Angioembolization

血管栓塞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术创伤是全世界儿童发病和死亡的重要原因。非手术治疗是血液动力学稳定的腹部实体器官钝性损伤患儿的护理标准。栓塞是一种潜在的途径,越来越多的证据表明成人创伤患者受益。然而,儿童的数据是有限的。材料与方法回顾性分析所有儿童(<18岁)的医院资料,向印度的三级护理创伤中心展示,患者有2021年1月至2023年6月的钝性外伤史.术前成像,血管造影和栓塞细节,输血次数,并评估住院时间。结果研究期间有腹部外伤史的216名儿童(平均年龄:11.65岁)。84名儿童呈快速阳性,离开谁,67例患者在计算机断层扫描上有腹部实体器官损伤。肝脏是最常见的损伤实体器官(n=45),其次是脾脏和肾脏。10名儿童腹部实体器官动脉损伤,其中8名儿童接受了栓塞治疗。栓塞组(n=8)平均住院时间为4天,相比之下,接受手术治疗的儿童为11天(n=2)。随访6个月时,所有儿童均无症状.结论对于适当选择的腹部损伤患儿,超选择性栓塞是一种安全可行的方法。
    Background  Trauma is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide among children. Nonoperative management is the standard of care in hemodynamically stable children with blunt abdominal solid organ injury. Embolization is a potential pathway, which has shown increasing evidence for benefit in adult trauma patients. However, the data in children is limited. Materials and Methods  A retrospective analysis of hospital data of all children (<18 years of age), presenting to a tertiary-care trauma center in India, with history of blunt trauma from January 2021 to June 2023, was performed. Preprocedural imaging, angiographic and embolization details, number of blood transfusions, and length of hospital stay were assessed. Results  Two hundred and sixteen children (average age: 11.65 years) presented with a history of abdominal trauma during the study period. Eighty four children were FAST positive, out of whom, 67 patients had abdominal solid organ injury on computed tomography. Liver was the most commonly injured solid organ ( n  = 45), followed by the spleen and kidney. Ten children had solid abdominal organ arterial injuries for which eight children underwent embolization. The average length of hospital stay in embolization group ( n  = 8) was 4 days, as compared to 11 days in children undergoing operative management ( n  = 2). At 6 months follow-up, all children were asymptomatic. Conclusion  Superselective embolization is a safe and feasible procedure in appropriately selected children with abdominal injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经修订的美国创伤外科协会(AAST)脾损伤器官损伤量表(OIS)纳入了放射学特征,但其含义尚不清楚。我们假设修订后的AAST-OIS会更好地预测结果。
    方法:回顾了2016年至2021年I级创伤中心收治的钝性脾损伤患者。灵敏度,特异性,使用两种模式计算高级别损伤(AAST-OISIV-V级)的脾切除术的阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV).
    结果:在分析的852例患者中,观察到48.5%,24.6%被栓塞,其余患者接受手术干预。AAST-OIS中位数从II增加到III(p<0.01)。敏感度(38.0%vs.73.7%)和净现值(80.9%与对于严重损伤,脾切除术的88.2%)增加,但特异性(93.5%vs70.1%)和PPV(67.5%vs46.7%)降低。
    结论:修正后的AAST-OIS能更好地预测脾挽救,但在预测脾切除需要时准确性较差。
    BACKGROUND: The revised American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) organ injury scale (OIS) for splenic injury incorporates radiologic features but the implications of this are unknown. We hypothesized that the revised AAST-OIS would better predict outcomes.
    METHODS: Patients with a blunt splenic injury admitted to a Level I trauma center were reviewed from 2016 to 2021. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for splenectomy were calculated for high-grade injuries (AAST-OIS grades IV-V) using both schemas.
    RESULTS: Of the 852 patients analyzed, 48.5% were observed, 24.6% were embolized, and the remaining underwent operative intervention. The median AAST-OIS increased from II to III (p ​< ​0.01). Sensitivity (38.0% vs. 73.7%) and NPV (80.9% vs. 88.2%) for splenectomy increased for high-grade injuries but specificity (93.5% vs 70.1%) and PPV (67.5% vs 46.7%) decreased.
    CONCLUSIONS: The revised AAST-OIS better predicted splenic salvage but is less accurate at predicting need for splenectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于高能量创伤的增加,伴有损伤的骨盆骨折(PF)呈上升趋势。与年龄相关的合并症的老年人口的增加进一步使管理复杂化。由于靠近骨盆骨,腹部器官损伤与PF有关。PF患者在计算机断层扫描中存在对比液(CB)被认为是活动性出血的迹象。然而,其临床意义和与结局的关联尚有争议.
    目的:分析多发性创伤伴PF患者,重点是老年人群,共同伤害和对比腮红的价值。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究包括1级创伤中心收治的558例PF患者(2017年01月至2023年01月)。分析变量包括:年龄,性别,损伤机制(MOI),损伤严重程度评分(ISS),格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS),缩写伤害量表(AIS),共同受伤,输血要求,盆腔血管造影,栓塞,剖腹手术,骨科骨盆手术,重症监护室和住院时间,出院处置和死亡率。这项研究比较了老年患者和非老年患者,有和没有CB和腹部共同损伤的患者。比较组实施倾向评分匹配。
    结果:PF占所有创伤入院的4%。89例患者有CB。286例(52%)患者合并受伤,其中93例(17%)腹部合并受伤。老年患者与非老年患者相比跌倒更多,因为MOI,下ISS和AIS骨盆,更高的GCS,腹部共同受伤较少,相似的CB和血管栓塞率,骨科骨盆手术较少,住院时间较短,死亡率较高。在倾向匹配之后,骨科骨盆手术率仍然较低(8%对19%,P<0.001),住院时间缩短,死亡率更高(13%对4%,老年患者的P<0.001)。在89例CB患者中,45例(51%)栓塞。在倾向匹配之后,与没有CB的患者相比,有CB的患者有更多的盆腔血管造影(71%vs12%,P<0.001),较高的栓塞率(64%vs22%,P=0.02)和相当的死亡率。
    结论:一半的PF患者有伴随的共同损伤,包括17%的腹部共同受伤。同样受伤的老年患者死亡率更高。一半的CB患者需要栓塞。
    BACKGROUND: Pelvic fractures (PF) with concomitant injuries are on the rise due to an increase of high-energy trauma. Increase of the elderly population with age related comorbidities further complicates the management. Abdominal organ injuries are kindred with PF due to the proximity to pelvic bones. Presence of contrast blush (CB) on computed tomography in patients with PF is considered a sign of active bleeding, however, its clinical significance and association with outcomes is debatable.
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze polytrauma patients with PF with a focus on the geriatric population, co-injuries and the value of contrast blush.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 558 patients with PF admitted to level 1 trauma center (01/2017-01/2023). Analyzed variables included: Age, sex, mechanism of injury (MOI), injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow coma scale (GCS), abbreviated injury scale (AIS), co-injuries, transfusion requirements, pelvic angiography, embolization, laparotomy, orthopedic pelvic surgery, intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, discharge disposition and mortality. The study compared geriatric and non-geriatric patients, patients with and without CB and abdominal co-injuries. Propensity score matching was implemented in comparison groups.
    RESULTS: PF comprised 4% of all trauma admissions. 89 patients had CB. 286 (52%) patients had concomitant injuries including 93 (17%) patients with abdominal co-injuries. Geriatric patients compared to non-geriatric had more falls as MOI, lower ISS and AIS pelvis, higher GCS, less abdominal co-injuries, similar CB and angio-embolization rates, less orthopedic pelvic surgeries, shorter lengths of stay and higher mortality. After propensity matching, orthopedic pelvic surgery rates remained lower (8% vs 19%, P < 0.001), hospital length of stay shorter, and mortality higher (13% vs 4%, P < 0.001) in geriatric patients. Out of 89 patients with CB, 45 (51%) were embolized. After propensity matching, patients with CB compared to without CB had more pelvic angiography (71% vs 12%, P < 0.001), higher embolization rates (64% vs 22%, P = 0.02) and comparable mortality.
    CONCLUSIONS: Half of the patients with PF had concomitant co-injuries, including abdominal co-injuries in 17%. Similarly injured geriatric patients had higher mortality. Half of the patients with CB required an embolization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    腹部穿刺是一种常用的床边手术。它作为一种治疗和诊断工具的各种条件。它被认为是一种安全的手术,并发症的风险较低。很少,医源性并发症,如腹膜炎,出血,可能发生肠穿孔。腹膜内出血很少见,通常是由于腹内静脉侧支血管或肠系膜静脉曲张出血所致。然而,腹膜内出血继发于腹壁动脉损伤,例如腹壁下动脉或回旋深动脉(DCIA),是非常罕见的。我们报道了一名64岁的失代偿性心力衰竭患者,由于严重的腹水而进行了穿刺。手术后24小时,他逐渐变得低血压和昏昏欲睡。在穿刺部位可见3cm×2cm的瘀斑。腹部紧急CT血管造影显示左侧大的腹膜内血肿,左侧DCIA有积极的造影剂外渗。我们对左DCIA进行了成功的血管栓塞。重要的是要注意,继发于DCIA损伤的腹膜内出血可能表现为隐匿性腹膜内出血。血管栓塞术是治疗不受控制的腹膜内出血的有用工具。建议穿刺部位在左下象限,髂前上棘(ASIS)上内侧2-4厘米。此病例报告强调了常见手术的罕见但可能致命的并发症。穿刺后不明原因低血压的患者需要高度怀疑腹膜内出血。即使没有明显的腹部体征。超声引导的使用将有助于降低严重并发症的风险并提高整体成功率。
    Abdominal paracentesis is a commonly performed bedside procedure. It serves as a therapeutic and diagnostic tool for a variety of conditions. It is regarded as a safe procedure with a low risk of complications. Rarely, iatrogenic complications such as peritonitis, haemorrhage, and bowel perforation may occur. Intraperitoneal haemorrhage is rare and usually occurs due to bleeding from the intraabdominal venous collateral vessels or mesenteric varices. However, intraperitoneal haemorrhage secondary to injury to the abdominal wall arteries, such as the inferior epigastric artery or deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA), is very uncommon.  We report on a 64-year-old man with decompensated cardiac failure who underwent paracentesis due to gross ascites. Twenty-four hours post-procedure, he became progressively hypotensive and lethargic. An ecchymosis measuring 3 cm × 2 cm was seen over the puncture site. An urgent CT angiography of the abdomen showed a large left-sided intraperitoneal haematoma with active contrast extravasation from the left DCIA. We performed a successful angioembolisation of the left DCIA. It is important to note that intraperitoneal haemorrhages secondary to DCIA injury may present as occult intraperitoneal haemorrhage. Angioembolisation is a useful tool in the management of uncontrolled intraperitoneal haemorrhage. The recommended puncture site is in the left lower quadrant, 2-4 cm superior and medial to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). This case report serves to emphasise the rare but potentially lethal complication of a commonly performed procedure. A high index of suspicion of intraperitoneal haemorrhage is required for patients with unexplained hypotension post-paracentesis, even if overt abdominal signs are absent. The use of ultrasound guidance will aid in reducing the risk of severe complications and increasing the overall success rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)仍然是创伤发病的主要原因。目前尚不清楚出血控制程序的类型(即,脾切除术与血管栓塞术)与VTE风险增加相关。我们假设,与接受脾切除术的患者相比,接受血管栓塞治疗钝性高级别脾损伤的血流动力学稳定的患者的VTE发生率较低。
    方法:查询了2017年至2019年美国外科医生学会创伤质量计划数据集,以确定美国3-5级钝性脾损伤手术协会的所有患者。比较了接受脾切除术和血管栓塞治疗的患者的结果,包括VTE率。倾向评分匹配(1:1)进行年龄调整,性别,初始生命体征,伤害严重程度评分,和脾损伤等级。
    结果:分析包括4698例匹配患者(脾切除术[n=2349]和血管栓塞[n=2349])。中位(四分位间距)年龄为41(27-58)岁,69%为男性。患者之间匹配良好。血管栓塞与VTE显著低于脾切除术(2.2%对3.4%,P=0.010),尽管使用了较少的VTE化学预防(70%对80%,P<0.001),以及开始化学预防的相对延迟(44h对33h,P<0.001)。血管栓塞组的住院时间和重症监护病房住院时间和死亡率也明显较低。
    结论:血管栓塞术与VTE的发生率明显低于脾切除术。因此,对于高度钝性脾损伤的血流动力学稳定的患者,初始治疗应考虑血管栓塞治疗,其中不需要进行剖腹手术.
    BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) continues to be a major cause of morbidity in trauma. It is unclear whether the type of hemorrhage control procedure (i.e., splenectomy versus angioembolization) is associated with an increased risk of VTE. We hypothesize that hemodynamically stable patients undergoing angioembolization for blunt high-grade splenic injuries have lower rates of VTE compared to those undergoing splenectomy.
    METHODS: The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program dataset from 2017 to 2019 was queried to identify all patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade 3-5 blunt splenic injuries. Outcomes including VTE rates were compared between those who were managed with splenectomy versus angioembolization. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed adjusting for age, sex, initial vital signs, Injury Severity Score, and splenic injury grade.
    RESULTS: The analysis included 4698 matched patients (splenectomy [n = 2349] and angioembolization [n = 2349]). The median (interquartile range) age was 41 (27-58) years and 69% were male. Patients were well matched between groups. Angioembolization was associated with significantly lower VTE than splenectomy (2.2% versus 3.4%, P = 0.010) despite less use of VTE chemoprophylaxis (70% versus 80%, P < 0.001), as well as a relative delay in initiation of chemoprophylaxis (44 h versus 33 h, P < 0.001). Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay and mortality were also significantly lower in the angioembolization group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Angioembolization is associated with a significantly lower incidence of VTE than splenectomy. Thus, angioembolization should be considered for initial management of hemodynamically stable patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries in whom laparotomy is not otherwise indicated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:虽然通常在BLSI的非手术治疗(NOM)期间进行CT随访和血管造影预防性栓塞,特别是在严重受伤的情况下,早期重复CT预防意外出血的效用尚不清楚.这项研究旨在阐明入院后7天内早期随访计算机断层扫描(CT)是否会减少小儿钝性肝和脾损伤(BLSI)的意外止血程序。
    方法:对患有BLSI的儿科患者(2008-2019年)进行了多中心观察队列研究的事后分析,随访CT的时间由治疗医生决定。比较了7天内有和没有早期随访CT的患者的意外止血程序(剖腹手术和/或破裂的假性动脉瘤的紧急血管造影)和与BLSI相关的并发症的发生率。使用倾向评分调整后的患者人口统计信息进行逆概率加权,合并症,损伤的机制和严重程度,初步复苏,和制度特征。
    结果:在1320名患者中,552例早期随访CT。大约25%的患者在入院当天进行了血管造影。有和没有早期重复CT的患者意外止血的发生率相似(8[1.4%]vs.6[0.8%];调整后OR,1.44[0.62-3.34];p=0.40)。重复CT扫描的患者更频繁地接受多次血管造影(或,2.79[1.32-5.88]),并且与BLSI相关的并发症更多,尤其是胆漏(或,1.73[1.04-2.87])。
    结论:7天内随访CT扫描与儿童BLSI的NOM意外止血减少无关。
    OBJECTIVE: While follow-up CT and prophylactic embolization with angiography are often conducted during non-operative management (NOM) for BLSI, particularly in a high-grade injury, the utility of early repeated CT for preventing unexpected hemorrhage remains unclear. This study aimed to elucidate whether early follow-up computerized tomography (CT) within 7 days after admission would decrease unexpected hemostatic procedures on pediatric blunt liver and spleen injury (BLSI).
    METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of a multicenter observational cohort study on pediatric patients with BLSI (2008-2019) was conducted on those who underwent NOM, in whom the timing of follow-up CT were decided by treating physicians. The incidence of unexpected hemostatic procedure (laparotomy and/or emergency angiography for ruptured pseudoaneurysm) and complications related to BLSI were compared between patients with and without early follow-up CT within 7 days. Inverse probability weighting with propensity scores adjusted patient demographics, comorbidities, mechanism and severity of injury, initial resuscitation, and institutional characteristics.
    RESULTS: Among 1320 included patients, 552 underwent early follow-up CT. Approximately 25% of patients underwent angiography on the day of admission. The incidence of unexpected hemostasis was similar between patients with and without early repeat CT (8 [1.4%] vs. 6 [0.8%]; adjusted OR, 1.44 [0.62-3.34]; p = 0.40). Patients with repeat CT scans more frequently underwent multiple angiographies (OR, 2.79 [1.32-5.88]) and had more complications related to BLSI, particularly bile leak (OR, 1.73 [1.04-2.87]).
    CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up CT scans within 7 days was not associated with reduced unexpected hemostasis in NOM for pediatric BLSI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    据报道肾部分切除术后出现肾假性动脉瘤,肾外伤,或经皮手术。肾脏假性动脉瘤也可在肾脏炎症后发生;然而,这种情况很少见,很少报道。
    一名53岁的男子出现在急诊室,有3天的发热和右背痛病史。血液样本显示严重的炎症,计算机断层扫描显示右输尿管中段有8毫米直径的结石和肾积水。患者被诊断为结石性肾盂肾炎,并接受了急诊输尿管支架置入术和抗生素治疗。在住院的第8天,出现血尿和右背痛,第9天出现膀胱填塞和贫血。对比增强计算机断层扫描显示假性动脉瘤破裂,患者接受了成功的血管栓塞治疗。患者在第23天出院。
    我们报告一例可能由结石性肾盂肾炎引起的肾假性动脉瘤。
    UNASSIGNED: Renal pseudoaneurysms reportedly occur after partial nephrectomy, renal trauma, or percutaneous procedures. Renal pseudoaneurysms can also occur after renal inflammation; however, such cases are rare and seldom reported.
    UNASSIGNED: A 53-year-old man presented to our emergency room with a 3-day history of fever and right back pain. A blood sample revealed severe inflammation and computed tomography showed an 8 mm diameter stone in the right middle ureter and hydronephrosis. The patient was diagnosed with calculous pyelonephritis and underwent emergency ureteral stenting and antibiotic therapy. On day 8 of hospitalization, hematuria and right back pain developed, and on day 9 bladder tamponade and anemia developed. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a ruptured pseudoaneurysm, and the patient underwent successful angioembolization. The patient was discharged on day 23.
    UNASSIGNED: We report a case of a renal pseudoaneurysm possibly caused by calculous pyelonephritis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肾上腺出血(AH)是一种罕见且潜在的灾难性疾病,具有15%的公认死亡风险。各种症状可能导致诊断困境,可能会被遗漏。我们介绍了2例右侧AH;这两种情况最初都被认为是肾绞痛。案例1是一位86岁的绅士,表现为右侧腹部疼痛,发现右侧无创伤性AH。他出现了失血性休克,需要血管栓塞的出血血管。病例2是一名62岁的绅士,他表现为右侧腹部疼痛,并被发现患有右侧无创伤AH。他的血液动力学稳定,并成功地保守管理。肾上腺出血是一种可能被错过的致命疾病。由于更广泛的可用性和快速评估,CT扫描是急性表现期间推荐的成像方式。我们证明了血液动力学稳定的患者采用“观察并等待”方法进行治疗,而不稳定的患者则采用复苏治疗,然后进行紧急血管栓塞。
    Adrenal hemorrhage (AH) is an uncommon and potentially disastrous affliction that carries an accepted mortality risk of 15%. Variable symptomatology can cause a diagnostic dilemma and may be missed. We present 2 cases of right-sided AH; both cases were initially presumed to be renal colic. Case 1 was an 86-year-old gentleman, presenting with right flank pain found to have a right-sided atraumatic AH. He presented with hemorrhagic shock, requiring angioembolization of the bleeding vessel. Case 2 was a 62-year-old gentleman who presented with right flank pain and was found to have a right-sided atraumatic AH. He was hemodynamically stable and successfully managed conservatively. Adrenal hemorrhage is a potentially fatal affliction that may be missed. CT scans are the recommended imaging modality during an acute presentation due to wider availability and fast assessment. We demonstrate a hemodynamically stable patient managed with a \'watch and wait\' approach and an unstable patient managed with resuscitation followed by urgent angioembolization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:肾部分切除术后的肾动脉假性动脉瘤是一种罕见的实体,这种实体的发生率在腹部穿透性损伤后更常见,经皮肾介入治疗,如经皮肾造瘘术(PCN)或经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)。虽然罕见,肾动脉假性动脉瘤如果不及时治疗可能危及生命,他们通常在术后两周内出现,通常表现为肉眼血尿,侧腹疼痛和/或贫血。
    方法:我们报告了两名分别为34和57岁的南亚种族女性患者的病例,左侧机器人辅助保留肾单位手术后出现肾动脉假性动脉瘤,治疗临床上出现的极间肿块,无痛,术后15天内伴有血凝块的肉眼血尿,并通过数字减影血管造影和线圈栓塞成功治疗。
    结论:肾动脉瘤是微创保留肾单位手术的一种罕见致命并发症,但考虑到其发展的术前和术中风险因素,并在一开始就迅速怀疑可以通过弹簧圈栓塞术挽救生命。出血动脉瘤。
    BACKGROUND: Renal artery pseudoaneurysm following partial nephrectomy is a rare entity, the incidence of this entity is more common following penetrating abdominal injuries, percutaneous renal interventions such as percutaneous nephrostomy(PCN) or Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Although rare, renal artery pseudoaneurysm can be life threatening if not managed timely, they usually present within two weeks postoperatively with usual presenting complains being gross haematuria, flank pain and/or anaemia.
    METHODS: We report case of two female patients 34 and 57 year old respectively of South Asian ethnicity, presenting with renal artery pseudoaneurysm following left sided robot assisted nephron sparing surgery for interpolar masses presenting clinically with total, painless, gross haematuria with clots within fifteen days postoperatively and their successful treatment by digital subtraction angiography and coil embolization.
    CONCLUSIONS: Renal artery aneurysm is a rare fatal complication of minimally invasive nephron sparing surgery however considering the preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for its development and prompt suspicion at the outset can be life saving with coil embolization of the bleeding arterial aneurysm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Wunderlich综合征(WS)的特征是在没有已知创伤的情况下自发性肾脏或肾周出血。WS比医源性或创伤性疾病引起的出血要罕见得多。伦克三联征急性发作侧腹疼痛的经典WS演示,侧翼质量,在不到四分之一的患者中看到低血容量性休克。大多数患者仅表现为孤立的侧腹疼痛,并且经常在急诊科进行未增强的计算机断层扫描(CT)成像。潜在的病因各不相同,大多数病例归因于肿瘤,血管疾病,囊性肾病,和抗凝。我们在此介绍一例80岁的女性,在没有创伤的情况下,她的左侧腹部出现严重不适三天。患者处于低血容量休克状态。经过全面评估,诊断为继发于血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的WS,对左肾动脉进行选择性血管栓塞。然而,由于进一步恶化,必须进行左肾切除术.患者恢复顺利,随访中没有恶化。根据患者的血液动力学状态,治疗方式是生动的,从保守管理到手术干预,并且应该根据入学时的重要状态进行调整。
    Wunderlich syndrome (WS) is characterized by spontaneous renal or perinephric hemorrhage in the absence of known trauma. WS is much rarer than haemorrhage caused by iatrogenic or traumatic conditions. The classic WS presentation of Lenk\'s triad of acute onset flank pain, flank mass, and hypovolemic shock is seen in less than a quarter of patients. The majority of patients present with only isolated flank pain and are frequently imaged in the emergency department with an unenhanced computed tomography (CT). The underlying aetiology varies, with the majority of cases attributed to neoplasms, vascular disease, cystic renal disease, and anticoagulation. We hereby present a case of an 80-year-old female who presented with severe discomfort in her left flank for three days in the absence of trauma. The patient was brought in a state of hypovolemic shock. After a thorough evaluation, a diagnosis of WS secondary to angiomyolipoma was made, for which selective angioembolization of the left renal artery was performed. However, due to further deterioration, a left nephrectomy had to be performed. The patient had an uneventful recovery and showed no deterioration on follow-up. The treatment modalities are vivid depending on the hemodynamic status of the patient, ranging from conservative management to operative intervention, and should be tailored to the vital state on admission.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号