The last few years have seen a rise in the identification and development of bio-therapeutics through the use of cutting-edge delivery methods or bio-formulations, which has created bio-analytical difficulties. Every year, new bio-pharmaceutical product innovations come out, but the analytical development of these products is challenging. Quantifying the products and components of conjugated molecular structures is essential for preclinical and clinical research in order to guide therapeutic development, given their intrinsic complexity. Furthermore, a significant amount of information is needed for the measurement of these unique modalities by LC-MS techniques. Numerous LC-MS based methods have been developed, including AEX-HPLC-MS, RP-IP-LCMS, HILIC-MS, LCHRMS, Microflow-LC-MS, ASMS, Hybrid LBA/LC-MS, and more. However, these methods continue to face problems, prompting the development of alternative approaches. Therefore, developing bio-molecules that are this complicated and, low in concentration requires a skilled LC-MS based approach and knowledgeable personnel. This review covers general novel modalities classifications, sample preparation techniques, current status and bio-analytical strategies for analyzing various novel modalities, including gene bio-therapeutics, oligonucleotides, antibody-drug conjugates, monoclonal antibodies and PROTACs. It also covers how these strategies have been used in the past and how they are being used now to address challenges in the development of LC-MS based methods, as well as improvement strategies, current advancements and recent developed methods. We additionally covered on the benefits and drawbacks of different LC-MS based techniques for the examination of bio-pharmaceutical products and the future perspectives.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which combine the precise targeting capabilities of antibodies with the powerful cytotoxicity of small-molecule drugs, have evolved into a promising approach for tumor treatment. However, the traditional covalent coupling method requires the design of a specific linker tailored to the properties of the small-molecule drugs, which greatly limits the development of ADCs and the range of drugs that can be used. Herein, a novel type of antibody-calixarene drug conjugates (ACDCs) that function similarly to ADCs by delivering drugs to their targets using antibodies but without the requirement of covalent conjugation of the drugs with antibodies is presented. By replacement of conventional linkers with supramolecular linkers, the ACDCs can load various chemotherapeutic drugs through host-guest interactions. Furthermore, ACDCs are readily reduced upon reaching the hypoxic microenvironment, resulting in rapid release of the drugs. With this precise drug encapsulation and controlled release mechanism, ACDCs deliver drugs to tumor tissues effectively and achieve a significantly enhanced antitumor effect. Considering that the ACDCs can be easily prepared by combining antibody-calixarene conjugates derived from tumor-targeting antibodies with various small-molecule drugs, ACDCs may provide a promising platform technology to accelerate ADC development and thus improve the therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapy.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) consist of monoclonal antibodies that target tumor cells and cytotoxic drugs linked through linkers. By leveraging antibodies\' targeting properties, ADCs deliver cytotoxic drugs into tumor cells via endocytosis after identifying the tumor antigen. This precise method aims to kill tumor cells selectively while minimizing harm to normal cells, offering safe and effective therapeutic benefits. Recent years have seen significant progress in antitumor treatment with ADC development, providing patients with new and potent treatment options. With over 300 ADCs explored for various tumor indications and some already approved for clinical use, challenges such as resistance due to factors like antigen expression, ADC processing, and payload have emerged. This review aims to outline the history of ADC development, their structure, mechanism of action, recent composition advancements, target selection, completed and ongoing clinical trials, resistance mechanisms, and intervention strategies. Additionally, it will delve into the potential of ADCs with novel markers, linkers, payloads, and innovative action mechanisms to enhance cancer treatment options. The evolution of ADCs has also led to the emergence of combination therapy as a new therapeutic approach to improve drug efficacy.

Current therapies targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), are limited by drug resistance and systemic toxicities. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are one of the most rapidly expanding classes of anti-cancer therapeutics with 13 presently approved by the FDA. Importantly, ADCs represent a promising therapeutic option with the potential to overcome traditional HER-targeted therapy resistance by delivering highly potent cytotoxins specifically to HER-overexpressing cancer cells and exerting both mAb- and payload-mediated antitumor efficacy. The clinical utility of HER-targeted ADCs is exemplified by the immense success of HER2-targeted ADCs including trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan. Still, strategies to improve upon existing HER2-targeted ADCs as well as the development of ADCs against other HER family members, particularly EGFR and HER3, are of great interest. To date, no HER4-targeting ADCs have been reported. In this review, we extensively detail clinical-stage EGFR-, HER2-, and HER3-targeting monospecific ADCs as well as novel clinical and pre-clinical bispecific ADCs (bsADCs) directed against this receptor family. We close by discussing nascent trends in the development of HER-targeting ADCs, including novel ADC payloads and HER ligand-targeted ADCs.

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a clinically challenging subtype due to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options post-neoadjuvant failure. Historically, capecitabine has been the cornerstone of adjuvant therapy for TNBC patients not achieving a pathological complete response (pCR). However, the integration of new modalities such as immunotherapy and PARP inhibitors has prompted a re-evaluation of traditional post-neoadjuvant approaches.
METHODS: This review synthesizes data from pivotal clinical trials and meta-analyses to evaluate the efficacy of emerging therapies in the post-neoadjuvant setting. We focus on the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), PARP inhibitors (PARPis), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) alongside or in place of capecitabine in TNBC treatment paradigms.
RESULTS: The addition of ICIs like pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant regimens has shown increased pCR rates and improved event-free survival, posing new questions about optimal post-neoadjuvant therapies. Similarly, PARPis have demonstrated efficacy in BRCA-mutated TNBC populations, with significant improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Emerging studies on ADCs further complicate the adjuvant landscape, offering potentially efficacious alternatives to capecitabine, especially in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: The challenge remains to integrate these new treatments into clinical practice effectively, considering factors such as drug resistance, patient-specific characteristics, and socio-economic barriers. This review discusses the implications of these therapies and suggests a future direction focused on personalized medicine approaches in TNBC.
CONCLUSIONS: As the treatment landscape for TNBC evolves, the role of capecitabine is being critically examined. While it remains a viable option for certain patient groups, the introduction of ICIs, PARPis, and ADCs offers promising alternatives that could redefine adjuvant therapy standards. Ongoing and future trials will be pivotal in determining the optimal therapeutic strategies for TNBC patients with residual disease post-neoadjuvant therapy.

Platinum-based chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma for decades, based on its proven efficacy and well-characterized safety profile. Although enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab showed superior efficacy versus platinum-based chemotherapy in the EV-302 phase 3 trial, common and potentially cumulative toxicities associated with EV plus pembrolizumab may make this combination less suitable for some patients, such as those with pre-existing neuropathy, hyperglycemia, or hepatic impairment, or patients likely to have favorable outcomes with platinum-based chemotherapy. The availability of EV plus pembrolizumab in various countries may also be limited by financial considerations. Thus, platinum-based chemotherapy is likely to remain a valuable option for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Eligibility for cisplatin- or carboplatin-based regimens can be determined by assessing renal function, performance status, and specific comorbidities. In cisplatin-eligible and -ineligible patients without disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy, avelumab first-line maintenance is standard of care based on findings from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial, which showed that avelumab first-line maintenance plus best supportive care prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival compared with best supportive care alone across clinically relevant subgroups. Adverse events associated with avelumab were generally consistent with those observed with other immune checkpoint inhibitors, and long-term follow-up showed no new safety concerns with prolonged treatment. Efficacy benefits and safety profiles were similar in patients who received avelumab first-line maintenance after cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. The effectiveness and safety of avelumab first-line maintenance have been confirmed in several real-world studies. Overall, these data support the use of avelumab first-line maintenance for all platinum-treated patients without disease progression. In this podcast, we discuss the evolving role of platinum-based chemotherapy in this disease setting in the context of EV-302 trial results and describe practical considerations in patients receiving first-line cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance therapy.

Antineoplastic therapy is one of the main research themes of this century. Modern approaches have been implemented to target and heighten the effect of cytostatic drugs on tumors and diminish their general/unspecific toxicity. In this context, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a promising and successful strategy. The aim of this review was to assess different aspects regarding ADCs. They were presented from a chemical and a pharmacological perspective and aspects like structure, conjugation and development particularities alongside effects, clinical trials, safety issues and perspectives and challenges for future use of these drugs were discussed. Representative examples include but are not limited to the following main structural components of ADCs: monoclonal antibodies (trastuzumab, brentuximab), linkers (pH-sensitive, reduction-sensitive, peptide-based, phosphate-based, and others), and payloads (doxorubicin, emtansine, ravtansine, calicheamicin). Regarding pharmacotherapy success, the high effectiveness expectation associated with ADC treatment is supported by the large number of ongoing clinical trials. Major aspects such as development strategies are first discussed, advantages and disadvantages, safety and efficacy, offering a retrospective insight on the subject. The second part of the review is prospective, focusing on various plans to overcome the previously identified difficulties.

UNASSIGNED: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a revolutionary approach in the systemic treatment for both solid and hematologic tumors. Constituted by an antibody, a cytotoxic payload, and a linker, ADCs aim to selectively deliver cytotoxic agents to tumors while sparing normal tissues. Various ADCs have been tested and approved for multiple solid tumors so far, but if there is one that had a major impact on clinical practice, this is Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd). Notably, T-DXd was approved for HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC), HER2-positive gastric cancer (GC), HER2-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and HER2 3+ solid tumors. Moreover, it received Breakthrough Therapy Designation for HER2-positive colorectal cancer (CRC).
UNASSIGNED: We review preclinical and clinical data of T-DXd, focusing on early-phase ongoing trials exploring combination therapies to enhance the activity of T-DXd in HER2-expressing solid tumors.
UNASSIGNED: The clinical use of T-DXd still raises questions about selection of patients, treatment duration, prioritization over other approved ADCs, and management of resistance. Concerns regarding the toxicity of T-DXd remain, particularly with combinations involving potentially toxic drugs. Advancements in biomarker identification and combination therapies offer promising avenues to enhance efficacy and overcome resistance to T-DXd, ultimately improving outcomes for patients with cancer.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a crucial component of targeted therapies in gastric cancer, potentially altering traditional treatment paradigms. Many ADCs have entered rigorous clinical trials based on biological theories and preclinical experiments. Modality trials have also been conducted in combination with monoclonal antibody therapies, chemotherapies, immunotherapies, and other treatments to enhance the efficacy of drug coordination effects. However, ADCs exhibit limitations in treating gastric cancer, including resistance triggered by their structure or other factors. Ongoing intensive researches and preclinical experiments are yielding improvements, while enhancements in drug development processes and concomitant diagnostics during the therapeutic period actively boost ADC efficacy. The optimal treatment strategy for gastric cancer patients is continually evolving. This review summarizes the clinical progress of ADCs in treating gastric cancer, analyzes the mechanisms of ADC combination therapies, discusses resistance patterns, and offers a promising outlook for future applications in ADC drug development and companion diagnostics.

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), oncogenic variants present in <5% of cases are considered rare, the predominant of which include human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) mutations, mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) alterations, c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) rearrangements, rearrangement during transfection (RET) fusions, v-raf mouse sarcoma virus oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) mutations, and neurotrophic troponin receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions. Brain metastases (BMs) occur in approximately 10%-50% of patients with NSCLC harboring rare genetic variants. The recent advent of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors and macromolecular antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has conferred marked survival benefits to patients with NSCLC harboring rare driver alterations. Despite effective brain lesion control for most targeted agents and promising reports of intracranial remission associated with novel ADCs, BM continues to be a major therapeutic challenge. This review discusses the recent advances in the treatment of NSCLC with rare genetic variants and BM, with a particular focus on intracranial efficacy, and explores future perspectives on how best to treat these patients.