OBJECTIVE: To determine whether clinical screening tests can predict lower limb joint kinematics and kinetics outcomes eliciting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk in single-leg landings.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Laboratory research.
METHODS: Twenty-six professional male futsal athletes.
METHODS: Participants completed the Modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT), Lateral Step Down (LSD), Lunge, Hop tests, and isometric strength tests for clinical screening of lower extremity injury risk and performed single-leg landings to assess lower extremity 3D kinematics and kinetics outcomes.
RESULTS: mSEBT, LSD, and isometric strength were the more important tests when constructing the prediction models. The predictive power of clinical tests for screening injury risk significantly increases when combined with strength measurements (p = 0.005, f2 = 0.595). We discerned 11 biomechanical predictions, six explicitly related to the sagittal plane\'s biomechanics. Some predictions were leg-dependent, with muscle strength tests predominantly predicting biomechanical outcomes of the preferred leg.
CONCLUSIONS: Combining clinical screening tests with strength measures enhances ACL injury risk factors prediction during single-leg landings. Clustering at least two tests improves prediction accuracy, aiding injury prevention planning and decision-making.

Background Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are tools of increasing interest in the sports population. The purpose of this study was to perform the cross-cultural adaptation and reliability analysis of the 4 Domain Sports Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (4 DSP) into Spanish. Methods A six-stage cross-cultural adaptation protocol was executed to obtain the Spanish version of the 4 DSP (S-4DSP). Subsequently, the questionnaire was administered to a population of 108 postoperative athletes with ACL (Anterior Cruciate Ligament) injuries. The questionnaire was administered again after 30 days. Acceptability, floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency (Cronbach\'s alpha), and reproducibility (Intraclass Correlation) were evaluated. Results The S-4DSP was fully completed by 108 participants (mean age 34 ± 10.75, 26% women), achieving 100% acceptability. No floor effect was detected. The statistical analysis yielded a global Cronbach\'s alpha for the questionnaire of 0.65, and domain-specific alphas of 0.88, 0.72, 0.27, and 0.68 for the first, second, third, and fourth domains, respectively. The Intraclass Correlation test reached a maximum of 0.94 and a minimum of 0.48 for the first and fifth questions, respectively. Conclusions The S-4DSP is a reliable and useful tool for evaluating Spanish-speaking athletes after ACL reconstruction.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Fresh-frozen specimen availability and cost may be a barrier for initiation of biomechanical studies where soft tissue is used in a construct with other medical devices. The impact of soft tissue preservation method on the outcomes of biomechanical studies in the specific case of graft-suture constructs is relatively unexplored. This study aimed to observe peak loads and failure modes in biomechanical testing of fresh-frozen (FF) versus formalin embalmed (FE) quadriceps tendon (QT) graft-suture constructs for soft tissue fixation in ACLR and assess suitability of FE QT graft constructs for load-to-fail testing.
METHODS: Twenty QT grafts were harvested from human cadaver specimens. Ten grafts came from fresh-frozen donors and 10 from embalmed donors. All grafts were prepared with the modified Prusik knot using a braided composite suture and subjected to tensile loading. Comparisons between the biomechanical properties of the graft-suture constructs were made with unpaired t tests with α = 0.05.
RESULTS: FE and FF constructs displayed similar peak loads and failure modes. FF constructs had greater elongation after pre-tensioning than FE (7.3 vs. 5.5 mm, p = 0.02) and greater elongation after cyclic loading than FE constructs (17.5 vs. 10.5 mm, p = 0.01). Hysteresis was greater for FF constructs at the 50th, 100th, 150th, and 200th cycle (p = 0.02, p = 0.07, p < 0.001, p = 0.004, respectively). FE constructs were stiffer than fresh-frozen (103 vs. 84 N/mm, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: FE constructs were significantly stiffer but displayed similar peak load and failure mode to FF which was reflective of the strength of the suture material. FE grafts can offer an alternative to FF grafts in graft-suture constructs for biomechanical studies where load at failure and knot security and strength is of main interest.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is one of the most common orthopedic procedures, and huge variation exists in the surgical technique. Single bundle hamstrings autograft reconstruction is a common method and has good clinical outcomes. A criticism of the hamstrings autograft is a small graft diameter, often less than 8-mm, which has been associated with increased re-rupture rates. Several graft preparation techniques for single bundle hamstrings autograft exist. Perioperative decisions include the number of tendons utilized, number of graft strands, graft configuration, and femoral and tibial fixation methods. Awareness of the minimum tendon and graft length required to produce each graft variation is necessary to avoid common pitfalls. However, intraoperative graft modification is possible to maximize graft diameter, and obtain proper fixation. The objective of this current concepts review is to describe the indications, surgical anatomy, technique, intraoperative tips, clinical outcomes, and complications for single bundle hamstrings autograft preparation techniques in ACLR.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with excessive posterior tibial slope (PTS) may have higher risks of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACL-R) failure, and clinical outcomes after revision ACL-R procedures are typically poor.
OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the literature summarizing the clinical and radiological outcomes of the surgical treatment of ACL insufficiency in the setting of excessive PTS using a tibial deflexion osteotomy combined with ACL-R.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and OVID Medline databases from 1990 to present. Inclusion criteria were: studies of outcomes of isolated tibial deflexion osteotomies performed with primary or revision ACL-R in the English language. Data extracted included study demographic information, type of tibial deflexion osteotomy and concomitant procedures, radiological outcomes, patient reported outcome scores, and postoperative complications FINDINGS: Six studies, with 133 knees were identified. All included studies were retrospective case series, with a weighted mean follow-up of 3.39 years. In 106 of 133 (79.7%) knees, tibial deflexion osteotomy was performed concomitantly with an ACL-R, whereas in 27 of 133 (20.3%) knees the procedures were staged. 22, 45, and 66 of 133 knees (16.5%, 33.8%, and 49.6%) underwent primary, 1st revision, and 2nd or greater revision ACL-R, respectively. 3 of 133 (2.25%) knees demonstrated recurrent ACL graft failure at final follow-up. On average, PTS decreased from 15.2 degrees preoperatively to 7.1 degrees postoperatively. Mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner scores increased from 42.5, 46.4, and 4.2 preoperatively to 71.8, 89.0, and 6.7 postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review suggest that combined ACL-R and tibial deflexion osteotomy may be effective in decreasing PTS and improving knee function and stability.
METHODS: Systematic Review; Level of evidence 4.

BACKGROUND: Our study aims to assess the effectiveness of multicomponent supervised tele-rehabilitation compared to home-based self-rehabilitation management in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
METHODS: The current study is designed as a single-center, single-blinded, randomized controlled, two-arm trial. Participants will be randomized and allocated at a 1:1 ratio into either a multicomponent supervised tele-rehabilitation group or a home-based self-rehabilitation group. All participants receive uniform preoperative education through the HJT software. Participants in the intervention group undergo multicomponent supervised tele-rehabilitation, while those in the control group follow a home-based self-rehabilitation program. All the participants were assessed and measured for the included outcomes at the outpatient clinic before the procedure, and in 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks after ACLR by two assessors. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who achieve a satisfactory active ROM at the 12 weeks following the ACLR. The satisfactory active ROM was also collected at 2, 4, 8, and 24 weeks after ACLR. The secondary outcomes were active and passive range of motion (ROM), pain, muscle strength, and function results.
BACKGROUND: Ethical approval has been obtained from the West China Hospital Ethics Committee (approval number 2023-1929, December 2023). The trial has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT06232824, January 2024).

UNASSIGNED: Anterior cruciate ligament injury of the knee is common and leads to decreased activity and risk of secondary osteoarthritis of the knee. Management of patients with a non-acute anterior cruciate ligament injury can be non-surgical (rehabilitation) or surgical (reconstruction). However, insufficient evidence exists to guide treatment.
UNASSIGNED: To determine in patients with non-acute anterior cruciate ligament injury and symptoms of instability whether a strategy of surgical management (reconstruction) without prior rehabilitation was more clinically and cost-effective than non-surgical management (rehabilitation).
UNASSIGNED: A pragmatic, multicentre, superiority, randomised controlled trial with two-arm parallel groups and 1:1 allocation. Due to the nature of the interventions, no blinding could be carried out.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-nine NHS orthopaedic units in the United Kingdom.
UNASSIGNED: Participants with a symptomatic (instability) non-acute anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee.
UNASSIGNED: Patients in the surgical management arm underwent surgical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction as soon as possible and without any further rehabilitation. Patients in the rehabilitation arm attended physiotherapy sessions and only were listed for reconstructive surgery on continued instability following rehabilitation. Surgery following initial rehabilitation was an expected outcome for many patients and within protocol.
UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome was the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 4 at 18 months post randomisation. Secondary outcomes included return to sport/activity, intervention-related complications, patient satisfaction, expectations of activity, generic health quality of life, knee-specific quality of life and resource usage.
UNASSIGNED: Three hundred and sixteen participants were recruited between February 2017 and April 2020 with 156 randomised to surgical management and 160 to rehabilitation. Forty-one per cent (n = 65) of those allocated to rehabilitation underwent subsequent reconstruction within 18 months with 38% (n = 61) completing rehabilitation and not undergoing surgery. Seventy-two per cent (n = 113) of those allocated to surgery underwent reconstruction within 18 months. Follow-up at the primary outcome time point was 78% (n = 248; surgical, n = 128; rehabilitation, n = 120). Both groups improved over time. Adjusted mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 4 scores at 18 months had increased to 73.0 in the surgical arm and to 64.6 in the rehabilitation arm. The adjusted mean difference was 7.9 (95% confidence interval 2.5 to 13.2; p = 0.005) in favour of surgical management. The per-protocol analyses supported the intention-to-treat results, with all treatment effects favouring surgical management at a level reaching statistical significance. There was a significant difference in Tegner Activity Score at 18 months. Sixty-eight per cent (n = 65) of surgery patients did not reach their expected activity level compared to 73% (n = 63) in the rehabilitation arm. There were no differences between groups in surgical complications (n = 1 surgery, n = 2 rehab) or clinical events (n = 11 surgery, n = 12 rehab). Of surgery patients, 82.9% were satisfied compared to 68.1% of rehabilitation patients. Health economic analysis found that surgical management led to improved health-related quality of life compared to non-surgical management (0.052 quality-adjusted life-years, p = 0.177), but with higher NHS healthcare costs (£1107, p < 0.001). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the surgical management programme versus rehabilitation was £19,346 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Using £20,000-30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year thresholds, surgical management is cost-effective in the UK setting with a probability of being the most cost-effective option at 51% and 72%, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: Not all surgical patients underwent reconstruction, but this did not affect trial interpretation. The adherence to physiotherapy was patchy, but the trial was designed as pragmatic.
UNASSIGNED: Surgical management (reconstruction) for non-acute anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients was superior to non-surgical management (rehabilitation). Although physiotherapy can still provide benefit, later-presenting non-acute anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients benefit more from surgical reconstruction without delaying for a prior period of rehabilitation.
UNASSIGNED: Confirmatory studies and those to explore the influence of fidelity and compliance will be useful.
UNASSIGNED: This trial is registered as Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10110685; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02980367.
UNASSIGNED: This award was funded by the National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 14/140/63) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 27. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
The study aimed to find out whether it is better to offer surgical reconstruction or rehabilitation first to patients with a more long-standing injury of their anterior cruciate ligament in their knee. This injury causes physical giving way of the knee and/or sensations of it being wobbly (instability). The instability can affect daily activities, work, sport and can lead to arthritis. There are two main treatment options for this problem: non-surgical rehabilitation (prescribed exercises and advice from physiotherapists) or an operation by a surgeon to replace the damaged ligament (anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction). Although studies have highlighted the best option for a recently injured knee, the best management was not known for patients with a long-standing injury, perhaps occurring several months previously. Because the surgery is expensive to the NHS (around £100 million per year), it was also important to look at the costs involved. We carried out a study recruiting 316 non-acute anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients from 29 different hospitals and allocated each patient to either surgery or rehabilitation as their treatment option. We measured how well they did with special function and activity scores, patient satisfaction and costs of treatment. Patients in both groups improved substantially. It was expected that some patients in the rehabilitation group would want surgery if non-surgical management was unsuccessful. Forty-one per cent of patients who initially underwent rehabilitation subsequently elected to have reconstructive surgery. Overall, the patients allocated to the surgical reconstruction group had better results in terms of knee function and stability, activity level and satisfaction with treatment than patients allocated to the non-operative rehabilitation group. There were few problems or complications with either treatment option. Although the surgery was a more expensive treatment option, it was found to be cost-effective in the UK setting. The evidence can be discussed in shared decision-making with anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients. Both strategies of management led to improvement. Although a rehabilitation strategy can be beneficial, especially for recently injured patients, it is advised that later-presenting non-acute and more long-standing anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients undergo surgical reconstruction without necessarily delaying for a period of rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Up to 20% of patients remain unsatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), prompting the development of new implants. Bi-Cruciate Retaining (BCR) TKA preserves both the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), with the ACL beneficial for its proprioceptive qualities. The Bi-Cruciate Stabilised (BCS) TKA substitutes the ACL and PCL with a unique dual cam-post mechanism. Robotics improve accuracy and facilitate technically demanding TKA.
METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study recruited from two centres. Measured outcomes included kinematic analysis, proprioception, and functional outcomes.
RESULTS: There was a significantly larger maximum flexion angle and range of flexion to extension in sit-to-stand and stairs in BCR when compared to BCS. Further analysis revealed more similarities between BCR and normal native knees. Proprioception and functional scores did not have any statistical difference.
CONCLUSIONS: BCR TKA demonstrated better knee flexion in weight-bearing active range of motion and showed similarities with normal knee kinematics.

BACKGROUND:  Various benefits of needleless suture loop techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft preparation have been discussed, yet their impact on graft diameter remains unexplored. We hypothesized that the suture loop technique would reduce the graft diameter compared to the conventional locking suture technique.
METHODS:  Fifty-seven patients whose grafts were made with the Krackow stitch (group K) and 54 patients with the suture loop (group SL) were analyzed retrospectively. (1) The distal (sutured side) diameter of each anteromedial bundle and posterolateral bundle was compared to the proximal (non-sutured side) diameter, and (2) the average of the proximal and distal graft diameters in each group was calculated.
RESULTS:  In group K, 78.9% of anteromedial bundles and 40.3% of posterolateral bundles exhibited a larger distal diameter than the proximal, while in group SL, 42.6% of anteromedial bundles and 3.7% of posterolateral bundles showed a larger distal diameter. In both bundles, there were significantly fewer grafts with larger distal diameters in group SL (p < 0.001). The mean distal diameter of anteromedial bundles was smaller in group SL (6.33 ± 0.43 mm vs. 6.07 ± 0.43 mm, p < 0.005). Consequently, the distal cross-sectional area of anteromedial bundles in group SL was 8% smaller than that in group K.
CONCLUSIONS:  The use of the suture loop technique resulted in a significantly smaller distal diameter of the anteromedial bundle. This reduces the size of the tibial tunnel and may contribute to a reduction in potential damage to adjacent structures.