases with a waiting time of 58 vs. 93 days for non-IRD cases (-38%, p < 0.01). An AI-based stratification resulted in an accuracy of 67% for IRD and a predicted saving of 19% waiting time. The accuracy increased up to 78% with a time saving for IRD cases of up to 31%, when all basic laboratory results were known. Simplified algorithms, e.g., stratification by the use of laboratory findings alone, resulted in a lower accuracy and time savings.
    CONCLUSIONS: Manual allocation of appointments by a medical specialist is effective and significantly reduces the waiting times for patients with IRD. An automated categorization can lead to a reduction in waiting times for appointments when taking complete laboratory results and a lower sensitivity into consideration.
    UNASSIGNED: HINTERGRUND: Die zeitnahe Terminvergabe für Neuvorstellungen ist eine tägliche Herausforderung in der rheumatologischen Praxis, die von digitalen Lösungen unterstützt werden kann. Es stellt sich die Frage nach einer möglichst einfachen und effektiven Methode der Terminpriorisierung.
    METHODS: Mithilfe eines Anmeldeformulars für Neuvorstellungen wurden standardisiert Symptome und Laborbefunde erfasst. Die Terminvergabe erfolgte nach fachärztlicher Sichtung dieser Informationen in 3 Kategorien: (a) < 6 Wochen, (b) 6 Wochen bis 3 Monate und (c) > 3 Monate. Die Wartezeiten zwischen dem Zeitpunkt der Anmeldung und dem Vorstellungstermin wurden berechnet und verglichen zwischen Patienten mit und ohne Diagnose einer entzündlich-rheumatischen Erkrankung (ERE). Zusätzlich wurde ein Entscheidungsbaum, eine Methode aus dem Bereich des überwachten Lernens innerhalb der künstlichen Intelligenz (KI), erstellt und die resultierende Klassifikation bezüglich Trefferrate und berechneter Wartezeitersparnis verglichen.
    UNASSIGNED: Insgesamt wurden 800 Fälle (darunter 555 Frauen [69,4 %], medianes Alter 53 Jahre [IQA 39–63]) zwischen 2020 und 2023 ausgewertet. Eine ERE konnte in 409 (51,1 %) Fällen bestätigt werden mit einer Wartezeit von 58 vs. 93 Tagen bei Non-ERE-Fällen (−38 %, p < 0,01). Eine KI-Stratifizierung ergab eine Trefferrate von 67 % bezüglich einer ERE und eine prognostizierte Einsparung von 19 % Wartezeit. Die Trefferrate stieg hierbei auf 78 % mit einer Zeitersparnis für ERE-Fälle um bis zu 31 %, wenn grundlegende Laborergebnisse bekannt waren. Andererseits ergaben vereinfachte Algorithmen z. B. durch eine reine Laborwert-basierte Stratifizierung eine niedrigere Trefferrate und Zeitersparnis.
    UNASSIGNED: Die fachärztliche Terminzuweisung ist effektiv und verkürzt die Terminwartezeit für Patienten mit ERE signifikant. Eine automatisierte Kategorisierung kann unter Berücksichtigung vollständiger Laborwerte mit reduzierter Sensitivität zu einer Verkürzung der Terminwartezeit führen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:本研究探索在特里尔社会压力测试(TSST)期间使用神经常微分方程(NODE)分析下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴中的激素动力学,以对重度抑郁症(MDD)患者进行分类。方法:使用TSST数据,测量血浆ACTH和皮质醇浓度。NODE模型在没有压力源先验知识的情况下复制了激素变化。将来自NODE的矢量场输入到卷积神经网络(CNN)进行患者分类,通过交叉验证(CV)程序进行验证。结果:NODE模型有效地捕获了系统动力学,在向量场中嵌入应力效应。分类程序产生了有希望的结果,1x1CV达到AUROC评分,正确识别了83%的非典型MDD患者和53%的健康对照。2x2CV产生了类似的结果,支持模型的鲁棒性。讨论:我们的结果表明,结合NODE和CNN可以根据疾病状态对患者进行分类。为使用HPA轴应激反应作为MDD的客观生物标志物进行进一步研究提供了初步步骤。
    Introduction: This study explores using Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (NODEs) to analyze hormone dynamics in the hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis during Trier Social Stress Tests (TSST) to classify patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Methods: Data from TSST were used, measuring plasma ACTH and cortisol concentrations. NODE models replicated hormone changes without prior knowledge of the stressor. The derived vector fields from NODEs were input into a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for patient classification, validated through cross-validation (CV) procedures. Results: NODE models effectively captured system dynamics, embedding stress effects in the vector fields. The classification procedure yielded promising results, with the 1x1 CV achieving an AUROC score that correctly identified 83% of Atypical MDD patients and 53% of healthy controls. The 2x2 CV produced similar outcomes, supporting model robustness. Discussion: Our results demonstrate the potential of combining NODEs and CNNs to classify patients based on disease state, providing a preliminary step towards further research using the HPA axis stress response as an objective biomarker for MDD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺癌的发病率,这也是世界上男性和女性死亡率最高的国家,正在全球范围内增加。由于成像技术的进步和个人越来越倾向于接受筛查,磨玻璃结节(GGNs)的检出率迅速上升。目前,用于数据分析和解释的人工智能(AI)方法,图像处理,疾病诊断,病变预测为GNs的诊断提供了新的视角。本文旨在研究如何尽早发现恶性病变,并通过使用影像学数据识别良性和恶性病变来改善临床诊断和治疗决策。它还旨在描述计算机断层扫描(CT)引导的活检的使用,并强调该领域AI技术的发展。
    我们使用PubMed,ElsevierScienceDirect,Springer数据库,和谷歌学者搜索与文章主题相关的信息。我们聚集在一起,检查,解读南昌大学第二附属医院影像中心相关影像资料。此外,我们使用AdobeIllustrator2020来处理所有数字。
    我们检查了GGNs的常见迹象,阐明了这些体征与良性和恶性病变的识别之间的关系,然后介绍了人工智能在图像分割中的应用,自动分类,以及过去三年GGNs的侵入性预测,包括它的局限性和前景。我们还讨论了对持久性纯GGNs进行活检的必要性。
    可以结合多种影像学特征,以提高对良性和恶性GGNs的诊断。应谨慎考虑使用CT引导下的穿刺活检来阐明病变的性质。新AI工具的发展带来了新的可能性,希望提高影像医师分析GGN图像的能力,实现准确诊断。
    UNASSIGNED: The incidence rate of lung cancer, which also has the highest mortality rates for both men and women worldwide, is increasing globally. Due to advancements in imaging technology and the growing inclination of individuals to undergo screening, the detection rate of ground-glass nodules (GGNs) has surged rapidly. Currently, artificial intelligence (AI) methods for data analysis and interpretation, image processing, illness diagnosis, and lesion prediction offer a novel perspective on the diagnosis of GGNs. This article aimed to examine how to detect malignant lesions as early as possible and improve clinical diagnostic and treatment decisions by identifying benign and malignant lesions using imaging data. It also aimed to describe the use of computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsies and highlight developments in AI techniques in this area.
    UNASSIGNED: We used PubMed, Elsevier ScienceDirect, Springer Database, and Google Scholar to search for information relevant to the article\'s topic. We gathered, examined, and interpreted relevant imaging resources from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University\'s Imaging Center. Additionally, we used Adobe Illustrator 2020 to process all the figures.
    UNASSIGNED: We examined the common signs of GGNs, elucidated the relationship between these signs and the identification of benign and malignant lesions, and then described the application of AI in image segmentation, automatic classification, and the invasiveness prediction of GGNs over the last three years, including its limitations and outlook. We also discussed the necessity of conducting biopsies of persistent pure GGNs.
    UNASSIGNED: A variety of imaging features can be combined to improve the diagnosis of benign and malignant GGNs. The use of CT-guided puncture biopsy to clarify the nature of lesions should be considered with caution. The development of new AI tools brings new possibilities and hope to improving the ability of imaging physicians to analyze GGN images and achieving accurate diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    轴性脊柱关节炎(axSpA)经常被诊断为晚期,特别是在人类白细胞抗原(HLA)-B27阴性患者中,导致错过最佳治疗的机会。这项研究旨在开发一种人工智能(AI)工具,被称为NegSpA-AI,使用骶髂关节(SIJ)磁共振成像(MRI)和临床SpA特征来提高HLA-B27阴性患者对axSpA的诊断。
    我们回顾性纳入了2010年1月至2021年8月南方医科大学第三附属医院和南海医院的454名HLA-B27阴性风湿病专家诊断的axSpA或其他疾病(非axSpA)患者。他们被分成一个训练集(n=328)进行5倍交叉验证,内部测试集(n=72),和独立的外部测试集(n=54)。要构建一个预期的测试集,我们进一步纳入了2021年9月至2023年8月来自南方医科大学第三附属医院的87例患者.使用的MRI技术包括T1加权(T1W),T2加权(T2W),和脂肪抑制(FS)序列。我们使用深度学习(DL)网络开发了NegSpA-AI,以在入院时区分axSpA和非axSpA。此外,我们进行了一项包括4名放射科医师和2名风湿病医师的读者研究,以评估和比较独立和AI辅助临床医师的表现.
    NegSpA-AI与独立的初级风湿病学家(≤5年的经验)相比表现出众,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.878[95%置信区间(CI):0.786-0.971],0.870(95%CI:0.771-0.970),和内部0.815(95%CI:0.714-0.915),外部,和预期的测试集,分别。NegSpA-AI的帮助提高了辨别的准确性,灵敏度,独立初级放射科医生的特异性为7.4-11.5%,1.0-13.3%,在3个测试集中为7.4-20.6%(均P<0.05)。在前瞻性测试集上,人工智能辅助还提高了诊断的准确性,灵敏度,独立初级风湿病学家的特异性下降了7.7%,7.7%,和6.9%,(均P<0.01)。
    提出的NegSpA-AI有效地改善了放射科医师对SIJMRI的解释和风湿病学家对HLA-B27阴性axSpA的诊断。
    UNASSIGNED: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is frequently diagnosed late, particularly in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27-negative patients, resulting in a missed opportunity for optimal treatment. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) tool, termed NegSpA-AI, using sacroiliac joint (SIJ) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical SpA features to improve the diagnosis of axSpA in HLA-B27-negative patients.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively included 454 HLA-B27-negative patients with rheumatologist-diagnosed axSpA or other diseases (non-axSpA) from the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University and Nanhai Hospital between January 2010 and August 2021. They were divided into a training set (n=328) for 5-fold cross-validation, an internal test set (n=72), and an independent external test set (n=54). To construct a prospective test set, we further enrolled 87 patients between September 2021 and August 2023 from the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University. MRI techniques employed included T1-weighted (T1W), T2-weighted (T2W), and fat-suppressed (FS) sequences. We developed NegSpA-AI using a deep learning (DL) network to differentiate between axSpA and non-axSpA at admission. Furthermore, we conducted a reader study involving 4 radiologists and 2 rheumatologists to evaluate and compare the performance of independent and AI-assisted clinicians.
    UNASSIGNED: NegSpA-AI demonstrated superior performance compared to the independent junior rheumatologist (≤5 years of experience), achieving areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.878 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.786-0.971], 0.870 (95% CI: 0.771-0.970), and 0.815 (95% CI: 0.714-0.915) on the internal, external, and prospective test sets, respectively. The assistance of NegSpA-AI promoted discriminating accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of independent junior radiologists by 7.4-11.5%, 1.0-13.3%, and 7.4-20.6% across the 3 test sets (all P<0.05). On the prospective test set, AI assistance also improved the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of independent junior rheumatologists by 7.7%, 7.7%, and 6.9%, respectively (all P<0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: The proposed NegSpA-AI effectively improves radiologists\' interpretations of SIJ MRI and rheumatologists\' diagnoses of HLA-B27-negative axSpA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人工智能(AI)与医学的集成正在增长,一些专家预测它很快就会独立使用。然而,由于独立验证的积极结果有限,怀疑论仍然存在。这项研究评估了AI软件在分析胸部X射线(CXR)以识别肺结节方面的有效性,一种可能的肺癌指标.
    这项回顾性研究分析了2020年至2022年在莫斯科计算机视觉实验期间进行的放射学检查的7,670,212对记录,专注于CXR和计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描。所有图像均在临床常规期间采集。最终的数据集包括100张CXR图像(50张带有肺结节,50没有),连续选择,并根据纳入和排除标准,评估所有五种基于人工智能的解决方案的性能,参加莫斯科计算机视觉实验并分析CXR。评估分3个阶段进行。在第一阶段,将从AI服务获得的肺结节的概率与地面实况(1-有结节,0-没有结节)。在第二阶段,3位放射科医生评估了AI服务执行的结节分割(正确分割1个结节,0结节不正确分割或根本没有分割)。第三阶段,同样的放射科医生还评估了结节的分类(1-结节正确分割和分类,0-所有其他情况)。将第2阶段和第3阶段获得的结果与GroundTruth进行了比较,这在所有三个阶段都很常见。对于每个阶段,计算每个AI服务的诊断准确性指标。
    三种软件解决方案(Celsus,LunitINSIGHTCXR,和qXR)展示了符合或超过供应商规格的诊断指标,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)最高,为0.956[95%置信区间(CI):0.918至0.994]。然而,当三个放射科医生评估准确的结节分割和分类,低于供应商声明的指标执行的所有解决方案,最高AUC达到0.812(95%CI:0.744至0.879)。同时,在研究的第2阶段和第3阶段,所有AI服务均表现出100%的特异性.
    为确保基于AI的软件的可靠性和适用性,使用高质量数据集验证性能指标并让放射科医师参与评估过程至关重要.建议开发人员在允许独立使用软件进行肺结节检测之前提高基础模型的准确性。在研究期间创建的数据集可以在https://mosmed处访问。人工智能/数据集/mosmeddatargogksnalichiotissutstviemlegochnihuzlovtipvii/。
    UNASSIGNED: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into medicine is growing, with some experts predicting its standalone use soon. However, skepticism remains due to limited positive outcomes from independent validations. This research evaluates AI software\'s effectiveness in analyzing chest X-rays (CXR) to identify lung nodules, a possible lung cancer indicator.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study analyzed 7,670,212 record pairs from radiological exams conducted between 2020 and 2022 during the Moscow Computer Vision Experiment, focusing on CXR and computed tomography (CT) scans. All images were acquired during clinical routine. The final dataset comprised 100 CXR images (50 with lung nodules, 50 without), selected consecutively and based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, to evaluate the performance of all five AI-based solutions, participating in the Moscow Computer Vision Experiment and analyzing CXR. The evaluation was performed in 3 stages. In the first stage, the probability of a nodule in the lung obtained from AI services was compared with the Ground Truth (1-there is a nodule, 0-there is no nodule). In the second stage, 3 radiologists evaluated the segmentation of nodules performed by the AI services (1-nodule correctly segmented, 0-nodule incorrectly segmented or not segmented at all). In the third stage, the same radiologists additionally evaluated the classification of the nodules (1-nodule correctly segmented and classified, 0-all other cases). The results obtained in stages 2 and 3 were compared with Ground Truth, which was common to all three stages. For each stage, diagnostic accuracy metrics were calculated for each AI service.
    UNASSIGNED: Three software solutions (Celsus, Lunit INSIGHT CXR, and qXR) demonstrated diagnostic metrics that matched or surpassed the vendor specifications, and achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.956 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.918 to 0.994]. However, when evaluated by three radiologists for accurate nodule segmentation and classification, all solutions performed below the vendor-declared metrics, with the highest AUC reaching 0.812 (95% CI: 0.744 to 0.879). Meanwhile, all AI services demonstrated 100% specificity at stages 2 and 3 of the study.
    UNASSIGNED: To ensure the reliability and applicability of AI-based software, it is crucial to validate performance metrics using high-quality datasets and engage radiologists in the evaluation process. Developers are recommended to improve the accuracy of the underlying models before allowing the standalone use of the software for lung nodule detection. The dataset created during the study may be accessed at https://mosmed.ai/datasets/mosmeddatargogksnalichiemiotsutstviemlegochnihuzlovtipvii/.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    冠状动脉钙积分(CACS)已被证明是心血管事件的独立预测因子。传统的冠状动脉钙质评分算法已经针对心电图(ECG)门控图像进行了优化,这些都是通过特定的设置和定时获取的。因此,如果基于人工智能的冠状动脉钙积分(AI-CACS)可以从胸部低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)检查计算,它在提前评估冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的风险方面可能是有价值的,它有可能减少患者心血管事件的发生。这项研究旨在评估AI-CACS算法在三种不同切片厚度(1、3和5mm)的非门控胸部扫描中的性能。
    共有135例同时接受胸部LDCT和ECG门控非对比增强心脏CT的患者被前瞻性纳入本研究。Agatston评分是使用AI-CACS软件从在1、3和5mm的切片厚度下重建的胸部CT图像中自动得出的。然后使用常规的半自动方法作为参考,将这些评分与从ECG门控心脏CT数据获得的评分进行比较。分析AI-CACS与心电图门控冠状动脉钙化积分(ECG-CACS)的相关性,和Bland-Altman地块被用来评估协议。风险分层基于计算的CACS,并确定了一致率。
    总共112名患者被纳入最终分析。三种不同厚度(1、3、5mm)的AI-CACS与ECG-CACS的相关性分别为0.973、0.941、0.834(均P<0.01)。分别。Bland-Altman图显示了三种厚度分别为-6.5、15.4和53.1的AI-CACS的平均差异。三个AI-CACS组的风险类别一致性分别为0.868、0.772和0.412(均P<0.01)。分别。虽然一致性率为91%,84.8%,62.5%,分别。
    基于AI的算法成功地从胸部的LDCT扫描中计算出CACS,证明了它在风险分类中的效用。此外,从切片厚度为1mm的图像获得的CACS比从切片厚度为3和5mm的图像获得的CACS更准确.
    UNASSIGNED: The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular events. The traditional coronary artery calcium scoring algorithm has been optimized for electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated images, which are acquired with specific settings and timing. Therefore, if the artificial intelligence-based coronary artery calcium score (AI-CACS) could be calculated from a chest low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) examination, it could be valuable in assessing the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) in advance, and it could potentially reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular events in patients. This study aimed to assess the performance of an AI-CACS algorithm in non-gated chest scans with three different slice thicknesses (1, 3, and 5 mm).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 135 patients who underwent both LDCT of the chest and ECG-gated non-contrast enhanced cardiac CT were prospectively included in this study. The Agatston scores were automatically derived from chest CT images reconstructed at slice thicknesses of 1, 3, and 5 mm using the AI-CACS software. These scores were then compared to those obtained from the ECG-gated cardiac CT data using a conventional semi-automatic method that served as the reference. The correlations between the AI-CACS and electrocardiogram-gated coronary artery calcium score (ECG-CACS) were analyzed, and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement. Risk stratification was based on the calculated CACS, and the concordance rate was determined.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 112 patients were included in the final analysis. The correlations between the AI-CACS at three different thicknesses (1, 3, and 5 mm) and the ECG-CACS were 0.973, 0.941, and 0.834 (all P<0.01), respectively. The Bland-Altman plots showed mean differences in the AI-CACS for the three thicknesses of -6.5, 15.4, and 53.1, respectively. The risk category agreement for the three AI-CACS groups was 0.868, 0.772, and 0.412 (all P<0.01), respectively. While the concordance rates were 91%, 84.8%, and 62.5%, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: The AI-based algorithm successfully calculated the CACS from LDCT scans of the chest, demonstrating its utility in risk categorization. Furthermore, the CACS derived from images with a slice thickness of 1 mm was more accurate than those obtained from images with slice thicknesses of 3 and 5 mm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心脏异种移植(cXT)已成为解决心脏供体短缺的一种方法,促使人们对其科学进行探索,伦理,和监管方面。该综述从遗传修饰开始,增强用于人类移植的猪心脏,通过免疫学挑战,拒绝机制,和免疫反应。关键领域包括临床前里程碑,互补级联角色,和基因工程来解决超急性排斥反应。生理平衡系统,如猪异种移植物中的人血栓调节蛋白和内皮细胞蛋白C受体上调,突出提高移植物存活率的努力。评估猪和狒狒供体以及非人灵长类动物的挑战阐明了供体物种选择的复杂性。伦理考虑,包括动物权利,福利,和人畜共患疾病的风险,在cXT上下文中进行严格检查。该综述探讨了具有侵袭性免疫抑制和成簇规则间隔回文重复相关蛋白9(CRISPR/Cas9)技术的免疫控制机制。阐明超急性排斥反应,补体激活,和抗体介导的排斥反应错综复杂。探讨了CRISPR/Cas9在产生表达人抑制剂分子的猪内皮细胞中的作用,以缓解排斥反应。伦理和监管方面强调委员会和国际准则的作用。前瞻性的观点设想精准医学遗传学,人工智能,还探索了猪体内的个性化心脏培养作为cXT未来的转化要素。这种全面的分析为研究人员提供了见解,临床医生,和政策制定者,解决当前状态,以及cXT的未来前景。
    Cardiac xenotransplantation (cXT) has emerged as a solution to heart donor scarcity, prompting an exploration of its scientific, ethical, and regulatory facets. The review begins with genetic modifications enhancing pig hearts for human transplantation, navigating through immunological challenges, rejection mechanisms, and immune responses. Key areas include preclinical milestones, complement cascade roles, and genetic engineering to address hyperacute rejection. Physiological counterbalance systems, like human thrombomodulin and endothelial protein C receptor upregulation in porcine xenografts, highlight efforts for graft survival enhancement. Evaluating pig and baboon donors and challenges with non-human primates illuminates complexities in donor species selection. Ethical considerations, encompassing animal rights, welfare, and zoonotic disease risks, are critically examined in the cXT context. The review delves into immune control mechanisms with aggressive immunosuppression and clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) technology, elucidating hyperacute rejection, complement activation, and antibody-mediated rejection intricacies. CRISPR/Cas9\'s role in creating pig endothelial cells expressing human inhibitor molecules is explored for rejection mitigation. Ethical and regulatory aspects emphasize the role of committees and international guidelines. A forward-looking perspective envisions precision medical genetics, artificial intelligence, and individualized heart cultivation within pigs as transformative elements in cXT\'s future is also explored. This comprehensive analysis offers insights for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers, addressing the current state, and future prospects of cXT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这篇综述总结了人工智能(AI)在临床微生物学的当前状态下的当前和潜在用途,重点是替代劳动密集型任务。
    方法:在PubMed上使用关键术语临床微生物学和人工智能进行搜索。对与临床微生物学相关的研究进行了综述,当前的诊断技术,以及人工智能在常规微生物学工作流程中的潜在优势。
    结果:许多研究强调了潜在的劳动力,以及诊断准确性,实现基于幻灯片和宏观数字图像分析的AI的好处。这些范围从革兰氏染色解释到培养物生长的分类和定量。
    结论:人工智能在临床微生物学中的应用显著提高了诊断的准确性和效率,为劳动密集型任务和人员短缺提供有前途的解决方案。仍然需要更多的研究工作和美国食品和药物管理局的批准,才能将这些人工智能应用完全纳入常规的临床实验室实践。
    OBJECTIVE: This review summarizes the current and potential uses of artificial intelligence (AI) in the current state of clinical microbiology with a focus on replacement of labor-intensive tasks.
    METHODS: A search was conducted on PubMed using the key terms clinical microbiology and artificial intelligence. Studies were reviewed for relevance to clinical microbiology, current diagnostic techniques, and potential advantages of AI in routine microbiology workflows.
    RESULTS: Numerous studies highlight potential labor, as well as diagnostic accuracy, benefits to the implementation of AI for slide-based and macroscopic digital image analyses. These range from Gram stain interpretation to categorization and quantitation of culture growth.
    CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence applications in clinical microbiology significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, offering promising solutions to labor-intensive tasks and staffing shortages. More research efforts and US Food and Drug Administration clearance are still required to fully incorporate these AI applications into routine clinical laboratory practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探索生成AI的整合,特别是大型语言模型(LLM),在眼科教育和实践中,解决他们的应用,好处,挑战,和未来的方向。
    方法:对当前AI在眼科中的应用和教育计划进行文献回顾和分析。
    方法:对已发表研究的分析,reviews,文章,网站,以及有关AI在眼科中使用的机构报告。结合AI的教育计划的检查,包括课程框架,训练方法,以及人工智能在医学检查和临床案例研究中的表现评价。
    结果:生成AI,特别是LLM,显示出提高眼科诊断准确性和患者护理的潜力。应用包括帮助患者,内科医生,和医学生的教育。然而,诸如人工智能幻觉之类的挑战,偏见,缺乏可解释性,和过时的培训数据限制了临床部署。研究表明,眼科委员会考试问题的LLM准确性不同,强调需要更可靠的人工智能集成。全国范围内的一些教育计划提供与临床医学和眼科相关的AI和数据科学培训。
    结论:生成AI和LLM在眼科教育和实践方面提供了有希望的进步。通过包括基本人工智能原则的综合课程应对挑战,道德准则,并更新,无偏见的训练数据至关重要。未来的方向包括开发临床相关的评估指标,在人为监督下实施混合模型,利用图像丰富的数据,并将AI性能与眼科医生进行基准测试。关于数据隐私的强有力的政策,安全,和透明度对于促进AI在眼科应用的安全和道德环境至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the integration of generative AI, specifically large language models (LLMs), in ophthalmology education and practice, addressing their applications, benefits, challenges, and future directions.
    METHODS: A literature review and analysis of current AI applications and educational programs in ophthalmology.
    METHODS: Analysis of published studies, reviews, articles, websites, and institutional reports on AI use in ophthalmology. Examination of educational programs incorporating AI, including curriculum frameworks, training methodologies, and evaluations of AI performance on medical examinations and clinical case studies.
    RESULTS: Generative AI, particularly LLMs, shows potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient care in ophthalmology. Applications include aiding in patient, physician, and medical students\' education. However, challenges such as AI hallucinations, biases, lack of interpretability, and outdated training data limit clinical deployment. Studies revealed varying levels of accuracy of LLMs on ophthalmology board exam questions, underscoring the need for more reliable AI integration. Several educational programs nationwide provide AI and data science training relevant to clinical medicine and ophthalmology.
    CONCLUSIONS: Generative AI and LLMs offer promising advancements in ophthalmology education and practice. Addressing challenges through comprehensive curricula that include fundamental AI principles, ethical guidelines, and updated, unbiased training data is crucial. Future directions include developing clinically relevant evaluation metrics, implementing hybrid models with human oversight, leveraging image-rich data, and benchmarking AI performance against ophthalmologists. Robust policies on data privacy, security, and transparency are essential for fostering a safe and ethical environment for AI applications in ophthalmology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胰腺炎的早期识别仍然是影响患者预后的重要临床诊断挑战。随着深度学习模型的发展,定量成像在胰腺炎及其并发症的非侵入性诊断中显示出巨大的前景。我们概述了诊断成像和定量成像方法的进步以及人工智能(AI)的发展。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了AI在早期发现和治疗胰腺炎方面改善临床支持的方法学现状和局限性.
    Early identification of pancreatitis remains a significant clinical diagnostic challenge that impacts patient outcomes. The evolution of quantitative imaging followed by deep learning models has shown great promise in the non-invasive diagnosis of pancreatitis and its complications. We provide an overview of advancements in diagnostic imaging and quantitative imaging methods along with the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI). In this article, we review the current and future states of methodology and limitations of AI in improving clinical support in the context of early detection and management of pancreatitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号