BACKGROUND: Fiberoptic intubation is an important method for tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine injury. How to effectively and safely complete fiberoptic intubation while maintaining the stability of the cervical spine is very important. This study compared the efficiency and safety of fiberoptic intubation after anesthesia induction under different types of air pressure in patients with simulated cervical spinal injury.
METHODS: In total, 59 adult patients who underwent fiberoptic intubation with a cervical collar for simulated cervical spinal injury were randomly allocated to continuous positive-pressure oxygen, normal-pressure, or intermittent negative-pressure suction groups. After the induction of anesthesia and adequate 100% oxygenation, which confirmed effective neuromuscular blockade, it was deemed appropriate to begin fiberoptic intubation. In the continuous positive-pressure oxygen group, the fiberoptic device was connected through the negative-pressure suction path with 5 L/min oxygen. In the intermittent negative-pressure suction group, the fiberoptic device was connected to the negative-pressure suction device. In the normal-pressure group, the flexible fiberoptic device was not connected to either the oxygen source or the negative-pressure suction device. The intubation time was recorded as the primary outcome measure. The intubation success rate, number of attempts, minimum SpO2, objective lens contamination rate, and incidence of complications were also compared among the groups.
RESULTS: Compared with those in the other groups, the median (range) intubation time in the continuous positive-pressure group was 59 (36-181) seconds, which was significantly shorter than that in the normal-pressure group, 167 (46-181) seconds, and the intermittent negative-pressure suction group, 132.5 (38-181) seconds (P=0.04). The success rate of nasotracheal intubation was significantly greater in the continuous positive-pressure group (94.7%, 18/19) than in the normal-pressure group (50%, 10/20) and intermittent negative-pressure suction group (50%, 10/20) (P=0.004). There was a significant difference among the three groups (P=0.043). The median (range) minimum SpO2 during fiberoptic intubation was 100% (99-100%) in the continuous positive-pressure group, 100% (90-100%) in the normal-pressure group, and 99% (88-100%) in the intermittent negative-pressure suction group (P=0.029). However, no statistically significant difference was detected among the groups with complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The continuous use of positive-pressure oxygen via the negative-pressure suction pathway can improve the efficiency and safety of fiberoptic intubation in patients with simulated cervical spinal injury after anesthesia induction.

BACKGROUND: Preschoolers become anxious when they are about to undergo anesthesia and surgery, warranting the development of more appropriate and effective interventions.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of static cartoons combined with dynamic virtual environments on preoperative anxiety and anesthesia induction compliance in preschool-aged children undergoing surgery.
METHODS: One hundred and sixteen preschool-aged children were selected and assigned to the drug (n = 37), intervention (n = 40), and control (n = 39) groups. All the children received routine preoperative checkups and nursing before being transferred to the preoperative preparation room on the day of the operation. The drug group received 0.5 mg/kg midazolam and the intervention group treatment consisting of static cartoons combined with dynamic virtual environments. The control group received no intervention. The modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale was used to evaluate the children\'s anxiety level on the day before surgery (T0), before leaving the preoperative preparation room (T1), when entering the operating room (T2), and at anesthesia induction (T3). Compliance during anesthesia induction (T3) was evaluated using the Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC). Changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and respiratory rate (RR) were also recorded at each time point.
RESULTS: The anxiety scores of the three groups increased variously at T1 and T2. At T3, both the drug and intervention groups had similar anxiety scores, both of which were lower than those in the control group. At T1 and T2, MAP, HR, and RR of the three groups increased. The drug and control groups had significantly higher MAP and RR than the intervention group at T2. At T3, the MAP, HR, and RR of the drug group decreased and were significantly lower than those in the control group but were comparable to those in the intervention group. Both the drug and intervention groups had similar ICC scores and duration of anesthesia induction (T3), both of which were higher than those of the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Combining static cartoons with dynamic virtual environments as effective as medication, specifically midazolam, in reducing preoperative anxiety and fear in preschool-aged children. This approach also improve their compliance during anesthesia induction and helped maintain their stable vital signs.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the impact of positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the non-hypoxic apnea time in infants during anesthesia induction with an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8.
METHODS: This age stratified randomized controlled trial included patients under 1 year of age. Preoxygenation was performed using an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 for 2 min. Inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 was administered via a face mask with volume-controlled ventilation at a tidal volume of 6 mL.kg-1, with or without 7 cmH2O of PEEP. Tracheal intubation was performed after 3 min of ventilation; however, it was disconnected from the breathing circuit. Ventilation was resumed once the pulse oximetry readings reached 95%. The primary outcome was the non-hypoxic apnea time, defined as the time from the cessation of ventilation to achieving a pulse oximeter reading of 95%. The secondary outcome measures included the degree of atelectasis assessed by ultrasonography and the presence of gastric air insufflation.
RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were included in the final analysis. In the positive end-expiratory pressure group, the atelectasis score decreased (17.0 vs. 31.5, p < .001; mean difference and 95% CI of 11.6, 7.5-15.6), while the non-hypoxic apnea time increased (80.1 s vs. 70.6 s, p = .005; mean difference and 95% CI of -9.4, -16.0 to -2.9), compared to the zero end-expiratory pressure group, among infants who are 6 months old or younger, not in those aged older than 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of positive end-expiratory pressure reduced the incidence of atelectasis and extended the non-hypoxic apnea time in infants who are 6 months old or younger. However, it did not affect the incidence of atelectasis nor the non-hypoxic apnea time in patients aged older than 6 months.

BACKGROUND: Postinduction hypotension (PIHO) is a hemodynamic abnormality commonly observed during the induction of general anesthesia. Etomidate is considered a safer drug for the induction of anesthesia because it has only minor adverse effects on the cardiovascular and pulmonary systems. Recent evidence indicates that the novel benzodiazepine remimazolam has minimal inhibitory effects on the circulation and respiration. However, the efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus etomidate in the induction of anesthesia are unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To further understand the potential of remimazolam in anesthesia induction, it is necessary to design a meta-analysis to compare its effects versus the classic safe anesthetic etomidate. The aim of this study is to determine which drug has more stable hemodynamics and a lower incidence of PIHO. Our study will also yield data on sedation efficiency, time to loss of consciousness, time to awakening, incidence of injection pain, and postoperative nausea and vomiting with the two drugs.
METHODS: We plan to search the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases from the date of their creation until March 31, 2025. The language is limited to English and Chinese. The search terms are \"randomized controlled trials,\" \"etomidate,\" and \"remimazolam.\" The incidence of PIHO is the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes include depth of anesthesia after induction, sedation success rate, time to loss of consciousness, hemodynamic profiles, recovery time, incidence of injection pain, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Reviews, meta-analyses, case studies, abstracts from conferences, and commentaries will not be included. The heterogeneity of the results will be evaluated by sensitivity and subgroup analyses. RevMan software and Stata software will be used for data analysis. We will evaluate the quality of included studies using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The confidence of the evidence will be assessed through the Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Developments, and Evaluations system.
RESULTS: The protocol was registered in the international PROSPERO (Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) registry in November 2023. As of June 2024, we have performed a preliminary article search and retrieval for further review. The review and analyses are expected to be completed in March 2025. We expect to submit manuscripts for peer review by the end of June 2025.
CONCLUSIONS: By synthesizing the available evidence and comparing remimazolam and etomidate, we hope to provide valuable insights into the selection of anesthesia-inducing drugs to reduce the incidence of PIHO and improve patient prognosis.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42023463120; https://tinyurl.com/333jb8bm.
UNASSIGNED: PRR1-10.2196/55948.

UNASSIGNED: Cough is one of the most common complications following intravenous administration of sufentanil during anesthesia induction. The study aimed to investigate the protective effect of alfentanil, afentanyl derivative with short onset time and short duration, in reducing sufentanil-induced cough.
UNASSIGNED: Eighty patients that scheduled for thyroid surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into the alfentanil group and normal saline group, with 40 cases per group. Patients in the alfentanil group received intravenous administration of 2 μg/kg alfentanil prior to sufentanil injection during general anesthesia induction, while the same dose of normal saline was administered in the normal saline group. The outcomes measures included the incidence and severity of cough and common side effects of opioids following the administration of sufentanil during the induction of general anesthesia, intraoperative hemodynamics parameters and major adverse events during anesthesia recovery period.
UNASSIGNED: The incidence of cough within one minute after the injection of sufentanil during anesthesia induction was 40% in the normal saline group, and the pretreatment of alfentanil significantly reduced the incidence of sufentanil-induced cough to 5% (p < 0.05). Correspondingly, the patients in the alfentanil group had decreased severity of sufentanil-induced cough compared with the normal saline group (p < 0.05). No significant differences in the incidences of common side effects of opioids (dizziness, nausea and vomiting, chest tightness and respiratory depression) within one minute after sufentanil injection were found (p > 0.05). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the two groups in intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, extubation time, or the incidences of emergence agitation, respiratory depression, delayed recovery from anesthesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting during Postanesthesia Care Unit stay (p > 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: Pretreatment with low-dose alfentanil (2 μg/kg) effectively and safely reduced both the incidence and severity of sufentanil-induced cough during anesthesia induction.
UNASSIGNED: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (identifier: ChiCTR2300069286).

OBJECTIVE: The perioperative period is a stressful experience for both the child and their parents. Anesthesia staff generally have a positive attitude to the parental presence in the operating room. They can be a powerful resource in creating a caring environment, but they are challenged by limited time to establish a relationship. The present study describes the anesthesia staff\'s experience of parental presence during their child\'s anesthesia induction.
METHODS: A descriptive design with a phenomenological approach.
METHODS: A total of 22 anesthesia staff from four Swedish hospitals were interviewed. The study has been carried out using a reflective lifeworld research (RLR) approach.
RESULTS: The following four constituents describe anesthesia staff\'s experiences of parental presence: a conditional presence; a relationship that is secondary; a shared but two-part responsibility; and a need to demonstrate professionalism.
CONCLUSIONS: Parental presence is natural and essentially irreplaceable, as it creates security for the child. However, the results show that parental presence is not free of obligations and expectations. Designing for good perioperative care is important, and the staff plays a key role in cooperating with the parents to improve the quality of care.

UNASSIGNED: Post-induction hypotension (PIH) is a common clinical phenomenon linked to increased morbidity and mortality in various non-cardiac surgeries. Patients with surgery in the afternoon may have preoperative hypovolemia caused by prolonged fasting and dehydration, which increases the risk of hypotension during the induction period. However, studies on the fluid therapy in early morning combating PIH remain inadequate. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the influence of prophylactic high-volume fluid in the early morning of the operation day on the incidence of PIH during non-cardiac surgery after noon.
UNASSIGNED: We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery after noon between October 2021 and October 2022. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received a substantial volume of intravenous fluid (high-volume group) or not (low-volume group) in the early morning of the surgery day. We investigated the incidence of PIH and intraoperative hypotension (IOH) as well as the accumulated duration of PIH in the first 15 minutes. In total, 550 patients were included in the analysis.
UNASSIGNED: After propensity score matching, the incidence of PIH was 39.7% in the high-volume group and 54.1% in the low-volume group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients in the high-volume group had lower incidence of hypotension after induction compared with the low-volume group (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.89; p = 0.016). The high-volume fluid infusion in the preoperative morning was significantly correlated with the decreased duration of PIH (p = 0.013), but no statistical difference was observed for the occurrence of IOH between the two groups (p = 0.075).
UNASSIGNED: The fluid therapy of more than or equal to 1000 mL in the early morning of the surgery day was associated with a decreased incidence of PIH compared with the low-volume group in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery after noon.

BACKGROUND: Propofol has been the gold standard for anesthesia induction and maintenance due to its rapid onset and favorable pharmacokinetic properties. However, the search for alternative agents with improved safety and efficacy has led to the emergence of ciprofol (HSK3486), a structural analog of propofol. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to comprehensively assess the safety and efficacy of ciprofol compared to propofol for anesthesia induction and maintenance in adult patients undergoing surgical procedures.
METHODS: This study included only double-arm RCTs in which participants were aged eighteen or older undergoing surgery. For the statistical analysis of the extracted data, we employed RevMan 5.4.1.
RESULTS: Ciprofol demonstrated a promising trend of higher anesthesiologists\' satisfaction during the induction phase (MD 0.14, 95%, CI - 0.28 to 0.56, p = 0.51), whereas Propofol was favored during maintenance. Propofol also exhibited advantages with a shorter time to successful anesthesia induction (MD 0.08 min, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.15, p = 0.04), and quicker attainment of full alertness (MD 0.11 min, 95% CI - 1.29 to 1.52, p = 0.87), suggesting its efficiency in clinical practice. Importantly, there were no significant disparities in the success rate of anesthesia.
CONCLUSIONS: Both ciprofol and propofol demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety for anesthesia induction and maintenance in adult patients undergoing surgery. While propofol provides a faster onset of induction, ciprofol exhibits advantages in terms of pain management. Clinicians should consider these findings when selecting anesthetic agents, and tailoring choices to individual patient needs and clinical scenarios.

Ciprofol, a newer entrant with similarities to propofol, has shown promise with a potentially improved safety profile, making it an attractive alternative for induction of general anesthesia. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ciprofol compared with propofol during general anesthesia induction.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Clinical Trial.gov, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to July 2023 to identify relevant studies. All statistical analyses were conducted using R statistical software version 4.1.2.
Thirteen Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) encompassing a total of 1998 participants, were included in our analysis. The pooled analysis indicated that Ciprofol was associated with a notably lower incidence of pain upon injection [RR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.23; I^2 = 43%, p < 0.0000001] and was non-inferior to propofol in terms of anesthesia success rate [RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.01; I^2 = 0%; p = 0.43]. In terms of safety, the incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in the ciprofol group [RR:0.82; 95% CI:0.68 to 0.98; I^2 = 48%; p = 0.03]. However, no statistically significant differences were found for postoperative hypertension, bradycardia, or tachycardia.
In conclusion, Ciprofol is not inferior to Propofol in terms of its effectiveness in general anesthesia. Ciprofol emerges as a valuable alternative sedative with fewer side effects, especially reduced injection pain, when compared to Propofol.
Propofol, frequently utilized as an anesthetic, provides swift onset and quick recovery. However, it has drawbacks such as a narrow effective dosage range and a high occurrence of adverse effects, particularly pain upon injection. Ciprofol, a more recent drug with propofol-like properties, has demonstrated promise and may have an improved safety profile, making it a compelling alternative for inducing general anesthesia. This meta-analysis compared the safety and effectiveness of Ciprofol with Propofol for general anesthesia induction in a range of medical procedures, encompassing thirteen Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and 1998 individuals. The pooled analysis indicated that Ciprofol was associated with a notably lower incidence of pain upon injection [RR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.23; I^2 = 43%, p < 0.0000001] and was non-inferior to propofol in terms of anesthesia success rate [RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.01; I^2 = 0%; p = 0.43]. In terms of safety, the incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in the ciprofol group [RR:0.82; 95% CI:0.68 to 0.98; I^2 = 48%; p = 0.03]. However, no statistically significant differences were found for hypertension, bradycardia, or tachycardia. In conclusion, ciprofol is equally effective at inducing and maintaining general anesthesia as propofol. When compared to propofol, ciprofol is a better alternative sedative for operations including fiberoptic bronchoscopy, gynecological procedures, gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, and elective surgeries because it has less adverse effects, most notably less painful injections.

OBJECTIVE: Previous reports argue that preoperative sleep conditions of patients can influence the dosage of general anaesthesia drugs. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the dose-effect relationship of preoperative sleep disorders on the induction of general anaesthesia with remimazolam tosilate and calculate the Median effective (ED50) and 95% effective (ED95) dosages.
METHODS: Included in our study were 56 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our hospital. A separate group of 27 patients with sleep disorders (SD group) and 29 patients without sleep disorders (NSD group) using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were also included. According to the Dixon \'up-and-down\' design, patients received remimazolam at preselected concentrations starting at 0.2 mg/kg. After the administration of remimazolam, loss of consciousness was observed. By observing whether consciousness disappeared within a minute, we adjusted the dose of remimazolam by 0.1 mg/kg (up and down) in the following patient. The Median effective dose (ED50), 95% effective dose (ED95), and 95% confidence interval (CI) of remimazolam for effective sedation were calculated.
RESULTS: The ED50 of remimazolam was 0.226 mg/kg (95%CI 0.221-0.232 mg/kg) in the SD group and 0.191 mg/kg (95%CI, 0.183-0.199 mg/kg) in the NSD group. The ED95 of remimazolam was 0.237 mg/kg (95%CI 0.231-0.262 mg/kg) in the SD group and 0.209 mg/kg (95%CI 0.200-0.254 mg/kg) in the NSD group.
CONCLUSIONS: In the SD group, the ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam during anaesthesia induction were 0.226 and 0.237 mg/kg, respectively. The induction dose of remimazolam in the SD group was significantly higher than that in the NSD group.