OBJECTIVE: Cytopenias after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) are a common complication, the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of which remain incompletely understood. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (MSC) therapy has been successfully employed in the treatment of immune-related disorders and can aid in the restoration of the hematopoietic niche.
METHODS: A phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of administering four sequential doses of ex-vivo expanded bone marrow MSCs from a third-party donor to patients with persistent severe cytopenias after allo-SCT was performed.
RESULTS: The overall response rate on day 90 was 75% among the 27 evaluable patients (comprising 12 complete responses, 8 partial responses, and 7 with no response). The median time to respond was 14.5 days. Responses were observed across different profiles, including single or multiple affected lineages, primary or secondary timing, and potential immune-mediated or post-infectious pathophysiology versus idiopathic origin. With a median follow-up for surviving patients of 85 months after MSC infusion, 53% of patients are alive. Notably, no adverse events related to MSC therapy were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the sequential infusion of third-party MSCs emerges as a viable and safe therapeutic option, exhibiting potential benefits for patients experiencing cytopenias following allo-SCT.

Patient 1 was a 70-year-old woman with refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who received allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from an HLA-haploidentical related donor. Upper back pain appeared on day63, and Th8-Th9 pyogenic spondylitis was diagnosed based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Blood culture on day14 identified Corynebacterium striatum as the causative bacteria of blood stream infection (BSI). The pyogenic spondylitis resolved after treatment with daptomycin for 2 months. Patient 2 was a 65-year-old man with relapsed angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma who received bone marrow transplantation from an HLA-DR single-antigen-mismatched unrelated donor. Lower back pain appeared on day30, and L4-L5 pyogenic spondylitis was diagnosed based on MRI. Blood culture was negative. Daptomycin and clindamycin were selected for treatment based on the drug susceptibility of bacteria that had caused pre-engraftment BSI (Escherichia coli on day3 and Corynebacterium striatum on day9), and the pyogenic spondylitis resolved after 6 months of this treatment. Pyogenic spondylitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of back pain accompanied by BSI before engraftment in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

The present article describes the protocol of a mixed-methods study (an observational cohort design and focus groups), aimed to examine neuropsychological functioning and other biopsychosocial outcomes, therapeutic adherence and unmet care needs in paediatric population undergoing solid organ or allogeneic hematopoietic transplant during the pre- and post-transplant phases. Following a multi-method/multi-source approach, neuropsychological domains will be comprehensively measured with objective tests (SDMT, K-CPT 2/CPT 3, TAVECI/TAVEC, WISC-V/WAIS-IV Vocabulary and Digit Span subtests, Verbal Fluency tests, Stroop, ROCF, and TONI-4); ecological executive functioning, affective and behavioral domains, pain intensity/interference, sleep quality and therapeutic adherence will be assessed through questionnaires (parent/legal guardians-reported: BRIEF-2 and BASC-3; and self-reported: BASC-3, BPI, PROMIS, AIQ and SMAQ); and blood levels of prescribed drugs will be taken from each patient\'s medical history. These outcomes will be measured at pre-transplant and at 4-weeks and 6-months post-transplant phases. The estimated sample size was 60 patients (any type of transplant, solid organ, or hematopoietic) from La Paz University Hospital (Madrid, Spain). Finally, three focus group sessions will be organized with patients, parents/guardians, and transplant clinicians (n = 15, with 5 participants per group), in order to qualitatively identify unmet care needs during the pre-, and post-transplant stages of the process. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05441436).

During clinical courses involving treatment with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), multidisciplinary patient assessment including physical function is indispensable, and quantitative skeletal muscle loss is a poor prognostic marker. Deteriorating quality of muscle from intramuscular adipose tissue degeneration can be important as well, because many patients are cachexic or sarcopenic before allo-HSCT, although this approach has not yet been used in such patients. We conducted this retrospective cohort study to evaluate the quality as well as quantity of skeletal muscle using computed tomography (CT) scans. The psoas muscle mass index (PMI) and radiographic density (RD) calculated by cross-sectional area and averaged CT values of the psoas major muscle at the umbilical level were used to determine the quantity and quality of muscle, respectively. A total of 186 adult patients, ranging in age from 17 to 68 years (median, 49 years), were included in this study, with 46 (24.7%) assigned to the lower PMI group and 49 (26.3%) assigned to the lower RD group. Low RD was identified as an independent risk factor for poor overall survival after allo-HSCT (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.54; P < .01), whereas PMI was not significant. Decreased RD along with a reduced 6-min walking distance before transplantation were significant factors in increased nonrelapse mortality (HR, 2.69; P = .01). This study is the first to suggest the use of a qualitative skeletal muscle index to serve as a prognostic indicator following allo-HSCT. RD should be included in pretransplantation screening parameters, and approaches that include rehabilitation focused on improving both muscle quality and quantity may improve the prognosis of allo-HSCT.

The consensus recommendations in 2018 from The Chinese Society of Hematology (CSH) on indications, conditioning regimens and donor selection for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) facilitated the standardization of clinical practices of allo-HSCT in China and progressive integration with the world. There have been new developments since the initial publication. To integrate recent developments and further improve the consensus, a panel of experts from the CSH recently updated the consensus recommendations, which are summarized as follows: (1) there is a new algorithm for selecting appropriate donors for allo-HSCT candidates. Haploidentical donors (HIDs) are the preferred donor choice over matched sibling donors (MSDs) for patients with high-risk leukemia or elderly patients with young offspring donors in experienced centers. This replaces the previous algorithm for donor selection, which favored MSDs over HIDs. (2) Patients with refractory/relapsed lymphoblastic malignancies are now encouraged to undergo salvage treatment with novel immunotherapies prior to HSCT. (3) The consensus has been updated to reflect additional evidence for the application of allo-HSCT in specific groups of patients with hematological malignancies (intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), favorable-risk AML with positive minimal residual disease, and standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia). (4) The consensus has been updated to reflect additional evidence for the application of HSCT in patients with nonmalignant diseases, such as severe aplastic anemia and inherited diseases. (5) The consensus has been updated to reflect additional evidence for the administration of anti-thymocyte globulin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factors and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in HID-HSCT.

Oropharyngeal mucositis (OPM) is common following conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) and results in pain, functional status decline, need for nutritional support, infections, and prolonged length of stay (LOS). Methotrexate (MTX) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis exacerbates OPM and slows hematopoietic engraftment, which may prolong LOS. Previous studies have demonstrated reduced OPM and more rapid engraftment when leucovorin (LCV) is added following MTX GVHD prophylaxis, yet this practice is controversial. The primary objective of this study was to determine if the routine addition of LCV to MTX GVHD prophylaxis impacted the duration of grade 2 to 4 OPM. Secondary objectives included determination of the incidence of grade 2 to 4 and grade 3 to 4 OPM, time to engraftment, ability to receive all four planned MTX doses, use of total parenteral nutrition (TPN), use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), LOS, incidence of acute or chronic GVHD, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). This single-center, retrospective cohort study compared alloHCT outcomes for 46 adult patients who received MTX 15 mg/m2 day +1; MTX 10 mg/m2 days +3, +6, and +11 (15-10-10-10); and LCV following days +3, +6, and +11 MTX compared to historical controls who did not. Patients who received myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and matched related donor (MRD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD) alloHCT were included. The addition of LCV resulted in significant reductions in the duration of grade 2 to 4 OPM (median, 6 days versus 10.5 days; P = .0004), duration of TPN (7 days versus 16 days; P = .001), PCA use (16% versus 39%; P = .0001), time to neutrophil engraftment (median, 18 versus 20 days; P = .008), and LOS (median, 27.5 versus 31 days; P = .017) compared to historical controls. Patients who received routine LCV had similar incidences of grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD (30% versus 28%; relative risk [RR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], .57 to 2.03; P = 1.0), grade 3 or 4 acute GVHD (2% versus 7%; RR, .33; 95% CI, .04 to 3.09; P = .62) and chronic GVHD (37% versus 30%; RR, 1.21; 95% CI, .67 to 2.16; P = .66) compared to historical controls. Graft failure occurred in 2% of patients in each group. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, RFS was similar in the LCV group compared to historical controls (HR, .86; 95% CI, .24 to 1.2; P = .13); however, OS was improved in patients who received LCV (HR, .33; 95% CI, .13 to .83; P = .01). In patients undergoing MAC MRD/MUD alloHCT with four planned doses of MTX GVHD prophylaxis (15-10-10-10), LCV was associated with reduced duration of grade 2 to 4 OPM, faster neutrophil engraftment, reduced utilization of TPN and PCA, and shortened LOS compared to historical controls not receiving routine LCV. These benefits were apparent without an increased risk of acute or chronic GVHD or adverse effect on RFS. LCV improved OS; however, it is unclear if this was due to the intervention or an unmeasured confounder. A randomized, prospective trial of LCV prophylaxis in patients receiving MAC alloHCT and MTX 15-10-10-10 GVHD prophylaxis is warranted to confirm our findings.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Addition of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) to standard immunosuppressive agents reduces GVHD in different donor settings.
We compared the outcomes of adults with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allo-HSCT from HLA-identical sibling donors after the use of PTCY (n = 197) or ATG (n = 1913).
Patients in the PTCY group were younger than those in the ATG group (median age, 47 vs 54 years; P < .01). Peripheral blood was the most frequently used stem cell source, being significantly more frequent in the ATG group than in the PTCY group (95% vs 70% P < .01). The conditioning regimen was more frequently myeloablative in the PTCY group than in the ATG group (59% vs 48%; P < .01). Time to neutrophil engraftment was shorter in the ATG group than in the PTCY group (17 vs 20 days; P < .01). No differences were observed according to the other transplantation outcomes, except for chronic GVHD of all grades and extensive chronic GVHD at 2 years, which were significantly lower in the ATG group compared with the PTCY group (P < .02).
PTCY is feasible in an HLA-identical sibling setting, and despite similar outcomes, ATG may be associated with lower incidence of chronic GVHD.

BACKGROUND: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a serious complication in allogeneic transplantation. The first-line treatment is high doses of corticosteroids. In the absence of response to corticosteroids, several immunosuppressive drugs can be used, but they entail an elevated risk of severe infections. Added to this, there are patients who do not improve on any immunosuppressive treatment, with subsequent deteriorated quality of life and high mortality. Ruxolitinib has been shown to induce responses in refractory patients. In this study we have presented our real-life experience.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with severe GVHD refractory to corticosteroids. Demographic, previous treatment, response and mortality data were collected.
RESULTS: Since 2014, seventeen patients with GVHD were treated with ruxolitinib due to refractoriness to corticosteroids and immunosuppressants and a few to extracorporeal photopheresis, 8 with acute GVHD (1 pulmonary, 4 cutaneous grade IV and 3 digestive grade IV) and 9 with chronic GHVD (5 cutaneous sclerodermiform, 2 pulmonary and 1 multisystemic). The overall response to ruxolitinib treatment for acute GVHD was 80%, 40% with partial response and 40% with complete remission. Global response in chronic GVHD was 79%. The GVHD mortality was only seen in acute disease and was 40%. Causes of mortality in those patients were severe viral pneumonia, post-transplantation hemophagocytic syndrome and meningeal GVHD refractory to ruxolitinib.
CONCLUSIONS: In our series, the use of ruxolitinib as a rescue strategy in acute or chronic GVHD was satisfactory. Ruxolitinib treatment in patients with a very poor prognosis showed encouraging results. However, the GVHD mortality remains high in refractory patients, showing that better therapeutic strategies are needed.

BACKGROUND: Advanced-stage mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome (aMF/SS) has a dismal outcome. The only curative treatment is allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) but this is limited to selected candidates, thus palliative therapy is the most frequent strategy.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of aMF/SS in cases referred to haematology units for advanced/palliative therapy.
METHODS: Data from 30 patients were collected from four centres, and descriptive statistics, frequencies and survival analyses were calculated.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight per cent of patients received systemic therapy. The median number of therapies was three (range: 1-9). Bexarotene (21%), CHOP-like chemotherapy (10%) and methotrexate (9%) were the more common treatments. The overall survival at a median follow-up of 28 months (range: 8-65 months) for aMF/SS was 56.9%. Survival probability was more favourable for MF (p < 0.02). Nine patients received allo-SCT. Half of the patients (56%) relapsed after allo-SCT but could be rescued with immunosuppression tapering, donor lymphocyte infusions and additional therapy (80%).
CONCLUSIONS: There is significant heterogeneity in aMF/SS treatments. Survival is more favourable for MF compared to SS. Current chemoimmunotherapies are insufficient to control disease, making allo-SCT the best therapeutic approach in selected patients.

Since their discovery CD4+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) represented a promising tool to induce tolerance in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Preclinical models proved that adoptive transfer of Tregs or the use of compounds that can favor their function in vivo are effective for prevention and treatment of graft-vs.-host disease (GvHD). Following these findings, Treg-based therapies have been employed in clinical trials. Adoptive immunotherapy with Tregs effectively prevents GvHD induced by alloreactive T cells in the setting of one HLA haplotype mismatched hematopoietic transplantation. The absence of post transplant pharmacologic immunosuppression unleashes T-cell mediated graft-vs.-tumor (GvT) effect, which results in an unprecedented, almost complete control of leukemia relapse in this setting. In the present review, we will report preclinical studies and clinical trials that demonstrate Treg ability to promote donor engraftment, protect from GvHD and improve GvT effect. We will also discuss new strategies to further enhance in vivo efficacy of Treg-based therapies.