All of Us Research Program

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    难治性抑郁症(TRD)是心理健康的主要挑战,影响大量患者,并导致相当大的经济和社会负担。导致TRD的病因复杂,尚未完全了解。
    为了使用不同性状的多基因评分(PGS)研究与TRD相关的遗传因素,并使用来自美国所有研究计划(AoU)的大规模基因组数据探索它们在TRD病因中的潜在作用。
    使用病例队列设计分析了AoU中292,663名参与者的数据。治疗难治性抑郁症(TRD),治疗反应性重度抑郁症(trMDD),以及所有其他未正式诊断为重度抑郁症(非MDD)的患者均通过诊断代码和处方模式进行鉴定.使用来自七个域的61个独特性状的多基因评分(PGS),并进行逻辑回归以评估PGS和TRD之间的关联。最后,Cox比例风险模型用于探索PGS对从重度抑郁障碍(MDD)到TRD的诊断事件进展率的预测价值。
    在发现集中(104128非MDD,16640trMDD,和4177TRD),61个选定的PGS中有44个被发现与MDD显著相关,无论治疗反应如何。发现其中11个与TRD的关联比与trMDD的关联更强,涵盖教育领域的PGS,认知,个性,睡眠,和气质。失眠和特定神经质特征的遗传易感性与TRD风险增加相关(OR范围从1.05到1.15),而高等教育和智力得分是保护性的(ORs分别为0.88和0.91)。这些关联在AoU内的两个其他独立集合中是一致的(n=104,388和63,330)。在随时间追踪的28,964人中,3,854在MDD诊断后平均944天内(95%CI:883~992天)出现TRD。发现所有11个先前鉴定和复制的PGS调节从MDD到TRD的转化率。因此,那些受过高等教育PGS的人将比那些受过较低教育PGS的人经历更慢的转化率,风险比为0.79(80%对20%,95%CI:0.74~0.85)。那些失眠PGS较高的人比失眠PGS较低的人有更快的转化率,风险比为1.21(第80百分位数与第20百分位数,95%CI:1.13~1.30)。
    我们的结果表明,遗传易感性与神经质有关,认知功能,睡眠模式在TRD的发生发展中起着重要作用。这些发现强调了在管理和治疗TRD中考虑遗传和社会心理因素的重要性。未来的研究应该集中在将遗传数据与临床结果相结合,以增强我们对导致治疗抵抗的途径的理解。
    问题:发展为难治性抑郁症(TRD)的个体的易感特征是什么?研究结果:对来自我们所有研究计划的292,663名参与者的数据进行的分析显示,包括神经质在内的特征的多基因评分(PGS),认知功能,睡眠模式与重度抑郁症(MDD)显着相关,特别是,TRD。在研究的61个性状中,与治疗反应性MDD相比,11显示与TRD的关联更强,包括与高等教育和智力相关的特征,神经质和失眠增加了风险。意义:研究结果强调了在管理和治疗TRD时考虑诱发因素的重要性。他们通过具有确定的易感特征的量身定制的方法提出了潜在的干预途径,降低抑郁症进展为治疗抵抗的风险。测量潜在易感性的个性化遗传信息最终可以增强治疗策略。
    UNASSIGNED: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a major challenge in mental health, affecting a significant number of patients and leading to considerable economic and social burdens. The etiological factors contributing to TRD are complex and not fully understood.
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the genetic factors associated with TRD using polygenic scores (PGS) across various traits, and to explore their potential role in the etiology of TRD using large-scale genomic data from the All of Us Research Program (AoU).
    UNASSIGNED: Data from 292,663 participants in the AoU were analyzed using a case-cohort design. Treatment resistant depression (TRD), treatment responsive Major Depressive Disorder (trMDD), and all others who have no formal diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (non-MDD) were identified through diagnostic codes and prescription patterns. Polygenic scores (PGS) for 61 unique traits from seven domains were used and logistic regressions were conducted to assess associations between PGS and TRD. Finally, Cox proportional hazard models were used to explore the predictive value of PGS for progression rate from the diagnostic event of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) to TRD.
    UNASSIGNED: In the discovery set (104128 non-MDD, 16640 trMDD, and 4177 TRD), 44 of 61 selected PGS were found to be significantly associated with MDD, regardless of treatment responsiveness. Eleven of them were found to have stronger associations with TRD than with trMDD, encompassing PGS from domains in education, cognition, personality, sleep, and temperament. Genetic predisposition for insomnia and specific neuroticism traits were associated with increased TRD risk (OR range from 1.05 to 1.15), while higher education and intelligence scores were protective (ORs 0.88 and 0.91, respectively). These associations are consistent across two other independent sets within AoU (n = 104,388 and 63,330). Among 28,964 individuals tracked over time, 3,854 developed TRD within an average of 944 days (95% CI: 883 ~ 992 days) after MDD diagnosis. All eleven previously identified and replicated PGS were found to be modulating the conversion rate from MDD to TRD. Thus, those having higher education PGS would experiencing slower conversion rates than those who have lower education PGS with hazard ratios in 0.79 (80th versus 20th percentile, 95% CI: 0.74 ~ 0.85). Those who had higher insomnia PGS experience faster conversion rates than those who had lower insomnia PGS, with hazard ratios in 1.21 (80th versus 20th percentile, 95% CI: 1.13 ~ 1.30).
    UNASSIGNED: Our results indicate that genetic predisposition related to neuroticism, cognitive function, and sleep patterns play a significant role in the development of TRD. These findings underscore the importance of considering genetic and psychosocial factors in managing and treating TRD. Future research should focus on integrating genetic data with clinical outcomes to enhance our understanding of pathways leading to treatment resistance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    TheAllofUsResearchProgram(计划)是一项正在进行的流行病学队列研究,重点是收集生活方式,健康,社会经济,环境,以及来自100万美国参与者的生物学数据。该计划的重点是招募在生物医学研究(UBR)中代表性不足的人群。联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)是UBR参与者的关键招募流。该计划是数字化的设计,参与者通过基于Web的平台完成调查。由于许多FQHC参与者尚未做好数字化准备,招聘和留住是一个挑战,需要高触摸方法。然而,2020年3月,由于大流行,该计划暂停了面对面活动,因此高接触方法不再是一种选择。2021年1月,该计划推出了计算机辅助电话访谈(CATI),以帮助参与者远程完成调查。本文旨在了解数字准备与调查完成模式之间的关联(CATI与基于网络的平台)由FQHC的参与者提供。
    这项研究包括2,089名参与者,他们在2021年1月28日(引入CATI时)至2022年1月27日(引入CATI后1年)之间通过CATI和/或基于Web的平台完成了一项或多项调查。
    结果显示,在700名未做好数字化准备的参与者中,51%使用CATI;在1053名数字就绪参与者中,30%的人使用CATI完成保留调查。其余336名参与者有“未知/缺失”的数字准备,34%使用CATI。CATI允许通过电话与经过培训的工作人员一起完成调查,该工作人员代表参与者输入了答复。不管参与者的数字准备情况如何,与网络相比,CATI完成保留调查的中位时间更长。与基于Web的平台相比,CATI导致跳过的响应更少,突出了更好的数据完整性。这些发现证明了在在线调查中使用CATI提高应答率的有效性,尤其是在数字挑战人群中。分析为NIH提供了见解,医疗保健提供者,以及采用虚拟工具进行数据收集的研究人员,远程医疗,远程医疗,或数字挑战组的患者门户,即使当面援助仍然是一种选择。它还提供了有关员工时间投资和对健康数据收集工具进行虚拟管理所需的支持的见解。
    UNASSIGNED: The All of Us Research Program (Program) is an ongoing epidemiologic cohort study focused on collecting lifestyle, health, socioeconomic, environmental, and biological data from 1 million US-based participants. The Program has a focus on enrolling populations that are underrepresented in biomedical research (UBR). Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are a key recruitment stream of UBR participants. The Program is digital by design where participants complete surveys via web-based platform. As many FQHC participants are not digitally ready, recruitment and retention is a challenge, requiring high-touch methods. However, high-touch methods ceased as an option in March 2020 when the Program paused in-person activities because of the pandemic. In January 2021, the Program introduced Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) to help participants complete surveys remotely. This paper aims to understand the association between digital readiness and mode of survey completion (CATI vs. web-based platform) by participants at FQHCs.
    UNASSIGNED: This study included 2,089 participants who completed one or more surveys via CATI and/or web-based platform between January 28, 2021 (when CATI was introduced) and January 27, 2022 (1 year since CATI introduction).
    UNASSIGNED: Results show that among the 700 not-digitally ready participants, 51% used CATI; and of the 1,053 digitally ready participants, 30% used CATI for completing retention surveys. The remaining 336 participants had \"Unknown/Missing\" digital readiness of which, 34% used CATI. CATI allowed survey completion over the phone with a trained staff member who entered responses on the participant\'s behalf. Regardless of participants\' digital readiness, median time to complete retention surveys was longer with CATI compared to web. CATI resulted in fewer skipped responses than the web-based platform highlighting better data completeness. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of using CATI for improving response rates in online surveys, especially among populations that are digitally challenged. Analyses provide insights for NIH, healthcare providers, and researchers on the adoption of virtual tools for data collection, telehealth, telemedicine, or patient portals by digitally challenged groups even when in-person assistance continues to remain as an option. It also provides insights on the investment of staff time and support required for virtual administration of tools for health data collection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:电子健康记录(EHR)是研究的有用数据源,但是它们的可用性受到测量误差的阻碍。这项研究调查了EHR中成人身高和体重测量的自动错误检测算法,适用于所有人研究计划(AllofUs)。
    方法:我们开发了成人身高和体重的参考图表,并根据参与者的性别进行分层。我们的分析包括4,076,534个身高和5,207,328个重量的测量值,来自150,000名参与者。使用修改后的标准偏差分数识别错误,与预期值的差异,以及连续测量之间的显著变化。我们使用来自250名随机选择的参与者的图表审查高度(8,092)和重量(9,039)评估了我们的方法,并将其与“我们所有人”中的当前清洁算法进行了比较。
    结果:所提出的算法对整个队列中身高的1.4%和体重的1.5%进行了分类。身高敏感性为90.4%(95%CI:79.0-96.8%),体重敏感性为65.9%(95%CI:56.9-74.1%)。身高的精确度为73.4%(95%CI:60.9-83.7%),体重的精确度为62.9(95%CI:54.0-71.1%)。相比之下,当前的清洁算法在高度误差的灵敏度(55.8%)和精度(16.5%)方面表现较差,而在重量误差方面具有较高的精度(94.0%)和较低的灵敏度(61.9%)。
    结论:我们提出的算法在检测身高误差方面优于权重。它可以作为当前AllofUs清洁算法的有价值的补充,用于识别错误的高度值。
    BACKGROUND: Electronic Health Records (EHR) are a useful data source for research, but their usability is hindered by measurement errors. This study investigated an automatic error detection algorithm for adult height and weight measurements in EHR for the All of Us Research Program (All of Us).
    METHODS: We developed reference charts for adult heights and weights that were stratified on participant sex. Our analysis included 4,076,534 height and 5,207,328 wt measurements from ∼ 150,000 participants. Errors were identified using modified standard deviation scores, differences from their expected values, and significant changes between consecutive measurements. We evaluated our method with chart-reviewed heights (8,092) and weights (9,039) from 250 randomly selected participants and compared it with the current cleaning algorithm in All of Us.
    RESULTS: The proposed algorithm classified 1.4 % of height and 1.5 % of weight errors in the full cohort. Sensitivity was 90.4 % (95 % CI: 79.0-96.8 %) for heights and 65.9 % (95 % CI: 56.9-74.1 %) for weights. Precision was 73.4 % (95 % CI: 60.9-83.7 %) for heights and 62.9 (95 % CI: 54.0-71.1 %) for weights. In comparison, the current cleaning algorithm has inferior performance in sensitivity (55.8 %) and precision (16.5 %) for height errors while having higher precision (94.0 %) and lower sensitivity (61.9 %) for weight errors.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed algorithm outperformed in detecting height errors compared to weights. It can serve as a valuable addition to the current All of Us cleaning algorithm for identifying erroneous height values.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的脆弱性和韧性的区别尚不清楚。利用创伤经历报告,遗传数据,和电子健康记录(EHR),我们调查并预测了英国生物库(UKB)和美国研究计划(AoU)中PTSD脆弱性和弹性的临床合并症(共表型),分别。在60,354名创伤暴露的UKB参与者中,我们根据PTSD症状定义了PTSD脆弱性和弹性,创伤负担,和多基因风险评分。进行了基于EHR的表型全关联研究(PheWAS),以剖析PTSD脆弱性和弹性的共表型。重要的诊断终点作为权重,产生表型风险评分(PheRS),以在多达95,761名AoU参与者中进行PTSD脆弱性和弹性PheRS的PheWAS。基于EHR的PheWAS显示了与PTSD脆弱性呈正相关的三种重要表型(最高关联“睡眠障碍”)和与PTSD韧性呈负相关的五种结果(最高关联“肠易激综合征”)。在AoU队列中,PheRS分析显示,脆弱性和复原力之间存在部分反比关系,具有明显的共病关联。虽然PheRS脆弱性关联与多种表型有关,PheRS弹性与眼部状况呈负相关。我们的研究揭示了创伤后应激障碍脆弱性和复原力的表型差异,强调这些概念不仅仅是PTSD的不存在和存在。
    What distinguishes vulnerability and resilience to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) remains unclear. Levering traumatic experiences reporting, genetic data, and electronic health records (EHR), we investigated and predicted the clinical comorbidities (co-phenome) of PTSD vulnerability and resilience in the UK Biobank (UKB) and All of Us Research Program (AoU), respectively. In 60,354 trauma-exposed UKB participants, we defined PTSD vulnerability and resilience considering PTSD symptoms, trauma burden, and polygenic risk scores. EHR-based phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) were conducted to dissect the co-phenomes of PTSD vulnerability and resilience. Significant diagnostic endpoints were applied as weights, yielding a phenotypic risk score (PheRS) to conduct PheWAS of PTSD vulnerability and resilience PheRS in up to 95,761 AoU participants. EHR-based PheWAS revealed three significant phenotypes positively associated with PTSD vulnerability (top association \"Sleep disorders\") and five outcomes inversely associated with PTSD resilience (top association \"Irritable Bowel Syndrome\"). In the AoU cohort, PheRS analysis showed a partial inverse relationship between vulnerability and resilience with distinct comorbid associations. While PheRSvulnerability associations were linked to multiple phenotypes, PheRSresilience showed inverse relationships with eye conditions. Our study unveils phenotypic differences in PTSD vulnerability and resilience, highlighting that these concepts are not simply the absence and presence of PTSD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管社会人口统计学特征与健康差异有关,不同社会和人口因素的相对预测价值在很大程度上仍然未知.这项研究旨在描述我们所有参与者的社会人口统计学特征,并评估每个因素对与高发病率和死亡率相关的慢性疾病的预测价值。
    方法:我们使用来自“我们所有人”研究计划的去识别调查数据进行了横截面分析,它收集了社会,人口统计学,以及自2018年5月以来居住在美国的成年人的健康信息。社会人口统计学数据包括自我报告的年龄,性别,性别,性取向,种族/民族,收入,教育,健康保险,初级保健提供者(PCP)状态,和健康素养得分。我们分析了自我报告的高血压患病率,冠状动脉疾病,任何癌症,皮肤癌,肺部疾病,糖尿病,肥胖,和慢性肾病。最后,我们使用来自逻辑回归的每个预测因子的充分性指数评估了每个社会人口统计学因素对预测每种慢性疾病的相对重要性.
    结果:在此分析的372,050名参与者中,中位年龄为53岁,59.8%的人报告了女性性行为,最常见的种族/族裔类别是白人(54.0%),黑色(19.9%),西班牙裔/拉丁裔(16.7%)。被认定为亚洲人的参与者,中东/北非,怀特最有可能报告年收入超过20万美元,高级学位,雇主或工会保险,而被认定为黑人的参与者,西班牙裔,夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民最有可能报告年收入低于10,000美元,低于高中学历,医疗补助保险。我们发现年龄最能预测高血压,冠状动脉疾病,任何癌症,皮肤癌,糖尿病,肥胖,和慢性肾病。保险类型最能预测肺部疾病。值得注意的是,没有两种健康状况对社会人口统计学因素具有相同的重要性.
    结论:年龄是评估慢性病的最佳预测指标,但是收入的相对预测价值,教育,健康保险,PCP状态,种族/民族,和性取向是高度可变的不同健康状况。确定特定疾病中差异最大的社会人口群体可以指导未来的干预措施以促进健康公平。
    Although sociodemographic characteristics are associated with health disparities, the relative predictive value of different social and demographic factors remains largely unknown. This study aimed to describe the sociodemographic characteristics of All of Us participants and evaluate the predictive value of each factor for chronic diseases associated with high morbidity and mortality.
    We performed a cross-sectional analysis using de-identified survey data from the All of Us Research Program, which has collected social, demographic, and health information from adults living in the United States since May 2018. Sociodemographic data included self-reported age, sex, gender, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, income, education, health insurance, primary care provider (PCP) status, and health literacy scores. We analyzed the self-reported prevalence of hypertension, coronary artery disease, any cancer, skin cancer, lung disease, diabetes, obesity, and chronic kidney disease. Finally, we assessed the relative importance of each sociodemographic factor for predicting each chronic disease using the adequacy index for each predictor from logistic regression.
    Among the 372,050 participants in this analysis, the median age was 53 years, 59.8% reported female sex, and the most common racial/ethnic categories were White (54.0%), Black (19.9%), and Hispanic/Latino (16.7%). Participants who identified as Asian, Middle Eastern/North African, and White were the most likely to report annual incomes greater than $200,000, advanced degrees, and employer or union insurance, while participants who identified as Black, Hispanic, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander were the most likely to report annual incomes less than $10,000, less than a high school education, and Medicaid insurance. We found that age was most predictive of hypertension, coronary artery disease, any cancer, skin cancer, diabetes, obesity, and chronic kidney disease. Insurance type was most predictive of lung disease. Notably, no two health conditions had the same order of importance for sociodemographic factors.
    Age was the best predictor for the assessed chronic diseases, but the relative predictive value of income, education, health insurance, PCP status, race/ethnicity, and sexual orientation was highly variable across health conditions. Identifying the sociodemographic groups with the largest disparities in a specific disease can guide future interventions to promote health equity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号