Anesthetics drugs

麻醉药
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    越来越多的证据表明,麻醉药会影响手术干预后癌症患者的预后。然而,在肺部肿瘤治疗中联合使用麻醉药的最佳剂量和潜在机制研究甚少。这里,我们旨在探讨复合麻醉药异丙酚的作用,舒芬太尼,和罗库溴铵治疗肺癌采用正交试验设计,探讨麻醉药的最佳组合。首先,我们使用细胞计数试剂盒8和Transwell迁移和侵袭试验评估了三种麻醉药对A-549细胞增殖和侵袭的影响.随后,我们应用正交实验设计(OED)方法来筛选具有最有效抗肿瘤活性的联合麻醉药的合适浓度。我们发现,当单独或联合应用时,所有三种药物均以剂量和时间依赖性方式抑制A-549细胞的增殖。在联合药物暴露后24小时,抑制幅度差异最大。三种麻醉药的最佳组合是1.4μmol/L异丙酚,2nmol/L舒芬太尼,和7.83μmol/L罗库溴铵。这种最佳的3-药物组合在24小时比任一单一药物产生更有益的结果。我们的研究结果为提高肺部肿瘤治疗的疗效和优化麻醉策略提供了理论依据。
    A growing body of evidence suggests that anesthetics impact the outcome of patients with cancer after surgical intervention. However, the optimal dose and underlying mechanisms of co-administered anesthetics in lung tumor therapy have been poorly studied. Here, we aimed to investigate the role of combined anesthetics propofol, sufentanil, and rocuronium in treating lung cancer using an orthogonal experimental design and to explore the optimal combination of anesthetics. First, we evaluated the effects of the three anesthetics on the proliferation and invasion of A-549 cells using Cell Counting Kit 8 and Transwell migration and invasion assays. Subsequently, we applied the orthogonal experimental design (OED) method to screen the appropriate concentrations of the combined anesthetics with the most effective antitumor activity. We found that all three agents inhibited the proliferation of A-549 cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner when applied individually or in combination, with the highest differences in the magnitude of inhibition occurring 24 h after combined drug exposure. The optimal combination of the three anesthetics that achieved the strongest reduction in cell viability was 1.4 µmol/L propofol, 2 nmol/L sufentanil, and 7.83 µmol/L rocuronium. This optimal 3-drug combination produced a more beneficial result at 24 h than either single drug. Our results provide a theoretical basis for improving the efficacy of lung tumor treatment and optimizing anesthetic strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心肌缺血再灌注(IR)循环与损伤性级联的激活有关,从而导致新的心肌挑战,占梗死面积的50%。一些证据暗示活性氧(ROS)是促氧化剂临床环境中心肌损伤的可能原因。在动物和人模型中,在缺血和缺血后再灌注期间都发生损伤。造成这种损伤的机制包括再灌注期间细胞钙(Ca(2))浓度的增加和ROS来源的诱导。药物预处理,其中包括抵消ROS爆发和Ca(2+)超负荷随后在心肌中的IR循环的药理学策略,可以有效地限制伤害。目前,广泛的证据支持使用麻醉药作为一种重要的心脏保护策略,作用于各种水平,如代谢受体,离子通道或线粒体水平。在长期缺血发作之前给药被称为麻醉预处理,而当在再灌注开始时给予时,被称为麻醉后处理。两种类型的麻醉调理减少,尽管程度不同,心肌损伤的程度。本文重点介绍了IR引起的心肌损伤的细胞和病理生理学概念,以及常用的麻醉药如何减轻心脏组织中氧化应激引起的功能和结构作用。
    Ischemia-reperfusion (IR) cycle in the myocardium is associated with activation of an injurious cascade, thus leading to new myocardial challenges, which account for up to 50% of infarct size. Some evidence implicates reactive oxygen species (ROS) as a probable cause of myocardial injury in prooxidant clinical settings. Damage occurs during both ischemia and post-ischemic reperfusion in animal and human models. The mechanisms that contribute to this damage include the increase in cellular calcium (Ca(2+)) concentration and induction of ROS sources during reperfusion. Pharmacological preconditioning, which includes pharmacological strategies that counteract the ROS burst and Ca(2+) overload followed to IR cycle in the myocardium, could be effective in limiting injury. Currently widespread evidence supports the use of anesthetics agents as an important cardioprotective strategy that act at various levels such as metabotropic receptors, ion channels or mitochondrial level. Their administration before a prolonged ischemic episode is known as anesthetic preconditioning, whereas when given at the very onset of reperfusion, is termed anesthetic postconditioning. Both types of anesthetic conditioning reduce, albeit not to the same degree, the extent of myocardial injury. This review focuses on cellular and pathophysiological concepts on the myocardial damage induced by IR and how anesthetic pharmacological agents commonly used could attenuate the functional and structural effects induced by oxidative stress in cardiac tissue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号