Apatinib

阿帕替尼
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    系统治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效主要受到复杂的肿瘤防御机制和药物严重的毒副作用的限制。阿帕替尼(Apa)的疗效,一个关键的肝癌治疗,由于靶向不足而不能令人满意,并且伴随着显著的副作用。利用纳米材料增强其靶向性是提高肝癌治疗效果的关键策略。
    通过使用金属-有机骨架(MOFs)作为载体,制备了一种金属多酚网络涂覆的阿帕替尼负载的基于金属-有机骨架的多功能药物递送系统(MIL-100@Apa@MPN)。随后使用诸如X射线衍射(XRD)、透射电子显微镜(TEM),zeta电位测量,和粒度分析。体外实验观察MIL-100@Apa@MPN对HepG2细胞的药物释放动力学和细胞毒作用。使用H22荷瘤小鼠模型评价MIL-100@Apa@MPN的体内抗肿瘤功效。
    配制的MIL-100@Apa@MPN表现出非凡的热稳定性,并具有均匀的结构,测得的载药率(DL)和包封率(EE)分别为28.33%和85.01%,分别。体外研究表明,HepG2细胞有效摄取香豆素-6负载的NPs,并且在较低的pH条件下(pH5.0)观察到累积药物释放的显着增加,导致释放约73.72%的Apa。在HepG2细胞中,与游离Apa相比,MIL-100@Apa@MPN表现出更显著的抗增殖活性。在体内,MIL-100@Apa@MPN显著抑制肿瘤生长,减轻副作用,与其他组相比,H22荷瘤小鼠的治疗效果增强。
    我们成功构建了具有出色安全性的MOF输送系统,缓释能力,pH靶向,提高抗肿瘤疗效,强调其作为肝癌治疗方法的潜力。
    UNASSIGNED: The efficacy of systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is limited mainly by the complex tumor defense mechanism and the severe toxic side-effects of drugs. The efficacy of apatinib (Apa), a key liver cancer treatment, is unsatisfactory due to inadequate targeting and is accompanied by notable side-effects. Leveraging nanomaterials to enhance its targeting represents a crucial strategy for improving the effectiveness of liver cancer therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: A metal polyphenol network-coated apatinib-loaded metal-organic framework-based multifunctional drug-delivery system (MIL-100@Apa@MPN) was prepared by using metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as carriers. The nanoparticles (NPs) were subsequently characterized using techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), zeta potential measurements, and particle size analysis. In vitro experiments were conducted to observe the drug release kinetics and cytotoxic effects of MIL-100@Apa@MPN on HepG2 cells. The in vivo anti-tumor efficacy of MIL-100@Apa@MPN was evaluated using the H22 tumor-bearing mouse model.
    UNASSIGNED: The formulated MIL-100@Apa@MPN demonstrates remarkable thermal stability and possesses a uniform structure, with measured drug-loading (DL) and encapsulation efficiency (EE) rates of 28.33% and 85.01%, respectively. In vitro studies demonstrated that HepG2 cells efficiently uptake coumarin-6-loaded NPs, and a significant increase in cumulative drug release was observed under lower pH conditions (pH 5.0), leading to the release of approximately 73.72% of Apa. In HepG2 cells, MIL-100@Apa@MPN exhibited more significant antiproliferative activity compared to free Apa. In vivo, MIL-100@Apa@MPN significantly inhibited tumor growth, attenuated side-effects, and enhanced therapeutic effects in H22 tumor-bearing mice compared to other groups.
    UNASSIGNED: We have successfully constructed a MOF delivery system with excellent safety, sustained-release capability, pH-targeting, and improved anti-tumor efficacy, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic approach for the treatment of HCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    骨肉瘤(OS)是最常见的原发性骨肉瘤,具有很高的局部侵袭和转移倾向。尽管阿帕替尼的抗肿瘤作用已在高级OS中得到充分证实,阿帕替尼和免疫疗法的协同作用尚未阐明.
    在这项研究中,我们建立了荷瘤小鼠,并观察了低剂量和高剂量阿帕替尼治疗的肿瘤大小.17种细胞因子的表达,包括血管内皮生长因子(VEGF),通过蛋白质微阵列分析检测。此外,我们设计了阿帕替尼和抗原特异性树突状细胞(DC)-T联合治疗荷瘤小鼠.通过肿瘤大小和微血管密度(MVD)计数的统计分析检测肿瘤生长,通过蛋白质印迹法检测VEGF的蛋白表达,细胞因子白细胞介素6(IL-6),IL-17和干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)的酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA),以及通过流式细胞术检测骨髓来源的抑制细胞(MDSC)和肿瘤浸润巨噬细胞(TAMs)的数量。
    结果显示阿帕替尼有效抑制肿瘤生长,大剂量阿帕替尼取得了更强的效果。对于DC-T免疫疗法也是如此。然而,他们的联合治疗显示出更好的溶瘤作用。同时,阿帕替尼或DC-T治疗抑制VEGF和促血管生成介质IL-6和IL-17的表达,但增加IFN-γ的产生.联合治疗进一步降低/增加了这些作用。此外,联合治疗降低了OS微环境中的MDSC,但提高了TAM-M1比率。这些发现表明,阿帕替尼和抗原特异性DC-T联合疗法通过调节促/抗血管生成诱导剂和改善OS微环境中的免疫状态而在溶瘤中更有效。
    这项研究证明,在OS治疗中使用治疗剂进行免疫疗法是可行的,这可能为肿瘤治疗中手术与化疗的结合提供了一种新的方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone sarcoma with a high propensity for local invasion and metastasis. Although the antitumor effect of apatinib has been well confirmed in advanced OS, the synergistic effect of apatinib and immunotherapies has not yet been elucidated.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, we established tumour-bearing mice and observed tumour size with low and high doses of apatinib treatments. The expression of 17 cytokines, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), was detected by protein microarray analysis. Moreover, we designed apatinib and antigen-specific dendritic cell (DC)-T combination treatment for tumour-bearing mice. Tumour growth was detected by statistical analysis of tumour size and microvessel density (MVD) counting, the protein expression of VEGF by western blotting, the cytokines interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-17 and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the numbers of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and tumour-infiltration macrophages (TAMs) by flow cytometry.
    UNASSIGNED: The results showed that apatinib efficiently suppressed tumour growth, and high-dose apatinib achieved a stronger effect. The same was true for DC-T immunotherapy. However, their combination treatment revealed a better oncolytic effect. Meanwhile, apatinib or DC-T treatment inhibited the expression of VEGF and the proangiogenic mediators IL-6 and IL-17 but increased IFN-γ production. Combination therapy further reduced/increased these effects. In addition, the combination treatment reduced MDSC but enhanced TAM-M1 ratios in the OS microenvironment. These findings indicated that apatinib and antigen-specific DC-T combination therapy was more efficient in oncolysis by regulating pro-/anti-angiogenic inducers and improving the immune state in the OS microenvironment.
    UNASSIGNED: This study proved that it was feasible to employ immunotherapy with therapeutic agents in OS treatment, which may provide a new approach in addition to the combination of surgery with chemotherapy in tumour treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的特点是预后差,-高倾向于转移,-扩散,和-缺乏新的治疗选择。阐明表征该疾病的较新途径可能允许开发靶向疗法并因此获得有利的结果。
    方法:当前的研究探索了三氧化二砷(ATO)和阿帕替尼(APA)在体外和体内的联合作用。使用-H446和-H196SCLC细胞系测试体外模型。药物减少转移的能力,-细胞增殖,和-迁移进行了评估。利用生物信息学分析,确定差异表达的基因。使用基因敲低模型评估基因调控并使用Western印迹确认。体内模型用于确认在药物存在下病理特征的分辨率。应用IHC法检测人小细胞肺癌组织及癌旁组织中生长因子受体结合蛋白(GRB)10的表达水平。
    结果:在组合中,发现ATO和APA显著降低细胞增殖,-迁移,和-两种细胞系中的转移。发现细胞增殖被Caspase-3,-7途径的激活所抑制。在药物存在的情况下,发现GRB10的表达稳定。发现GRB10的沉默负调节VEGFR2/Akt/mTOR和Akt/GSK-3β/c-Myc信号通路。同时,在体内证实没有转移和肿瘤体积减小。免疫组化成果证实GRB10在癌旁组织中的表达程度显著高于在人小细胞肺癌组织中的表达程度。
    结论:协同,ATO和APA对抑制细胞增殖具有比每种药物独立更显著的影响。ATO和APA可能通过稳定GRB10来介导其作用,从而充当肿瘤抑制剂。因此,我们,初步报道GRB10稳定性作为SCLC治疗靶点的影响。
    BACKGROUND: Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is characterized by -poor prognosis, -high predilection for -metastasis, -proliferation, and -absence of newer therapeutic options. Elucidation of newer pathways characterizing the disease may allow for development of targeted therapies and consequently favorable outcomes.
    METHODS: The current study explored the combinatorial action of arsenic trioxide (ATO) and apatinib (APA) in vitro and in vivo. In vitro models were tested using -H446 and -H196 SCLC cell lines. The ability of drugs to reduce -metastasis, -cell proliferation, and -migration were assessed. Using bioinformatic analysis, differentially expressed genes were determined. Gene regulation was assessed using gene knock down models and confirmed using Western blots. The in vivo models were used to confirm the resolution of pathognomic features in the presence of the drugs. Growth factor receptor bound protein (GRB) 10 expression levels of human small cell lung cancer tissues and adjacent tissues were detected by IHC.
    RESULTS: In combination, ATO and APA were found to significantly reduce -cell proliferation, -migration, and -metastasis in both the cell lines. Cell proliferation was found to be inhibited by activation of Caspase-3, -7 pathway. In the presence of drugs, it was found that expression of GRB10 was stabilized. The silencing of GRB10 was found to negatively regulate the VEGFR2/Akt/mTOR and Akt/GSK-3β/c-Myc signaling pathway. Concurrently, absence of metastasis and reduction of tumor volume were confirmed in vivo. The immunohistochemical results confirmed that the expression level of GRB10 in adjacent tissues was significantly higher than that in human small cell lung cancer tissues.
    CONCLUSIONS: Synergistically, ATO and APA have a more significant impact on inhibiting cell proliferation than each drug independently. ATO and APA may be mediating its action through the stabilization of GRB10 thus acting as a tumor suppressor. We thus, preliminarily report the impact of GRB10 stability as a target for SCLC treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:缺乏接受阿帕替尼治疗的长期癌症幸存者的数据。本研究旨在描述阿帕替尼治疗后长期癌症幸存者的特征,并了解他们对阿帕替尼的满意度以及抑郁和失眠的严重程度。
    方法:邀请接受阿帕替尼治疗至少5年的实体瘤患者完成在线调查问卷。患者的特点和治疗,阿帕替尼的知识,满意度,收集患者健康问卷-9和失眠严重程度指数评估的抑郁和失眠严重程度。
    结果:在2023年12月8日至2024年3月1日之间,共有436名患者完成了在线问卷调查。大多数患者对阿帕替尼的疗效(96.6%)和安全性(93.1%)感到满意,愿意继续阿帕替尼治疗(99.5%),并且会向其他患者推荐阿帕替尼(93.3%)。持续的阿帕替尼治疗对日常生活产生了显著的负面影响,工作,或仅在两名(0.5%)患者中进行研究。目前,几乎所有患者都没有或有轻度抑郁症(97.0%)和失眠(97.9%)。最常见的患者报告的不良事件是手足综合征(21.3%)和高血压(18.3%)。
    结论:我们的调查显示,长期癌症幸存者对阿帕替尼的满意度很高。长期阿帕替尼治疗对患者的生活质量几乎没有负面影响。
    BACKGROUND: Data on long-term cancer survivors treated with apatinib are lacking. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of long-term cancer survivors after apatinib-based therapy, and to know about their satisfaction degree with apatinib and severity of depression and insomnia.
    METHODS: Patients with solid tumors who had received apatinib-based therapy for at least 5 years were invited to complete an online questionnaire. Characteristics of patients and treatment, knowledge of apatinib, satisfaction degree, and severity of depression and insomnia assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Insomnia Severity Index were collected.
    RESULTS: Between December 8, 2023 and March 1, 2024, a total of 436 patients completed the online questionnaire. Most patients were satisfied with the efficacy (96.6%) and safety (93.1%) of apatinib, were willing to continue apatinib treatment (99.5%), and would recommend apatinib to other patients (93.3%). Continuous apatinib treatment resulted in significant negative impact on daily life, work, or study in only two (0.5%) patients. Almost all patients currently had no or mild depression (97.0%) and insomnia (97.9%) problems. The most common patient-reported adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (21.3%) and hypertension (18.3%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our survey showed a high satisfaction degree with apatinib in long-term cancer survivors. Long-term apatinib treatment resulted in almost no negative impact on patient\'s quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    目的/背景:门静脉癌栓(PVTT)是原发性肝细胞癌(HCC)的常见并发症。HCC通常浸润肝内血管,尤其是门静脉,导致PVTT的形成,标记晚期HCC并与不良预后相关。PVTT通常会使局部治疗策略(如手术切除)复杂化,并影响干预措施的疗效。联合治疗,包括免疫疗法和靶向治疗,在肝癌治疗中显示出希望,但对于合并PVTT的HCC患者的管理选择特征不完全。本研究旨在探讨camrelizumab+apatinib治疗HCC伴PVTT患者的疗效和安全性。病例介绍:2例HCC伴PVTT。患者1,一名51岁的男性,有乙型肝炎病毒病史,被诊断为IIIA期肝癌,并接受卡利珠单抗+阿帕替尼治疗,六个周期后达到完全反应(CR)。患者2,一名50岁男性,患有IIIA期肝癌,也接受了相同的治疗,四个周期后达到CR,但因急性心脏病死亡。结果:我们的研究发现,卡姆瑞珠单抗+阿帕替尼有效缩小了充盈缺陷的大小,并显著延长了患者的无进展生存期。此外,在治疗过程中没有观察到不良反应。然而,尽管联合治疗证明了可管理的安全性,需要进一步的临床研究来验证其长期疗效和安全性.结论:卡利珠单抗+阿帕替尼在HCC合并PVTT患者中具有满意的疗效和安全性。为将来的治疗提供临床证据。
    Aims/Background: Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is a common complication of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCC typically infiltrates intrahepatic vessels, particularly the portal vein, leading to the formation of PVTT, marking advanced-stage HCC and correlating with poor prognosis. PVTT often complicates local treatment strategies such as surgical resection and affects the efficacy of interventions. Combination therapy, including immunotherapy and targeted therapy, shows promise in HCC treatment, but management options for HCC patients with PVTT are incompletely characterized. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab + apatinib in treating HCC patients with PVTT. Case Presentation: Two cases of HCC with PVTT were presented. Patient 1, a 51-year-old male with a history of hepatitis B virus, was diagnosed with stage IIIA HCC and treated with camrelizumab + apatinib, achieving complete response (CR) after six cycles. Patient 2, a 50-year-old male with stage IIIA HCC, also underwent the same treatment and achieved CR after four cycles but died due to acute cardiac disease. Results: Our research found that camrelizumab + apatinib effectively shrank the size of filling defects and significantly prolonged patients\' progression-free survival. In addition, no adverse effects were observed during the treatment process. However, despite the manageable safety profile demonstrated by combination therapy, further clinical research is needed to validate its long-term efficacy and safety. Conclusion: Camrelizumab + apatinib produced satisfactory efficacy and safety among the HCC patients with PVTT, providing clinical evidence for future treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评价药物洗脱微珠经肝动脉化疗栓塞术(D-TACE)联合阿帕替尼/卡莫瑞珠单抗治疗晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)合并肝动脉门静脉分流(APS)患者的疗效和安全性。
    方法:从2021年1月至2022年12月,对接受D-TACE联合阿帕替尼/卡瑞珠单抗的APS晚期HCC患者的连续医疗记录进行了审查。总生存期(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),肿瘤反应,和不良事件(AE)进行评估。
    结果:本研究共纳入23例患者,中位随访时间为11个月(范围,2-26个月)。在这项研究中,8例患者(34.8%)达到PR,13例患者(56.5%)达到SD,2例(8.7%)患者发生PD。客观有效率和疾病控制率分别为34.8%和91.3%,分别。OS和PFS分别为11个月和7个月,分别。多因素分析显示肿瘤数目是影响PFS的独立预后因素。19例患者在口服阿帕替尼后发生AE,8例患者在卡姆瑞珠单抗治疗后发生AE。无治疗相关死亡发生。
    结论:D-TACE联合阿帕替尼/康瑞珠单抗对合并APS的晚期HCC患者有明显的疗效和可控的不良事件,这可能是一个有希望的治疗选择。
    结论:•1.我们探讨了一种新的治疗策略为晚期肝癌患者肝动脉门静脉分流;2.D-TACE联合阿帕替尼/卡莫瑞珠单抗在合并APS的晚期HCC患者中具有有意义的疗效和可控的不良事件,这可能是一个有希望的治疗选择。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (D-TACE) combined with apatinib/camrelizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with hepatic arterioportal shunts (APS).
    METHODS: From January 2021 to December 2022, consecutive medical records of advanced HCC patients with APS receiving D-TACE combined apatinib/camrelizumab were reviewed for eligibility. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed.
    RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were included in this study, and the median follow-up time was 11 months (range, 2-26 months). In this study, 8 patients (34.8%) achieved PR, 13 patients (56.5%) achieved SD, and 2 patients (8.7%) developed PD. The objective response rate and disease controlled rate were 34.8% and 91.3%, respectively. OS and PFS were 11 months and 7 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that tumor number was an independent prognostic factor affecting PFS. AEs occurred in 19 patients after oral apatinib and in 8 patients after camrelizumab treatment. No treatment-related death occurred.
    CONCLUSIONS: D-TACE combined with apatinib/camrelizumab had meaningful efficacy and controllable AEs in advanced HCC patients with APS, which may be a promising treatment option.
    CONCLUSIONS: •1.We investigate a new treatment strategy for advanced HCC patients with hepatic arterioportal shunts;2.D-TACE combined with apatinib/camrelizumab had meaningful efficacy and controllable AEs in advanced HCC patients with APS, which may be a promising treatment option.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前,治疗铂耐药复发性卵巢癌的最佳治疗方法仍有待充分阐明.本系统综述和网络荟萃分析旨在阐明阿帕替尼的相对疗效和安全性。作为单一疗法或与化疗联合使用,与单纯化疗相比,用于治疗铂耐药的复发性卵巢癌。PubMed,检索了Embase和万方数据电子数据库,搜索从数据库的概念到2023年4月。进行质量评估,并使用R软件进行网络荟萃分析。纳入和排除标准筛选后,本分析包括17项临床试验,合并1,228例铂类耐药复发性卵巢癌患者的数据,分为以下3个治疗组:i)555例接受阿帕替尼联合化疗的患者;ii)229例接受阿帕替尼单独治疗的患者;iii)444例接受常规化疗的患者.本研究的结果表明,阿帕替尼与tegiol[比值比(OR),2.54;95%CI,1.06-6.11]或依托泊苷(OR,2.12;95%CI,1.20-3.74)与阿帕替尼单药治疗后相比,显着提高了客观缓解率(ORR)。相比之下,与阿帕替尼治疗相比,吉西他滨单药治疗导致ORR疗效较差(OR,0.47;95%CI,0.23-0.95)。此外,阿帕替尼与依托泊苷的组合(OR,1.32;95%CI,1.06-1.64)或紫杉醇(OR,1.52;95%CI,1.04-2.23)与单独使用阿帕替尼相比,疾病控制率(DCR)显着提高。根据累计排名分析下的面积,就DCR而言,阿帕替尼和紫杉醇联合使用是最有效的治疗方式.在安全方面,不良事件的发生率,例如手足综合征[相对风险(RR),4.23;95%CI,1.80-9.95]和高血压(RR,4.80;95%CI,1.53-15.05),发现在接受含阿帕替尼治疗的患者中,与单纯化疗相比。因此,本荟萃分析强调了阿帕替尼的潜力,特别是联合化疗,作为铂耐药复发性卵巢癌患者的治疗策略。
    At present, the optimal therapeutic approach for the treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer remains to be fully elucidated. The present systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the relative efficacy and safety of apatinib, administered either as monotherapy or in conjunction with chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, for the treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. The PubMed, Embase and Wanfang Data electronic databases were searched, where the search spanned from the conception of the databases until April 2023. A quality evaluation was conducted and R software was used for network meta-analysis. Following inclusion and exclusion criteria screening, the present analysis included 17 clinical trials, combining data from 1,228 patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer categorized into the following three treatment cohorts: i) 555 patients who received apatinib plus chemotherapy; ii) 229 patients who received apatinib alone; and iii) 444 patients who underwent conventional chemotherapy. Results of the present study demonstrated that the co-administration of apatinib with either tegiol [odds ratio (OR), 2.54; 95% CI, 1.06-6.11] or etoposide (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.20-3.74) significantly improved the objective response rate (ORR) compared with that following apatinib monotherapy. By contrast, gemcitabine monotherapy resulted in inferior ORR efficacy compared with that following apatinib (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.95). In addition, combinations of apatinib with etoposide (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.06-1.64) or paclitaxel (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04-2.23) demonstrated a significantly improved disease control rates (DCR) compared with those following apatinib alone. According to the area under the cumulative ranking analysis, apatinib and paclitaxel in combination was the most efficacious treatment modality in terms of DCR. In terms of safety, the incidence of adverse events, such as hand-foot syndrome [relative risk (RR), 4.23; 95% CI, 1.80-9.95] and hypertension (RR, 4.80; 95% CI, 1.53-15.05), was found to be significantly higher in patients treated with apatinib-containing therapies, compared with those treated with chemotherapy alone. Consequently, the present meta-analysis highlighted the potential of apatinib, particularly in combination with chemotherapy, as a therapeutic strategy for patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前,缺乏研究局部晚期甲状腺癌新辅助治疗的前瞻性临床试验.
    这项研究是一项多中心研究,开放标签,单臂,II期试验评估阿帕替尼作为新辅助治疗局部晚期分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者的疗效和安全性。
    患者术前接受阿帕替尼治疗,疗程为2至4个周期,最终导致手术切除。主要终点是客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR);次要终点是R0手术率,血清甲状腺球蛋白水平的改变,无病生存,和不良事件(AE)。
    共14例符合纳入标准的患者接受新辅助阿帕替尼治疗。其中,13名患者在阿帕替尼治疗后接受了外科手术,并被纳入ITT人群。ORR为53.8%,DCR为100%。在患者中,84.6%接受R0手术,而其余的15.4%接受了R1切除。在观察到的AE中,主要是高血压,手足综合征,肝功能障碍,蛋白尿,和甲状腺功能减退,未报告4级或5级不良事件。手术后,患者的中位随访期为34个月,在此期间,疾病进展发生在5个人(35.7%),包括3例局部复发和2例远处转移。
    阿帕替尼可能是局部晚期DTC新辅助治疗的有效药物。因此,患者可能受益于手术结果及其长期预后。
    UNASSIGNED: Presently, there is a paucity of prospective clinical trials investigating neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced thyroid cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: This study was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of apatinib as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with local advanced differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients were treated with preoperative apatinib over a course of 2 to 4 cycles, culminating in surgical resection. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR); the secondary endpoints were the rate of R0 surgery, alterations in serum thyroglobulin levels, disease-free survival, and adverse events (AEs).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 14 patients who met the inclusion criteria were administered neoadjuvant apatinib. Among these, 13 patients underwent surgical procedures following apatinib treatment and were enrolled in the ITT population. The ORR was 53.8% and the DCR was 100%. Of the patients, 84.6% received R0 surgery, while the remaining 15.4% underwent R1 resection. Predominant among the observed AEs were hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, hepatic dysfunction, proteinuria, and hypothyroidism, with no instances of grade 4 or 5 AEs reported. Subsequent to surgery, patients were followed up for a median period of 34 months, during which disease progression occurred in 5 individuals (35.7%), encompassing 3 cases of locoregional recurrences and 2 cases of distant metastases.
    UNASSIGNED: Apatinib may be an effective agent in the use of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced DTC. Patients may therefore benefit from surgical outcomes and their long-term prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝切除术后的高复发率强调了对肝细胞癌(HCC)新辅助治疗的迫切需要,以提高患者的整体预后。免疫检查点抑制剂,卡姆瑞珠单抗联合抗血管生成酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)阿帕替尼,已成为不可切除HCC患者的一线治疗选择,但其新辅助联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)在HCC中的应用仍有待探索.因此,本研究旨在探讨序贯TACE的有效性和安全性,camrelizumab,和阿帕替尼作为单一的新辅助疗法,巨大的HCC。
    方法:这种多中心,开放标签随机3期试验将在7家三级医院进行.单个巨大(直径≥10cm)的患者,可切除的HCC将以1:1的比例随机分配到单独的手术臂或新辅助治疗后的手术臂。在新辅助治疗组中,患者将在随机化后1周内接受TACE,其次是卡利珠单抗(200毫克q2w,4个周期),连同阿帕替尼(250mgqd,2个月)。除非疾病被评估为进行性,否则患者将在新辅助治疗后接受肝切除术。主要结果是1年无复发生存期(RFS)。将计算60名患者的计划样本量,以允许在1年内积累足够的RFS事件,以实现RFS主要终点的80%功效。
    结论:局部治疗的多模式治疗提供的协同作用,TKI,抗程序性细胞死亡1抑制剂可显着改善不可切除HCC患者的总体生存率。我们的试验将研究TACE三联的疗效和安全性,camrelizumab,阿帕替尼作为一种新辅助治疗策略,可切除的HCC。
    背景:www.chitr.org.cnChiCTR2300078086。2023年11月28日注册。开始招聘:2024年1月1日。预计完成招聘:2025年6月15日。
    BACKGROUND: The high recurrence rate after liver resection emphasizes the urgent need for neoadjuvant therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to enhance the overall prognosis for patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, camrelizumab combined with an anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) apatinib, have emerged as a first-line treatment option for patients with unresectable HCC, yet its neoadjuvant application in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in HCC remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of sequential TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib as a neoadjuvant therapy for single, huge HCC.
    METHODS: This multi-center, open-label randomized phase 3 trial will be conducted at 7 tertiary hospitals. Patients with single huge (≥ 10 cm in diameter), resectable HCC will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to arm of surgery alone or arm of neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. In the neoadjuvant therapy group, patients will receive TACE within 1 week after randomization, followed by camrelizumab (200 mg q2w, 4 cycles), along with apatinib (250 mg qd, 2 months). Patients will receive liver resection after neoadjuvant therapy unless the disease is assessed as progressive. The primary outcome is recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 1 year. The planned sample size of 60 patients will be calculated to permit the accumulation of sufficient RFS events in 1 year to achieve 80% power for the RFS primary endpoint.
    CONCLUSIONS: Synergistic effects provided by multimodality therapy of locoregional treatment, TKI, and anti-programmed cell death 1 inhibitor significantly improved overall survival for patients with unresectable HCC. Our trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of the triple combination of TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib as a neoadjuvant strategy for huge, resectable HCC.
    BACKGROUND: www.chitr.org.cn ChiCTR2300078086. Registered on November 28, 2023. Start recruitment: 1st January 2024. Expected completion of recruitment: 15th June 2025.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:阿帕替尼联合免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)和经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的证据有限。这项研究旨在比较阿帕替尼联合ICIs和TACE与阿帕替尼联合TACE在这些患者中的疗效和安全性。
    方法:本研究回顾性纳入了90例接受阿帕替尼联合TACE治疗的晚期HCC患者(A-TACE组,n=52)或阿帕替尼+ICIs和TACE(IA-TACE组,n=38)。
    结果:与A-TACE组相比,IA-TACE组的客观缓解率在数值上较高,无统计学意义(57.9%vs.36.5%,P=0.055)。组间疾病控制率无差异(86.8%vs.76.9%,P=0.248)。与A-TACE组相比,IA-TACE组的无进展生存期(PFS)提高(P=0.018)。IA-TACE组的中位PFS(95%置信区间)为12.5(8.7-16.3)个月,A-TACE组为8.5(5.6-11.4)个月。与A-TACE组相比,IA-TACE组的总生存期(OS)也延长(P=0.007)。IA-TACE组的中位OS(95%置信区间)为21.1(15.8-26.4)个月,A-TACE组为14.3(11.5-17.1)个月。通过多元Cox回归模型,IA-TACE与延长的PFS(风险比=0.539,P=0.038)和OS(风险比=0.447,P=0.025)独立相关。大多数不良事件在组间没有差异。与A-TACE组相比,IA-TACE组只有反应性皮肤毛细血管内皮增生的发生率更高(10.5%vs.0.0%,P=0.029)。
    结论:阿帕替尼联合ICIs和TACE治疗晚期肝癌可能是一种安全有效的治疗方法。但需要进一步的大规模研究进行验证。
    OBJECTIVE: The evidence of apatinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is limited. This study aimed to compare the treatment efficacy and safety of apatinib plus ICIs and TACE with apatinib plus TACE in these patients.
    METHODS: This study retrospectively enrolled 90 patients with advanced HCC treated with apatinib plus TACE (A-TACE group, n = 52) or apatinib plus ICIs and TACE (IA-TACE group, n = 38).
    RESULTS: The objective response rate was numerically higher in IA-TACE group compared with A-TACE group without statistical significance (57.9% vs. 36.5%, P = 0.055). Disease control rate was not different between groups (86.8% vs. 76.9%, P = 0.248). Progression-free survival (PFS) was improved in IA-TACE group compared with A-TACE group (P = 0.018). The median PFS (95% confidence interval) was 12.5 (8.7-16.3) months in IA-TACE group and 8.5 (5.6-11.4) months in A-TACE group. Overall survival (OS) was also prolonged in IA-TACE group compared with A-TACE group (P = 0.007). The median OS (95% confidence interval) was 21.1 (15.8-26.4) months in IA-TACE group and 14.3 (11.5-17.1) months in A-TACE group. By multivariate Cox regression model, IA-TACE was independently associated with prolonged PFS (hazard ratio = 0.539, P = 0.038) and OS (hazard ratio = 0.447, P = 0.025). Most adverse events were not different between groups. Only the incidence of reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation was higher in IA-TACE group compared with A-TACE group (10.5% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.029).
    CONCLUSIONS: Apatinib plus ICIs and TACE may be an effective and safe treatment for patients with advanced HCC, but further large-scale studies are needed for verification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号