Aphasia, Primary Progressive

失语症,初级进步
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:额颞叶变性(FTLD)相关综合征患者的家庭护理和生存率数据有限。然而,他们的评估对于计划试验和评估干预效果至关重要.基于人口的登记册为这一估计提供了独特的样本。这项研究的目的是评估养老院的入院率,存活率,从欧洲FRONTIERS注册研究中得出的FTLD相关综合征事件患者的预测因子。
    方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性纵向多国观测注册研究,考虑在2018年6月1日至2019年5月31日之间诊断出的FTLD相关综合征的事件患者,并随访长达5年至2023年5月31日。我们招募了符合行为变异额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)诊断的患者,原发性进行性失语症(PPA),进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)或皮质基底综合征(CBS),和FTD与运动神经元疾病(FTD-MND)。使用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox多变量回归模型评估家庭护理和生存率。生存概率评分(SPS)是基于生存的独立预测因子计算的。
    结果:共纳入266例FTLD患者(平均年龄±SD=66.7±9.0;女性=41.4%)。从疾病发作开始,中位护理院入院率为97个月(95%CI=86-98),从诊断开始为57个月(95%CI=56-58)。中位生存期从疾病发作开始为90个月(95%CI=77-97),从诊断开始为49个月(95%CI=44-58)。与bvFTD相比,FTD-MND(风险比[HR]4.59,95%CI=2.49-8.76,p<0.001)和PSP/CBS(HR1.56,95%CI=1.01-2.42,p=0.044)的诊断生存期较短。PPA和bvFTD之间没有差异。SPS在预测1年生存概率方面具有很高的准确性(受试者工作特征曲线下面积=0.789,95%CI=0.69-0.87),当按年龄定义时,欧洲居住区,锥体外系症状,和MND在诊断。
    结论:在FTLD相关综合征中,生存率根据临床特征和地理不同而不同.SPS能够预测个体患者水平的预后,准确率约为80%,并可能有助于改善临床试验中的患者分层。未来需要考虑不同人群的验证性研究。
    OBJECTIVE: Data on care home admission and survival rates of patients with syndromes associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are limited. However, their estimation is essential to plan trials and assess the efficacy of intervention. Population-based registers provide unique samples for this estimate. The aim of this study was to assess care home admission rate, survival rate, and their predictors in incident patients with FTLD-associated syndromes from the European FRONTIERS register-based study.
    METHODS: We conducted a prospective longitudinal multinational observational registry study, considering incident patients with FTLD-associated syndromes diagnosed between June 1, 2018, and May 31, 2019, and followed for up to 5 years till May 31, 2023. We enrolled patients fulfilling diagnosis of the behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), primary progressive aphasia (PPA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) or corticobasal syndrome (CBS), and FTD with motor neuron disease (FTD-MND). Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox multivariable regression models were used to assess care home admission and survival rates. The survival probability score (SPS) was computed based on independent predictors of survivorship.
    RESULTS: A total of 266 incident patients with FTLD were included (mean age ± SD = 66.7 ± 9.0; female = 41.4%). The median care home admission rate was 97 months (95% CIs 86-98) from disease onset and 57 months (95% CIs 56-58) from diagnosis. The median survival was 90 months (95% CIs 77-97) from disease onset and 49 months (95% CIs 44-58) from diagnosis. Survival from diagnosis was shorter in FTD-MND (hazard ratio [HR] 4.59, 95% CIs 2.49-8.76, p < 0.001) and PSP/CBS (HR 1.56, 95% CIs 1.01-2.42, p = 0.044) compared with bvFTD; no differences between PPA and bvFTD were found. The SPS proved high accuracy in predicting 1-year survival probability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.789, 95% CIs 0.69-0.87), when defined by age, European area of residency, extrapyramidal symptoms, and MND at diagnosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: In FTLD-associated syndromes, survival rates differ according to clinical features and geography. The SPS was able to predict prognosis at individual patient level with an accuracy of ∼80% and may help to improve patient stratification in clinical trials. Future confirmatory studies considering different populations are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)和重复性头部撞击(RHI)与多种类型的神经退行性疾病的风险增加有关,痴呆风险更高,痴呆症症状出现的年龄较早,提示转诊对晚年大脑健康的影响。额颞叶痴呆(FTD)和原发性进行性失语症(PPA)代表了一系列神经病理多样的临床表型。由于复杂的认知和行为症状,FTD/PPA诊断带来了独特的挑战,这些症状不成比例地表现为早发性痴呆(65岁之前)。我们对FTD和PPA患者与健康对照者的终生头部创伤暴露进行了详细表征,以检查终生TBI和RHI的频率以及相关的临床意义。
    方法:我们研究了132名FTD/PPA(年龄68.9±8.1,65%男性)和132名性别匹配的健康对照(HC;年龄73.4±7.6)。我们比较了FTD/PPA和HC(卡方,逻辑回归,方差分析)。在FTD/PPA内,我们评估了与症状发病年龄的相关性(方差分析).在行为变异FTD中,我们评估了与认知功能和神经精神症状的关联(线性回归控制年龄,性别,和多年的教育)。
    结果:对于任何接触/碰撞运动,FTD/PPA的参与年限均大于HC(8.5±6.7yrsvs.5.3±4.5yrs,p=.008)和美式足球(6.2yrs±4.3yrsvs.3.1±2.4yrs;p=.003)。在FTD/PPA内,与TBI的症状发作年龄较早(0TBI:62.1±8.1,1TBI:59.9±6.9,2+TBI:57.3±8.4;p=.03)和美式足球年数(0yrs:62.2±8.7,1-4yrs:59.7±7.0,5+yrs:55.9±6.3;p=.009)相关。在bvFTD内,那些踢过美式足球的人记忆力较差(z得分:-2.4±1.2vs.-1.4±1.6,p=.02,d=1.1)。
    结论:终身头部外伤可能是FTD/PPA可预防的环境危险因素。剂量依赖性暴露于TBI或RHI影响bvFTD的FTD/PPA症状发作和记忆功能。需要进行临床病理研究,以更好地了解RHI或TBI与FTD/PPA发作和症状之间的神经病理学相关性。
    BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and repetitive head impacts (RHI) have been linked to increased risk for multiple types of neurodegenerative disease, higher dementia risk, and earlier age of dementia symptom onset, suggesting transdiagnostic implications for later-life brain health. Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA) represent a spectrum of clinical phenotypes that are neuropathologically diverse. FTD/PPA diagnoses bring unique challenges due to complex cognitive and behavioral symptoms that disproportionately present as an early-onset dementia (before age 65). We performed a detailed characterization of lifetime head trauma exposure in individuals with FTD and PPA compared to healthy controls to examine frequency of lifetime TBI and RHI and associated clinical implications.
    METHODS: We studied 132 FTD/PPA (age 68.9 ± 8.1, 65% male) and 132 sex-matched healthy controls (HC; age 73.4 ± 7.6). We compared rates of prior TBI and RHI (contact/collision sports) between FTD/PPA and HC (chi-square, logistic regression, analysis of variance). Within FTD/PPA, we evaluated associations with age of symptom onset (analysis of variance). Within behavioral variant FTD, we evaluated associations with cognitive function and neuropsychiatric symptoms (linear regression controlling for age, sex, and years of education).
    RESULTS: Years of participation were greater in FTD/PPA than HC for any contact/collision sport (8.5 ± 6.7yrs vs. 5.3 ± 4.5yrs, p = .008) and for American football (6.2yrs ± 4.3yrs vs. 3.1 ± 2.4yrs; p = .003). Within FTD/PPA, there were dose-dependent associations with earlier age of symptom onset for TBI (0 TBI: 62.1 ± 8.1, 1 TBI: 59.9 ± 6.9, 2 + TBI: 57.3 ± 8.4; p = .03) and years of American football (0yrs: 62.2 ± 8.7, 1-4yrs: 59.7 ± 7.0, 5 + yrs: 55.9 ± 6.3; p = .009). Within bvFTD, those who played American football had worse memory (z-score: -2.4 ± 1.2 vs. -1.4 ± 1.6, p = .02, d = 1.1).
    CONCLUSIONS: Lifetime head trauma may represent a preventable environmental risk factor for FTD/PPA. Dose-dependent exposure to TBI or RHI influences FTD/PPA symptom onset and memory function in bvFTD. Clinico-pathological studies are needed to better understand the neuropathological correlates linking RHI or TBI to FTD/PPA onset and symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    语言治疗师/病理学家(SLT/Ps)是管理和治疗原发性进行性失语(PPA)的关键专业人员,然而,该学科在教育和培训方面存在差距,对技能有影响,信心,和临床决策。这项调查旨在探索在国际上与PPA(PwPPA)生活在一起的SLT/Ps之间需要的领域,以提高当前和未来从事进行性沟通障碍工作的劳动力的技能。来自27个国家与PwPPA合作的一百八十六名SLT/Ps参加了关于他们的教育和临床经验的匿名在线调查,临床决策,以及与该人群合作时自我报告的需求领域。SLT/Ps与PwPPA一起工作的最佳实践原则用于构成本调查的后两个部分。只有40.7%的受访者表示,他们的大学教育为他们目前在PwPPA的工作做好了准备。能力领域的“深入了解人”,\"\"实际问题,\"\"连通性,“”和“预防灾害”被确定为优先和需要的基本领域。受访者确定了教学在线课程(92.5%),干预措施的样本工具和活动(64.8%),以及关于为晚期和临终期提供护理的具体培训(58.3%),作为他们当前工作的核心需求领域。这是第一个全面探讨SLT/Ps与PwPPA合作观点的国际调查。根据调查结果,迫切需要增加当前的教育和持续培训机会,以更好地促进PwPPA及其家人的福祉,并确保为当前和未来的SLT/P员工做好适当的准备。
    Speech-language therapists/pathologists (SLT/Ps) are key professionals in the management and treatment of primary progressive aphasia (PPA), however, there are gaps in education and training within the discipline, with implications for skills, confidence, and clinical decision-making. This survey aimed to explore the areas of need amongst SLT/Ps working with people living with PPA (PwPPA) internationally to upskill the current and future workforce working with progressive communication disorders. One hundred eighty-six SLT/Ps from 27 countries who work with PwPPA participated in an anonymous online survey about their educational and clinical experiences, clinical decision-making, and self-reported areas of need when working with this population. Best practice principles for SLT/Ps working with PwPPA were used to frame the latter two sections of this survey. Only 40.7% of respondents indicated that their university education prepared them for their current work with PwPPA. Competency areas of \"knowing people deeply,\" \"practical issues,\" \"connectedness,\" and \"preventing disasters\" were identified as the basic areas of priority and need. Respondents identified instructional online courses (92.5%), sample tools and activities for interventions (64.8%), and concrete training on providing care for advanced stages and end of life (58.3%) as central areas of need in their current work. This is the first international survey to comprehensively explore the perspectives of SLT/Ps working with PwPPA. Based on survey outcomes, there is a pressing need to enhance current educational and ongoing training opportunities to better promote the well-being of PwPPA and their families, and to ensure appropriate preparation of the current and future SLT/P workforce.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:语义认知既需要语义表示(概念知识),和语义控制(为特定上下文/任务塑造和操纵信息的能力)(LambonRalph,Jefferies,帕特森,&罗杰斯,2017)。先前的研究将语义痴呆的语义表征损失与中风后语义失语症(SA)的语义控制缺陷进行了对比(Jefferies&LambonRalph,2006年;汤普森等人。,2022年)。原发性进行性失语症(lvPPA)的logopenic变体与SA具有神经解剖学共性,包括以左颞顶和下额叶区域为中心的损伤,和神经心理学的共性,包括执行和语言障碍。因此,我们调查了lvPPA是否会损害语义控制。
    方法:我们比较了12名患有lvPPA的个体,9患有典型的遗忘型阿尔茨海默病(AD),和12个年龄匹配的健康对照在一系列的语言和非语言语义,语言,记忆和执行功能测试。
    结果:lvPPA患者在不同的测试中跨越了多个水平的表现,并表现出语义控制缺陷的特征:(i)他们在需要更大语义需求的测试中表现出损害(例如,语义关联知识测试比简单的单词-图片匹配更多);(ii)只有lvPPA患者在语义和执行测试之间表现出很强的相关性;(iii)在lvPPA患者中未发现项目熟悉度的影响;(iv)lvPPA和AD患者均受益于波士顿命名测试中的语音提示。
    结论:LvPPA患者在语义测试方面的表现与先前报道的SA相似,提示语义控制受损。成像分析正在进行中,将在AAIC会议上提供。参考资料:Jefferies,E.,&LambonRalph,M.A.(2006年)。卒中失语症与语义痴呆的语义损害:病例系列比较。大脑,129(Pt8),2132-2147。https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl153LambonRalph,M.A.,Jefferies,E.,帕特森,K.,&罗杰斯,T、T、(2017年)。语义认知的神经和计算基础。NatRevNeurosci,18(1)、42-55.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.150Thompson,H.E.,Noonan,K.A.,Halai,A.D.,霍夫曼,P.,Stampacchia,S、Hallam,G.,...Jefferies,E、(2022年)。对颞顶皮层的损害足以使语义控制受损。皮质,156,71-85。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.05.022。
    BACKGROUND: Semantic cognition requires both semantic representation (conceptual knowledge), and semantic control (the ability to shape and manipulate information for a particular context/task) (Lambon Ralph, Jefferies, Patterson, & Rogers, 2017). Prior investigations have contrasted the semantic representation loss in semantic dementia with semantic control deficits in post-stroke semantic aphasia (SA) (Jefferies & Lambon Ralph, 2006; Thompson et al., 2022). The logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) has neuroanatomical commonalities with SA, including damage centred on the left temporoparietal and inferior frontal regions, and neuropsychological commonalities including executive and language impairments. Accordingly, we investigated whether lvPPA impairs semantic control.
    METHODS: We compared 12 individuals with lvPPA, 9 with typical amnestic Alzheimer\'s disease (AD), and 12 age-matched healthy controls on a battery of verbal and non-verbal semantic, language, memory and executive functioning tests.
    RESULTS: The lvPPA patients spanned multiple levels of performance across the different tests and showed the characteristic features of a semantic control deficit: (i) They showed impairments in tests that require greater semantic demand (e.g., semantic association knowledge test more than straightforward word-picture matching); (ii) only lvPPA patients showed strong correlations between semantic and executive tests; (iii) an effect of item familiarity was not found in lvPPA patients; and (iv) both lvPPA and AD patients benefited from phonemic cueing on the Boston Naming Test.
    CONCLUSIONS: LvPPA patients\' performance on semantic tests is similar to that of previously reported SA, suggesting an impairment of semantic control. Imaging analysis is underway and will be available at the AAIC conference. References: Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2006). Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: a case-series comparison. Brain, 129(Pt 8), 2132-2147. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl153 Lambon Ralph, M. A., Jefferies, E., Patterson, K., & Rogers, T. T. (2017). The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci, 18(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.150 Thompson, H. E., Noonan, K. A., Halai, A. D., Hoffman, P., Stampacchia, S., Hallam, G., . . . Jefferies, E. (2022). Damage to temporoparietal cortex is sufficient for impaired semantic control. Cortex, 156, 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.05.022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管人们对音乐作为大脑功能的指标和痴呆症的治疗方式有相当大的兴趣,不同痴呆症中音乐处理的神经相关性仍然不明确。在额颞叶痴呆谱中,行为变异额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)和语义变异原发性进行性失语症(svPPA)通常与音乐功能和/或保留的音乐技能的惊人变化有关,提示额颞叶痴呆可能是一种指导性疾病模型,用于评估神经退行性病变中音乐处理的大脑机制。在这里,我们使用额颞叶痴呆患者的激活功能磁共振成像来解决这个问题。
    方法:19例患者(10svPPA,9个bvFTD)和26个健康的年龄匹配的对照者接受了3-Tesla\'稀疏\'fMRI,他们被动地聆听音乐旋律。在2×2阶乘设计中,操纵刺激条件以探索音乐处理的两个关键维度:语义记忆(熟悉度:熟悉度与新颖的旋律)和感知特征(时间结构:等时与同步旋律)。扫描后行为测试评估了参与者在两个操纵刺激维度下辨别旋律的能力。还收集了有关参与者人口统计学和音乐背景的信息。
    结果:健康的老年对照组在后上颞叶皮层中显示出可分离的激活曲线,用于处理音乐颞叶结构,并在颞前和额叶下皮质中处理音乐熟悉度。与健康的老年人相比,综合征组显示出这些分布式神经网络的参与模式不同。在扫描后行为测试中,与健康对照组相比,bvFTD患者的音乐熟悉度判断也显著受损.
    结论:额颞叶痴呆综合征表现出不同的音乐感功能神经解剖学特征。未来的工作应该探索音乐处理的功能磁共振成像,作为对特定分子病理学中神经功能的探测,以及痴呆治疗潜力的候选标记。
    BACKGROUND: Despite considerable interest in music as an index of brain function and a therapeutic modality in dementia, the neural correlates of music processing in different dementias remain poorly defined. In the frontotemporal dementia spectrum, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) are often associated with striking changes in musical function and/or retained musical skills, suggesting frontotemporal dementia may be an instructive disease model in which to assess brain mechanisms of music processing in neurodegenerative pathologies. Here we addressed this issue using activation fMRI in patients with frontotemporal dementia.
    METHODS: Nineteen patients (10 svPPA, nine bvFTD) and 26 healthy age-matched controls underwent 3-Tesla \'sparse\' fMRI in which they listened passively to musical melodies. In a 2×2 factorial design, stimulus conditions were manipulated to probe two key dimensions of music processing: semantic memory (familiarity: familiar vs. novel melodies) and perceptual features (temporal structure: isochronous vs. anisochronous melodies). Post-scan behavioral testing assessed participants\' ability to discriminate melodies under each of the two manipulated stimulus dimensions. Information about participant demographics and musical background was also collected.
    RESULTS: The healthy older control group showed separable profiles of activation in posterior superior temporal cortex for processing musical temporal structure, and in anterior temporal and inferior frontal cortices for processing musical familiarity. Compared with healthy older listeners, syndromic groups showed differential patterns of engagement of these distributed neural networks. In post-scan behavioral testing, patients with bvFTD also exhibited significantly impaired musical familiarity judgments relative to healthy controls.
    CONCLUSIONS: Frontotemporal dementia syndromes show distinct functional neuroanatomical signatures of music perception. Future work should explore fMRI of music processing as a probe of neural function in particular molecular pathologies and a candidate marker of therapeutic potential in dementia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:额颞叶痴呆(FTD)患者在地理上是分散的,并且经常有行为和/或运动缺陷,这限制了进入现场临床试验和研究。为了解决这些参与障碍,我们调查了安装家用传感器技术以远程评估FTD日常功能的可行性。
    方法:我们的目标是招募20名具有各种临床综合征的FTD参与者,包括行为变体FTD(bvFTD),原发性进行性失语症(PPA),皮质基底综合征(CBS),和进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)。我们还旨在为住在同一家中的每个参与者注册一个研究伙伴作为对照。在参与者家中安装了协作老龄化研究技术(CART)平台,以收集长达两年的连续数据,使用运动传感器,生理监测设备(例如,scales,睡眠传感器),电子药盒,和可穿戴的活动记录仪。还跟踪了计算机的使用和驾驶模式。通过研究协调员访问或通过视频和书面说明远程安装技术,基于时间表和物流。参与者被要求完成每周一次的Qualtrics调查,访客,和健康变化。
    结果:在通过ALLFTD和其他FTD项目招募的159名UCSF参与者中,28%(N=45)符合纳入标准。在这45人中,有10人因疾病严重程度或搬迁到辅助生活设施而不合格。三分之一(36%,N=17)由于研究伙伴不堪重负而下降(N=3),拒绝任何子项目参与(N=7),对参与者诊断的敏感性(N=2),或缺乏反应(N=5)。通过加州大学洛杉矶分校的ALLFTD队列招募了另外两名参与者。该平台已安装在19个家庭(bvFTD:n=10;PPA:n=5;CBS/PSP:n=4)。由于死亡或搬迁到辅助生活设施,两所房屋停产。平均数据收集为360天(max=527)。在103个报告的技术问题中,92%的人在没有额外家访的情况下得到了解决,通过电话或电子邮件。参与者每周完成65%的健康问卷。
    结论:尽管存在一些招聘和保留方面的挑战,这些发现通常为在FTD中进行全面的家庭被动数据研究的可行性和可持续性提供了初步支持。
    BACKGROUND: Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) patients are geographically dispersed and often have behavioral and/or motor deficits that limit access to in-person clinical trials and research. To address these participation barriers, we investigated the feasibility of installing in-home sensor technologies to remotely assess everyday functioning in FTD.
    METHODS: We aimed to recruit 20 FTD participants with a variety of clinical syndromes, including behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), primary progressive aphasia (PPA), corticobasal syndrome (CBS), and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). We also aimed to enroll a study partner for each participant that lived in the same home to serve as a control. The Collaborative Aging Research Using Technology (CART) platform was installed in participants\' homes to collect continuous data for up to two years, using motion sensors, physiological monitoring devices (e.g., scales, sleep sensors), electronic pillboxes, and wearable actigraphs. Computer use and driving patterns were also tracked. Technology was installed either via a study coordinator visit or remotely through video and written instructions, based on schedule and logistics. Participants were asked to complete a weekly Qualtrics survey about time away from home, visitors, and health changes.
    RESULTS: Of the 159 UCSF participants available for recruitment through ALLFTD and other FTD projects, 28% (N = 45) met inclusion criteria. Of those 45, ten were ineligible due to advanced disease severity or relocation to an assisted living facility. A third (36%, N = 17) declined due to overwhelmed study partners (N = 3), declined any subproject participation (N = 7), sensitivity to participant\'s diagnosis (N = 2), or lack of response (N = 5). Two additional participants were recruited through UCLA\'s ALLFTD cohort. The platform has been installed in 19 homes (bvFTD: n = 10; PPA: n = 5; CBS/PSP: n = 4). Two homes discontinued due to death or relocation to assisted living facility. Mean data collection is 360 days (max = 527). Of 103 reported technological issues, 92% were resolved without additional home visits, either by phone or email. Participants completed 65% of weekly health questionnaires.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although there were some recruitment and retention challenges, these findings generally provide preliminary support for the feasibility and sustainability of conducting comprehensive in-home passive data research in FTD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:没有流行病学研究正式评估原发性进行性失语症(PPA)和原发性进行性失语症(PPAOS)的发病率。因此,我们决定在奥姆斯特德县评估这些疾病的发病率,MN,在2011年至2022年之间,为了表征临床,射线照相,以及这些患者的病理特征。
    方法:这是对奥姆斯特德县前瞻性确定的PPA和PPAOS患者人群队列数据的回顾性研究,MN,从2011年到2022年。奥姆斯特德县的成人(18岁以上)中PPA的发生率计算为研究期间每100,000人年的患者人数。奥姆斯特德县的成年人口由罗切斯特流行病学项目报告的2011-2022年每年的年度流域人口确定。行为神经科医生验证了临床诊断并确定了亚型。
    结果:我们在研究期间确定了10名患者(60%为女性)(症状发作的中位年龄:70岁;范围:66-73),8与PPA和2与PPAOS。在8例PPA患者中(6例女性患者,2名男性患者),2符合非流利型PPA(nfvPPA)的标准,3用于对数开放型变异PPA(LVPPA),3为语义变体(svPPA)。言语评估证实了所有患者的临床诊断,并且均显示出与各自亚型一致的典型影像学表现。6例患者(2PPAOS,2nfvPPA,2lvPPA)死亡,3例接受尸检(2PPAOS,1nfvPPA),确认进行性核上性麻痹的病理诊断。在研究期间,PPA+PPAOS的发生率为0.70人/100,000人年(95%CI0.34-1.29人/100,000)。PPAOS的发生率为0.14人/100,000人年(95%CI0.02-0.55人/100,000),而对于8名PPA患者,发病率为0.56人/100,000人年(95%CI0.24-1.10例/100,000).nfvPPA的发生率为每100,000人年0.14人(95%CI0.02-0.55),lvPPA每100,000人年0.21人(95%CI0.04-0.61),svPPA和每100,000人年0.21人(95%CI0.04-0.61)。
    结论:作为一个群体,PPA和PPAOS是一组相对罕见的疾病。PPAOS的发生率略低于PPA组,但与单个PPA变体的发生率相似。
    OBJECTIVE: No epidemiologic studies have formally assessed the incidence of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS). Thus, we decided to assess the incidence of these disorders in Olmsted County, MN, between 2011 and 2022, and to characterize clinical, radiographic, and pathologic characteristics of these patients.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective examination of data from a population-based cohort of patients with PPA and PPAOS prospectively identified in Olmsted County, MN, from 2011 to 2022. The incidence of PPA among adults (older than 18 years) was calculated for Olmsted County as the number of patients per 100,000 person-years during the study period. The adult population of Olmsted County was determined by the annual catchment population reported by the Rochester Epidemiological Project for each year 2011-2022. A behavioral neurologist verified the clinical diagnoses and determined subtypes.
    RESULTS: We identified 10 patients (60% female) within the study period (median age of symptoms onset: 70 years; range: 66-73), 8 with PPA and 2 with PPAOS. Of the 8 patients with PPA (6 female patients, 2 male patients), 2 met criteria for non-fluent variant PPA (nfvPPA), 3 for logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA), and 3 for semantic variant (svPPA). Speech evaluation confirmed the clinical diagnoses in all patients and all showed typical imaging findings consistent with their respective subtype. Six patients (2 PPAOS, 2 nfvPPA, 2 lvPPA) died and 3 underwent autopsy (2 PPAOS, 1 nfvPPA), confirming the pathologic diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy. The incidence of PPA + PPAOS was 0.70 persons per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 0.34-1.29 persons per 100,000) during the study period. The incidence of PPAOS was 0.14 persons per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 0.02-0.55 persons per 100,000), whereas for the 8 patients with PPA, the incidence was 0.56 persons per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 0.24-1.10 cases per 100,000). The incidence of nfvPPA was 0.14 persons per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 0.02-0.55), 0.21 persons per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 0.04-0.61) for lvPPA, and 0.21 persons per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 0.04-0.61) for svPPA.
    CONCLUSIONS: As a group, PPA and PPAOS are a relatively rare group of diseases. PPAOS has a slightly lower incidence than PPA as a group but similar incidence to the individual PPA variants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    原发性进行性失语(PPA)是一种已知会影响左半球额叶和颞叶区域的疾病。PPA通常是痴呆症未来发展的指标,特别是语义性痴呆(SD),用于额颞叶痴呆(FTD)和对数减少性进行性失语(LPA),作为阿尔茨海默病(AD)的非典型表现。这篇综述的目的是阐明2-脱氧-2-[18F]氟-D-葡萄糖(FDG)-正电子发射断层扫描(PET)在PPA的检测和诊断中的价值。使用WebofScience对文献进行了全面回顾,PubMed,谷歌学者。三种PPA亚型在前颞叶的FDG-PET成像中显示出不同的低代谢区域,左颞顶叶交界处LPA,左额下回和脑岛的非流利/农艺变异PPA(nfvPPA)。尽管有不同的模式,重叠的低代谢区域会使鉴别诊断复杂化,特别是在经常被诊断为AD的SD患者中。与其他诊断工具的集成可以改进诊断过程并导致改善的患者结果。未来的研究应该专注于在更大的人群中验证这些发现,并探索早期的治疗意义,准确的PPA诊断与更有针对性的治疗干预措施。
    Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a disease known to affect the frontal and temporal regions of the left hemisphere. PPA is often an indication of future development of dementia, specifically semantic dementia (SD) for frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) as an atypical presentation of Alzheimer\'s disease (AD). The purpose of this review is to clarify the value of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) in the detection and diagnosis of PPA. A comprehensive review of literature was conducted using Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The three PPA subtypes show distinct regions of hypometabolism in FDG-PET imaging with SD in the anterior temporal lobes, LPA in the left temporo-parietal junction, and nonfluent/agrammatic Variant PPA (nfvPPA) in the left inferior frontal gyrus and insula. Despite the distinct patterns, overlapping hypometabolic areas can complicate differential diagnosis, especially in patients with SD who are frequently diagnosed with AD. Integration with other diagnostic tools could refine the diagnostic process and lead to improved patient outcomes. Future research should focus on validating these findings in larger populations and exploring the therapeutic implications of early, accurate PPA diagnosis with more targeted therapeutic interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:吞咽困难是神经退行性疾病的重要特征,在原发性进行性失语症(PPA)中可能危及生命,但在这些综合征中仍未得到充分表征。我们假设吞咽困难在非流利/语法变异(nfv)PPA中比其他PPA综合征更普遍,根据伴随的电机特征预测,与吞咽控制相关的萎缩影响区域。
    方法:在我们的三级转诊中心进行的一项回顾性病例对照研究中,我们招募了56例PPA患者(21nfvPPA,22语义变体[sv]PPA,13对数可变变量[lv]PPA)。使用基于护理人员调查和临床记录的形式,我们记录了吞咽困难(存在/不存在)和相关,潜在的临床预测,认知,和行为特征。这些用于训练机器学习模型。使用基于体素的形态计量学和感兴趣区域分析评估患者的脑磁共振成像扫描,比较与吞咽困难存在/不存在相关的差异萎缩情况。
    结果:吞咽困难在nfvPPA中明显更普遍(43%vs.5%svPPA和无lvPPA)。机器学习模型揭示了nfvPPA组中预测吞咽困难的特征层次结构,具有出色的分类精度(90.5%,95%置信区间=77.9-100);最强的预测因素是口面失用症,其次是年龄较大,帕金森病,更严重的行为障碍,和更严重的认知障碍。在左中额叶中发现nfvPPA中吞咽困难的明显灰质萎缩,右上额叶,和右颌上回和右尾状。
    结论:吞咽困难是nfvPPA的共同特征,与潜在的皮质下皮质网络功能障碍有关。临床医生应该预测这种症状,特别是在其他运动特征和更严重疾病的情况下。
    OBJECTIVE: Dysphagia is an important feature of neurodegenerative diseases and potentially life-threatening in primary progressive aphasia (PPA) but remains poorly characterized in these syndromes. We hypothesized that dysphagia would be more prevalent in nonfluent/agrammatic variant (nfv)PPA than other PPA syndromes, predicted by accompanying motor features, and associated with atrophy affecting regions implicated in swallowing control.
    METHODS: In a retrospective case-control study at our tertiary referral centre, we recruited 56 patients with PPA (21 nfvPPA, 22 semantic variant [sv]PPA, 13 logopenic variant [lv]PPA). Using a pro forma based on caregiver surveys and clinical records, we documented dysphagia (present/absent) and associated, potentially predictive clinical, cognitive, and behavioural features. These were used to train a machine learning model. Patients\' brain magnetic resonance imaging scans were assessed using voxel-based morphometry and region-of-interest analyses comparing differential atrophy profiles associated with dysphagia presence/absence.
    RESULTS: Dysphagia was significantly more prevalent in nfvPPA (43% vs. 5% svPPA and no lvPPA). The machine learning model revealed a hierarchy of features predicting dysphagia in the nfvPPA group, with excellent classification accuracy (90.5%, 95% confidence interval = 77.9-100); the strongest predictor was orofacial apraxia, followed by older age, parkinsonism, more severe behavioural disturbance, and more severe cognitive impairment. Significant grey matter atrophy correlates of dysphagia in nfvPPA were identified in left middle frontal, right superior frontal, and right supramarginal gyri and right caudate.
    CONCLUSIONS: Dysphagia is a common feature of nfvPPA, linked to underlying corticosubcortical network dysfunction. Clinicians should anticipate this symptom particularly in the context of other motor features and more severe disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    神经退行性痴呆综合征,如原发性进行性失语症(PPA),传统上,诊断部分基于言语和非言语认知特征。关于PPA是否最好分为三个变体以及对PPA变体进行分类的最独特的语言特征的辩论仍在继续。在这项横断面研究中,我们首先利用人工智能(AI)和自然语言处理(NLP)的功能来执行无监督分类,来自78名PPA患者的连接语音样本。然后,我们使用NLP来识别最佳分离三种PPA变体的语言特征。大型语言模型(LLM)识别出三个不同的PPA集群,与独立的临床诊断有88.5%的一致性。三个数据驱动簇的皮质萎缩模式对应于临床诊断标准中的定位。在随后的监督分类中,出现了十七个鲜明的特点,包括将动词分为高频和低频类型的观察结果显着提高了分类精度。利用这些从分析中得出的语言特征,连接的语音样本,我们开发了一个分类器,该分类器在4组(3个PPA变异体和健康对照)的分类中获得了97.9%的准确率.本研究的数据驱动部分展示了LLM在PPA患者的语音中找到与常规变体一致的自然分区的能力。此外,这项工作确定了一组强大的语言特征,表明每个PPA变体,强调动词分为高频类和低频类的意义。除了提高诊断准确性,这些发现增强了我们对语言加工神经生物学的理解。
    Neurodegenerative dementia syndromes, such as primary progressive aphasias (PPA), have traditionally been diagnosed based, in part, on verbal and non-verbal cognitive profiles. Debate continues about whether PPA is best divided into three variants and regarding the most distinctive linguistic features for classifying PPA variants. In this cross-sectional study, we initially harnessed the capabilities of artificial intelligence and natural language processing to perform unsupervised classification of short, connected speech samples from 78 pateints with PPA. We then used natural language processing to identify linguistic features that best dissociate the three PPA variants. Large language models discerned three distinct PPA clusters, with 88.5% agreement with independent clinical diagnoses. Patterns of cortical atrophy of three data-driven clusters corresponded to the localization in the clinical diagnostic criteria. In the subsequent supervised classification, 17 distinctive features emerged, including the observation that separating verbs into high- and low-frequency types significantly improved classification accuracy. Using these linguistic features derived from the analysis of short, connected speech samples, we developed a classifier that achieved 97.9% accuracy in classifying the four groups (three PPA variants and healthy controls). The data-driven section of this study showcases the ability of large language models to find natural partitioning in the speech of patients with PPA consistent with conventional variants. In addition, the work identifies a robust set of language features indicative of each PPA variant, emphasizing the significance of dividing verbs into high- and low-frequency categories. Beyond improving diagnostic accuracy, these findings enhance our understanding of the neurobiology of language processing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号