Multiple clinical trials for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) prevention have been completed. Here, we set out to report on the lessons learnt from these studies. Researchers who conducted RA prevention trials shared the background, rationale, approach and outcomes and evaluated the lessons learnt to inform the next generation of RA prevention trials. Individuals at risk of RA can be identified through population screening, referrals to musculoskeletal programmes and by recognition of arthralgia suspicious for RA. Clinical trials in individuals at risk for future clinical RA have demonstrated that limited courses of corticosteroids, atorvastatin and hydroxychloroquine do not alter incidence rates of clinical RA; however, rituximab delays clinical RA onset, and methotrexate has transient effects in individuals who are anticitrullinated protein antibody-positive with subclinical joint inflammation identified by imaging. Abatacept delays clinical RA onset but does not fully prevent onset of RA after treatment cessation. Additionally, subclinical joint inflammation and symptoms appear responsive to interventions such as methotrexate and abatacept. To advance prevention, next steps include building networks of individuals at risk for RA, to improve risk stratification for future RA and to understand the biological mechanisms of RA development, including potential endotypes of disease, which can be targeted for prevention, thus adopting a more precision-based approach. Future trials should focus on interceptions aimed at preventing clinical RA onset and which treat existing symptoms and imaging-defined subclinical inflammation. These trials may include advanced designs (eg, adaptive) and should be combined with mechanistic studies to further define pathophysiological drivers of disease development.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) manifests through various symptoms and systemic manifestations. Diagnosis involves serological markers like rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA). Past studies have shown the added value of likelihood ratios (LRs) in result interpretation. LRs can be combined with pretest probability to estimate posttest probability for RA. There is a lack of information on pretest probability. This study aimed to estimate pretest probabilities for RA.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 133 consecutive RA patients and 651 consecutive disease controls presenting at a rheumatology outpatient clinic. Disease characteristics, risk factors associated with RA and laboratory parameters were documented for calculating pretest probabilities and LRs.
RESULTS: Joint involvement, erosions, morning stiffness, and positive CRP, ESR tests significantly correlated with RA. Based on these factors, probabilities for RA were estimated. Besides, LRs for RA were established for RF and ACPA and combinations thereof. LRs increased with antibody levels and were highest for double high positivity. Posttest probabilities were estimated based on pretest probability and LR.
CONCLUSIONS: By utilizing pretest probabilities for RA and LRs for RF and ACPA, posttest probabilities were estimated. Such approach enhances diagnostic accuracy, offering laboratory professionals and clinicians insights in the value of serological testing during the diagnostic process.

The complement (C) system is implicated in the etiopathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there is a lack of studies characterizing all three C pathways in RA patients. This study aimed to evaluate the association between an in-depth examination of the C system and RA patient characteristics, focusing on disease activity and the presence of rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies (ACPA). In a cohort of 430 RA patients, functional assays of the three C pathways (classical, alternative, and lectin) and serum levels of their components were assessed. Components included C1q (classical); factor D and properdin (alternative); lectin (lectin); C1-inhibitor; C2, C4, and C4b (classical and lectin); C3, C3a, and C4b (common); and C5, C5a, and C9 (terminal). A multivariable linear regression analysis showed significant positive correlations between C-reactive protein and C system proteins and functional assays, especially in the terminal and common pathways. Disease activity, measured by scores with or without acute phase reactants, positively correlated with the classical pathway functional test and terminal pathway products. Conversely, rheumatoid factor or ACPA presence was associated with lower classical pathway values and decreased C3a and C4b levels, suggesting complement depletion. In conclusion, RA disease activity increases C molecules and functional complement assays, while rheumatoid factor or ACPA positivity is linked to C consumption. Our study offers a detailed analysis of the complement system\'s role in RA, potentially guiding the development of more targeted and effective treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Helicobacter pylori infection has been reported to aggravate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the relevant mechanism remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the underlying pathogenic mechanism of H. pylori infection in the progression of RA.
METHODS: The Disease Activity Score (DAS-28) and serum anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) levels were compared between H. pylori-negative and H. pylori-positive patients with RA. MH7A cells were stimulated with polyclonal ACPA purified from the peripheral blood of patients with RA. The citrullination levels were assessed by western blot in GES-1 cells and sera. ChIP, luciferase reporter assays, mass spectrometry and ELISA were applied to explore the molecular mechanism of H. pylori infection in RA progression.
RESULTS: The DAS-28 and ACPA levels of patients with RA in the H. pylori-positive group were significantly higher than those in the H. pylori-negative group. Polyclonal ACPA derived from H. pylori-positive patients promoted cell proliferation and induced secretion of IL-6 and IL-8. For the first time, we found that H. pylori infection induces cellular protein citrullination by upregulating protein arginine deiminase type 4 (PAD4). Furthermore, we confirmed a direct functional binding of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α on the PADI4 gene promoter. We demonstrated that PAD4 interacts with and citrullinates keratin 1 (K1), and serum and synovial fluid levels of anti-Cit-K1 antibody were markedly increased in H. pylori-infected patients with RA.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal a novel mechanism by which H. pylori infection contributes to RA progression. Therapeutic interventions targeting H. pylori may be a viable strategy for the management of RA.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and shared epitope (SE) allele-related genetic markers associate with treatment response to abatacept, certolizumab pegol or tocilizumab versus active conventional treatment (ACT).
METHODS: Patients with treatment-naïve early rheumatoid arthritis were randomised in the NORD-STAR trial to ACT, certolizumab pegol, abatacept or tocilizumab, all with methotrexate. Centralised laboratory analyses for ACPA, RF and SE were performed. Clinical Disease Activity Index remission was analysed longitudinally with logistic generalised estimating equations. Differences in treatment effect across RF, ACPA and SE subgroups were assessed with interaction terms at 24 and 48 weeks, adjusted for sex, country, age, body mass index, Disease Activity Score of 28 joints based on C-reactive protein and smoking.
RESULTS: In total, 778 patients were included. At 24 weeks, abatacept treatment showed a better response than ACT in the RF and/or ACPA-positive subgroups, but this effect was not significantly different from the negative subgroups. By 48 weeks, abatacept treatment showed better response regardless of RF/ACPA status. No differences were found across RF, ACPA, SE allele, valine at amino acid position 11 or valine-arginine-alanine haplotype subgroups for any biological treatment at 48 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this randomised controlled trial, abatacept treatment was associated with a better response than ACT in the RF and/or ACPA-positive subgroup at 24 weeks, but this was no longer seen at 48 weeks; adding SE allele-related genetic markers did not strengthen the association. Moreover, ACPA, RF and SE allele-related genotypes were not, alone or in combination, associated with clinical responses of importance sufficiently strongly to warrant implementation in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: EudraCT 2011-004720-35; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01491815.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Gut-residing bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, can acetylate their proteome under conditions of amine starvation. It is postulated that the (gut) microbiome is involved in the breach of immune tolerance to modified self-proteins leading to the anti-modified protein antibodies (AMPAs), hallmarking seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our aim was to determine whether acetylated bacterial proteins can induce AMPA responses cross-reactive to modified self-proteins and be recognised by human AMPA (hAMPA).
METHODS: E. coli bacteria were grown under amine starvation to generate endogenously acetylated bacterial proteins. Furthermore, E. coli proteins were acetylated chemically. Recognition of these proteins by hAMPA was analysed by western blotting and ELISA; recognition by B cells carrying a modified protein-reactive B cell receptor (BCR) was analysed by pSyk (Syk phosphorylation) activation assay. C57BL/6 mice were immunised with (modified) bacterial protein fractions, and sera were analysed by ELISA.
RESULTS: Chemically modified bacterial protein fractions contained high levels of acetylated proteins and were readily recognised by hAMPA and able to activate B cells carrying modified protein-reactive BCRs. Likely due to substantially lower levels of acetylation, endogenously acetylated protein fractions were not recognised by hAMPA or hAMPA-expressing B cells. Immunising mice with chemically modified protein fractions induced a strong cross-reactive AMPA response, targeting various modified antigens including citrullinated proteins.
CONCLUSIONS: Acetylated bacterial proteins are recognisable by hAMPA and are capable of inducing cross-reactive AMPA in mice. These observations provide the first conceptual evidence for a novel mechanism involving the (endogenous) acetylation of the bacterial proteome, allowing a breach of tolerance to modified proteins and the formation of cross-reactive AMPA.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Early diagnosis and treatment-start is key for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the economic effect of an early versus a later diagnosis has never been investigated. We aimed to investigate whether early diagnosis of RA is associated with lower treatment-related costs compared with later diagnosis.
METHODS: Patients with RA consecutively included in the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic between 2011 and 2017 were studied (n=431). Symptom duration was defined as the time between symptom onset and first presentation at the outpatient clinic; early treatment start was defined as symptom duration <12 weeks. Information on disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug use per patient over 5 years was obtained from prescription data from patient records. Prices were used from 2022 and 2012 (proxy of time of prescription) to study the impact of changes in drug costs. Autoantibody-positive and autoantibody-negative RA were studied separately because differences in disease severity may influence costs.
RESULTS: Within autoantibody-negative RA, costs were 316% higher in the late compared with the early group (β=4.16 (95% CI 1.57 to 11.1); €4856 vs €1159). When using 2012 prices, results were similar. For autoantibody-positive RA, costs were 19% higher in the late group (€9418 vs €7934, β=1.19, 0.57 to 2.47). This effect was present but smaller when using 2012 prices. Within patients with autoantibody-positive RA using biologicals, late treatment start was associated with 46% higher costs (β=1.46 (0.91 to 2.33)); higher costs were also seen when using 2012 prices.
CONCLUSIONS: When RA is detected within 12 weeks after symptom onset, treatment-related costs were lower in both autoantibody-negative and autoantibody-positive RA. This study is the first to report how early diagnosis and treatment start impact treatment-related costs.

The aim of the study was to investigate the features of the clinical picture of the disease in patients with ACPA-negative and ACPA-positive variants of rheumatoid arthritis.
METHODS: : The study included patients with a reliable diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) according to the criteria of ACR/EULAR 2010. Depending on the ACPA values, two groups of patients were recruited: ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative, comparable in gender, age, duration of the disease, and therapy. The nature of the onset and course of the disease and the activity of RA were evaluated (according to the DAS28, SDAI, CDAI indices).
CONCLUSIONS: : The study involved 79 patients with ACPA-negative variant of RA and 79 ACPA-positive patients. The age of patients (Me [IR] (in years)) with the ACPA(-) variant was 52 [39; 62]; with the ACPA(+) variant, 54 [42; 62]; the duration of the disease (in months) was 59 [23; 122] and 48 [17; 84], respectively. In ACPA(+) patients, a higher disease activity was determined (by the indices DAS 28crp, DAS28esr, SDAI, CDAI), higher values of C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and a greater number of painful and swollen joints (p < 0.05). According to the localization of the involved joints, arthritis of the proximal interphalangeal, metacarpal, wrist and shoulder joints was more often determined in ACPA(+) patients. Systemic manifestations of RA at the time of examination and in the anamnesis were statistically significantly more common in ACPA(+) (32.9%) than in ACPA(-) (17.7%) patients. Of the systemic manifestations, rheumatoid nodules were more common in ACPA(+) patients, whereas a tendency to a higher frequency of neuropathy, sclerites, and episcleritis was revealed in ACPA(-) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: . In patients with ACPA(-) subtype, clinical signs of joint damage and the inflammatory component are less pronounced compared to ACPA(+). However, the mixed picture of manifestation, the less \"bright\" course of the disease, the absence of characteristic immunological biomarkers necessitate long-term and careful monitoring of this group of patients. At the same time, the subjective severity of the disease and dysfunction due to ankylosing joints do not differ from the ACPA(+) variant of RA.