UNASSIGNED: Intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC) is one of the most common invasive malignancies. Currently, ICC is treated with radical surgical resection. However, the majority of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, making surgery ineligible for them.
UNASSIGNED: We present a case of advanced ICC, which could not undergo radical surgery due to tumor invasion of liver blood vessels. The gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) regimen combined with Tislelizumab immunotherapy and Lenvatinib targeted therapy for 8 cycles resulted in significant tumor shrinkage significantly and the vascular invasion disappeared. CA19-9 levels were reduced to normal levels. Partial remission and successful tumor transformation were achieved. The patient underwent a successful radical surgical resection, including cholecystectomy, resection of liver segments IV, V, and VIII, as well as a regional lymphatic dissection procedure, resulting in complete pathological remission.
UNASSIGNED: Tumor-free surgical margins (R0) resection of patients with advanced ICC after combination of immune, targeted and chemotherapy is rare, and there are almost no cases of complete postoperative remission. The GEMOX regimen in combination with Tislelizumab and Lenvatinib has a good antitumor efficacy and safety profile, and may be a feasible and safe translational treatment option for advanced ICC.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend ivosidenib followed by modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX) for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations. Taiwan National Health Insurance covers only fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) chemotherapy for this ICC group, and there has been no prior economic evaluation of ivosidenib. Therefore, we aimed to assess ivosidenib\'s cost-effectiveness in previously treated, advanced ICC-presenting IDH1 mutations compared with mFOLFOX or 5-FU/LV.
METHODS: A 3-state partitioned survival model was employed to assess ivosidenib\'s cost-effectiveness over a 10-year horizon with a 3% discount rate, setting the willingness-to-pay threshold at 3 times the 2022 GDP per capita. Efficacy data for Ivosidenib, mFOLFOX, and 5-FU/LV were sourced from the ClarIDHy, ABC06, and NIFTY trials, respectively. Ivosidenib\'s cost was assumed to be NT$10,402/500 mg. Primary outcomes included incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and net monetary benefit. Deterministic sensitivity analyses (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were employed to evaluate uncertainty and explore price reduction scenarios.
RESULTS: Ivosidenib exhibited ICERs of NT$6,268,528 and NT$5,670,555 compared with mFOLFOX and 5-FU/LV, respectively, both exceeding the established threshold. PSA revealed that ivosidenib was unlikely to be cost-effective, except when it was reduced to NT$4,161 and NT$5,201/500 mg when compared with mFOLFOX and 5-FU/LV, respectively. DSA underscored the significant influence of ivosidenib\'s cost and utility values on estimate uncertainty.
CONCLUSIONS: At NT$10,402/500 mg, ivosidenib was not cost-effective for IDH1-mutant ICC patients compared with mFOLFOX or 5-FU/LV, indicating that a 50-60% price reduction is necessary for ivosidenib to be cost-effective in this patient group.

UNASSIGNED: A statistical model is essential in determining the appropriate predictive indicators for therapies in many types of cancers. Predictors have been compared favorably to the traditional systems for many cancers. Thus, this study has been proposed as a new standard approach. A recent study on the clinical efficacy of Atractylodes lancea (Thunb) DC. (AL) revealed the higher clinical benefits in patients with advanced-stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) treated with AL compared with standard supportive care. We investigated the relationships between clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetic parameters of serum bioactivity of AL and its active constituent atractylodin and determined therapeutic ranges.
UNASSIGNED: Group 1 of advanced-stage ICC patients received daily doses of 1000 mg of standardized extract of the capsule formulation of AL (CMC-AL) for 90 days. Group 2 received daily doses of 1000 mg of CMC-AL for 14 days, followed by 1500 mg for 14 days, and 2000 mg for 62 days. Group 3 (control group) received palliative care. Cox proportional hazard model and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) were applied to determine the cut-off values of AUC0-inf, Cmax, and Cavg associated with therapeutic outcomes. Number needed to treat (NNT) and relative risk (RR) were also applied to determine potential predictors.
UNASSIGNED: The AUC0-inf of total AL bioactivity of >96.71 µg hour/ml was identified as a promising predictor of disease prognosis, that is, progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR). Cmax of total AL bioactivity of >21.42 was identified as a predictor of the prognosis of survival. The therapeutic range of total AL bioactivity for PFS and DCR is 14.48 to 65.8 µg/ml, and for overall survival is 10.97 to 65.8 µg/ml. Conclusions: The predictors of ICC disease prognosis were established based on the pharmacokinetics of total AL bioactivity. The information could be exploited to improve the clinical efficacy of AL in patients with advanced-stage ICC. These predictors will be validated in a phase 2B clinical study.
UNASSIGNED: TCTR20210129007 (TCTR: www.clinicaltrials.in.th).

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a highly aggressive malignancy rising from the biliary tree with poor prognosis. We report the feasibility and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with PD-1 inhibitor and apatinib for the treatment of a patient with unresectable ICC. A 70-year-old female presented with intermittent right upper abdominal distension, abdominal pain, and vomiting after eating for more than one month. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan revealed multiple intrahepatic lesions, retroperitoneal lymph node, and left lung metastasis. Based on the patient\'s medical history and pathology, the diagnosis was confirmed as locally advanced unresectable ICC. Multimodal therapy was applied to the ICC. The therapy comprised TACE every three months, and a combination regimen of the PD-1 inhibitor camrelizumab and the antiangiogenic agent apatinib. The patient underwent microwave ablation for a lesion on the left lung that had not responded to systemic therapies. Enhanced CT scan after every 2-3 months was performed. After several sessions, the primary lesion reduced dramatically in size. At 20 months from diagnosis, the patient was alive, in good condition, and stable. The patient experienced no critical complications and toxicity associated with the administered therapies. This case suggests that treatment with TACE combined with systemic therapy of camrelizumab combined with apatinib may be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with inoperable ICC.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is one of the most common invasive malignant tumors, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Currently, radical surgical resection is the preferred treatment for ICC. However, most patients are only diagnosed at an advanced stage and are therefore not eligible for surgery. Herein, we present a case of advanced ICC in which radical surgery was not possible due to tumor invasion of the second porta hepatis and right hepatic artery. Six treatment cycles with a gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) regimen combined with camrelizumab immunotherapy achieved a partial response and successful tumor conversion, as tumor invasion of the second porta hepatis and right hepatic artery was no longer evident. The patient subsequently underwent successful radical surgical resection, including hepatectomy, caudate lobe resection, and cholecystectomy combined with lymph node dissection. Cases of patients with advanced ICC undergoing surgical resection after combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy are rare. The GEMOX regimen combined with camrelizumab demonstrated favorable antitumor efficacy and safety, suggesting that it might be a potential feasible and safe conversion therapy strategy for patients with advanced ICC.

Patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) often have a poor prognosis. Recent advancements in targeted molecular therapy and immunotherapy have been made. Herein, we report a case of advanced iCCA treated with a combination of pemigatinib (a selective FGFR inhibitor), chemotherapy, and an immune checkpoint inhibitor. A 34-year-old female was diagnosed with advanced iCCA with multiple liver masses and metastases in the peritoneum and lymph nodes. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) identified the genetic mutations. An FGFR2-BICC1 gene fusion was found in this patient. The patient was treated with pemigatinib in combination with pembrolizumab plus systemic gemcitabine and oxaliplatin. After 9 cycles of the combination therapy, the patient achieved a partial response, complete metabolic response, and normalization of tumor markers. Sequentially, the patient received pemigatinib and pembrolizumab for 3 months. Due to the elevated tumor biomarker, she is currently receiving chemotherapy, pemigatinib, and pembrolizumab treatment again. She regained an excellent physical status after 16 months of treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first reported case of advanced iCCA successfully treated with a combination of pemigatinib, chemotherapy, and ICIs as a first-line regimen. This treatment combination may be effective and safe in the advanced iCCA.

BACKGROUND: A programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined with lenvatinib and Gemox chemotherapy as first-line therapy demonstrated high anti-tumor activity against biliary tract cancer in phase II clinical trials. Herein, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in a multicenter real-world study.
METHODS: Patients with advanced ICC who received PD-1 inhibitor combined with lenvatinib and Gemox chemotherapy were retrospectively screened at two medical centers. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), whereas the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Prognostic factors for survival were analyzed.
RESULTS: Fifty-three patients with advanced ICC were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 13.7 (95% confidence interval (CI): 12.9-17.2) months. The median OS and PFS were 14.3 (95% CI: 11.3-NR) and 8.63 (95% CI: 7.17-11.6) months, respectively. The ORR, DCR, and clinical benefit rate were 52.8, 94.3, and 75.5%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the tumor burden score (TBS), tumor-node metastasis classification (TNM) stage, and PD-L1 expression were independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), 41.5% (22/53) experienced grade 3 or 4 AEs, including fatigue (8/53, 15.1%) and myelosuppression (7/53, 13.2%). No grade 5 AEs were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: PD-1 inhibitors combined with lenvatinib and Gemox chemotherapy represent an effective and tolerable regimen for advanced ICC in a multicenter retrospective real-world study. TBS, TNM stage, and PD-L1 expression can be used as potential prognostic factors for OS and PFS.

Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are related to poor prognosis in hepatobiliary cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma, but their value in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is obscure. This study aimed to investigate the change in CTCs during chemotherapy and its correlation with clinical features, treatment response and survival profile in advanced ICC patients. Fifty-one unresectable, advanced ICC patients who underwent chemotherapy were consecutively enrolled. Peripheral blood samples were collected at diagnosis and 2 months (M2) after chemotherapy initiation for CTC detection via the ISET method. The mean and median CTC counts at diagnosis were 7.4 ± 12.2 and 4.0 (range: 0.0-68.0), respectively, with 92.2% of patients having more than one CTC. A higher CTC count at diagnosis was correlated with elevated lymph node metastasis (p = 0.005), distant metastasis (p = 0.005) and TNM stage (p = 0.001) but no other characteristics. In addition, the CTC count at diagnosis was higher in nonobjective-response patients than in objective-response patients (p = 0.002), and a CTC count at diagnosis above 3 correlated with worse progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.007) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.036). At M2, the CTC count was greatly decreased (p < 0.001). CTC count at M2 also correlated with lower treatment response (p < 0.001), and CTC counts above 3 were associated with poor PFS (p = 0.003) and OS (p = 0.017). After multivariate Cox analyses, CTC counts at diagnosis above 3 and CTC count increase from diagnosis to M2 independently predicted PFS and OS (p < 0.05). Detection of CTCs before and during chemotherapy is useful for prognostication in advanced ICC patients.

Background: Lenvatinib combined with a PD-1 inhibitor has obtained a satisfactory antitumor effect in several solid tumors. However, the efficacy and tumor response of lenvatinib with a PD-1 inhibitor in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma still need further exploration. Methods: This is a single-arm study for the assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of lenvatinib with a PD-1 inhibitor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients who had chemotherapy failure. Efficacy was evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors RECIST Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Results: A total of 40 patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were enrolled after the chemorefractory effect. The median progression-free survival was 5.83 ± 0.76 months. The 3-month and 6-month progression-free survival rates were 80.0% and 32.5%, respectively. The median overall survival was 14.30 ± 1.30 months. The 12-month and 18-month overall survival rates were 61.4% and 34.7%. The 3-month RECIST 1.1 evaluation was that seven patients (17.5%) showed partial response, 23 patients (57.5%) had stable disease, and 10 patients (25.0%) had progressive disease. The objective response rate was 17.5%, and the disease control rate was 75.0%. All the recorded any-grade adverse events inducing treatment termination were controllable, and there were no AE-related deaths. Conclusion: Our study showed that a combination of lenvatinib with the PD-1 inhibitor could be an effective treatment for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after the chemorefractory effect.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), always diagnosed at an advanced stage in recent years, is of high aggression and poor prognosis. There is no standard treatment beyond first-line chemotherapy and no molecular-targeted agents or immune checkpoint inhibitors approved for advanced intrahepatic CCA. Hence, we firstly report an original therapeutic strategy for a 60-year-old patient diagnosed with intrahepatic CCA categorized as Stage IIIB (T3N1M0) by the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. After histopathological examination and next-generation sequencing, the patient was treated with four courses of novel systemic sequential therapy (intravenous gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; oral lenvatinib 8 mg/day from days 1 to 21; intravenous tislelizumab 200 mg on day 15). Then, the patient achieved partial response and was operated on right hemihepatectomy, cholecystectomy, and abdominal lymph node dissection. Without any perioperative complications, the patient was discharged from our hospital in perfect condition. Thereafter, the patient continued to use this new regimen 1 month after surgery for adjuvant therapy and was confirmed without recurrence when we followed up. In a word, we found an effective therapeutic regimen for preoperative advanced intrahepatic CCA conversion therapy, which may become a new approach in cancer treatment in the future.