» The purpose of this article was to review the multidisciplinary, team-based approach necessary for the optimal management of patients with limb loss undergoing osseointegration surgery.» In this study, we describe the interdisciplinary process of screening, counseling, and surgical and rehabilitation considerations with an emphasis on principles rather than specific implants or techniques.» Integrated perioperative management and long-term surveillance are crucial to ensure the best possible outcomes.» We hope this model will service as an implant-agnostic guide to others seeking to development an osseointegration center of excellence.

For some individuals with severe socket-related problems, prosthesis osseointegration directly connects a prosthesis to the residual limb creating a bone-anchored limb (BAL). We compared dynamic gait stability and between-limb stability symmetry, as measured by the Margin of Stability (MoS) and the Normalized Symmetry Index (NSI), for people with unilateral transfemoral amputation before and one-year after BAL implantation. The MoS provides a mechanical construct to assess dynamic gait stability and infer center of mass and limb control by relating the center of mass and velocity to the base of support. Before and one-year after BAL implantation, 19 participants walked overground at self-selected speeds. We quantified dynamic gait stability anteriorly and laterally at foot strike and at the minimum lateral MoS value. After implantation, we observed decreased lateral MoS at foot strike for the amputated (MoS mean(SD) %height; pre: 6.6(2.3), post: 5.9(1.3), d = 0.45) and intact limb (pre: 6.2(1.2), post: 5.8(1.0), d = 0.38) and increased between-limb MoS symmetry at foot strike (NSI mean(SD) %; anterior-pre: 10.3(7.3), post: 8.4(3.6), d = 0.23; lateral-pre: 18.8(12.4), post: 12.4(4.9), d = 0.47) and at minimum lateral stability (pre: 28.1(18.1), post: 19.2(6.8), d = 0.50). Center of mass control using a BAL resulted in dynamic gait stability more similar between limbs and may have reduced the adoption of functional asymmetries. We suggest that improved between-limb MoS symmetry after BAL implantation is likely due to subtle changes in individual limb MoS values at self-selected walking speeds resulting in an overall positive impact on fall risk through improved center of mass and prosthetic limb control.

One of the most significant developments in prosthetic knee technology has been the introduction of the Microprocessor-Controlled Prosthetic Knee (MPK). However, there is a lack of consensus over how different types of MPKs affect performance in different ambulation modes. In this study, we investigated the biomechanical differences in ramp and stair maneuvers when an individual with transfemoral amputation wears three commercial MPKs: the Össur Power Knee, the Össur Rheo Knee and the Ottobock C-Leg 4. The primary outcome variable for this study was the lower limb biological joint work, inclusive of the intact leg and prosthetic side hip. We hypothesized that (1) the Power Knee would result in lower biological work during ascent activities than the C-Leg and Rheo, both passive MPKs, and (2) the C-Leg and Rheo would result in lower biological work during descent activities than the Power Knee. During ramp ascent, the C-Leg was associated with lower biological joint work (p < 0.05) than the Power Knee. However, this relationship did not hold during stair ascent, where the Power Knee showed advantages for stair ascent with net reductions in biological joint work of 14.1% and 23.3% compared to the Rheo and C-leg, respectively. There were no significant differences in biological joint work between the knees during ramp and stair descent, indicating that choice of MPK may not be as important for descent activities. Our results demonstrate that differences are present between different types of MPKs during ascent activities which could prove useful in the prescription of these devices.

Factors associated with upper limb prosthesis adoption are not well understood. In this study, we explored how prosthesis usability experience relates to the extent of prosthesis adoption through the development of a structural equation model (SEM). First, items related to prosthesis usability were developed and refined using cognitive testing and pilot testing and employed in a survey of 402 prosthesis users (mean age 61.7 (sd 14.4), 77.1% Veterans). The SEM examined two unidimensional latent constructs: Prosthesis Usability Experience and Prosthesis Adoption-and each had multiple measured indicators. SEMs tested direct as well as moderating and mediating effects between the latent constructs and covariates related to demographics and prosthesis type. SEM found a significant positive association between Prosthesis Usability Experience and Extent of Prosthesis Adoption. Several covariates had direct effects on prosthesis adoption: 1) Extent of Prosthesis Adoption was lower for those with transhumeral and shoulder amputation, and higher for those with bilateral amputation, compared to the reference group with unilateral transradial amputation and 2) Myoelectric multiple degree of freedom (multi-DOF) prosthesis use was associated with lower Extent of Prosthesis Adoption, compared to body-powered prosthesis use. Myoelectric multi-DOF use also modified the effect of Prosthesis Usability Experience on Extent of Prosthesis Adoption. For those with bilateral ULA, the strength of the relationship between Prosthesis Usability Experience and Extent of Prosthesis Adoption was reduced. Findings suggest that in order to increase prosthesis adoption, prosthetics developers and rehabilitation providers should focus on implementing strategies to improve prosthesis usability experience. New Prosthesis Usability Experience measures could be used to identify persons at greater risk for poor prosthesis adoption and target interventions to increase prosthesis use.

BACKGROUND: Hip- and pelvic-level amputations are devastating injuries that drastically alter patient function and quality of life. This study examined the experience of military beneficiaries with a hip- or pelvic-level amputation to better characterize their challenges and specific needs and to optimize treatment in the future.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the Military Health System and identified 118 patients with a history of one or more amputation(s) at the hip or pelvic level between October 2001 and September 2017. Surviving participants (n = 97) were mailed a letter which explained the details of the study and requested participation in a telephonic interview. A total of six individuals (one female, five males) participated in structured interviews.
RESULTS: The study group included four participants with hip disarticulations and two participants with hemipelvectomies (one internal, one external). All six participants reported significant challenges with activities related to prosthetic use, mobility, residual limb health, pain, gastrointestinal and genitourinary function, psychiatric health, and sexual function.
CONCLUSIONS: These interviews highlight the unique needs of individuals with hip- and pelvic-level amputations and may improve access to higher echelons of care that would enhance the function and quality of life for these participants.

A novel powered ankle-foot prosthesis is designed. The effect of wearing the novel prosthesis and an energy-storage-and-return (ESAR) foot on lower-limb biomechanics is investigated to preliminarily evaluate the design. With necessary auxiliary materials, a non-amputated subject (a rookie at using prostheses) is recruited to walk on level ground with an ESAR and the novel powered prostheses separately. The results of the stride characteristics, the ground reaction force (GRF) components, kinematics, and kinetics in the sagittal plane are compared. Wearing the powered prosthesis has less prolongation of the gait cycle on the unaffected side than wearing the ESAR foot. Wearing ESAR or proposed powered prostheses influences the GRF, kinematics, and kinetics on the affected and unaffected sides to some extent. Thereinto, the knee moment on the affected side is influenced most. Regarding normal walking as the reference, among the total of 15 indexes, the influences of wearing the proposed powered prosthesis on six indexes on the affected side (ankle\'s/knee\'s/hip\'s angles, hip\'s moment, and Z- and X-axis GRF components) and five indexes on the unaffected side (ankle\'s/knee\'s/hip\'s angles and ankle\'s/hip\'s moments) are slighter than those of wearing the ESAR foot. The influences of wearing the powered prosthesis on two indexes on the unaffected side (knee\'s moment and X-axis GRF component) are similar to those of wearing the ESAR foot. The greatest improvement of wearing the powered prosthesis is to provide further plantarflexion after reaching the origin of the ankle joint before toe-off, which means that the designed powered device can provide further propulsive power for the lifting of the human body\'s centre of gravity during walking on level ground. The results demonstrate that wearing the novel powered ankle-foot prosthesis benefits the rookie in recovering the normal gait more than wearing the ESAR foot.

This study investigates the differences in peak plantar pressure between the amputated and intact limbs of transfemoral amputees when walking outdoors. Ten non-amputees (aged 24.4 ± 2.0 years, 176.9 ± 2.5 cm, 72.3 ± 7.9 kg) and six transfemoral amputees (48.5 ± 6.3 years, 173.8 ± 4.2 cm, 82.0 ± 11.9 kg) participated in the study. Over approximately 1.6 km, the participants encountered various obstacles, including stairs, uneven surfaces, hills, and level ground, both indoors and outdoors. Throughout the walking session, the peak plantar pressure in both feet was monitored using wearable insole sensors. For all terrains, the percentage asymmetry was determined. Significant changes in peak plantar pressure asymmetry were found between the intact and amputated limbs, particularly when walking on level ground indoors, uneven terrains, descending stairs, and on steep slopes outdoors (all p < 0.05). These findings highlight the greater peak plantar pressure asymmetry in transfemoral amputees when walking outside. In addition, this study revealed that not all terrains contribute uniformly to this asymmetry.

Sensory feedback for prosthesis control is typically based on encoding sensory information in specific types of sensory stimuli that the users interpret to adjust the control of the prosthesis. However, in physiological conditions, the afferent feedback received from peripheral nerves is not only processed consciously but also modulates spinal reflex loops that contribute to the neural information driving muscles. Spinal pathways are relevant for sensory-motor integration, but they are commonly not leveraged for prosthesis control. We propose an approach to improve sensory-motor integration for prosthesis control based on modulating the excitability of spinal circuits through the vibration of tendons in a closed loop with muscle activity. We measured muscle signals in healthy participants and amputees during different motor tasks, and we closed the loop by applying vibration on tendons connected to the muscles, which modulated the excitability of motor neurons. The control signals to the prosthesis were thus the combination of voluntary control and additional spinal reflex inputs induced by tendon vibration. Results showed that closed-loop tendon vibration was able to modulate the neural drive to the muscles. When closed-loop tendon vibration was used, participants could achieve similar or better control performance in interfaces using muscle activation than without stimulation. Stimulation could even improve prosthetic grasping in amputees. Overall, our results indicate that closed-loop tendon vibration can integrate spinal reflex pathways in the myocontrol system and open the possibility of incorporating natural feedback loops in prosthesis control.

UNASSIGNED: In this study, we sought to examine how lower limb prosthesis users define success, what constructs they associate with success, and what barriers and facilitators contribute to achieving success.
UNASSIGNED: Purposively sampled lower limb prosthesis users were recruited to participate in a focus group study. Verbatim transcripts from focus groups were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Identified constructs were mapped to existing outcome measures, and a conceptual framework for success with a lower limb prosthesis was proposed.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty-one lower limb prosthesis users participated in one of five focus groups. Five themes were developed: keep moving forward, despite ups and downs; being able to live MY normal life and do the things I want to do with ease; learning what works for me and how to manage my prosthesis; only I can define my success; and what about my mental health? Several constructs that do not align with existing measures were identified, including prosthetic attention, grief/loss after amputation, and trust in prosthesis. Facilitators for success described by participants included peer connection, finding the right prosthetist, and mental health support.
UNASSIGNED: According to lower limb prosthesis users, success must be patient-driven, individually defined, and continually reassessed.
According to prosthesis users, success with a lower limb prosthesis should be patient-driven, individually defined, and continually reassessed.Lower limb prosthesis users described facilitators for success to include peer connection, finding the right prosthetist, mental health support, and access to appropriate prosthetic technology.Constructs described by lower limb prosthesis users as relating to success that are currently difficult to measure include prosthetic attention, grief/loss after amputation, prosthesis management, ability to blend in, and trust in the prosthesis.

This study was aimed to compare the variability of inter-joint coordination in the lower-extremities during gait between active individuals with transtibial amputation (TTAs) and healthy individuals (HIs). Fifteen active male TTAs (age: 40.6 ± 16.24 years, height: 1.74 ± 0.09 m, and mass: 71.2 ± 8.87 kg) and HIs (age: 37.25 ± 13.11 years, height: 1.75 ± 0.06 m, and mass: 74 ± 8.75 kg) without gait disabilities voluntarily participated in the study. Participants walked along a level walkway covered with Vicon motion capture system, and their lower-extremity kinematics data were recorded during gait. The spatiotemporal gait parameters, lower-extremity joint range of motion (ROM), and their coordination and variability were calculated and averaged to report a single value for each parameter based on biomechanical symmetry assumption in the lower limbs of HIs. Additionally, these parameters were separately calculated and reported for the intact limb (IL) and the prosthesis limb (PL) in TTAs individuals. Finally, a comparison was made between the averaged values in HIs and those in the IL and PL of TTAs subjects. The results showed that the IL had a significantly lower stride length than that of the PL and averaged value in HIs, and the IL had a significantly lower knee ROM and greater stance-phase duration than that of HIs. Moreover, TTAs showed different coordination patterns in pelvis-to-hip, hip-to-knee, and hip-to-ankle couplings in some parts of the gait cycle. It concludes that the active TTAs with PLs walked with more flexion of the knee and hip, which may indicate a progressive walking strategy and the differences in coordination patterns suggest active TTA individuals used different neuromuscular control strategies to adapt to their amputation. Researchers can extend this work by investigating variations in these parameters across diverse patient populations, including different amputation etiologies and prosthetic designs. Moreover, Clinicians can use the findings to tailor rehabilitation programs for TTAs, emphasizing joint flexibility and coordination.