UNASSIGNED: Compartment syndrome is an uncommon but life-threatening condition. No study has comprehensively compared compartment syndrome (CS) association with available drugs. The objective of this study was to estimate the association between CS and drugs using the FDA Adverse Event Report System (FAERS).
UNASSIGNED: FAERS reports from the first quarter of 2004 to the third quarter of 2023 were analyzed. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) was used to identify CS cases. Reporting odds ratio (ROR), corresponding to 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to detect a positive signal.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 2197 reports were considered in the study after the inclusion criteria were applied. Totally 100 drugs were found to be associated with CS. The median time for drug-associated CS was 45 days.
UNASSIGNED: By analyzing the FAERS database, the study revealed that certain drugs are significantly associated with compartment syndrome. Further studies are needed to verify whether these drugs are associated with such a risk.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this project was to create time-aware, individual-level risk score models for adverse drug events related to multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapy and to provide interpretable explanations for model prediction behavior.
METHODS: We used temporal sequences of observational medical outcomes partnership common data model (OMOP CDM) concepts derived from an electronic health record as model features. Each concept was assigned an embedding representation that was learned from a graph convolution network trained on a knowledge graph (KG) of OMOP concept relationships. Concept embeddings were fed into long short-term memory networks for 1-year adverse event prediction following drug exposure. Finally, we implemented a novel extension of the local interpretable model agnostic explanation (LIME) method, knowledge graph LIME (KG-LIME) to leverage the KG and explain individual predictions of each model.
RESULTS: For a set of 4859 patients, we found that our model was effective at predicting 32 out of 56 adverse event types (P < .05) when compared to demographics and past diagnosis as variables. We also assessed discrimination in the form of area under the curve (AUC = 0.77 ± 0.15) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR = 0.31 ± 0.27) and assessed calibration in the form of Brier score (BS = 0.04 ± 0.04). Additionally, KG-LIME generated interpretable literature-validated lists of relevant medical concepts used for prediction.
CONCLUSIONS: Many of our risk models demonstrated high calibration and discrimination for adverse event prediction. Furthermore, our novel KG-LIME method was able to utilize the knowledge graph to highlight concepts that were important to prediction. Future work will be required to further explore the temporal window of adverse event occurrence beyond the generic 1-year window used here, particularly for short-term inpatient adverse events and long-term severe adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Bempedoic acid exhibits promising potential in hyperlipidemia therapy and preventing cardiovascular events. However, investigations into its adverse drug reactions remain scant. This study seeks to utilize data mining techniques with the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to assess adverse drug events (ADEs) linked to bempedoic acid.
METHODS: Based on the drug\'s market release timeline, we extracted data from the FAERS database covering the fourth quarter of 2020 through the fourth quarter of 2023 for disproportionality analysis.
RESULTS: This study gathered a total of 5,797,543 adverse event case reports, of which 735 were linked to bempedoic acid. These reports covered 19 System Organ Classes (SOCs) and 22 Preferred Terms (PTs). Predominantly, the musculoskeletal and nervous systems were implicated in these adverse events. By conducting PT-level screening, various signals for ADEs were detected, including myalgia (ROR 30.33, PRR 28.51, IC 4.83, EBGM 28.47), arthralgia (n = 34, ROR 6.34, PRR 6.09, IC 2.61, EBGM 6.09), tendon disorders (ROR 99.57, PRR 98.75, IC 6.62, EBGM 98.28), and dizziness (ROR 3.18, PRR 3.13, IC 1.65, EBGM 3.13). Particularly noteworthy was the hypertensive crisis (ROR 28.63, PRR 28.51, IC 4.83, EBGM 28.47), which exhibited a robust signal strength, an observation previously unreported in clinical studies and drug labeling.
CONCLUSIONS: While our results are largely consistent with the drug\'s specifications, several new adverse reaction signals, such as hypertensive crisis, have not been previously documented. Therefore, further investigations are necessary to assess these unlabeled adverse reactions, offering crucial support for the clinical utilization of bempedoic acid.

UNASSIGNED: Drug trials in neonates are scarce, and the neonates may consequently be at risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Spontaneous ADR reporting is an important tool for expanding the knowledge on drug safety in neonates. This study explores the quality of current neonatal ADR reports and the ADR reports of the most common drugs used in neonatal departments.
UNASSIGNED: An observational cross-sectional study focused on neonates was conducted using data on spontaneous reports extracted from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) from the third quarter of 2014 up to December 2022. Only the primary suspect drugs given to neonates or subjects aged <30 days were included in the analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Spontaneous reports from 13 million patients of all ages, totaling 50 million ADRs, were evaluated. Information regarding the age was missing in 40% of the reports, and data on 43,737 neonates with 948 different suspected drugs were identified and included in the analysis. We report the frequency of spontaneous ADR reports in the FAERS database for the ten most frequently administered drugs in neonatal intensive care units in the USA.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, neonatal ADRs are still underreported. The FAERS database in its current form discriminates insufficiently between prenatal and postnatal drug exposures. Hence, improved neonatal pharmacovigilance systems are urgently needed.

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug events (ADEs) represent challenges affecting Africa\'s healthcare systems owing to the increased healthcare expenditure and negative health outcomes of ADEs.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically review published studies on ADEs and synthesize the existing evidence of ADE prevalence in Africa.
METHODS: Studies reporting on ADE occurrence in African settings and published from Jan 1, 2000 to Oct 1, 2023 were identified by searching PubMed, EBSCO, Science Direct, and Web of Science. Studies that either articulately investigated ADEs caused by clinical condition (such as HIV patients) or ADEs caused by exposure to specific drug(s) (such as antibiotics) were considered specific and the remaining were general. Grouped ADE prevalence rates were described using median and interquartile range (IQR). PROSPERO registration (CRD42022374095).
RESULTS: We included 78 observational studies from 15 African countries that investigated the prevalence of ADEs leading to hospital admissions (17 studies), developed during hospitalizations (30 studies), and captured in the outpatient departments (38 studies) or communities (4 studies). Twelve studies included multiple settings. The median prevalence of ADE during hospitalization was 7.8% (IQR: 4.2-21.4%) and 74.2% (IQR: 54.1-90.7%) in general and specific patients, respectively. The ADE-related fatality rate was 0.1% and 1.3% in general and specific patients. The overall median prevalence of ADEs leading to hospital admissions was 6.0% (IQR: 1.5-9.0%); in general, patients and the median prevalence of ADEs in the outpatient and community settings were 22.9% (IQR: 14.6-56.1%) and 32.6% (IQR: 26.0-41.3%), respectively, with a median of 43.5% (IQR: 16.3-59.0%) and 12.4% (IQR: 7.1-28.1%) of ADEs being preventable in general and specific patients, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of ADEs was significant in both hospital and community settings in Africa. A high ADE prevalence was observed in specific patients, emphasizing important areas for improvement, particularly in at-risk patient groups (e.g., pediatrics, HIV, and TB patients) in various settings. Due to limited studies conducted in the community setting, future research in this setting is encouraged.

UNASSIGNED: In clinical practice, observations have been made regarding bladder and urethral symptoms (BUS), notably urinary frequency and urgency, among patients prescribed the anti-seizure medication (ASM) lacosamide. However, the precise association between ASMs and BUS events in real-world settings remains elusive.
UNASSIGNED: Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database were employed and the analysis focused on ASMs-associated BUS events utilizing disproportionality analysis methods, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the proportional reporting ratio (PRR). Furthermore, co-administration, time to onset of ASMs-associated BUS events, and severity assessments were conducted.
UNASSIGNED: Several ASMs demonstrated statistically meaningful associations with BUS signals, notably ezogabine, valproic acid/valproate sodium, and clorazepate (p < 0.05). And ASMs-associated BUS events predominantly occurred within the first week and persisted for more than 180 days afterward. Diazepam, gabapentin, and brivaracetam exhibited distinct risk profiles for severe BUS events compared to valproic acid/sodium valproate (p < 0.05). And the nomogram constructed in this study exhibited robust predictive performance.
UNASSIGNED: This study yields valuable insights into the association between ASMs and BUS events, but several limitations warrant consideration. Nonetheless, these findings emphasize the significance of vigilance and proactive management of ASMs-associated BUS events.

BACKGROUND: Despite previous efforts, medication safety in paediatrics remains a major concern. To inform improvement strategies and further research especially in outpatient care, we systematically reviewed the literature on the frequency and nature of drug-related hospital admissions in children.
METHODS: Searches covered Embase, Medline, Web of Science, grey literature sources and relevant article citations. Studies reporting epidemiological data on paediatric drug-related hospital admissions published between 01/2000 and 01/2024 were eligible. Study identification, data extraction, and critical appraisal were conducted independently in duplicate using templates based on the \'Joanna Briggs Institute\' recommendations.
RESULTS: The review included data from 45 studies reporting > 24,000 hospitalisations for adverse drug events (ADEs) or adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Due to different reference groups, a total of 52 relative frequency values were provided. We stratified these results by study characteristics. As a percentage of inpatients, the highest frequency of drug-related hospitalisation was found with \'intensive ADE monitoring\', ranging from 3.1% to 5.8% (5 values), whereas with \'routine ADE monitoring\', it ranged from 0.2% to 1.0% (3 values). The relative frequencies of \'ADR-related hospitalisations\' ranged from 0.2% to 6.9% for \'intensive monitoring\' (23 values) and from 0.04% to 3.8% for \'routine monitoring\' (8 values). Per emergency department visits, five relative frequency values ranged from 0.1% to 3.8% in studies with \'intensive ADE monitoring\', while all other eight values were ≤ 0.1%. Heterogeneity prevented pooled estimates. Studies rarely reported on the nature of the problems, or studies with broader objectives lacked disaggregated data. Limited data indicated that one in three (median) drug-related admissions could have been prevented, especially by more attentive prescribing. Besides polypharmacy and oncological therapy, no other risk factors could be clearly identified. Insufficient information and a high risk of bias, especially in retrospective and routine observational studies, hampered the assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the high frequency of drug-related hospitalisations, medication safety in paediatrics needs to be further improved. As routine identification appears unreliable, clinical awareness needs to be raised. To gain more profound insights especially for generating improvement strategies, we have to address under-reporting and methodological issues in future research.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO (CRD42021296986).

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological cancer. The combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab has exhibited efficacy as the second line treatment for advanced EC, with a significant benefit in terms of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival, but the adverse events (AE) profile is complex. AEs associated with the treatment may represent a limitation to this combination. Here, we report the case of a 38-year-old female patient diagnosed with stage IV EC elsewhere, whose disease progressed after the first line of treatment and was referred to a specialised cacncer centre in Muscat, Oman, in 2021. We treated her with the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab. During the course of the treatment, she developed hand-foot syndrome grade III and hypothyroidism grade II. The AEs were managed with supportive medications, dose interruptions, dose reductions and multidisciplinary care, which allowed the continuation of the treatment. The patient achieved a good partial response and an ongoing PFS of more than 12 months.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a group of well-differentiated heterogeneous neoplasms characterized by slow progression and distinct clinical and biological behavior. In the majority of patients with NET, first-line treatment is represented by somatostatin analogs (SSAs) that, despite being drugs with high tolerability (even at high doses) and providing to carcinoid symptoms control and anti-proliferative effects, may present some side effects, with potential impact on quality of life and nutritional status. The most frequent side effects are represented by gastrointestinal events in particular alterations in bowel habits (diarrhea and constipation), abdominal pain, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, and cholelithiasis. Considering the relative rarity of NETs, literature about frequency and standard clinical management of adverse events SSA-related is still lacking and heterogeneous. The aim of this review is to arm gastroenterologists and other physicians treating NET patients with essential knowledge on the side effects of SSAs. By identifying and managing these adverse events early, healthcare professionals can offer optimal care, avert foreseeable complications, and ensure the best outcomes for patients. Without such early recognition, there is a risk of diminishing the patient\'s quality of life and their ability to sustain treatment over time.

OBJECTIVE: Oncology patients often struggle to manage their medications and related adverse events during transitions of care. They are expected to take an active role in self-monitoring and timely reporting of their medication safety events or concerns to clinicians. The purpose of this study was to explore the factors influencing oncology patients\' willingness to report adverse events or concerns related to their medication after their transitions back home.
METHODS: A qualitative interview study was conducted with adult patients with breast, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer who experienced care transitions within the previous year. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to understand patients\' perceptions of reporting mediation-related safety events or concerns from home. All interviews were conducted via phone calls, recorded, and transcribed for thematic data analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 41 individuals participated in the interviews. Three main themes and six subthemes emerged, including patients\' perceived relationship with clinicians (the quality of communication and trust in clinicians), perceived severity of adverse medication events (perceived severe vs. non-severe events), and patient activation in self-management (self-efficacy in self-management and engagement in monitoring health outcomes).
CONCLUSIONS: The patient-clinician relationship significantly affects patients\' reporting behaviors, which can potentially interact with other factors, including the severity of adverse events. It is important to engage oncology patients in medication safety self-reporting from home by enhancing health communication, understanding patients\' perceptions of severe events, and promoting patient activation. By addressing these efforts, healthcare providers should adopt a more patient-centered approach to enhance the overall quality and safety of oncological care.