All-site cancer

全部位癌症
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:长期暴露于颗粒物(PM)与来自大人群队列的全部位癌症死亡率之间潜在因果关系的证据仍然有限,并且传统统计方法存在残留的混杂问题。
    目的:我们的目的是利用因果推断方法研究中国南方长期PM暴露与全部位癌症死亡率之间的潜在因果关系。
    方法:我们使用了中国南方的一个队列,从2009年到2015年招募了580,757名参与者,并跟踪到2020年。使用经过验证的时空模型生成了PM1,PM2.5和PM10浓度的年平均值。我们采用了因果推断方法,边际结构Cox模型,基于观察性数据评估长期暴露于PM与全部位癌症死亡率之间的关联.
    结果:随着PM1,PM2.5和PM10的增加1µg/m3,所有部位癌症的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)为1.033(95%CI:1.025-1.041),1.032(95%CI:1.027-1.038),和1.020(95%CI:1.016-1.025),分别。与PM1每增加1µg/m3相关的消化系统和呼吸系统癌症死亡率的HR(95%CI)为1.022(1.009-1.035)和1.053(1.038-1.068),分别。此外,不活跃的参与者,从不吸烟的人,或者居住在周围绿色度较低的地区的人更容易受到PM暴露的影响,全部位癌症死亡率的HR(95%CI)为1.042(1.031-1.053),1.041(1.032-1.050),和1.0473(1.025-1.070),分别为PM1每增加1µg/m3。PM1的影响在低暴露组中比在一般人群中更明显,多重敏感性分析证实了结果的稳健性。
    结论:这项研究提供了证据,表明长期暴露于PM可能会增加所有部位癌症死亡的风险,强调改善空气质量对预防癌症的潜在健康益处。
    BACKGROUND: Evidence of a potential causal link between long-term exposure to particulate matter (PM) and all-site cancer mortality from large population cohorts remained limited and suffered from residual confounding issues with traditional statistical methods.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the potential causal relationship between long-term PM exposure and all-site cancer mortality in South China using causal inference methods.
    METHODS: We used a cohort in southern China that recruited 580,757 participants from 2009 through 2015 and tracked until 2020. Annual averages of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 concentrations were generated with validated spatiotemporal models. We employed a causal inference approach, the Marginal Structural Cox model, based on observational data to evaluate the association between long-term exposure to PM and all-site cancer mortality.
    RESULTS: With an increase of 1 µg/m³ in PM1, PM2.5, and PM10, the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for all-site cancer were 1.033 (95% CI: 1.025-1.041), 1.032 (95% CI: 1.027-1.038), and 1.020 (95% CI: 1.016-1.025), respectively. The HRs (95% CI) for digestive system and respiratory system cancer mortality associated with each 1 µg/m³ increase in PM1 were 1.022 (1.009-1.035) and 1.053 (1.038-1.068), respectively. In addition, inactive participants, who never smoked, or who lived in areas of low surrounding greenness were more susceptible to the effects of PM exposure, the HRs (95% CI) for all-site cancer mortality were 1.042 (1.031-1.053), 1.041 (1.032-1.050), and 1.0473 (1.025-1.070) for every 1 µg/m³ increase in PM1, respectively. The effect of PM1 tended to be more pronounced in the low-exposure group than in the general population, and multiple sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provided evidence that long-term exposure to PM may elevate the risk of all-site cancer mortality, emphasizing the potential health benefits of improving air quality for cancer prevention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:个体环境暴露与癌症发展有关;然而,环境暴露同时发生。环境质量指数(EQI)是对5个领域中发生的累积环境暴露的县级度量。
    方法:从监测中,EQI与县级年度年龄调整癌症发病率相关,流行病学,和最终结果(SEER)程序状态癌症概况。考虑了男性和女性受试者的全部位癌症和前3名部位特异性癌症。发生率差异(IRD;每100,000人的年比率差异)和95%置信区间(CI)使用固定斜率估算,随机截距多元线性回归模型。使用特定领域的指数评估协会,并按农村/城市状况对分析进行分层。
    结果:将总体EQI的最高五分之一/最差的环境质量与最低五分之一/最佳的环境质量进行比较,所有站点县级癌症发病率与整体环境质量差呈正相关(IRD,38.55;95%CI,29.57-47.53),男性(IRD,32.60;95%CI,16.28-48.91)和女性(IRD,30.34;95%CI,20.47-40.21)受试者,表明随着环境质量的下降,癌症发病率可能会增加。农村/城市分层模型显示出正相关,比较所有阶层的最高和最低五分位数,除了人口稀少/农村阶层和大都市/城市化阶层。前列腺癌和乳腺癌与不良的环境质量表现出最强的正相关。
    结论:我们观察到EQI与全部位癌症发病率之间存在强烈的正相关,和协会因农村/城市地位和环境领域而异。专注于癌症发展中单一环境暴露的研究可能无法解决癌症发展的更广泛的环境背景。未来的研究应该解决累积的环境暴露。癌症2017;123:2901-8。©2017美国癌症协会。
    BACKGROUND: Individual environmental exposures are associated with cancer development; however, environmental exposures occur simultaneously. The Environmental Quality Index (EQI) is a county-level measure of cumulative environmental exposures that occur in 5 domains.
    METHODS: The EQI was linked to county-level annual age-adjusted cancer incidence rates from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program state cancer profiles. All-site cancer and the top 3 site-specific cancers for male and female subjects were considered. Incident rate differences (IRDs; annual rate difference per 100,000 persons) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using fixed-slope, random intercept multilevel linear regression models. Associations were assessed with domain-specific indices and analyses were stratified by rural/urban status.
    RESULTS: Comparing the highest quintile/poorest environmental quality with the lowest quintile/best environmental quality for overall EQI, all-site county-level cancer incidence rate was positively associated with poor environmental quality overall (IRD, 38.55; 95% CI, 29.57-47.53) and for male (IRD, 32.60; 95% CI, 16.28-48.91) and female (IRD, 30.34; 95% CI, 20.47-40.21) subjects, indicating a potential increase in cancer incidence with decreasing environmental quality. Rural/urban stratified models demonstrated positive associations comparing the highest with the lowest quintiles for all strata, except the thinly populated/rural stratum and in the metropolitan/urbanized stratum. Prostate and breast cancer demonstrated the strongest positive associations with poor environmental quality.
    CONCLUSIONS: We observed strong positive associations between the EQI and all-site cancer incidence rates, and associations differed by rural/urban status and environmental domain. Research focusing on single environmental exposures in cancer development may not address the broader environmental context in which cancers develop, and future research should address cumulative environmental exposures. Cancer 2017;123:2901-8. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号