Edoxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant available in Europe but not in France. Given the high tourist traffic in France, understanding the pharmacology of edoxaban and the availability of its laboratory testing seemed crucial in emergency situations. The aim of this work was to describe the methodology for measuring the anti-Xa activity of edoxaban, highlighting pre-analytical and analytical aspects, along with essential clinico-biological data for therapeutic guidance. The analysis was performed using the chromogenic method on the STAR-Max analyzer, with the STA®-Liquid ANTI-Xa kit (Diagnostica Stago®). Anti-Xa Edoxaban level measurement has a detection limit of 15 ng/mL, a quantification limit of 20 ng/mL and a linearity limit of 400 ng/mL. Repeatability, intermediate precision, accuracy, and measurement uncertainty studies were conducted to assess method performance, meeting quality requirements. The comparison between two STAR-Max® analyzers showed excellent results with linear regression and a low bias with good precision and no loss of dispersion regardless of edoxaban levels. In conclusion, although the measurement of edoxaban level may be rarely necessary in clinical practice, its implementation is straightforward. The availability of edoxaban in neighboring countries, underscores the importance of having its measurement available in hospital laboratories.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of anti-Xa-guided management versus aPTT-guided management of intravenous (IV) unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with a durable ventricular assist device (VAD).
METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at a single academic medical center. Patients were included if they had a durable VAD and were managed using aPTT-guided UFH management from May 2019 to May 2020 or were managed using anti-Xa-guided UFH management from May 2021 to December 2021. The primary outcome of the study was the median time to goal anticoagulation post-initiation of UFH. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of time within the therapeutic range and the incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding complications.
RESULTS: The study included 23 patients, 12 of whom were managed using anti-Xa-guided UFH, and 11 were managed using aPTT-guided UFH. The treatment arm using anti-Xa-guided UFH demonstrated a faster time to therapeutic anticoagulation goal range with a median time of 21.3 h [IQR = 12.2-34.8] compared to 37.3 h [IQR = 41-74] in the aPTT-guided UFH treatment arm (P = 0.03). In addition, the anti-Xa-guided UFH arm had a higher percentage of time within the therapeutic range, 76 % [IQR = 64.25-96.25] compared to 53 % [IQR = 41-74] in the aPTT-guided UFH arm (P = 0.04). Both arms had no significant differences in major bleeding events (P = 0.59) or clinically relevant minor bleeding events (P = 0.60) among patients. There was no incidence of thromboembolic events in either treatment arm.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this single-center experience, anti-Xa-guided UFH management resulted in a faster time to therapeutic anticoagulation and a longer time within the desired therapeutic range. The results suggest that anti-Xa-guided monitoring may be superior to UFH-guided monitoring in patients with a durable VAD.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have significant advantages over vitamin K antagonists including lack of need for routine laboratory monitoring. However, assessment of DOAC effect and concentration may be important to guide clinical management including need for DOAC reversal, particularly in acute or emergent situations. In this manuscript, the authors describe tests to screen for DOAC presence and tests that have demonstrated equivalence to gold standard testing for quantifying DOAC exposure. They also discuss the effect of DOACs on other coagulation assays and strategies for monitoring unfractionated heparin in patients with concomitant DOAC exposure.

UNASSIGNED: Anti-Xa serves as a clinical surrogate for assessing the efficacy and bleeding risk in patients treated with enoxaparin for thromboembolic events. Evidence from the literature and empirical observations suggest that patients are underdosed in clinical practice to avoid bleeding complications. This study aimed to investigate such underdosing of enoxaparin and its potential impact on achieving therapeutic anti-Xa levels.
UNASSIGNED: This multicentric, retrospective, observational study included patients with acute ischemic stroke due to atrial fibrillation. All patients received enoxaparin in the therapeutic setting with subsequent anti-Xa measurements. The one-sample, one-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to identify a significant difference between the doses administered and the recommended daily dose. Logistic regression model analysis was performed to identify additional predictors affecting achievement of the therapeutic anti-Xa target range. Stepwise forward-backward selection with Akaike\'s information criterion as metric was applied to refine the logistic regression model.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 145 patients from the university hospitals of St. Pölten and Tulln in Lower Austria were included. The median daily enoxaparin dose administered was 1.23 mg/kg, resulting in an overall target range achievement rate of 66%. As compared to recommended therapeutic doses, significant underdosing of enoxaparin was evident in both participating centers (p < 0.001). The calculated threshold dose to achieve the therapeutic target range with a 90% probability was 1.5 mg/kg enoxaparin daily. Female sex was found to be a strong independent predictor of achieving a therapeutic target range (OR 9.44; 95% CI 3.40-30.05, p < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: Despite the underdosing observed in both centers, therapeutic anti-Xa levels were achieved with lower than recommended doses of enoxaparin, and women required even lower doses than men. These findings warrant further confirmation by prospective studies.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to anlayse the relationship between anti-Xa activity below range and thomboembolic events.
METHODS: Single center prospective observational longitudinal cohort study (February-November 2021).
METHODS: Patients admitted to the ICU of a University Hospital.
METHODS: Patients with severe COVID-19 pneumoniae.
METHODS: Enoxaparin was used for prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation. Enoxaparin dosing and dose adjustment were based on anti-Xa activity according to the hospital protocol.
METHODS: Target: thomboembolic events.
METHODS: demographics, pharmacotherapy, anti-Xa measurements, clinical data, and laboratory results. Logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for thomboembolic events.
RESULTS: Data were available for 896 serum anti-Xa measurements from 228 subjects. Overall, 71.9% were male, with a median age of 62. Most patients needed invasive mechanical ventilation (87.7%) and mortality was 24.1%. A total of 28.9% new thomboembolic events were diagnosed. There were 27.1% anti-Xa measesurements below range. When multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed anti-Xa activity below range (RR, 4.2; p = 0.000), C-reactive protein (25 mg/L increase) (RR, 1.14; p = 0.005) and D-dimer (1000 ng/L increase) (RR, 1.06; p = 0.002) were the independent factors related to new thomboembolic events in patients with severe COVID-19.
CONCLUSIONS: Anti-Xa activity below range, C-reactive protein and D-dimer were the independent factors related to thomboembolic events in patients with severe COVID-19. Purposely designed clinical trials should be carried out to confirm the benefit of an anti-Xa monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of inflammation on anticoagulation monitoring for patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).
METHODS: Prospective single-center cohort study.
METHODS: University-affiliated tertiary care academic medical center.
METHODS: Adult venovenous and venoarterial ECMO patients anticoagulated with heparin/ MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: C-Reactive protein (CRP) was used as a surrogate for overall inflammation. The relationship between CRP and the partial thromboplastin time (PTT, seconds) was evaluated using a CRP-insensitive PTT assay (PTT-CRP) in addition to measurement using a routine PTT assay. Data from 30 patients anticoagulated with heparin over 371 ECMO days was included. CRP levels (mg/dL) were significantly elevated (median, 17.2; interquartile range [IQR], 9.2-26.1) and 93% of patients had a CRP of ≥5. The median PTT (median 58.9; IQR, 46.9-73.3) was prolonged by 11.3 seconds compared with simultaneously measured PTT-CRP (median, 47.6; IQR, 40.1-55.5; p < 0.001). The difference between PTT and PTT-CRP generally increased with CRP elevation from 2.7 for a CRP of <5.0 to 13.0 for a CRP between 5 and 10, 17.7 for a CRP between 10 and 15, and 15.1 for a CRP of >15 (p < 0.001). In a subgroup of patients, heparin was transitioned to argatroban, and a similar effect was observed (median PTT, 62.1 seconds [IQR, 53.0-78.5 seconds] vs median PTT-CRP, 47.6 seconds [IQR, 41.3-57.7 seconds]; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Elevations in CRP are common during ECMO and can falsely prolong PTT measured by commonly used assays. The discrepancy due to CRP-interference is important clinically given narrow PTT targets and may contribute to hematological complications.

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin is administered in patients undergoing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Anticoagulation monitoring is recommended, with an anti-activated factor X (anti-Xa) targeting 0.3 to 0.7 IU/mL. Owing to heparin\'s heterogeneous pharmacokinetic properties, anti-Xa is unpredictable, generating a challenge in anticoagulation practices. The aim of this study was to build a pharmacokinetic model of heparin accounting for potential confounders, and derive an optimized dosing regimen for a given anti-Xa target.
METHODS: Adult patients undergoing VA-ECMO were included between January 2020 and June 2021. Anticoagulation was managed with an initial 100 IU/kg heparin loading dose followed by a continuous infusion targeting 0.2 to 0.7 IU/mL anti-Xa. The data were split into model development and model validation cohorts. Statistical analysis was performed using a nonlinear mixed effects modeling population approach. Model-based simulations were performed to develop an optimized dosing regimen targeting the desired anti-Xa.
RESULTS: A total of 74 patients were included, with 1703 anti-Xa observations. A single-compartment model best fitted the data. Interpatient variability for distribution volume was best explained by body weight, C-reactive protein and ECMO indication (post-cardiotomy shock or medical cardiogenic shock), and interpatient variability for elimination clearance was best explained by serum creatinine and C-reactive protein. Simulations using the optimized regimen according to these covariates showed accurate anti-Xa target attainment.
CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients on VA-ECMO, heparin\'s effect increased with serum creatinine and medical indication, whereas it decreased with body weight and systemic inflammation. We propose an optimized dosing regimen accounting for key covariates, capable of accurately predicting a given anti-Xa target.

OBJECTIVE: The initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) triggers complex coagulation processes necessitating systemic anticoagulation. Therefore, anticoagulation monitoring is crucial to avoid adverse events such as thrombosis and hemorrhage. The main aim of this work was to analyze the association between anti-Xa levels and thrombosis occurrence during ECMO support.
METHODS: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis (Scopus and PubMed, up to July 29, 2023).
METHODS: All retrospective and prospective studies.
METHODS: Patients receiving ECMO support.
METHODS: Anticoagulation monitoring during ECMO support.
RESULTS: A total of 16 articles with 1,968 patients were included in the review and 7 studies in the meta-analysis (n = 374). Patients with thrombosis had significantly lower mean anti-Xa values (standardized mean difference -0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.62 to -0.11, p < 0.01). Furthermore, a positive correlation was observed between unfractionated heparin infusion and anti-Xa levels (pooled estimate of correlation coefficients 0.31, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.43, p < 0.001). The most common adverse events were major bleeding (42%) and any kind of hemorrhage (36%), followed by thromboembolic events (30%) and circuit or oxygenator membrane thrombosis (19%). More than half of the patients did not survive to discharge (52%).
CONCLUSIONS: This work revealed significantly lower levels of anti-Xa in patients experiencing thromboembolic events and a positive correlation between anti-Xa and unfractionated heparin infusion. Considering the contemplative limitations of conventional monitoring tools, further research on the role of anti-Xa is warranted. New trials should be encouraged to confirm these findings and determine the most suitable monitoring strategy for patients receiving ECMO support.

UNASSIGNED: Unfractionated heparin is a widely used anticoagulant in critically ill patients. It has a well-established safety profile and remains an attractive option for clinicians due to its short half-life and reversibility. Heparin has a unique pharmacokinetic profile, which contributes to significant inter-patient and intra-patient variability in effect. The variability in anticoagulant effect combined with heparin\'s short half-life mean close monitoring is required for clinical efficacy and preventing adverse effects. To optimize heparin use in critically ill patients, effective monitoring assays and dose adjustment strategies are needed.
UNASSIGNED: This paper explores the use of heparin as an anticoagulant and optimal approaches to monitoring in critically ill patients.
UNASSIGNED: Conventional monitoring assays for heparin dosing have significant limitations. Emerging data appear to favor using anti-Xa assay monitoring for heparin anticoagulation, which many centers have successfully adopted as the standard. The anti-Xa assay appears have important benefits relative to the aPTT for heparin monitoring in critically ill patients, and should be considered for broader use.

Apixaban is a direct oral Xa inhibitor and is indicated for the treatment of venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) and prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, a generic (ZyQuis, Zydus Lifesciences Limited, India) has received Food and Drug Administration approval. While bioequivalence has been demonstrated with Eliquis (Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, UK), it is necessary to monitor its effectiveness prior to acceptance in medical practice. This prospective study independently evaluated Apixaban (ZyQuis) at two accredited laboratories. Participants were converted from Warfarin or Rivaroxaban to Apixaban 5 mg bd for a duration of one month. Peak anti-Xa levels were measured 3-4 h post the morning dose. The samples were processed on the Atellica COAG 360 (Siemens Healthineers, Marburg, Germany) analyzers with a chromogenic anti-Xa assay (Innovance, reference interval 69-321 ng/mL). There were 26 participants; 5 men, 21 women; mean ± standard deviation age of 46 ± 12 years. Indications for anticoagulation included: VTE (88.5%) and AF (11.5%). 69.2% of the participants had at least one comorbidity. 96.2% of the anti-Xa levels were within the laboratory\'s 95% reference interval. Mean anti-Xa activity was 191 ± 69 ng/mL and 186 ± 68 ng/mL measured at respective laboratories. Mean differences in anti-Xa measurements represented by Bland-Altman statistics were small (bias of -2.6%, 95% confidence interval -1.11 to -4.09) and a strong correlation was observed on Deming regression analysis (0.995). Apixaban (ZyQuis) was effective for the management of VTE and AF as evidenced by anti-Xa activity.