Angiotensin II receptor blockers

血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心血管疾病(CVDs)有很高的死亡率,尽管有几个可用的治疗靶点,抗高血压药物无反应仍然是一个常见问题.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)是推荐作为几种心血管疾病的一线治疗的重要药物。然而,对ACEI和ARB的反应在接受治疗的患者中有所不同。药物基因组学评估个体的遗传特征如何影响他们对药物治疗的可能反应。目前,大量研究表明,遗传多态性可能导致药物反应的变异性。此外,进一步评估抗高血压药物应答信号通路中基因-基因相互作用的研究可能有助于揭示抗高血压反应的潜在遗传预测因子.这篇综述总结了心血管疾病患者ACEI和ARBs的药物遗传学数据,并讨论了这些类型的抗高血压药在临床实践中的潜在药物遗传学。然而,需要在不同人群中进行复制研究。此外,评估在抗高血压药物反应中共享信号通路的基因-基因相互作用的研究可能有助于发现抗高血压反应的遗传预测因子.
    Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have a high mortality rate, and despite the several available therapeutic targets, non-response to antihypertensives remains a common problem. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are important classes of drugs recommended as first-line therapy for several CVDs. However, response to ACEIs and ARBs varies among treated patients. Pharmacogenomics assesses how an individual\'s genetic characteristics affect their likely response to drug therapy. Currently, numerous studies suggest that genetic polymorphisms may contribute to variability in drug response. Moreover, further studies evaluating gene-gene interactions within signaling pathways in response to antihypertensives might help to unravel potential genetic predictors for antihypertensive response. This review summarizes the pharmacogenetic data for ACEIs and ARBs in patients with CVD, and discusses the potential pharmacogenetics of these classes of antihypertensives in clinical practice. However, replication studies in different populations are needed. In addition, studies that evaluate gene-gene interactions that share signaling pathways in the response to antihypertensive drugs might facilitate the discovery of genetic predictors for antihypertensive response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在急性心肌梗死(MI)后无心力衰竭(HF)的患者中,血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)是否可以替代血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)仍存在争议。这项研究的目的是比较初始ARB和ACEI治疗无HF的MI患者的临床结果。
    方法:在2010年至2016年之间,共有31,013例患者在出院时接受了ARB或ACEI处方的MI冠状动脉血运重建术。排除在MI指数时患有HF的患者。主要结果是全因死亡。次要结果包括复发性MI,新心脏HF住院,斯托克,以及每个结果的综合。
    结果:在31,013名患者中,12,685例(40.9%)处方ARB,18,328例(59.1%)处方ACEI。与接受ACEI的患者相比,接受ARB的患者的停药率较低(28.2%对43.5%,调整后的风险比[HR]0.34,95%置信区间[CI]0.31-0.37,p<0.01)。在2.2年的中位随访期间,2,480名患者死亡。接受ARB和接受ACEI的患者的全因死亡发生率为27.7和22.9/1000人年,分别(调整后的HR1.04;95%CI,0.95-1.13;p=0.40)。接受ARB的患者和接受ACEI的患者之间的次要结局没有显着差异,除了中风(19.2vs.每1000人年13.6;调整后的HR1.17;95%CI1.04-1.32;p=0.01)。在亚组分析中,在糖尿病患者中,ARBs的死亡率高于ACEI.
    结论:在这个全国性的队列中,在无HF的MI患者中,ARB和ACEI作为出院药物的全因死亡发生率无显著差异.对于那些不耐受ACEI治疗的人,ARB将是ACEI的替代品。
    BACKGROUND: Whether angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) can be an alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in patients without heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between initial ARB and ACEI therapy in patients with MI without HF.
    METHODS: Between 2010 and 2016, a total of 31,013 patients who underwent coronary revascularization for MI with prescription of ARBs or ACEIs at hospital discharge were enrolled from the Korean nationwide medical insurance data. Patients who had HF at index MI were excluded. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The secondary outcomes included recurrent MI, hospitalization for new heart HF, stroke, and a composite of each outcome.
    RESULTS: Of 31,013 patients, ARBs were prescribed in 12,685 (40.9%) and ACEIs in 18,328 (59.1%). Patients receiving ARBs had a lower discontinuation rate compared with those receiving ACEIs (28.2% vs 43.5%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.37; P < .01). During a median follow-up of 2.2 years, 2480 patients died. The incidence rate of all-cause death in patients receiving ARBs and those receiving ACEIs was 27.7 and 22.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively (adjusted HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.95-1.13; P = .40). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes between patients receiving ARBs and those receiving ACEIs, except stroke (19.2 vs 13.6 per 1000 person-years; adjusted HR 1.17; 95% CI 1.04-1.32; P = .01). In a subgroup analysis, a higher mortality was observed with ARBs compared with ACEIs in patients with diabetes.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide cohort, there was no significant difference in the incidence of all-cause death between ARBs and ACEIs as discharge medications in patients with myocardial infarction without heart failure. Angiotensin II receptor blockers would be an alternative to ACEIs for those intolerant to ACEI therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已经评估了血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)治疗可以减缓肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者的疾病进展,但迄今为止证据很少.因此,我们的荟萃分析旨在探讨ARB治疗作为HCM患者潜在的疾病改善治疗的疗效.
    使用PubMed进行了文献检索,Scopus,WebofScience,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和Clinicaltrials.gov数据库从开始到12月13日,2021年。我们仅纳入随机对照试验(RCTs)。纳入研究的质量通过Cochrane协作工具进行评估。主要结果包括左心室质量减少和心肌功能障碍的其他超声心动图特征改善。次要结果是收缩压净降低。使用合并标准化平均差(SMD)和相应的95%置信区间(CI)进行荟萃分析。
    共筛选了1286篇文章。7项RCTs符合纳入标准,共397例HCM患者(195例患者为ARB组)。ARB治疗与左心室质量显著降低相关(SMD:-0.77;95%CI:-1.40,-0.03;p=0.04)。ARB治疗还与收缩压的显着降低相关(SMD:-0.33;95%CI:-0.61,-0.05:p=0.02)。
    ARB治疗可显著降低肥厚型心肌病患者的左心室质量和收缩压。我们建议对更大的患者人群进行进一步研究,以证实我们的荟萃分析的结果。
    OSF注册管理机构,DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/DAS7C。
    UNASSIGNED: Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) therapy has been evaluated to slow down the disease progression in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but there is scarce evidence available to date. Therefore, our meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of ARB therapy as a potential disease-modifying treatment in patients with HCM.
    UNASSIGNED: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane library, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases from inception to December 13th, 2021. We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The quality of included studies was assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration\'s tool. Primary outcomes included the reduction in left ventricular mass and improvement in other echocardiographic features of myocardial dysfunction. The secondary outcome was a net reduction in systolic blood pressure. Meta-analysis was performed using pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 1286 articles were screened. Seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria representing a total of 397 patients with HCM (195 patients were in the ARB group). ARB treatment was associated with significant reduction in left ventricular mass (SMD: -0.77; 95% CI: -1.40, -0.03; p = 0.04). ARB therapy was also associated with a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (SMD: -0.33; 95% CI: -0.61, -0.05: p = 0.02).
    UNASSIGNED: ARB therapy is associated with a marked reduction in left ventricular mass and systolic blood pressure in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. We recommend further studies with a larger patient population size to confirm the findings of our meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: OSF Registries, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DAS7C.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该数据集展示了使用基于计算片段和机器学习辅助的药物发现来生成用于治疗高血压的新的前导分子。具体来说,重点是针对肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)的药物,通常分为血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)。初步的数据集是一个特定的目标,从ChEMBL和DrugBank分子数据库获得的26个批准的ACEI和ARB分子的63个分子片段的用户生成的片段文库.该片段库提供了初级输入数据集,以生成数据集中呈现的新前导分子。筛选新产生的分子以检查它们是否满足口服药物的标准并且包含ACEI或ARB核心官能团标准。使用无监督机器学习,符合标准的分子根据其官能团分配分为药物类别簇.这个过程导致了三个最终的输出数据集,其中含有新的ACEI分子,另一个是新的ARB分子,最后一个是新的未分配的类分子。这些数据可以帮助及时有效地设计新型抗高血压药物。它也可以用于治疗抵抗患者的精准高血压药物,无反应或合并症。尽管该数据集特定于抗高血压药,该模型可以在最小的变化下重复使用,为其他健康状况产生新的铅分子。
    This dataset demonstrates the use of computational fragmentation-based and machine learning-aided drug discovery to generate new lead molecules for the treatment of hypertension. Specifically, the focus is on agents targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), commonly classified as Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs). The preliminary dataset was a target-specific, user-generated fragment library of 63 molecular fragments of the 26 approved ACEI and ARB molecules obtained from the ChEMBL and DrugBank molecular databases. This fragment library provided the primary input dataset to generate the new lead molecules presented in the dataset. The newly generated molecules were screened to check whether they met the criteria for oral drugs and comprised the ACEI or ARB core functional group criterion. Using unsupervised machine learning, the molecules that met the criterion were divided into clusters of drug classes based on their functional group allocation. This process led to three final output datasets, one containing the new ACEI molecules, another for the new ARB molecules, and the last for the new unassigned class molecules. This data can aid in the timely and efficient design of novel antihypertensive drugs. It can also be used in precision hypertension medicine for patients with treatment resistance, non-response or co-morbidities. Although this dataset is specific to antihypertensive agents, the model can be reused with minimal changes to produce new lead molecules for other health conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂的指导药物治疗提高了心力衰竭(HF)患者的生存率并降低了左心室射血分数(HFrEF)。然而,尚不清楚RAS抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂是否可用于老年HF患者.因此,本研究旨在探讨β受体阻滞剂和RAS抑制剂对老年HFrEF患者预后的影响.
    人口统计学,临床,和1,061例急性失代偿性HF患者的药理学数据,参加了急性失代偿性心力衰竭受试者的Kochi注册(KochiYOSACOI研究),进行分析以评估其对死亡率的影响。此外,机器学习方法被用来补充传统的统计模型进行分析.将HFrEF患者(n=314)分为2年内全因死亡率组(n=80)和幸存者组(n=234)。
    总的来说,41.1%(129/314)的患者年龄≥80岁,25.5%(80/314)的患者在2年内出现全因死亡。此外,57.6%(181/314)和79.0%(248/314)是RAS抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂,分别。我们的分析显示,RAS抑制剂的使用与降低所有年龄的HFrEF患者的全因死亡率和心脏死亡相关(P<0.001),β受体阻滞剂的使用与年龄有交互作用。机器学习显示,β受体阻滞剂的使用改变了死亡风险,门槛约为80岁。在年龄<80岁的HFrEF患者中,使用β受体阻滞剂与全因死亡率和心源性死亡较低相关(P<0.001),但在年龄≥80岁的患者中没有相关(分别为P=0.319和P=0.246)。这些结果表明,根据年龄,β受体阻滞剂在全因死亡率方面的益处可能有所不同。
    RAS抑制剂可预防所有年龄段的全因死亡率和心源性死亡,而β受体阻滞剂根据患者的年龄有不同的作用。这项研究表明,选择β受体阻滞剂和RAS抑制剂在患有HFrEF的老年患者中比在患有相同疾病的年轻患者中更为重要。
    UNASSIGNED: Guideline-directed medical therapy with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and beta-blockers has improved the survival of patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, it is unclear whether RAS inhibitors and beta-blockers can be administered to older patients with HF. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of beta-blockers and RAS inhibitors on the prognosis of older patients with HFrEF.
    UNASSIGNED: Demographic, clinical, and pharmacological data from 1,061 patients with acute decompensated HF, enrolled in the Kochi Registry of Subjects with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (Kochi YOSACOI study), were analyzed to assess their impact on mortality. Additionally, a machine learning approach was applied to complement the conventional statistical model for analysis. Patients with HFrEF (n = 314) were divided into the all-cause mortality within 2 years group (n = 80) and the survivor group (n = 234).
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, 41.1% (129/314) of the patients were aged ≥80, and 25.5% (80/314) experienced all-cause mortality within 2 years. Furthermore, 57.6% (181/314) and 79.0% (248/314) were prescribed RAS inhibitors and beta-blockers, respectively. Our analysis showed that RAS inhibitor use was associated with reduced all-cause mortality and cardiac death in patients with HFrEF of all ages (P < 0.001), and beta-blocker use had an interaction with age. Machine learning revealed that the use of beta-blockers altered the risk of mortality, with a threshold of approximately 80 years of age. Beta-blocker use was associated with lower all-cause mortality and cardiac death in patients with HFrEF aged <80 years (P < 0.001) but not in those aged ≥80 years (P = 0.319 and P = 0.246, respectively). These results suggest that beta blockers may differ in their all-cause mortality benefits according to age.
    UNASSIGNED: RAS inhibitors prevented all-cause mortality and cardiac death at all ages, whereas beta-blockers had different effects depending on the patient\'s age. This study suggested that the choice of beta-blockers and RAS inhibitors is more important in older patients with HFrEF than in younger patients with the same condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:当前和持续的挑战是降低腹主动脉腔内修复术(EVAR)后患者的死亡率。本研究旨在评估EVAR术后全因死亡率的预测因素。
    方法:有关人口统计特征的数据,合并症,实验室值,选定的解剖因素,EVAR治疗后,我们对2010年1月至2021年1月期间接受非破裂性腹主动脉瘤(AAA)择期EVAR治疗的患者的监测和并发症进行了评估.死亡率评估到2023年10月10日。在调整年龄后进行多变量分析,高血压,糖尿病,血脂异常,性别,吸烟,腰动脉的数量,肠系膜下动脉(IMA)通畅,IMA直径和再干预。
    结果:这项研究包括196名患者(183名男性和13名女性),平均年龄为72.4±7.67岁。在平均5.75±3.1年的随访期内,总死亡率为50.0%(N=98)。2-,5年和10年死亡率为9.7%,32.0%和66.6%,分别。再次干预患者的死亡率降低了59%(风险比[HR]:0.41;95%置信区间[CI]:0.23-0.73;p=.002),接受血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂或血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)治疗的患者的死亡率降低了59%(HR:0.41;95%CI:0.26-0.66;p<.001)。慢性抗凝与死亡率高2.09倍相关(HR:2.09;95%CI:1.19-3.67;p=.010),冠状动脉疾病(CAD)与死亡率高1.74倍相关(HR:1.74;95%CI:1.09-2.78;p=.021).前EVARAAA直径和后1年EVAR囊直径与死亡率呈正相关(分别为HR:1.05;95%CI:1.03-1.08;p<.001,和HR:1.05;95%CI:1.03-1.07;p<.001),也就是说,EVAR前和/或EVAR后1年AAA直径增加1mm与全因死亡风险增加5%相关.
    结论:再干预和使用ACE抑制剂或ARB治疗可能与EVAR后死亡率降低相关。更大的前EVAR,后EVARAAA直径,CAD和慢性抗凝治疗与EVAR后全因死亡率较高相关。
    OBJECTIVE: A current and ongoing challenge is to reduce patient mortality after endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR). This study aimed to assess the predictors of all-cause mortality after EVAR.
    METHODS: Data regarding the demographic characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory values, selected anatomical factors, post-EVAR treatment, surveillance and complications of patients who underwent elective EVAR for non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) between January 2010 and January 2021 were evaluated. Mortality was assessed until 10 October 2023. Multivariate analyses were performed after adjusting for age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, sex, smoking, number of lumbar arteries, patency of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), IMA diameter and reinterventions.
    RESULTS: This study included 196 patients (183 men and 13 women) with a mean age of 72.4 ± 7.67 years. The overall mortality rate during a mean follow-up period of 5.75 ± 3.1 years was 50.0% (N = 98). The 2-, 5- and 10-year mortality rates were 9.7%, 32.0% and 66.6%, respectively. The mortality rates decreased by 59% in patients with reinterventions (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.73; p = .002) and by 59% in patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) (HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.26-0.66; p < .001). Chronic anticoagulation was associated with 2.09-fold higher mortality (HR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.19-3.67; p = .010), and coronary artery disease (CAD) was associated with 1.74-fold higher mortality (HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.09-2.78; p = .021). Pre-EVAR AAA diameter and 1-year post-EVAR sac diameter were positively associated with mortality (HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.03-1.08; p < .001, and HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.03-1.07; p < .001, respectively), that is, an increase of pre-EVAR and/or 1-year post-EVAR AAA diameter by 1 mm was associated with a 5% higher risk of all-cause mortality.
    CONCLUSIONS: Reinterventions and treatment with ACE inhibitors or ARBs may be associated with decreased post-EVAR mortality. A greater pre-EVAR, a post-EVAR AAA diameter, CAD and chronic anticoagulation were associated with higher all-cause mortality post-EVAR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)是糖尿病肾病(DKD)的标准治疗方法之一。有些患者可能会自愿选择中草药(CHM)。然而,没有关于CHM的有效性和安全性的真实证据.我们旨在探讨CHM与ARB相比对DKD的有效性。从2007年至2016年,我们招募了732名DKD患者(72名仅使用CHM和661名使用ARB),所有患者均在台湾中国医科大学附属医院随访至2016年12月。对355名ARB用户和71名CHM用户进行了倾向性评分匹配后的分析。CHM使用者治疗后估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)为84.9±28.1ml/min/1.73m2,高于ARB使用者的(67.8±35.4ml/min/1.73m2)(p<0.001)。CHM使用者的eGFR变化为-6.0±21.4ml/min/1.73m2,ARB使用者的eGFR变化为-12.9±24.8ml/min/1.73m2(p=0.029)。服用CHM的患者的血尿素氮(BUN)和肌酐水平分别为22±16mg/dl和0.9±0.4mg/dl,分别,低于服用ARB的患者(30±28mg/dl和1.7±2.0mg/dl)(p=0.025和p=0.003)。使用线性回归与年龄调整,性别,BMI,基线eGFR,和HbA1c水平,我们发现,eGFR/基线eGFR的下降和尿白蛋白-肌酐比值(ACR)的变化在两组之间具有可比性(p=0.86和0.73).这项研究表明,CHM可能具有与ARB相当的有效性,这为进一步调查提供了见解。
    Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are one of the standard treatments for diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Some patients may opt for Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) of their own free will. However, there is no real-world evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of CHM. We aimed to explore the effectiveness of CHM for DKD in comparison to ARBs. We enrolled 732 DKD patients (72 used only CHM and 661 used ARBs) from 2007 to 2016, and all patients were followed until December 2016 at China Medical University Hospital in Taiwan. A total of 355 ARB users and 71 CHM users were analyzed after propensity score matching. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after treatment was 84.9 ± 28.1 ml/min/1.73 m2 in CHM users, which was higher than that (67.8 ± 35.4 ml/min/1.73 m2) in ARB users (p < 0.001). The change in the eGFR was -6.0 ± 21.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 in CHM users and -12.9 ± 24.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 in ARB users (p = 0.029). The blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine levels of patients taking CHM were 22 ± 16 mg/dl and 0.9 ± 0.4 mg/dl, respectively, and were lower than those (30 ± 28 mg/dl and 1.7 ± 2.0 mg/dl) of patients taking ARBs (p = 0.025 and p = 0.003). Using linear regression with adjustments for age, sex, BMI, baseline eGFR, and HbA1c levels, we found that the declines in the eGFR/baseline eGFR and changes in the urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.86 and 0.73). This study suggests that CHM may have comparable effectiveness to ARBs, which provides insights for further investigations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评价非心脏手术患者术前24h继续服用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂(ARB)对术后心肌损伤及血压的影响。
    方法:单中心,回顾性研究。
    方法:手术室和围手术期护理区。
    方法:从2012年1月至2022年6月,42,432例服用慢性ACEI/ARB的患者接受了非心脏手术。
    方法:在手术前24小时停药ACEI/ARB的患者(停药组,n=31,055)和在手术前24小时继续ACEI/ARB的人(继续组,n=11,377)。
    方法:主要结果是非心脏手术(MINS)术后7天内的心肌损伤。MINS定义为术后心肌肌钙蛋白测量值升高,高于参考上限的第99百分位数,具有上升/下降模式。围手术期血压和临床结果是次要结果。
    结果:在42,432名患者中,MINS发生在2848例(6.7%)中,是122例(0.3%)患者在30天内死亡的全部原因。持续组的MINS发生率显着高于保留组(847/11,377[7.4%]vs.2001/31,055[6.4%];OR[95%CI]1.17[1.07-1.27];P<0.001)。1:1倾向评分匹配后,每组11,373例患者。在匹配队列中,两组之间的MINS发生率仍然存在显着差异(7.4%vs.6.6%,OR[95%CI]1.14[1.03-1.26];P=0.015)。手术期间平均动脉压<65mmHg的时间平均体重在连续组中明显更高(平均0.11vs.0.09[95%CI的平均差异][0.01-0.03];P<0.001)。然而,其他临床结局和死亡率无显著差异.
    结论:术前停用ACEI/ARB可以降低术中低血压和术后心肌损伤的风险,但不影响非心脏手术患者的总体临床结局.
    To evaluate the effect of continuing of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) prescriptions 24 h before surgery on postoperative myocardial injury and blood pressure in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
    A single-center, retrospective study.
    Operating room and perioperative care area.
    42,432 patients who had been taking chronic ACEI/ARB underwent non-cardiac surgery from January 2012 to June 2022.
    Patients who discontinued ACEI/ARB 24 h before surgery (withheld group, n=31,055) and those who continued ACEI/ARB 24 h before surgery (continued group, n=11,377).
    Primary outcome was myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) within 7 days postoperatively. MINS was defined as an elevated postoperative cardiac troponin measurement above the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit with a rise/fall pattern. Perioperative blood pressure and clinical outcomes were secondary outcomes.
    Among 42,432 patients, MINS occurred in 2848 patients (6.7%) and was the all-cause of death within 30 days in 122 patients (0.3%). Incidence of MINS was significantly higher in the continued group than the withheld group (847/11,377 [7.4%] vs. 2001/31,055 [6.4%]; OR [95% CI] 1.17 [1.07-1.27]; P<0.001). After 1:1 propensity score matching, 11,373 patients were included in each group. There was still a significant difference for the occurrence of MINS between two groups in matched cohort (7.4% vs. 6.6%, OR [95% CI] 1.14 [1.03-1.26]; P=0.015). Time-average weight of mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg during surgery was significantly higher in the continued group (mean 0.11 vs. 0.09 [95% CI of mean difference] [0.01-0.03]; P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in other clinical outcomes and mortality.
    Withholding ACEI/ARB before surgery was associated with a reduced risk of intraoperative hypotension and postoperative myocardial injury, but it did not affect overall clinical outcomes in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi)在老年高血压和有骨折风险的患者中的治疗效果一直备受关注,因为越来越多的证据表明骨组织中的局部RAS激活导致破骨细胞吸收,导致骨质疏松症。本研究旨在调查大型队列中RASi使用与骨折发生率之间的关联。
    方法:我们采用嵌套病例对照设计来研究RASi使用与新出现的骨折之间的关联。病例定义为2004年1月至2015年12月期间新诊断为骨折的患者。我们使用1:1倾向评分匹配选择了1,049例病例和对照。进行条件logistic回归分析以估计RASi暴露与骨折发生率之间的关联。
    结果:总体而言,RASi的使用与较低的骨折发生率显着相关(曾经使用过的人与从未使用过的人:OR,0.73;95%CI,0.59-0.91)。我们发现,仅使用ARB的用户比从未使用RASi的用户经历更少的骨折(或,0.65;95%CI,0.49-0.86),而仅ACEi的用户或ARB/ACEi曾经的用户则没有。在亚组分析中,RASi-曾经没有脑血管疾病的使用者,BMI超过23且他汀类药物暴露者的OR显著较低.
    结论:本研究建立了使用RASi和减少骨折发生率之间的显著关联,因此突出了RASi作为有骨质疏松性骨折风险的老年患者的预防策略的潜在临床实用性。
    BACKGROUND: The therapeutic efficacy of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in elderly patients with hypertension and at risk of fractures has been in the limelight because of accumulating evidence that localized RAS activation in bone tissue leads to osteoclastic bone resorption, resulting in osteoporosis. This study set out to investigate the association between RASi use and fracture incidence in a large cohort.
    METHODS: We employed a nested case-control design to investigate the association between RASi use and newly developed fractures. A case was defined as a patient newly diagnosed with a fracture between January 2004 and December 2015. We selected 1,049 cases and controls using 1:1 propensity score matching. Conditional logistic regression analysis was conducted to estimate the association between RASi exposure and fracture incidence.
    RESULTS: Overall, RASi usage was significantly associated with lower odds for fracture incidence (ever-users vs never-users: OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.91). We found that ARB-only users experienced fewer fractures than RASi-never users (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.86), whereas ACEi-only users or ARB/ACEi-ever users did not. In subgroup analysis, RASi-ever users without cerebrovascular disease, those with a BMI exceeding 23, and statin exposure had significantly lower ORs.
    CONCLUSIONS: The present study established a significant association between RASi use and reduced fracture incidence, thus highlighting the potential clinical utility of RASi use as a preventive strategy in elderly patients at risk for osteoporotic fractures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    量子药理学引入理论模型来描述超高稀释产生生物效应的可能性,这可能有助于解释在高血压临床试验中观察到的安慰剂效应。为了在生理学中确定这一点并评估新型ARB,我们测试了已知的血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)(坎地沙坦和替米沙坦)用于治疗高血压和其他心血管疾病的能力,以及新型ARB(苯并咪唑-N-联苯四唑(ACC519T),苯并咪唑-双-N,N'-联苯四唑(ACC519T(2))和4-丁基-N,NO-双[[20-2Htetrazol-5-基)联苯-4-基]甲基)咪唑溴化物(BV6(K+)2),和nirmatrelvir(Paxlovid中的活性成分),以调节健康雄性新西兰白兔对各种血管加压药的反应中的血管收缩(血管紧张素A,血管紧张素II和去氧肾上腺素)。此外,确定了ACC519T和替米沙坦对清醒兔平均动脉压的血流动力学影响,同时还研究了BV6(K)2激活血管紧张素转换酶2(ACE2)的离体能力。我们表明,市售和新型ARB可以在超高稀释度下调节对不同血管加压药的收缩反应。ACC519T产生兔平均动脉压的剂量依赖性降低,而BV6(K+)2显著增加ACE2代谢。即使在超低浓度下,ARB抑制收缩反应的能力提供了量子药理学存在的证据。此外,ACC519T和BV6(K+)2调节血压和ACE2活性的能力,分别,表明他们对高血压的治疗潜力。
    Quantum pharmacology introduces theoretical models to describe the possibility of ultra-high dilutions to produce biological effects, which may help to explain the placebo effect observed in hypertensive clinical trials. To determine this within physiology and to evaluate novel ARBs, we tested the ability of known angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) (candesartan and telmisartan) used to treat hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases, as well as novel ARBs (benzimidazole-N-biphenyl tetrazole (ACC519T), benzimidazole-bis-N,N\'-biphenyl tetrazole (ACC519T(2)) and 4-butyl-N,N0-bis[[20-2Htetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl]methyl)imidazolium bromide (BV6(K+)2), and nirmatrelvir (the active ingredient in Paxlovid) to modulate vascular contraction in iliac rings from healthy male New Zealand White rabbits in responses to various vasopressors (angiotensin A, angiotensin II and phenylephrine). Additionally, the hemodynamic effect of ACC519T and telmisartan on mean arterial pressure in conscious rabbits was determined, while the ex vivo ability of BV6(K+)2 to activate angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) was also investigated. We show that commercially available and novel ARBs can modulate contraction responses at ultra-high dilutions to different vasopressors. ACC519T produced a dose-dependent reduction in rabbit mean arterial pressure while BV6(K+)2 significantly increased ACE2 metabolism. The ability of ARBs to inhibit contraction responses even at ultra-low concentrations provides evidence of the existence of quantum pharmacology. Furthermore, the ability of ACC519T and BV6(K+)2 to modulate blood pressure and ACE2 activity, respectively, indicates their therapeutic potential against hypertension.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号