Agar dilution

琼脂稀释
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们在基苏木的性传播感染诊所对从有症状的男性中分离出的淋病奈瑟菌(NG)的抗菌素耐药性(AMR)进行了表征,肯尼亚。
    方法:在2020年至2022年之间从有症状的男性中获得了两个尿道拭子,一个用于革兰氏染色,另一个直接接种到含有1%VCNT和1%IsoVitaleX富集的改良Thayer-Martin培养基上。培养结果通过菌落形态证实,革兰氏染色和氧化酶试验。将重复的分离株运送到统一服务大学进行确认和表征。通过E-test评估对八种药物的敏感性。琼脂稀释证实对头孢曲松有耐药性,头孢克肟,和阿奇霉素.敏感性,中间电阻(IR),和抗性(R)根据公布的标准确定。
    结果:在154名注册参与者中,112对NG为培养阳性。110例(98.2%)的琼脂稀释结果显示如下:阿奇霉素-R(1.8%),和4.5%R或IR对头孢曲松或头孢克肟:头孢曲松-R(0.9%),头孢曲松-IR(2.7%),和头孢克肟-IR(2.7%)。通过电子测试,大多数分离株对四环素的IR或R(97.2%),青霉素(90.9%),环丙沙星(95.4%)。
    结论:我们检测到NG对阿奇霉素和头孢曲松耐药,表明对目前肯尼亚用头孢菌素加大环内酯类药物治疗尿道炎的双重综合疗法的威胁越来越大。持续的AMR监测对于有效的药物选择至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: We characterized the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) isolated from symptomatic men at a sexually transmitted infection clinic in Kisumu, Kenya.
    METHODS: Two urethral swabs were obtained from symptomatic men between 2020 and 2022, one for Gram\'s stain and the other inoculated directly onto modified Thayer-Martin media containing 1% VCNT and 1% IsoVitaleX enrichment. Culture results were confirmed by colony morphology, Gram\'s stain and oxidase test. Duplicate isolates were shipped to Uniformed Services University for confirmation and characterization. Susceptibility to eight drugs was assessed by E-test. Agar dilution confirmed resistance to ceftriaxone, cefixime, and azithromycin. Susceptibility, intermediate resistance (IR), and resistance (R) were determined according to published criteria.
    RESULTS: Of 154 enrolled participants, 112 were culture-positive for NG. Agar dilution results in 110 (98.2%) showed the following: azithromycin-R (1.8%), and 4.5% R or IR to ceftriaxone or cefixime: ceftriaxone-R (0.9%), ceftriaxone-IR (2.7%), and cefixime-IR (2.7%). By E-test, most isolates were IR or R to tetracycline (97.2%), penicillin (90.9%), and ciprofloxacin (95.4%).
    CONCLUSIONS: We detected NG with resistance to azithromycin and ceftriaxone, indicating a growing threat to the current Kenyan dual syndromic treatment of urethritis with cephalosporin plus macrolides. Ongoing AMR surveillance is essential for effective drug choices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用参考方法和自动化系统确定苯唑西林敏感性对于治疗由金黄色葡萄球菌引起的侵袭性感染至关重要。这项研究比较了两种自动化系统与琼脂稀释的苯唑西林敏感性结果,并将其与侵袭性金黄色葡萄球菌的基因型相关联。
    在11年期间收集非重复金黄色葡萄球菌侵入性分离株。苯唑西林敏感性是通过凤凰100(2011年1月至2018年8月)或Vitek2(2018年9月至2021年12月)确定的,用琼脂稀释液测定苯唑西林和头孢西丁的敏感性。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)被证实存在mecA,使用SCCmec确定基因型。使用两个自动化系统和琼脂稀释评估基因型和抗生素敏感性之间的关联。
    总共842种侵袭性金黄色葡萄球菌,包括443mecA+MRSA和399mecA-MSSA,被收集。通过两个自动化系统和琼脂稀释确定的苯唑西林的敏感率分别为68.8%(Phoenix100为76.8%,Vitek2为57.6%)和54.0%,分别。与使用琼脂稀释的苯唑西林敏感性相比,凤凰100号和维特克2号的绝对一致性分别为0.46%和0.88%,分别(p<0.001)。在与琼脂稀释进行比较的同时,使用自动化系统将143个分离株误解为对苯唑西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌(OSSA),其中分子社区相关MRSA(CA-MRSA)数量超过医疗保健相关MRSA(HA-MRSA)(99vs34,p<0.001).有70mecA+OSSA(OS-MRSA)使用琼脂稀释,其中42个携带SCCmec类型主要分类为CA-MRSA(38,p<0.001).
    Vitek2在确定苯唑西林敏感性和预测mecA存在方面的分类一致性与琼脂稀释相当,而凤凰100不是。大多数通过琼脂稀释确定但被自动化系统和OS-MRSA误解为OSSA的ORSA被归类为CA-MRSA。
    UNASSIGNED: Determining oxacillin susceptibility using reference methods and automated systems is crucial for treating invasive infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus. This study compares the oxacillin susceptibility results from the two automated systems with agar dilution and correlates them with genotypes of invasive S. aureus.
    UNASSIGNED: Non-duplicate S. aureus invasive isolates were collected over an 11-year period. The oxacillin susceptibility was determined with Phoenix 100 (Jan 2011 to Aug 2018) or Vitek 2 (Sep 2018 to Dec 2021), and susceptibility for oxacillin and cefoxitin was determined with agar dilution. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was confirmed with mecA existence, and the genotype was determined using SCCmec. The association between genotype and antibiotic susceptibility using two automated systems and agar dilution was evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 842 invasive S. aureus, including 443 mecA+ MRSA and 399 mecA- MSSA, were collected. The susceptibility rates of oxacillin determined by two automated systems and agar dilution were 68.8% (76.8% for Phoenix 100 and 57.6% for Vitek 2) and 54.0%, respectively. When compared with the oxacillin susceptibility using agar dilution, the categorical agreement for Phoenix 100 and Vitek 2 were 0.46% and 0.88%, respectively (p < 0.001). One hundred and forty-three isolates were misinterpreted as oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus (OSSA) using automated systems while comparing with agar dilution, among which molecularly community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) outnumbered healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) (99 vs 34, p < 0.001). There were 70 mecA+ OSSA (OS-MRSA) using agar dilution, among which 42 harbored SCCmec types were predominantly categorized as CA-MRSA (38, p < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: The categorical agreement of Vitek 2 in determining oxacillin susceptibility and predicting mecA existence is comparable with agar dilution, whereas Phoenix 100 is not. Most of those ORSA determined by agar dilution but misinterpreted as OSSA by automated systems and OS-MRSA are categorized as CA-MRSA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    体外进行的抗菌素敏感性测试(AST)提供了一系列评估微生物耐药性(AMR)的方法。大肠杆菌,一种广泛分布的细菌,与AMR问题密切相关。这样,本研究旨在评估不同体外AST方法之间的一致性,包括在琼脂中的圆盘扩散,肉汤稀释法和琼脂稀释法。总共分析了100个大肠杆菌分离株对6种抗生素的耐药水平:阿莫西林,头孢噻呋酯,环丙沙星,氯霉素,四环素,和磺胺甲恶唑+甲氧苄啶,使用上述AST方法。采用标准断点值将分离株分类为抗性,中间,或者易感,并通过McNemars检验对AST方法进行了比较(p<0.05)。获得的数据证明了AST方法之间的等效性,强调这些标准化经典方法的可靠性。这种标准化有助于防止抗微生物剂的不当使用和抗微生物剂抗性微生物的传播。
    Antimicrobial susceptibility tests (AST) conducted in vitro offer a range of methods to assess the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of microorganisms. Escherichia coli, a widely distributed bacterium, is closely linked to the issue of AMR. In this way, the present study aimed to assess the agreement among different in vitro AST methods, including disk diffusion in agar, broth dilution, and agar dilution method. A total of 100 E. coli isolates were analyzed for their resistance levels against six antibiotics: amoxicillin, ceftiofur, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim, using the aforementioned AST methods. Standard breakpoint values were employed to classify isolates as resistant, intermediate, or susceptible, and comparisons among the AST methods were conducted by McNemar\'s test (P < .05). The obtained data demonstrated equivalence among the AST methods, highlighting the reliability of these standardized classical methodologies. This standardization aids in preventing the inappropriate use of antimicrobials and the dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:由真细菌引起的人类感染很少见,对这种情况的了解有限。本研究旨在描述真杆菌菌血症患者的临床特征和预后。
    方法:通过隆德的临床微生物学实验室鉴定了真杆菌菌血症的发作,瑞典。对病历进行回顾性审查。收集真细菌的血液分离物,并使用琼脂稀释进行抗生素敏感性测试。
    结果:确定了17例真杆菌菌血症患者,其中6例有单一抗菌菌血症。发病率为每百万居民和每年1.7例真杆菌菌血症。中位年龄为67岁(四分位距63-79岁),6名患者有某种形式的恶性肿瘤。大多数患者腹部有感染灶,30天死亡率较低(n=1)。
    结论:真细菌侵袭性感染的发病率较低。该病死亡率低,腹部感染灶,和恶性肿瘤,是常见的。
    BACKGROUND: Human infections due to Eubacterium are rare and knowledge of the condition is limited. This study aimed to describe clinical characteristics and outcome in patients with Eubacterium bacteremia.
    METHODS: Episodes of Eubacterium bacteremia were identified through the clinical microbiology laboratory in Lund, Sweden. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Blood isolates of Eubacterium were collected and antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed with agar dilution.
    RESULTS: Seventeen patients with Eubacterium bacteremia were identified of whom six had monomicrobial bacteremia. The incidence was 1.7 cases of Eubacterium bacteremia per million inhabitants and year. The median age was 67 years (interquartile range 63-79 years), and six patients had some form of malignancy. Most of the patients an abdominal focus of infection and the 30-day mortality was low (n = 1).
    CONCLUSIONS: Invasive infections with Eubacterium have a low incidence. The condition has a low mortality and an abdominal focus of infection, and malignancy, is common.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    无症状性菌尿(ASB)是怀孕期间的常见发现。有效的抗生素治疗可以减少其对母亲和胎儿的不利影响。然而,新出现的抗菌素耐药性限制了治疗选择。在这方面,磷霉素可能是一种有前途的药物,因为它的阻力仍然很低。该研究的目的是确定通过圆盘扩散和琼脂稀释(在选定的分离株中)引起ASB的分离株中磷霉素的抗菌敏感性模式,通过琼脂稀释确定通过圆盘扩散产生抗性的分离株中的最小抑制贡献(MIC),并检测负责磷霉素抗性的基因。
    这是微生物学系进行的为期2年的研究,尼赫鲁医学院和医院(JNMCH),Aligarh穆斯林大学(AMU),阿利加.总共提交了来自无症状妊娠女性(18-45岁)的10252个尿液样本,这些女性参加了产前保健(ANC)门诊部(OPD)。根据CLSI的标准方法进行病原体的鉴定和抗微生物剂敏感性测试(AST)。存在耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和其他葡萄球菌(MRSS)的表型检测,高水平氨基糖苷类耐药(HLAR),耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)和金黄色葡萄球菌(VRSA),超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)和耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)。通过琼脂稀释测试所有磷霉素抗性分离株(通过圆盘扩散)。对murA进行常规PCR,FosA,所有抗性分离株的uhpT和glpT基因。
    在这项研究中,ASB在孕妇中的患病率为1173(11.4%),其中大肠杆菌495(42%)是主要生物。磷霉素在革兰氏阳性球菌(GPC)和革兰氏阴性杆菌(GNB)中的总体敏感性为99%和97.6%,分别。MRSA和MRSS分别占50(66.6%)和71(76%),分别。在琼脂稀释上,大多数分离株(主要是大肠杆菌)显示MIC>2048μgml-1的最高比率。PCR研究揭示了四种大肠杆菌菌株同时具有murA(也存在于一种肺炎克雷伯菌菌株中)和glpT基因。而只有一种分离物(粪肠球菌)对fosA基因呈阳性。但是没有一个菌株具有uhpT基因。
    根据这项研究,murA和glpT基因比fosA更常见。根据这项初步研究,我们无法评论磷霉素抗性基因的患病率和区域分布。因此,应该进行更多的印度研究,以提高人们对特定地区基因存在的认识。
    UNASSIGNED: Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is a common finding during pregnancy. Effective antibiotic treatment could reduce its adverse effects on both mother and fetus. However, emerging antimicrobial resistance limits the treatment options. Fosfomycin might be a promising drug in this regard, as its resistance is still low. The aim of the study was to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of fosfomycin in isolates causing ASB by disc diffusion and agar dilution (in selected isolates), determine minimum inhibitory contribution (MIC) by agar dilution in isolates resistant by disc diffusion and detect the genes responsible for fosfomycin resistance.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a 2-year study carried in the Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital (JNMCH), Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Aligarh. A total of 10 252 urine samples from asymptomatic pregnant females (18-45 years) attending the antenatal care (ANC) outpatient department (OPD) were submitted. Identification of pathogen and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was carried out as per standard methods of CLSI. There was phenotypic detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and other Staphylococcus species (MRSS), high-level aminoglycoside resistance (HLAR), vancomycin resistant Enterococci (VRE) and S. aureus (VRSA), extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). All the fosfomycin-resistant isolates (by disk diffusion) were tested by agar dilution. Conventional PCR was performed for murA, fosA, uhpT and glpT genes on all resistant isolates.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, the prevalence of ASB among pregnant females was 1173(11.4 %), in which Escherichia coli 495(42 %) was the predominant organism. The overall sensitivity of fosfomycin among Gram-positive cocci (GPC) and Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) was 99 % and 97.6 %, respectively. MRSA and MRSS accounted for 50 (66.6 %) and 71 (76 %), respectively. The highest rates of MIC >2048 µg ml-1 were shown by most isolates (mainly E. coli ) on agar dilution. PCR studies revealed four E. coli strains possessed both murA (also present in one K. pneumoniae strain) and glpT genes. While only one isolate ( E. faecalis ) was positive for fosA gene. But none of the strain possessed the uhpT gene.
    UNASSIGNED: According to this study, murA and glpT genes were more frequent than fosA. We cannot comment on the prevalence and regional distribution of fosfomycin-resistant genes based on this preliminary study. Therefore, more Indian studies should be carried out to create awareness about the presence of genes in a particular area.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    琼脂稀释是淋病奈瑟菌表型抗菌药敏试验(AST)的金标准方法。然而,这种方法很费力,需要专业知识,因此,进行淋病奈瑟菌AST的实验室可以选择替代方法,如圆盘扩散和梯度扩散。在这项研究中,我们回顾性比较了2017年至2020年在艾伯塔省鉴定的2,394种独特的淋病奈瑟菌分离株与阿奇霉素的梯度扩散与琼脂稀释的性能,头孢克肟,头孢曲松,环丙沙星,青霉素,还有四环素.基因组测序用于解决AST方法之间的差异,检测抗菌素耐药性标记,并确定分离株的错误率和序列类型(ST)之间的趋势。超过90%的淋病奈瑟菌对阿奇霉素敏感,头孢克肟,和头孢曲松,而环丙沙星的敏感性下降,青霉素,还有四环素.青霉素(CA)和四环素(CA:47.22%;EA:55.96%)的两种方法之间的类别(CA)和基本协议(EA)最差;但是,低CA主要归因于小错误.误差超出可接受范围的抗微生物剂包括阿奇霉素(非常主要的误差:18.42%;主要的误差:7.73%)和四环素(非常主要的误差:6.17%)。对分离物子集的基因组测序解决了30.3%的阿奇霉素主要错误,并证实了阿奇霉素或四环素非常主要的错误。还确定了某些ST与阿奇霉素和四环素的错误类型之间的显着关联。总的来说,梯度扩散与头孢克肟的琼脂稀释相比,头孢曲松,还有环丙沙星,基因组测序被认为是一种有用的工具,可以在淋病奈瑟菌的梯度扩散和琼脂稀释之间仲裁不同的敏感性测试结果。
    Agar dilution is the gold standard method for phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. However, this method is laborious and requires expertise, so laboratories that perform N. gonorrhoeae AST may choose alternative methods such as disk diffusion and gradient diffusion. In this study, we retrospectively compare the performance of gradient diffusion to agar dilution for 2,394 unique N. gonorrhoeae isolates identified in Alberta from 2017 to 2020 against azithromycin, cefixime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline. Genome sequencing was utilized to resolve discrepancies between AST methods, detect antimicrobial resistance markers, and identify trends between error rates and sequence types (STs) of isolates. Over 90% of N. gonorrhoeae isolates were susceptible to azithromycin, cefixime, and ceftriaxone, whereas decreased susceptibility was observed for ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline. Categorical (CA) and essential agreement (EA) was poorest between the two methods for penicillin (CA: 86.02%; EA: 77.69%) and tetracycline (CA: 47.22%; EA: 55.96%); however, the low CA was primarily attributed to minor errors. Antimicrobial agents with errors outside of acceptable limits included azithromycin (very major error: 18.42%; major error: 7.73%) and tetracycline (very major error: 6.17%). Genome sequencing on a subset of isolates resolved 30.3% of the azithromycin major errors and confirmed the azithromycin or tetracycline very major errors. Significant associations between certain STs and error types for azithromycin and tetracycline were also identified. Overall, gradient diffusion compared well to agar dilution for cefixime, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin, and genome sequencing was identified as a useful tool to arbitrate discrepant susceptibility testing results between gradient diffusion and agar dilution for N. gonorrhoeae.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的和目的莫匹罗星是一种广泛用于治疗皮肤和软组织感染的局部抗生素。这导致了导致治疗失败的抗性。因此,本研究旨在确定从皮肤和软组织感染中获得的葡萄球菌分离株对莫匹罗星的耐药性。此外,比较了圆盘扩散法和琼脂稀释法检测莫匹罗星耐药性的方法。材料与方法本横断面研究于1月至12月在卡纳塔克邦某三级保健中心微生物学系进行,2018.临床样本,如伤口拭子,组织,和脓液被纳入研究。使用5µg和200µg的低剂量(MuL)和高水平莫匹罗星(MuH)光盘筛选所有葡萄球菌分离株的莫匹罗星耐药性,分别。使用琼脂稀释法测定最小抑制浓度(MIC)。结果在100株葡萄球菌中,68例为金黄色葡萄球菌,32例为CoNS。在11个分离株中检测到MuH。与金黄色葡萄球菌(1/11)相比,MuH在CoNS中更常见(10/11)。在研究中没有发现MuL。讨论在我们的研究中,11株莫匹罗星耐药菌株中有10株对甲氧西林耐药,具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。在这项研究中,椎间盘扩散结果与MIC之间的相关性是适当的。结论了解药敏报告后,莫匹罗星的司法处方应成为标准做法。可以在资源有限的环境中通过圆盘扩散来筛选莫匹罗星抗性。
    Aims and Objectives  Mupirocin is a widely used topical antibiotic for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections. This has resulted in resistance leading to treatment failure. Hence, the present study aimed to determine the prevalence of mupirocin resistance among staphylococcal isolates obtained from the skin and soft tissue infections. Also, comparison of disc diffusion and agar dilution method in detecting mupirocin resistance was done. Materials and Methods  This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology of a tertiary health care center in Karnataka from January to December, 2018. Clinical samples such as wound swabs, tissues, and pus were included in the study. All staphylococcal isolates were screened for mupirocin resistance using 5 µg and 200 µg discs for low-level (MuL) and high-level mupirocin resistance (MuH), respectively. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined using the agar dilution method. Results  Out of 100 staphylococcal isolates, 68 were Staphylococcus aureus and 32 were CoNS. MuH was detected in 11 isolates. MuH was more common in CoNS (10/11) compared with S. aureus (1/11). MuL was not found in the study. Discussion  In our study, 10 out of 11 mupirocin-resistant isolates were methicillin resistant, which is statistically significant ( p  < 0.05). The correlation between results of disc diffusion and MIC were appropriate in this study. Conclusion  Judicial prescription of mupirocin after knowing the susceptibility report should become the standard practice. Screening for mupirocin resistance can be done by disc diffusion in resource-limited settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:磷霉素是一种古老的杀菌药物,在过去十年中,因其在多重耐药革兰氏阴性感染中的潜在用途而受到越来越多的关注。然而,磷霉素敏感性试验的证据报告商业方法与肠杆菌(EB)的参考琼脂稀释液(AD)。该研究旨在评估两种自动化系统在EB临床分离株中测定磷霉素敏感性的性能。
    方法:将使用两种不同平台(BDPhoenix和MicroScanWalkAwayPlus)获得的两个收集的100个非重复临床EB菌株的磷霉素敏感性测试结果与AD获得的结果进行了比较。分类协议(CA),计算了主要误差(ME)和非常主要误差(VME)率。
    结果:BDPhoenix表现出6.9%的假抗性结果,并实现了69%的CA,而MicroScanWalkAwayPlus获得了3.7%的抗假结果和72%的CA。两种自动化系统均显示对耐药分离株的检测效果不佳,BDPhoenix和MicroscanWalkAwayPlus的假易感结果分别为49.1%和56.2%,分别。
    结论:总体而言,琼脂稀释仍然是最适合的常规实验室抗菌药物敏感性试验的方法,鉴于自动化系统的性能不佳。两种自动化系统的应用,在报告磷霉素的临床实验室中,应根据低于可接受阈值的准确性结果进行审查。
    BACKGROUND: Fosfomycin is an old bactericidal drug that has gained increasing interest in the last decade for its potential use in multi-drug resistant gram-negative infections. However, evidence on fosfomycin susceptibility testing reports a poor correlation between commercial methods vs. reference agar dilution (AD) for Enterobacterales (EB). The study aimed at assessing the performance of two automated systems for the determination of fosfomycin susceptibility in EB clinical isolates.
    METHODS: Fosfomycin susceptibility testing results of two collections of 100 non-duplicate clinical EB strains obtained using two different platforms (BD Phoenix and MicroScan WalkAway Plus) were compared with those obtained by AD. Categorical agreement (CA), major error (ME) and very major error (VME) rates were calculated.
    RESULTS: BD Phoenix exhibited a 6.9% rate of false-resistant results and achieved a CA of 69%, whereas MicroScan WalkAway Plus achieved 3.7% of false-resistant results and 72% of CA. Both automated systems showed poor detection of resistant isolates, with 49.1% and 56.2% of false-susceptible results for BD Phoenix and Microscan WalkAway Plus, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, agar dilution remains the most suitable method for routine laboratory antimicrobial susceptibility testing of fosfomycin on Enterobacterales strains, given the poor performance of automated systems. The application of both automated systems, in the clinical laboratories reporting of fosfomycin, should be reviewed in light of the accuracy results falling below the acceptable threshold.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在这项研究中,使用两种方法中的布鲁氏菌血琼脂(BBA)和AD中的四唑卵黄琼脂(TEYA)评估了圆盘扩散(DD)和琼脂稀释(AD)方法确定幽门螺杆菌对抗生素敏感性的功效和一致性。方法:对20株幽门螺杆菌分离株对9种抗生素的药敏试验;甲硝唑(MTZ),克拉霉素(CLR),阿莫西林(AMX),四环素(TET),氧氟沙星(OFX),左氧氟沙星(LVX),环丙沙星(CIP),呋喃唑酮(FRZ),和利福平(RIF)。在DD方法中将抗生素溶液浸渍到BBA上的空白纸盘中,或在AD方法中将其添加到BBA(ADB)或TEYA(ADT)介质中。将幽门螺杆菌分离物的悬浮液表面接种或斑点接种在固体培养基上。将板在37°C下在CO2培养箱中孵育5-7天。结果:与AD方法相比,DD方法对MTZ的敏感性最高(65%)(ADB:40%,ADT:30%)。两种方法均显示相似的CLR(85%)和AMX(100%)敏感性。对剩余抗生素的敏感性,由DD和ADB/ADT培养基分别确定为95%,TET的75%/75%,100%,FRZ为95%/85%,85%,OFX的85%/75%,90%,LVX为95%/85%,90%,85%/85%对于CIP,100%,85%/75%为RIF。结论:DD法和AD法检测161例(89.4%)易感性和耐药性与19例(10.6%)易感性和耐药性不一致(P<0.05)。DD是一种廉价简便的方法,在确定幽门螺杆菌对抗生素的敏感性方面,其功效和精度与AD方法相当。
    BACKGROUND: In this study, efficacy and consistency of disc diffusion (DD) and agar dilution (AD) methods in determining Helicobacter pylori susceptibility to antibiotics were evaluated using Brucella blood agar (BBA) in both methods and tetrazolium egg yolk agar (TEYA) in AD. METHODS: Twenty H. pylori isolates were tested for susceptibility to nine antibiotics; metronidazole (MTZ), clarithromycin (CLR), amoxicillin (AMX), tetracycline (TET), ofloxacin (OFX), levofloxacin (LVX), ciprofloxacin (CIP), furazolidone (FRZ), and rifampin (RIF). Antibiotics solutions were impregnated into blank paper disks on BBA in the DD method or added to BBA (ADB) or TEYA (ADT) media in the AD method. Suspensions of H. pylori isolates were surface or spot inoculated on solid media. Plates were incubated in CO2 incubator at 37°C for 5-7 days. RESULTS: The highest rate of susceptibility to MTZ (65%) was determined by DD method compared with AD method (ADB: 40%, ADT: 30%). Both methods showed similar CLR (85%) and AMX (100%) susceptibility rates. Susceptibility to remaining antibiotics, determined by DD and ADB/ADT media were in respective order as 95%, 75% / 75% for TET, 100%, 95% / 85% for FRZ, 85%, 85% / 75% for OFX, 90%, 95% / 85% for LVX, 90%, 85% / 85% for CIP, and 100%, 85% / 75% for RIF. CONCLUSION: DD and AD methods showed consistency in determining 161 (89.4%) susceptibility and resistance and inconsistency in determining 19 (10.6%) susceptibility and resistance (P < 0.05). DD is recommended as a cheap and easy method with the efficacy and precision comparable to the AD method in determining H. pylori susceptibility to antibiotics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:尿路感染是导致高发病率和死亡率的最常见细菌感染之一。全球范围内耐多药尿路病原体的惊人增长迫使临床医生重新考虑诸如福霉素之类的旧药物的治疗管理。我们的目的是比较琼脂稀释度,纸片扩散法和E-test法用于磷霉素对不同耐药尿路病原菌的药敏试验。
    UNASSIGNED:使用琼脂稀释液连续测试了181种尿路病原体的磷霉素敏感性,圆盘扩散和E测试。使用临床和实验室标准研究所(CLSI)和欧洲抗菌药物敏感性测试委员会(EUCAST)断点来解释结果。对4株XDR/PDR磷霉素耐药肺炎克雷伯菌进行全基因组测序分析。
    UNASSIGNED:发现大肠杆菌是最常见的尿路病原体(62.4%),其次是肺炎克雷伯菌(21%)。考虑到琼脂稀释为黄金标准,6.1%的菌株对磷霉素耐药。在CLSI断点之后,大肠杆菌的敏感性,肺炎克雷伯菌,其他肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌占92.9%,92.1%,100%,100%;而使用EUCAST断点的敏感性为85.7%,86.9%,92.9%,100%,分别。基本协议,绝对协议,主要错误,所有生物的电子测试/圆盘扩散的主要误差为91.2%/不适用,95%/93.9%,1.8%/4.7%,9.1%/9.1%,分别。全基因组测序显示突变UhpT基因以及质粒介导的fosA5或fosA6基因的存在赋予磷霉素抗性。
    UNASSIGNED:该结果支持肠杆菌对磷霉素的耐药性非常低;因此,应被视为治疗多药耐药尿路病原体的有价值的选择。与琼脂稀释相比,观察到圆盘扩散是福霉素敏感性测试的便捷方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Urinary tract infection is one of the most common bacterial infections causing high morbidity and mortality. The alarming rise of multidrug-resistant uropathogens worldwide forced the clinician to rethink the old drugs like Fosfomycin for its therapeutic management. Our objective was to compare agar dilution, disc diffusion and E-test method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Fosfomycin against different drug-resistant uropathogens.
    UNASSIGNED: Consecutive 181 uropathogens were tested for Fosfomycin susceptibility using agar dilution, disc diffusion and E-test. Results were interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints. Whole genome sequencing analysis was done on the 4 XDR/PDR Fosfomycin resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates.
    UNASSIGNED: Escherichia coli was found as the most common (62.4%) uropathogen followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (21%). Considering agar dilution as the gold standard, 6.1% of isolates were resistant to Fosfomycin. Following CLSI breakpoints, the susceptibility of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, other Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 92.9%, 92.1%, 100%, 100%; whereas using EUCAST breakpoints the susceptibility rates were 85.7%, 86.9%, 92.9%, and 100%, respectively. The essential agreement, categorical agreement, major error, and very major error for E-test/disc diffusion for all the organisms were 91.2%/Not Applicable, 95%/93.9%, 1.8%/4.7%, 9.1%/9.1%, respectively. Whole-genome sequencing showed mutation UhpT gene as well as the presence of plasmid-mediated fosA5 or fosA6 genes conferring Fosfomycin resistance.
    UNASSIGNED: This result supports very low resistance of Enterobacterales against Fosfomycin; hence should be considered a valuable option to treat multidrug-resistant uropathogens. Disc diffusion was observed to be a convenient method for Fosfomycin susceptibility testing compared to agar dilution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号