Aircraft noise

飞机噪音
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管美国的下一代航空运输系统(NextGen)优化了飞行模式,这导致了机场附近一些社区飞机噪音暴露增加的意外后果。尽管有证据表明长期接触高噪音会对健康产生有害影响,在航空政策讨论中,没有充分考虑到受影响社区噪音增加带来的潜在不利健康后果。
    目的:我们评估了马里兰州巴尔的摩-华盛顿瑟古德马歇尔国际机场(BWI)附近NextGen造成的飞机噪音增加的长期健康和相关经济负担。
    方法:概率马尔可夫模型预测了30、20和10年内的健康增量和相关经济负担,将NextGen后噪声暴露水平与NextGen前水平进行比较。健康结果包括心血管疾病(CVD),焦虑症,噪音烦恼,低出生体重(LBW)。噪声暴露分为四个级别(<55dBDNL,55-60dBDNL,60-65dBDNL,>65dBDNL)。进行了2000次迭代的蒙特卡罗模拟,以获得增量负担估计和不确定性区间。对噪声效应参数进行了单向灵敏度分析。
    结果:估计增加的飞机噪声暴露会产生(折现)3.62亿美元的增量死亡率成本,发病费用为3.36亿美元,以及在未来30年内损失15326个质量调整寿命年(QALYs)。敏感性分析揭示了CVD结果的最大不确定性。
    结论:NextGen是一种可以通过优化飞行模式来提高机场运营效率的系统。虽然运营效率在许多方面都是有益的,飞行模式和体积的变化也会产生噪声污染,在政策决策中应考虑的主要公共卫生问题。这项研究量化了在巴尔的摩-华盛顿国际机场附近的社区实施NextGen后,飞机噪声暴露增加的长期健康和经济影响。我们的发现强调了考虑噪声污染对公众健康影响的重要性。
    BACKGROUND: While the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) in the United States optimizes flight patterns, it has led to the unintended consequence of increasing aircraft noise exposure in some communities near airports. Despite the evidence that chronic exposure to high noise levels produces detrimental health effects, potential adverse health consequences due to increased noise in the affected communities have not been adequately considered in aviation policy discussions.
    OBJECTIVE: We assessed the long-term health and associated economic burden of increased aircraft noise caused by NextGen near the Baltimore-Washington Thurgood Marshall International (BWI) airport in Maryland.
    METHODS: A probabilistic Markov model projected the incremental health and associated economic burden over 30, 20, and 10 years, comparing post-NextGen noise exposure levels to pre-NextGen levels. Health outcomes included cardiovascular disease (CVD), anxiety disorders, noise annoyance, and low birth weight (LBW). Noise exposure was categorized into four levels (<55 dB DNL, 55-60 dB DNL, 60-65 dB DNL, >65 dB DNL). A Monte Carlo simulation with 2000 iterations was run to obtain incremental burden estimates and uncertainty intervals. One-way sensitivity analyses for noise effect parameters were conducted.
    RESULTS: Increased aircraft noise exposure was estimated to produce (discounted) incremental mortality costs of $362 million, morbidity costs of $336 million, and losses of 15,326 Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) over the next 30 years. Sensitivity analyses revealed the greatest uncertainty for CVD outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: NextGen is a system that can increase the operational efficiency of airports by optimizing flight patterns. While operational efficiency is beneficial in many ways, changes in flight patterns and volume can also produce noise pollution, a major public health concern that should be considered in policy decision-making. This study quantifies the long-term health and economic implications of increased aircraft noise exposure following the implementation of NextGen in communities near the Baltimore-Washington International Airport. Our findings underscore the importance of considering public health consequences of noise pollution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:长期暴露于运输噪声与心脏代谢疾病有关,最近的证据也显示与糖尿病(DM)发病率有关。这项研究旨在评估瑞士国家队列中交通噪声与DM死亡率之间的关系。
    方法:在15年的随访中(2001-2015年;414万成年人),累计超过72,000DM死亡。在住宅位置计算了特定源的噪声,考虑到移动的历史。多次曝光,时变Cox回归用于推导风险比(HR,和95%-置信区间)。模型包括道路交通,铁路和飞机噪音,空气污染,以及个人和地区一级的协变量,包括社会经济地位。分析包括暴露反应建模,效果修饰,和机场周围的子集分析。主要研究结果与已发表的关于死亡率和发病率的研究(单独和合并)整合到荟萃分析中。
    结果:HR为1.06(1.05,1.07),1.02(1.01,1.03)和1.01(0.99,1.02)每10分贝的昼夜水平(Lden)道路交通,铁路和飞机噪音,分别(调整后的模型,包括NO2)。样条建议道路交通噪声的阈值(~46dBLden,远低于53dBLdenWHO指南水平),但不是铁路噪音。替代PM2.5或包括1型DM死亡几乎没有改变相关性。男性的HR高于女性,与老年人相比,年轻人更年轻。仅关注1型DM显示出与道路交通噪声的独立关联。Meta分析仅适用于道路交通噪声与死亡率的关系(1.08[0.99,1.18]每10dB,n=4),点估计与发病率大致相似(每10分贝1.07[1.05,1.09],n=10)。结合发病率和死亡率研究表明,每种来源都有正相关关系,道路交通噪声最强(1.07[1.05,1.08],1.02[1.01,1.03],和1.02[1.00,1.03]每10分贝道路交通[n=14],铁路[n=5]和飞机噪音[n=5],分别)。
    结论:这项研究提供了交通噪音与糖尿病死亡率相关的新证据。随着越来越多的证据和巨大的疾病负担,DM应被视为噪声和健康讨论中的重要结果。
    BACKGROUND: Long-term exposure to transportation noise is related to cardio-metabolic diseases, with more recent evidence also showing associations with diabetes mellitus (DM) incidence. This study aimed to evaluate the association between transportation noise and DM mortality within the Swiss National Cohort.
    METHODS: During 15 years of follow-up (2001-2015; 4.14 million adults), over 72,000 DM deaths were accrued. Source-specific noise was calculated at residential locations, considering moving history. Multi-exposure, time-varying Cox regression was used to derive hazard ratios (HR, and 95%-confidence intervals). Models included road traffic, railway and aircraft noise, air pollution, and individual and area-level covariates including socio-economic position. Analyses included exposure-response modelling, effect modification, and a subset analysis around airports. The main findings were integrated into meta-analyses with published studies on mortality and incidence (separately and combined).
    RESULTS: HRs were 1.06 (1.05, 1.07), 1.02 (1.01, 1.03) and 1.01 (0.99, 1.02) per 10 dB day evening-night level (Lden) road traffic, railway and aircraft noise, respectively (adjusted model, including NO2). Splines suggested a threshold for road traffic noise (~ 46 dB Lden, well below the 53 dB Lden WHO guideline level), but not railway noise. Substituting for PM2.5, or including deaths with type 1 DM hardly changed the associations. HRs were higher for males compared to females, and in younger compared to older adults. Focusing only on type 1 DM showed an independent association with road traffic noise. Meta-analysis was only possible for road traffic noise in relation to mortality (1.08 [0.99, 1.18] per 10 dB, n = 4), with the point estimate broadly similar to that for incidence (1.07 [1.05, 1.09] per 10 dB, n = 10). Combining incidence and mortality studies indicated positive associations for each source, strongest for road traffic noise (1.07 [1.05, 1.08], 1.02 [1.01, 1.03], and 1.02 [1.00, 1.03] per 10 dB road traffic [n = 14], railway [n = 5] and aircraft noise [n = 5], respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new evidence that transportation noise is associated with diabetes mortality. With the growing evidence and large disease burden, DM should be viewed as an important outcome in the noise and health discussion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:飞机噪声暴露与心血管疾病风险有关。一种未被研究的候选途径是肥胖。这项研究调查了两个前瞻性护士健康研究(NHS和NHSII)队列中女性参与者的飞机噪音与肥胖之间的关系。
    方法:在1995-2010年期间,根据90个美国(U.S.)机场的超过44dB的模拟1dB(dB)噪声等高线,对参与者居住地址的飞机昼夜平均声级(DNL)进行估计。两年期调查(1994-2017年)提供了关于体重指数(BMI;二分法,分类)和其他个体特征。还计算了从18岁开始的BMI变化(BMI18;三元组)。飞机噪声暴露是二分的(45,55dB),分类(<45,45-54,≥55dB)或连续暴露≥45dB。使用广义估计方程的多变量多项逻辑回归针对个体特征和邻域社会经济状况进行了调整,绿色,人口密度,和环境噪声。效果修改由美国人口普查地区评估,气候边界,航空公司枢纽类型,听力损失,和吸烟状况。
    结果:在基线时,74848名女性参与者平均50.1岁,83.0%,14.8%,2.2%的飞机噪音<45、45-54和≥55dB,分别。在完全调整的模型中,暴露≥55dB与11%的几率相关(95%置信区间[95CI]:-1%,24%)的BMI≥30.0,几率更高15%(95CI:3%,29%)的成员在BMI18的最高三分位数(ΔBMI6.7至71.6)中。BMI18的第二三分位数(ΔBMI2.9至6.6)和BMI25.0-29.9以及≥45和<45dB的暴露量观察到较不明显的关联。有DNL-BMI趋势的证据(ptrends≤0.02)。在生活在西方的参与者中观察到了更强的关联,干旱气候地区,在以前的吸烟者中。
    结论:在两个全国性的女护士队列中,较高的飞机噪声暴露与较高的BMI相关,为飞机噪音-肥胖-疾病途径增加证据。
    OBJECTIVE: Aircraft noise exposure is linked to cardiovascular disease risk. One understudied candidate pathway is obesity. This study investigates the association between aircraft noise and obesity among female participants in two prospective Nurses\' Health Study (NHS and NHSII) cohorts.
    METHODS: Aircraft day-night average sound levels (DNL) were estimated at participant residential addresses from modeled 1 dB (dB) noise contours above 44 dB for 90 United States (U.S.) airports in 5-year intervals 1995-2010. Biennial surveys (1994-2017) provided information on body mass index (BMI; dichotomized, categorical) and other individual characteristics. Change in BMI from age 18 (BMI18; tertiles) was also calculated. Aircraft noise exposures were dichotomized (45, 55 dB), categorized (<45, 45-54, ≥55 dB) or continuous for exposure ≥45 dB. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression using generalized estimating equations were adjusted for individual characteristics and neighborhood socioeconomic status, greenness, population density, and environmental noise. Effect modification was assessed by U.S. Census region, climate boundary, airline hub type, hearing loss, and smoking status.
    RESULTS: At baseline, the 74,848 female participants averaged 50.1 years old, with 83.0%, 14.8%, and 2.2% exposed to <45, 45-54, and ≥55 dB of aircraft noise, respectively. In fully adjusted models, exposure ≥55 dB was associated with 11% higher odds (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: -1%, 24%) of BMIs ≥30.0, and 15% higher odds (95%CI: 3%, 29%) of membership in the highest tertile of BMI18 (ΔBMI 6.7 to 71.6). Less-pronounced associations were observed for the 2nd tertile of BMI18 (ΔBMI 2.9 to 6.6) and BMI 25.0-29.9 as well as exposures ≥45 versus <45 dB. There was evidence of DNL-BMI trends (ptrends ≤ 0.02). Stronger associations were observed among participants living in the West, arid climate areas, and among former smokers.
    CONCLUSIONS: In two nationwide cohorts of female nurses, higher aircraft noise exposure was associated with higher BMI, adding evidence to an aircraft noise-obesity-disease pathway.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:现有证据表明,精神病患者对噪声高度敏感,噪音暴露会增加不良心理健康结果的风险,比如精神病住院甚至自杀.为了调查噪声对这个脆弱人群的急性影响,我们评估了位于瑞士军事机场附近的精神病诊所的战斗机噪声与按需镇静和镇痛药物管理之间的短期关联.
    方法:我们应用了一个案例时间序列分析,使用分布滞后模型进行每小时时间分辨率。分析根据长期和季节性趋势进行了调整,星期几,一天的时间,随时间变化的天气条件和逗留的一周。使用不同战斗机和航线组合的详细飞行计划和噪声足迹对噪声暴露(每小时A加权等效连续声压级(LAeq))进行建模。结果数据可从诊所的记录中获得。
    结果:在研究期间(06/2016-12/2021),23,486次飞行。5,968次临床住院,中位住院时间为41天(IQR:28d,50d)记录。在暴露后3小时的滞后期内,镇静剂的用药比值比(OR)为1.016(95CI:1.006,1.026)每10dBLAeq,镇痛药为1.032(95CI:1.016,1.048)每10dB。多发病率患者的影响更大。
    结论:病例时间序列分析是一种新颖的方法,可以调查观察数据中的短暂关联,同时将偏倚风险降至最低。使用客观记录的结果衡量标准,我们的结果表明,精神病患者是一个脆弱的人群,噪声暴露可导致症状加重和不良事件。
    BACKGROUND: Existing evidence suggests that psychiatric patients are highly noise sensitive, and that noise exposure increases the risk for adverse mental health outcomes, such as psychiatric hospitalizations and even suicide. To investigate acute effects of noise in this vulnerable population, we assessed short-term associations between fighter jet noise and on-demand sedative and analgesic drug administrations in a psychiatric clinic located close to a military airfield in Switzerland.
    METHODS: We applied a case time series analysis with an hourly time resolution using distributed-lag models. Analysis was adjusted for long-term and seasonal trends, day of week, time of day, time-varying weather conditions and the week of stay. Noise exposure (hourly A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure levels (LAeq)) was modelled using detailed flight plans and noise footprints for different fighter jet and route combinations. Outcome data were available from the clinic\'s records.
    RESULTS: During the study period (06/2016-12/2021), 23,486 flights occurred. 5,968 clinical stays with a median length of 41 days (IQR: 28d, 50d) were recorded. The odds ratio (OR) for medication administration over the lag period of 3 hours after exposure was 1.016 (95 %CI: 1.006, 1.026) per 10 dB LAeq for sedatives and 1.032 (95 %CI: 1.016, 1.048) per 10 dB for analgesics. Effects were larger in multimorbid patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Case time series analysis is a novel method to investigate transient associations in observational data while minimizing risk of bias. Using an objectively recorded outcome measure, our results demonstrate that psychiatric patients are a vulnerable population, in which noise exposure can lead to symptom exacerbations and adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在一些基于人群的队列研究中,观察到飞机噪声与心血管疾病的各种诊断之间存在关联。然而,尚无研究解决急性冠心病患者与交通噪音相关的复发风险.我们进行了一项前瞻性患者队列研究,该研究涉及从法兰克福机场附近莱茵-美因河地区的11个心脏中心招募的737名患者。所有患者均在2013年7月至2018年11月期间诊断为血管造影证实的急性冠状动脉综合征。使用Soundplan软件计算居住地的单个飞机噪声暴露量,从黑森州国家机构提供的噪声图中获得了道路交通和铁路噪声的暴露。通过Cox回归分析相关混杂因素。作为非致死性终点的复发事件定义为心肌梗死,中风,搭桥手术或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架植入术。此外,对全因死亡率进行了评估.从663名(90%)患者获得了包括社会经济和混杂信息在内的随访数据,平均随访时间为42个月(范围:1-80个月)。平均Lden飞机噪声暴露为48.1dB。Lden飞机噪声暴露每增加10dB,复发的调整风险比(HR)为1.24(95%-CI:0.97-1.58)。对复发和全因死亡率的综合分析得出HR为1.31(95%-CI:1.03-1.66)。在Lday和Lnight飞机噪声暴露中发现了类似的HR。道路交通和铁路噪声的HR高于1,但不太明显,也不重要。在基于人群的队列研究中,观察到的飞机噪声的暴露-反应关联比以前观察到的更为明显,这表明急性冠心病患者特别容易受到运输噪声的影响。因此,减少环境噪声暴露的措施可能有助于改善冠心病患者的临床预后。
    In several population based cohort studies associations between aircraft noise and various diagnoses of cardiovascular disease were observed. However, no study has yet addressed the risk of recurrences in relation to transportation noise in patients with acute coronary heart disease. We conducted a prospective patient cohort study of 737 individuals recruited from eleven cardiac centers in the Rhine-Main region in the vicinity of Frankfurt Airport. All patients had an angiographically confirmed acute coronary syndrome diagnosed between July 2013 and November 2018. Individual aircraft noise exposure at the place of residence was calculated using Soundplan software, and exposure to road traffic and railway noise was obtained from noise maps provided by the Hessian State Agency. Data was analyzed by means of Cox regression adjusted for relevant confounders. Recurrent event as non-fatal endpoint was defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, bypass surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation. In addition, all-cause mortality was evaluated. Follow-up data including socioeconomic and confounder information was obtained from 663 (90%) patients covering a mean follow-up period of 42 (range: 1-80) months. Mean Lden aircraft noise exposure was 48.1 dB. Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence was 1.24 (95%-CI: 0.97-1.58) per 10 dB increase in Lden aircraft noise exposure. A combined analysis of recurrence and all-cause mortality yielded a HR of 1.31 (95%-CI: 1.03-1.66). Similar HRs were found for Lday and Lnight aircraft noise exposure. HRs for road traffic and railway noise were above unity but less pronounced and not significant. Observed exposure-response associations for aircraft noise were more pronounced than previously observed in population-based cohort studies suggesting that acute coronary heart disease patients are particularly vulnerable to effects from transportation noise. Measures to reduce environmental noise exposure may thus be helpful in improving clinical outcome of patients with coronary heart disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:环境噪声是一种重要的环境暴露,会影响健康。有人提出交通噪音与乳腺癌发病率之间存在关联,尽管目前的证据有限。我们调查了长期暴露于交通噪声与乳腺癌发病率之间的综合关联。
    方法:来自八个北欧队列的汇总数据提供了111,492名女性的研究人群。路,铁路,飞机噪音是在住宅地址模拟的。乳腺癌发病率(全部,雌激素受体(ER)阳性,ER阴性)来自癌症登记处。使用Cox比例危险模型估计危险比(HR),调整社会人口统计学和生活方式变量的主要模型,以及长期暴露于空气污染。
    结果:共有93,859名妇女被纳入分析,其中5875人患了乳腺癌。中位数(第5-95百分位数)5年住宅道路交通噪声为54.8(40.0-67.8)dBLden,在那些暴露的人中,铁路噪声中位数为51.0(41.2-65.8)dBLden。我们观察到乳腺癌的合并HR(95%置信区间(CI))为1.03(0.99-1.06),每10dB增加5年平均暴露于道路交通噪声,铁路噪声为1.03(95%CI:0.96-1.11),在调整生活方式和社会人口统计学协变量后。在进一步调整PM2.5的分析中,HR保持不变,在调整NO2时减弱(HR从1.02降至1.01),在使用相同样本的分析中。对于飞机噪音,未观察到关联。对于任何噪声源,该关联不会因ER状态而异。在使用<60dB作为截止值的分析中,我们发现道路交通的HR为1.08(0.99-1.18),铁路噪音为1.19(0.95-1.49)。
    结论:我们发现公路和铁路噪声与乳腺癌风险之间存在弱关联。需要更多高质量的前瞻性研究,特别是在那些暴露于铁路和飞机噪音的人中,在得出关于噪音作为乳腺癌危险因素的结论之前。
    Environmental noise is an important environmental exposure that can affect health. An association between transportation noise and breast cancer incidence has been suggested, although current evidence is limited. We investigated the pooled association between long-term exposure to transportation noise and breast cancer incidence.
    Pooled data from eight Nordic cohorts provided a study population of 111,492 women. Road, railway, and aircraft noise were modelled at residential addresses. Breast cancer incidence (all, estrogen receptor (ER) positive, and ER negative) was derived from cancer registries. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox Proportional Hazards Models, adjusting main models for sociodemographic and lifestyle variables together with long-term exposure to air pollution.
    A total of 93,859 women were included in the analyses, of whom 5,875 developed breast cancer. The median (5th-95th percentile) 5-year residential road traffic noise was 54.8 (40.0-67.8) dB Lden, and among those exposed, the median railway noise was 51.0 (41.2-65.8) dB Lden. We observed a pooled HR for breast cancer (95 % confidence interval (CI)) of 1.03 (0.99-1.06) per 10 dB increase in 5-year mean exposure to road traffic noise, and 1.03 (95 % CI: 0.96-1.11) for railway noise, after adjustment for lifestyle and sociodemographic covariates. HRs remained unchanged in analyses with further adjustment for PM2.5 and attenuated when adjusted for NO2 (HRs from 1.02 to 1.01), in analyses using the same sample. For aircraft noise, no association was observed. The associations did not vary by ER status for any noise source. In analyses using <60 dB as a cutoff, we found HRs of 1.08 (0.99-1.18) for road traffic and 1.19 (0.95-1.49) for railway noise.
    We found weak associations between road and railway noise and breast cancer risk. More high-quality prospective studies are needed, particularly among those exposed to railway and aircraft noise before conclusions regarding noise as a risk factor for breast cancer can be made.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    飞机噪声是大城市最重要的环境污染来源之一。在COVID-19大流行期间,社区的严格封锁可能会增加居民对噪音的不适感,这可能会扰乱公共活动并降低主观幸福感。现有的大多数研究都将飞机噪声视为单一声源,忽略了社区中其他声音的影响。本文应用现场调查来确定与飞机噪声评估相关的声景和非声学因素。
    对深圳宝安国际机场附近三个样本居民区的居民进行了纸质调查问卷,以调查居民的总体健康状况,飞机噪声评估,社区活动,和态度因素。通过对测量的飞机噪声水平和声景设施的存在进行控制的统计分析,调查了受访者的噪声评估与主观因素之间的关系。
    结果表明,在锁定期间,飞机噪音的负面影响得到了增强,特别是对于经常使用太空的人和那些健康状况不佳的居民。在类似飞机噪声暴露水平的条件下,鸟鸣和喷泉声音较多的社区,高度恼火的受访者比例较低,音景等级较高。本文进一步指出,个人因素包括对航空旅行的恐惧,噪声灵敏度,户外活动的频率增加了飞机噪音的烦恼程度,而飞机噪音的烦恼程度更高与健康状况差有关。
    这些发现暗示了主观因素的调节作用和自然声音的恢复作用,通过保护弱势群体和创建社区声景设施,可以为飞机噪声控制和社区咨询策略提供信息。未来的研究可能会进行实验前和实验后,以估计音景干预的潜在因果影响。
    UNASSIGNED: Aircraft noise is one of the most significant sources of environmental pollution in large cities. During the COVID-19 pandemic, strict lockdown in community might increase residents\' discomfort with the noise, which could disrupt public activities and reduce subjective well-being. Most of the existing studies considered aircraft noise as a single sound source, which have ignored the influence of other sounds in the community. This paper applied field survey to identify the soundscape and non-acoustic factors related to aircraft noise evaluation.
    UNASSIGNED: Paper questionnaires were delivered to select residents of three sample residential areas near Shenzhen Bao\'an International Airport to investigate residents\' general health, evaluation of aircraft noise, community activities, and attitudinal factors. The relationship between respondent\'s noise evaluations and subjective factors were investigated through statistical analyses controlling for measured aircraft noise levels and the existence of soundscape facilities.
    UNASSIGNED: The results indicated that the negative effects of aircraft noise were enhanced during the lock down, especially for frequent space users and those residents in poor health status. Under conditions of similar levels of aircraft noise exposure, communities with more birdsong and fountain sounds had lower proportion of highly annoyed respondents and higher level of soundscape ratings. This paper further indicated that personal factors including fear of air travel, noise sensitivity, and the frequency of outdoor activity had increased the level of annoyance to aircraft noise, while higher degree of annoyance to aircraft noise was associated with poor health status.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings implied the moderating effects of subjective factors and the restorative effects of natural sounds, which could inform aircraft noise control and community consultation strategies by protecting vulnerable populations and creating community soundscape facilities. Future research might conduct a pre- and post-experiment to estimate the potential causal impact of the soundscape intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:运输中的噪声污染是欧洲环境疾病负担的主要贡献者之一。我们提供了一个国家内这些健康影响的空间变化的新评估,以英国为例。
    方法:我们估计了烦恼的负担(非常烦恼),睡眠障碍(高度睡眠干扰),缺血性心脏病(IHD),中风,和糖尿病可归因于2018年英格兰成年人口的长期交通噪声暴露,直至地方当局水平(平均成年人口:136,000)。要得出估计值,我们结合了文献信息的暴露-反应关系,有了关于噪声暴露的人口数据,疾病,和死亡率。来自道路的长期平均噪声暴露,铁路和飞机来自战略噪音测绘,Lden和Lnight的较低暴露阈值为50dB(分贝)。
    结果:40%,英格兰4.5%和4.8%的成年人暴露在道路上,rail,飞机噪音超过50dBLden。我们估计由于道路交通而损失了近十万(〜97,000)残疾调整寿命年(DALY),~13,000来自铁路,和17000来自飞机噪音。这排除了一些噪声-结果对,因为可用的研究太少,无法提供可靠的暴露-响应估计。烦恼和睡眠障碍占DALY的大多数,接下来是中风,IHD,和糖尿病。伦敦,东南部,西北地区失去的道路交通DALY数量最多,而63%的飞机噪音DALY是在伦敦发现的。战略噪音地图并不包括所有道路,可能仍然有大量的交通流量。在使用伦敦所有道路的建模噪声进行的敏感性分析中,DALYs高出1.1倍至2.2倍。
    结论:在英格兰,交通噪声暴露导致了显著且不平等的环境疾病负担。从噪声暴露模型中省略次要道路会导致对疾病负担的低估。
    Noise pollution from transportation is one of the leading contributors to the environmental disease burden in Europe. We provide a novel assessment of spatial variations of these health impacts within a country, using England as an example.
    We estimated the burden of annoyance (highly annoyed), sleep disturbance (highly sleep disturbed), ischemic heart disease (IHD), stroke, and diabetes attributable to long-term transportation noise exposures in England for the adult population in 2018 down to local authority level (average adult population: 136,000). To derive estimates, we combined literature-informed exposure-response relationships, with population data on noise exposures, disease, and mortalities. Long-term average noise exposures from road, rail and aircraft were sourced from strategic noise mapping, with a lower exposure threshold of 50 dB (decibels) Lden and Lnight.
    40 %, 4.5 % and 4.8 % of adults in England were exposed to road, rail, and aircraft noise exceeding 50 dB Lden. We estimated close to a hundred thousand (∼97,000) disability adjusted life years (DALY) lost due to road-traffic, ∼13,000 from railway, and ∼ 17,000 from aircraft noise. This excludes some noise-outcome pairs as there were too few studies available to provide robust exposure-response estimates. Annoyance and sleep disturbance accounted for the majority of the DALYs, followed by strokes, IHD, and diabetes. London, the South East, and North West regions had the greatest number of road-traffic DALYs lost, while 63 % of all aircraft noise DALYs were found in London. The strategic noise mapping did not include all roads, which may still have significant traffic flows. In sensitivity analyses using modelled noise from all roads in London, the DALYs were 1.1x to 2.2x higher.
    Transportation noise exposures contribute to a significant and unequal environmental disease burden in England. Omitting minor roads from the noise exposure modelling leads to underestimation of the disease burden.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    飞机噪音会引起烦恼和睡眠障碍,并且有一些证据表明长期暴露与心血管疾病(CVD)之间存在关联。我们使用病例交叉设计和白天和黑夜不同时间的暴露数据,调查了居住在希思罗机场附近的630万人口中前一天飞机噪音与心血管事件之间的短期关联。我们纳入了2014-2018年所有记录的因CVD导致的住院(n=442,442)和死亡(n=49,443)。条件逻辑回归用于估计OR,并针对NO2浓度进行调整,温度,和假期。我们估计前一天晚上噪声增加10dB的风险增加(LeveOR=1.007,95%CI0.999-1.015),特别是从22:00-23:00小时(OR=1.007,95%CI1.000-1.013),以及所有心血管疾病入院的凌晨04:30-06:00h(OR=1.012,95%CI1.002-1.021),但与白天噪音没有显著关联。有年龄性别的影响,种族,剥夺,和季节,一些人认为夜间高噪声变异性与较高的风险有关。我们的发现与实验研究中提出的夜间飞机噪声对CVD的短期影响机制一致。包括睡眠障碍,血压和应激激素水平升高,内皮功能受损。
    Aircraft noise causes annoyance and sleep disturbance and there is some evidence of associations between long-term exposures and cardiovascular disease (CVD). We investigated short-term associations between previous day aircraft noise and cardiovascular events in a population of 6.3 million residing near Heathrow Airport using a case-crossover design and exposure data for different times of day and night. We included all recorded hospitalisations (n = 442,442) and deaths (n = 49,443) in 2014-2018 due to CVD. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the ORs and adjusted for NO2 concentration, temperature, and holidays. We estimated an increase in risk for 10 dB increment in noise during the previous evening (Leve OR = 1.007, 95% CI 0.999-1.015), particularly from 22:00-23:00 h (OR = 1.007, 95% CI 1.000-1.013), and the early morning hours 04:30-06:00 h (OR = 1.012, 95% CI 1.002-1.021) for all CVD admissions, but no significant associations with day-time noise. There was effect modification by age-sex, ethnicity, deprivation, and season, and some suggestion that high noise variability at night was associated with higher risks. Our findings are consistent with proposed mechanisms for short-term impacts of aircraft noise at night on CVD from experimental studies, including sleep disturbance, increases in blood pressure and stress hormone levels and impaired endothelial function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号