Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a relatively new and innovative immunotherapy for haemato-oncological diseases. In the UK, CAR T-cell therapy can be used to treat some patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, CAR T-cell therapy can have side effects that have implications for patients\' physical and psychosocial well-being and may induce adverse reactions that can cause life-threatening acute toxicities. Nurses may have a significant role throughout the CAR T-cell therapy process, including in supporting patient decision-making, administering infusions, monitoring patients, identifying and managing adverse reactions, and providing follow-up care. This article provides an overview of CAR T-cell therapy and describes some of its potential side effects and adverse reactions. The authors also consider the role of the nurse and the implications for the nursing workforce in terms of meeting the needs of the increasing numbers of patients who may become eligible for this treatment as it is extended to other cancer types.

OBJECTIVE: How do fertility clinics in Belgium manage risks for genetic conditions in donor sperm treatment?
METHODS: An electronic questionnaire was distributed to all fertility clinics in Belgium in June 2023, focusing on treatments with anonymous sperm donors from 2018 to 2022. Responses from 15 clinics were analysed anonymously using IBM SPSS statistics.
RESULTS: All clinics assessed donor risks, including a personal and family history, conventional karyotyping and (for 83.3% of the clinics) carrier screening for common autosomal recessive conditions. For recipients, 58.3% of the clinics relied only on a personal and family history. Despite efforts, the suspicion or detection of genetic conditions in donor sperm treatment was prevalent, with 9.4 adverse events reported per 100 children born. When adverse events occurred, most clinics (58.3%) would not inform the donor if no additional genetic testing was needed. Around 1 in 4 (26.7%) clinics always informed recipients about an adverse event possibly related to their donor. An equal number (26.7%) categorically ruled out the use of spermatozoa from a donor after an adverse event was traced back to his DNA, and 53.3% would not consider using the donor when the adverse event was not genetically confirmed. For the other clinics, deciding when to disclose new genetic risk information or when to allow the use of a donor linked to an adverse event was a complex matter involving different considerations.
CONCLUSIONS: Although suspected or detected genetic conditions linked to donor treatments were common, there was wide variation in how Belgian clinics prevented and managed these situations.

UNASSIGNED: Postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) increases fracture risk in women. Though traditional treatments are slow to act, combining romosozumab with conventional therapy shows promise. Despite its growing use, studies on effectiveness are limited. This study aims to systematically evaluate the combined therapy\'s impact on pain relief, disease progression, and adverse reactions in PMOP patients.
UNASSIGNED: Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their inception to September 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of romosozumab in PMOP. Random or fixed effect models were employed for statistical analysis. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the included studies and extracted the data. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.
UNASSIGNED: Six RCTs with a total sample size of 17,985 cases were included. The incidence of vertebral fractures was compared and analyzed after 12 and 24 months of treatment. Romosozumab significantly reduced the incidence of vertebral fractures at 24 months (OR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.35-0.52) but not at 12 months (OR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.14-1.05). It was also associated with a decreased incidence of nonvertebral fractures (OR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.94) and clinical fractures at 24 months (OR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.59-0.82) compared to standard therapy. Romosozumab demonstrated a significant improvement in percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) [mean difference (MD) = 10.38; 95% CI: 4.62-16.14] and in hip joint BMD (MD = 4.24; 95% CI: 2.92-5.56). There was no notable difference in adverse reactions compared to standard care (p > 0.05). Funnel plots displayed a predominantly symmetrical pattern, suggesting no evidence of publication bias in the selected literature.
UNASSIGNED: Combining romosozumab with conventional therapy effectively treats PMOP, significantly reducing vertebral, non-vertebral, and clinical fractures while increasing BMD in the hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine. However, further high-quality studies are needed for validation.

OBJECTIVE: Facemasks represent an essential measure of prevention against the spread of infectious diseases; however, they lessen the ability to convey and understand emotions through facial expressions. In blood donation settings, facemask wearing could interfere with professionals\' tasks, reduce the satisfaction of blood donors and affect their future blood donation behaviour. This preliminary cross-sectional study explored the association of mandatory facemask wearing with the quality of the blood donation process at the end of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
METHODS: A sample of 615 voluntary unpaid Italian blood and plasma donors completed an online survey assessing their attitude towards facemask wearing, the perceived distress due to facemasks in the different steps of the donation process, self-reported vasovagal reactions after donation and the intention to donate again.
RESULTS: Nearly 24% of donors reported a worsened quality of the donation process due to facemask wearing, and 36% reported moderate to severe distress during the donation itself. Donors with a more negative attitude towards facemasks reported a worse donation experience, mainly related to the interactions and the communication with physicians and nurses, and a higher probability of experiencing vasovagal reactions at their last donation. No significant correlations were observed between negative facemask attitudes towards facemask wearing, distress or future intention to donate blood/plasma.
CONCLUSIONS: Facemasks have worsened the quality of blood and plasma donations for one fourth of donors, confirming the interference with the quality of communications and relationships with healthcare professionals.

BACKGROUND: Registries can yield important insights on allergen immunotherapy (AIT) outcomes in daily clinical practice. However, systematic recordings of adverse events (AE) due to AIT in real-life are lacking.
METHODS: The Allergen Immunotherapy Adverse Events Registry (ADER) is a prospective, multicenter registry on real-life AIT safety. Data on adults (>18 years old) with respiratory allergies receiving AIT with mites, pollens, epithelia, and/or molds were retrieved and analyzed from ADER. The frequency, characteristics and risk factors of AE were investigated. The MedDRA terminology was used to record AE.
RESULTS: A total of 1545 individuals with a mean age of 33 ± 10 years receiving 1815 AIT courses (n = 1060 sublingual (SLIT); n = 755 subcutaneous (SCIT)) in centers from eight countries were included. Patients had allergic rhinitis (65%) or, asthma only (3.7%) or rhinitis with asthma (31.2%). Grass was the most frequent specific sensitizer (60.7%), followed by mites (45.5%), birch pollen (20.6%), epithelia (16.1%), and molds (8%). There were 296 AE recorded in 115 patients (7.4%). A higher frequency of AE occurred during up-dosing (59%) compared to maintenance. Severe reactions were rare (0.2%), all in the context of SCIT. After 6 weeks of maintenance only one moderate AE was recorded. The most frequently reported symptoms were from the respiratory system and the skin. Having asthma, doing SCIT, AIT with mugwort, cat, or birch were associated with higher risk for AE while the use of allergoids induced lower risk.
CONCLUSIONS: In real life clinical practice, AIT-associated AE occur in a minority of patients, while severe reactions are rare. The presence of asthma and use of SCIT are risk factors, while the use of modified allergens lowers the risk.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive heart failure (HHF) has a high incidence and poor prognosis.
OBJECTIVE: This article evaluated the efficacy and safety of Vericiguat in HHF and analyzed the relationship between C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and patient prognosis.
METHODS: 110 HHF patients were divided into Placebo and Vericiguat groups. Cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography and 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Blood samples were collected to detect the levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), cardiac troponin I (cTnI), endothelin (ET-1), nitric oxide (NO), and CRP.
RESULTS: Left ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD) and left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD) were reduced, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and 6MWT were increased, and the serum levels of NT-proBNP, cTnI, ET-1, NO, and CRP were decreased in Vericiguat group as against Placebo group; The total effective rate was 76.4% in Placebo group and 92.7% in Vericiguat group (P < 0.05). The adverse reaction rate was 10.9% and 9.1% (P > 0.05). The proportion of persons with poor prognosis and no improvement of cardiac function in patients with highly expressed CRP before treatment was higher as against patients with low expression of CRP (P < 0.05). Highly expressed CRP is an independent risk factor for poor prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Vericiguat is safe and effective in improving cardiac function in HHF patients.

Imiquimod is a well-known topical treatment for its efficacy against various skin conditions. While generally well-tolerated, adverse reactions like local skin irritation are common. However, severe systemic effects such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) are rare, but possible. We present the case of an 82-year-old male who developed SJS following topical Imiquimod therapy for basal cell carcinoma. Despite minimal systemic absorption, serious reactions can occur, warranting caution. Prompt recognition and discontinuation of treatment are crucial for managing such rare but severe adverse events. This case underscores the importance of informed consent and vigilant monitoring for adverse reactions associated with Imiquimod therapy.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is one of the most common symptoms of osteoporosis. The pain can seriously affect patients\' mood and quality of life; it can also further aggravate bone loss, causing a serious social burden. Minodronate is an oral bisphosphonate that needs to be administered daily. It significantly reduces levels of bone turnover markers (BTMs) and rapidly improves symptoms of low back pain in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporosis requires long-term treatment, and daily dosing reduces patient compliance. Minodronate has a better safety profile than other bisphosphonates. The objective of the trial is to explore the efficacy and safety of minodronate in the treatment of low back pain in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients.
METHODS: This is a single-centre, randomized, open-label controlled trial with a 24-week duration. Seventy-two eligible patients will be randomly divided into 4 groups. Subjects will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive either minodronate (1 mg/day) or alendronate (10 mg/day) every day; senior women (≥ 75 years old) and older women (< 75 years old) will be at a ratio of 1:2. The primary outcome is the time required for the visual analogue scale (VAS) score to decline by ≥ 10 from baseline. The secondary outcome is the changes in VAS scores from baseline, the frequency and dosage of rescue medication, BTMs, bone mineral density (BMD), and variations in upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptom scores from baseline (including heartburn, pain, and bloating).
CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide objective evidence for the efficiency and safety of minodronate. Furthermore, it will be helpful to evaluate the quantitative relationship between BTMs and BMD in patients with osteoporosis under different ages.
BACKGROUND: This study protocol has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05645289 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=NCT05645289 ) on December 8, 2022. The registry name is Peking University Third Hospital. This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Peking University Third Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee (M2022465, 2022.08.09, V2.0). The results will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals.
METHODS: The protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT05645289). Recruitment has started in January 2023 and is still ongoing.

To assess the efficacy and safety of capecitabine in treating advanced colon cancer. Patients with advanced colon cancer were randomized into three groups: control group (n = 50, daily dose 2,500 mg/m2), the medium-dose group (n = 50, daily dose 2,000 mg/m2), and the low-dose group (n = 50, daily dose 1,500 mg/m2) capecitabine for 4 cycles(12 weeks). Afterwards, the response rate, quality of life, and adverse reactions of the three groups were collected for comparison. Efficacy rates were 50%, 70%, and 72%, respectively, with the low-dose group showing the highest efficacy (χ2 = 6.424, p = 0.040); Quality of life comparison results indicated significant differences in physical function (F = 98.528, p < 0.001), role function (F = 123.418, p < 0.001), social function(F = 89.539, p < 0.001), emotional function (6 F = 77.295, p < 0.001), cognitive function (F = 83.529, p < 0.001), and overall quality of life (F = 99.528, p < 0.001) among the three groups, and the three groups returned consistent scores, with the low-dose group scoring highest. Incidence rates were 86.00%, 46.00%, 34.00%, with the control group having the highest rate (χ2 = 16.505, p < 0.001). Capecitabine at a dosage of 1,500 mg/m2 demonstrated a good therapeutic effect and improved the quality of life in patients with advanced colon cancer, with a lower incidence of adverse reactions. A prolonged treatment cycle with reduced dosage is suggested to further improve treatment outcomes and patient prognosis. Trial registration The study was registered on clicaltrials.gov \'NCT06246461\' on 30/01/2024.