UNASSIGNED: A plain pelvic radiograph is usually conducted with the lower limbs in internal rotation. This is to correct the anteversion of the femur. However, in the fracture neck of the femur, internal rotation of the fractured limb is avoided, because it would be painful. We examined the effect of correction of anteversion or otherwise on the diameter of the head of the femur using imaging.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to determine if there was a significant difference between the femoral head diameter at two different positions, at the normal anatomical position (without correcting the anteversion) and at the corrected anteversion position. It also aimed to document the correlation and the statistical significance between the differences in the size of the diameter at these two different positions with the anteversion angles of the femoral bone.
UNASSIGNED: Two sets of digital photographs of the proximal part of 55 non-sexed, non-paired femoral bones were taken. Images obtained were at two positions: normal anatomical (with anteversion uncorrected) and anteversion corrected positions. The diameters of the head of the femur were documented at these two different positions. The anteversion angles and actual femoral head (AFH) diameters were also measured and documented.
UNASSIGNED: The femoral head diameters at anatomical positions were persistently larger than those measured after the anteversion was corrected, except in three femoral bones (5%) where no differences were observed. The difference in the two measurements was statistically significant to the anteversion angle of the femoral bone. (P = 0.0005). The means of the two sets of measurements were statistically different from each other. Pairwise correlation showed that both were strongly associated with the AFH diameter but the measurements from images with corrected anteversion had a higher value (0.8166) than the measurements from normal anatomical position (0.7526).
UNASSIGNED: The correction of femoral anteversion produced femoral head size measurements that were closer to AFH diameters compared to those without the correction of the femoral anteversion. Femoral anteversion should always be corrected as per protocol.

Background and Objectives: The safe zone in total hip replacement was introduced many years ago. Its aim was to provide guidelines for orthopedic surgeons in order to avoid complications such as instability. With the growing interest in spinopelvic alignment, some new insights suggest that the safe zone is an obsolete concept. This study aims to show that, even outside the safe zone, the effect of total hip replacement can be satisfactory. This could be used as preliminary study for an analysis of a larger group. Materials and Methods: Fifty-nine consecutive patients with end-stage osteoarthritis treated by total hip replacement were enrolled into the study and divided into two groups: inside the safe zone and outside the safe zone. A physical examination during postoperative visits was performed; the range of movement was measured using a goniometer; and the HHS and VAS were taken to measure functional outcomes and pain, respectively. An analysis of the radiological outcomes was performed. Results: There was no significant difference in regard to changes in total offset, pain, HHS and other complications. There were no signs of instability among patients during the follow-up. Conclusions: The results of this study show that the \"safe zone\" is a more complicated term that was previously thought. A proper soft tissue balance and spinopelvic alignment could be factors that change the \"safe zone\" for each patient and make it more individual.

BACKGROUND: Femoral derotation osteotomy is treatment of choice in intoeing gait secondary to cerebral palsy (CP).
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to critically appraise the literature regarding the long-term outcomes of femoral derotation surgery in CP.
METHODS: Electronic databases of PubMed and Scopus was used for the literature review by two researchers independently (SB, SC). The study population included patients of cerebral palsy undergoing femoral derotation surgery. The keywords used were \"cerebral palsy\", \"intoeing gait\", \"femur anteversion\", \"hip anteversion\", \"femur derotation\" and \"femur osteotomy\".
RESULTS: Nine studies which included 657 limbs in 407 patients were selected for this study of which eight were retrospective in nature. The improvement in hip rotation at stance at last follow up (more than five years) maintained a statistical significance (SMD 1.67 95 %CI 1.12-2.22). Similar statistically significant outcomes were noted for foot progression angle (SMD 1.19 95 %CI 0.92-1.47), anteversion (SMD 2.75 95 %CI 1.49-4.01) and total passive internal rotation (SMD 1.71 95 %CI 1.19-2.22).
CONCLUSIONS: Femoral derotation surgery is the procedure of choice for correction of intoeing gait in CP. Even though, there is deterioration of results on long-term as compared to short term, majority of the patients shall maintain overall correction without recurrence of an intoeing gait. Future studies with uniform criteria for defining recurrence on the basis of functional limitations shall provide better idea about the natural course of this procedure.

UNASSIGNED: The transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) can be a useful and reproducible landmark in the orientation of the acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Its role in guiding cup orientation when aiming to implant in a functional anteversion orientation is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the TAL and the planned acetabular cup anteversion when implanted in a function orientation.
UNASSIGNED: In a retrospective study the anteversion of the TAL in the contralateral un-replaced hip was measured in CT scans of patients undergoing THA and compared to the functional cup anteversion using the patient-specific spinopelvic parameters. Comparative measurements of the native acetabular version were made from the superior rim to the inferior rim and at 10 mm intervals between the 2, all in reference to the anterior pelvic plane.
UNASSIGNED: 96 hips were measured. The mean TAL anteversion angle was 17.2° ± 4.5°. The mean planned acetabular cup anteversion angle was 26.3° ± 4.7°. Pearson\'s correlation coefficient of this measurement with the TAL was -0.03 (p = 0.769). There was a significant difference between the planned acetabular cup anteversion and the measurement of the TAL (p < 0.0001).
UNASSIGNED: If cups are implanted parallel to the TAL, almost 80% will be >5° different to targeted functional cup version. It should be aimed to implant cups with more anteversion than the TAL indicates.

UNASSIGNED: Femoral neck anteversion has traditionally been measured by the angle between the distal femur posterior condylar axis (PCA) and a line drawn through the center of the femoral head and neck. While less common, the transepicondylar axis (TEA) has also been used to reference femoral neck anteversion. The purpose of this study was to compare femoral neck version of the PCA vs the TEA using computerized tomography (CT).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 1507 femoral CTs were included. Precise bony landmarks were established: lateral epicondyle, medial epicondyle, posteromedial condyle, posterolateral condyle, center of the femoral neck, and center of the femoral head. Femoral version was calculated between the head and neck axis and either the PCA or TEA. Differences between sex and ethnicity were evaluated.
UNASSIGNED: The mean femoral anteversion was 12.7° ± 9.1° based on the PCA and 11.5° ± 7.9° based on the TEA (mean difference 1.2° ± 1.9°, P < .001). Males were less anteverted than females (9.8° ± 7.6° vs 13.5° ± 7.8°, P < .001). African Americans had less anteversion than other groups (8.1° ± 9.2° vs 11.5° ± 7.8°, P = .04), while Asians were more anteverted than other groups (12.1° ± 9.0° vs 11.2° ± 7.3°, P = .04). These values were referenced on the TEA.
UNASSIGNED: In this series of over 1500 femoral CT scans, the mean difference between anteversion measurements referencing the PCA and TEA was 1.2°. Native femoral version varied widely between gender and ethnic groups. Extreme femoral version, defined as <0° or >30°, was present in 11.8% of patients referencing the PCA.

BACKGROUND: To explore if digital protractor could guide the anteversion of acetabular cup during primary THA and make it consistent with preoperative.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 172 cases of primary THA with direct anterior approach (DAA) over 2 years. The anteversion of acetabular cup were measured from computed tomography (CT) scan preoperative and de-identified plain radiographs postoperative by two blinded investigators who were not involved in the surgery. The effect of the digital protractor on the anteversion was determined using regression analysis.
RESULTS: The mean anteversion for the THAs in digital protractor group was 15.5°and 21.4°in control group (P < 0.01). The mean anteversion bias for the THAs in digital protractor group was 1.59° and 6.63° in control group (P < 0.01).Regression analysis identified a 10.7% difference in anteversion due to the use of digital protractor (P < 0.01), and THAs performed without digital protractor were six times more likely to result in anteversion of > 25°. The correlation coefficient for the interobserver reliability of the measurement of the two investigators was 0.94.
CONCLUSIONS: The digital protractor is a practical tool in the DAA for THA to determine the anteversion of the acetabular prosthesis.

UNASSIGNED: The degree of expected rotational remodeling in femoral shaft fractures is poorly understood, partly because of the difficulty in accurately measuring rotational alignment radiographically before and after treatment. This study aimed to assess the degree of rotational remodeling in the short-term following post-traumatic fracture shaft of the femur with > 10° rotational malunion in children under 15 years.
UNASSIGNED: We carried out an observational study with a prospective follow-up on 18 children aged < 15 years with isolated, unilateral, oblique, or spiral, closed femur shaft fracture treated with closed reduction and immobilization with hip spica or internal fixation with elastic stable intramedullary nails or minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis. Only those with an initial axial malalignment measured on postoperative reduction radiographs of more than 10° by Ozel et al. technique were included. We evaluated the residual rotational malunion outcome using the ultrasound technique of Terjesen et al. by assessing the difference in femoral torsion as a guide to rotational malunion. The difference between the initial malreduction and the torsional difference between the hips at follow-up was deemed the extent of rotational change or remodeling.
UNASSIGNED: The mean axial malalignment was 21.6° (10°-32°). The mean rotational remodeling was 13.6° (range 7°-21°), with an SD of 3.9. This study shows that a significant amount of rotational remodeling occurs in children up to 14 years of age within 2 years of injury. It is higher in younger patients (r = 0.786; p < 0.001), and the extent of remodeling is proportional to the magnitude of the initial deformity (r = 0.81, p < 0.001).

BACKGROUND: A postoperative radiograph in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is usually obtained to evaluate the inclination and anteversion of the acetabular components. However, there is no gold-standard method for calculating the exact inclination and anteversion of the acetabular components on post-THA radiographs. We aimed to measure the actual anteversion of the acetabular component on postoperative radiographs by obtaining correlation data between the virtual and actual acetabular component positioning using virtual three-dimensional (3D) surgery.
METHODS: A total of 64 hip scans of 32 patients who underwent lower-extremity computed tomography (CT) were retrospectively reviewed. We reconstructed 3D models of the 64 hips using customized computer software (Mimics). Furthermore, to identify the safe zone of acetabular component position in THA, we performed virtual 3D surgery simulations for five anteversion (-10°, 0°, 10°, 20°, and 30°) and five inclination (20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, and 60°) types. We analyzed the acetabular anatomy using 3D models to measure the radiographic, anatomical, and operative anteversion (RA, AA, OA) and inclination (RI, AI, OI) angles. Additionally, we used the Woo-Morrey (WM) method to calculate the anteversion angle in the reconstructed cross-table lateral (CL) radiographs and determined the correlation between these measurements.
RESULTS: The safe zone of the acetabular component was visualized on post-THA CL radiographs using the WM method of anteversion measurement based on the different anteversions and inclinations of the acetabular component. The AA, RA, OA, OI, and WM differed significantly between males and females (p value < 0.05). As the anatomical inclination or anteversion increased, the WM anteversion measurements also increased. The radiographic anteversion measurement best matched the WM method of measurement, followed by anatomical and operative methods.
CONCLUSIONS: The actual anteversion of the acetabular component after THA can be measured on CL radiographs with the WM method using a 3D virtual program, with good reproducibility.

UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to investigate the femoral, acetabular, and combined anteversion of the hip joint in South Koreans using computed tomography (CT).
UNASSIGNED: We measured anteversion using CT venograms taken from 2016 to 2020. Of the total 1,073 patients, 952 patients were included in the study except for those with pelvic fractures, previous femoral fractures, childhood hip joint disease, osteoarthritis, or hip dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle, < 20), foreigners, and hip and knee replacement patients. Measurements were taken twice by two orthopedic surgeons.
UNASSIGNED: The femoral anteversion in women was 10.64° ± 10.26° (≤ 49 years), 15.75° ± 9.40° (50-59 years), 10.81° ± 9.14° (60-69 years), 12.38° ± 8.55° (70-79 years), and 11.23° ± 8.44° (≥ 80 years). The femoral anteversion in men was 12.02° ± 11.38° (≤ 49 years), 10.62° ± 9.11° (50-59 years), 6.09° ± 9.95° (60-69 years), 6.57° ± 9.51° (70-79 years), and 5.53° ± 9.29° (≥ 80 years). The acetabular anteversion in women was 17.65° ± 6.58° (≤ 49 years), 19.24° ± 6.42° (50-59 years), 20.30° ± 6.25° (60-69 years), 22.38° ± 7.36° (70-79 years), and 23.34° ± 6.98° (≥ 80 years). The acetabular anteversion in men was 15.21° ± 8.14° (≤ 49 years), 17.68° ± 6.00° (50-59 years), 17.54° ± 5.93° (60-69 years), 18.68° ± 6.62° (70-79 years), and 18.19° ± 6.94° (≥ 80 years). The combined anteversion in women was 28.29° ± 14.30° (≤ 49 years), 34.99° ± 10.62° (50-59 years), 31.11° ± 11.52° (60-69 years), 34.76° ± 10.86° (70-79 years), and 34.57° ± 11.45° (≥ 80 years). The combined anteversion in men was 27.23° ± 15.11° (≤ 49 years), 28.30° ± 11.23° (50-59 years), 23.63° ± 11.77° (60-69 years), 25.25° ± 12.02° (70-79 years), and 23.72° ± 11.88° (≥ 80 years).
UNASSIGNED: Femoral anteversion tended to decrease with age in men and acetabular anteversion tended to increase in both men and women. Combined anteversion showed a tendency to increase slightly in women.

The anteversion of the stem is occasionally intentionally changed by the surgeon for patients with smaller femoral neck anteversion during total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the reproducibility of preoperative planning with increasing anteversion has been rarely assessed. The present study investigated it using two types of stems. This retrospective study included patients who underwent primary posterolateral THA using taper-wedge (TS group; 73 hips) and anatomical (AS group; 70 hips) stems. Characteristics of sex and age were matched in the two groups by propensity score matching. In both groups, the relationship between the preoperative three-dimensional planning and postoperative stem position, and the relationship between postoperative stem position and femoral neck anteversion (FNA) were evaluated. In the TS group, there were no significant differences in average stem anteversion (SA) between preoperative planning and postoperative placement (36.1° ± 7.0° and 36.6° ± 11.1°, respectively: p = 0.651). The absolute error of SA was 8.1° ± 6.4°. In the AS group, the postoperative SA was significantly smaller than the preoperative planning SA (22.7° ± 11.6° and 30.0° ± 9.3°, respectively: p < 0.001). The absolute error of SA was 9.0° ± 5.8°. The postoperative SA was significantly larger than the FNA in the TS group (36.6° ± 11.1° and 26.3° ± 10.9°, respectively: p < 0.001). However, no significant differences between the two were observed in the AS group (23.7° ± 10.1° and 22.7° ± 11.6°, respectively: p = 0.253). The preoperative planning of intentional increasing anteversion did not show high reproducibility with taper-wedge and anatomical stems. The anatomical stem was placed according to the femoral medullary canal regardless of preoperative planning with increased SA.