BACKGROUND: The vegetative state (VS) after severe acute brain injury (SABI) is associated with significant prognostic uncertainty and poor long-term functional outcomes. However, it is generally distinguished from imminent death and is exempt from the Life-Sustaining Treatment (LST) Decisions Act in Korea. Here, we aimed to examine the perspectives of the general population (GP) and clinicians regarding decisions on mechanical ventilator withdrawal in patients in a VS after SABI.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was undertaken, utilizing a self-reported online questionnaire based on a case vignette. Nationally selected by quota sampling, the GP comprised 500 individuals aged 20 to 69 years. There were 200 doctors from a tertiary university hospital in the clinician sample. Participants were asked what they thought about mechanical ventilator withdrawal in patients in VS 2 months and 3 years after SABI.
RESULTS: Two months after SABI in the case, 79% of the GP and 83.5% of clinicians had positive attitudes toward mechanical ventilator withdrawal. In the GP, attitudes were associated with spirituality, household income, religion, the number of household members. On the other hand, clinicians\' attitudes were related to their experience of completing advance directives (AD) and making decisions about LST. In this case, 3 years after SABI, 92% of the GP and 94% of clinicians were more accepting of ventilator withdrawal compared to previous responses, based on the assumption that the patient had written AD. However, it appeared that the proportion of positive responses to ventilator withdrawal decreased when the patients had only verbal expressions (82% of the GP; 75.5% of clinicians) or had not previously expressed an opinion regarding LST (58% of the GP; 39.5% of clinicians).
CONCLUSIONS: More than three quarters of both the GP and clinicians had positive opinions regarding ventilator withdrawal in patients in a VS after SABI, which was reinforced with time and the presence of AD. Legislative adjustments are needed to ensure that previous wishes for those patients are more respected and reflected in treatment decisions.

BACKGROUND: With the ageing of the population intensifying, the implementation of advance care planning (ACP) in nursing facilities is especially crucial.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to search and synthesise qualitative studies exploring the perspectives of older people in nursing facilities about ACP discussions.
METHODS: The researchers conducted searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and CBM between the time of inception and October 2023. The PICo model was used to build the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers screened the literature, extracted data and then integrated the literature using the integrative synthesis.
RESULTS: A total of 12 articles were included, 47 themes were extracted, and three research integrations were summarised: (1) understanding of ACP; (2) attitude towards ACP; and (3) influencing factors of participation in ACP.
CONCLUSIONS: This study offers guidance for the future development of ACP on the participation of older people in nursing facilities.
CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to strengthen the education of ACP-related knowledge in conjunction with the cultural characteristics of different countries, to provide interdisciplinary support for older people through professional teamwork and to promote the development and improvement of ACP-related practices.

The most controversial issue in the Dutch euthanasia practice concerns the performance of euthanasia in a case of a patient in an advanced state of dementia on the basis of a request that is laid down in an advance directive. This is particularly controversial when such a patient, although lacking decisional capacity on the matter, shows signs of a wish to live. In two important verdicts of April 21 2020 the Dutch Supreme Court has ruled that a request that has been made competently cannot be revoked incompetently. In this comment I consider two recent documents from Dutch professional organisations that are contrary to these decisions, in particular a guideline stating that on a proper understanding of decisional capacity the expression of a wish to live of a demented person, however inarticulate, should always be considered to be made competently.

BACKGROUND: Shared care planning (ACP) is a reflective, deliberative and structured process involving the sick person and his or her caring environment. Health professionals recognize barriers to initiating ACP.Perceived self-efficacy is one of the main predictors of success in learning processes.
OBJECTIVE: 1) To crossculturally adapt the ACP self-efficacy scale in Spanish for Argentina (ACP-SEs); 2) To explore the reliability and validity of the scale; and 3) To explore self-efficacy in ACP in Argentinean professionals.
METHODS: Exploratory instrumental study carried out on health professionals who assist patients with advanced chronic diseases, interdisciplinary through a comprehension test of the ACP-SEs instrument and psychometric validation in a purposive sample of professionals. Sociodemographic variables and previous experience were analyzed.
RESULTS: After the comprehension test and linguistic adaptation of the scale through cognitive testing with eight professionals with experience with advanced chronic patients, the ACP-SEs Ar version of the scale was achieved. 236 professionals participated in the exploration, 83% attended patients with advanced chronic disease, 52.9 % were physicians, 52% received informal training in ACP, and 11% had a personal advance directive document. The scale\'s internal consistency was high (Cronbach\'s alpha = 0.89). Questions about prognosis, treatment options, goals, treatment preferences, and reassessment of goals of care showed significant differences between physicians and nonphysicians.
CONCLUSIONS: We explored PCA self-efficacy in health professionals with the ACP-SEs Ar scale validated for the first time in Argentina.
Introducción: La planificación compartida de la atención (PCA) es un proceso reflexivo, deliberativo y estructurado. Involucra a la persona enferma y su entorno afectivo. Los profesionales sanitarios reconocen barreras para iniciar la PCA. La autoeficacia percibida es un principal predictor del éxito en los procesos de aprendizaje. Objetivos: 1) Adaptar transculturalmente la escala de autoeficacia percibida en PCA en español para Argentina (ACP-SEs); 2) Explorar la confiabilidad y la validez de la escala y 3) Explorar la autoeficacia en PCA en profesionales argentinos. Métodos: Estudio instrumental exploratorio realizado a profesionales de la salud que asisten pacientes con enfermedades crónicas avanzadas, interdisciplinarios, a través de una prueba de comprensión del instrumento ACP-SEs y la validación psicométrica en una muestra intencional de profesionales. Se analizaron variables sociodemográficas y la experiencia previa. Resultados: Luego de la prueba de comprensión y adaptación lingüística de la escala a través de un test cognitivo con 8 profesionales con experiencia con pacientes crónicos avanzados se logró la versión de la escala ACP-SEs Ar. Participaron en la exploración 236 profesionales, el 83% asistía pacientes con enfermedad crónica avanzada; el 52.9% médicos; 52% recibió formación informal en PCA y 11% tenía un documento de directivas anticipadas personal. La consistencia interna de la escala fue alta (alfa de Cronbach = 0.89). Las preguntas sobre pronóstico, objetivos y preferencias de tratamiento, y reevaluación de los objetivos de cuidados mostraron diferencias significativas entre médicos y no médicos. Conclusión: La escala ACP-SEs Ar demostró propiedades psicométricas adecuadas.

BACKGROUND: Advance personal planning (APP) involves planning for future periods of incapacity, including making legal decisions and documents. APP ensures that a person\'s values and preferences are known and respected. This study aimed to examine knowledge of APP, attitudes and confidence towards APP, and participation in APP activities among older people residing in regional and rural areas.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with people aged over 65 years residing in and around regional towns in New South Wales, Australia. Participants responded to a social media advertisement or information provided through a community organisation. Data was collected via pen and paper survey or an online survey. The survey was developed for the study and included questions about the participant and their experiences with APP. Poisson regression modelling was conducted to explore the relationship between APP participation and APP knowledge, confidence and attitudes as well as the participant characteristics associated with APP participation.
RESULTS: Overall, 216 people completed the survey. Most participants had a will (90%) but only a third (32%) had documented an advance care directive. Knowledge of APP was low with only 2.8% of participants correctly answering all 6 knowledge questions. Participants had a positive attitude towards APP and high level of confidence that they could discuss APP issues with important people in their life. Those with increased knowledge, confidence and attitude towards APP were significantly more likely to participate in APP activities. Older age and having private health insurance were significantly associated with engaging in APP activities. Increased frailty and the presence of health conditions were not associated with increased APP participation.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to increase engagement with APP particularly among those who may be considered frail or have chronic health conditions. Increasing knowledge of, confidence and attitudes towards, APP could help to increase engagement in APP activities.

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning involves discussing individuals\' future medical treatment and care preferences. Nurses, due to their close relationships with patients and families, may be well-positioned to lead these discussions. Exploring the components and characteristics of nurse-led ACP interventions is essential for enhancing their implementation, effectiveness, and sustainability.
OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aimed to explore the characteristics of nurse-led ACP interventions in adult patients, identify the populations and settings where these interventions have been utilized, and the outcomes of these interventions in the U.S.
METHODS: A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O\'Malley\'s five-stage framework. Using keywords related to nurse-led ACP interventions, a comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases.
RESULTS: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were conducted in varied settings. Registered nurses, oncology nurse navigators, and other specialized nurses primarily delivered nurse-led ACP interventions. The interventions ranged from one to two sessions and utilized various models and resources such as the Five Wishes and Respecting Choices.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led ACP interventions have shown significant positive outcomes, including increased engagement in ACP, improved attitudes towards ADs, higher completion rates of ADs, and enhanced patient-surrogate congruence. These interventions are well-received by patients and can be implemented in diverse settings. However, a general guideline regarding nurse-led ACP interventions is needed to address the specific duration, sessions, and mode of delivery required for their optimal effectiveness.

暂无摘要。

Health care professionals can enhance conversations about serious illness and medical decision-making by adopting a transparent, standardized approach. This article critiques established communication strategies, which often emphasize patient values and goals without providing the necessary medical information to align these goals with a shared understanding of prognosis. We propose an alternate strategy that (1) provides detailed explanations of medical conditions at the beginning of the conversation, (2) includes support persons in discussions, (3) considers capacity, and (4) offers tailored advice by clinicians. The proposed framework aims to provide patients (or their delegates) with the information they need to integrate their values in pursuit of well-informed medical decisions. This strategy builds trust by providing honest information about medical conditions and their trajectories. It empowers decision makers to consider realistic outcomes, allowing them to accept or reject treatments in accordance with their preferences. This article presents a thorough step-by-step guide on how to conduct a serious illness conversation and facilitate medical decision-making, including a supplement that provides example phrases for use in clinical practice.

AbstractIn this piece I discuss optimal approaches that providers may take when pursuing surrogate decision-making. A potential critical problem here is some providers\' approach differing from that of others. To the extent that this occurs, the results may be arbitrary, and the harm from this may be profound since this may affect, of course, even whether some of these patients will live or die. One factor possibly resulting in these differences is the moral weight providers place on what family members want when these outcomes differ from what they think patients would want. Providers now most commonly place greatest moral weight on following what patients would want to maximally respect their autonomy, but this view may clash with the view of others who see autonomy as more relational and thus based on prior and present social relations with others. Giving family members\' wants more moral weight is a radical departure from what providers do now and may increase these differences. I discuss here the rationales for and against these competing choices.

OBJECTIVE: People with multiple system atrophy (MSA) and their carers may have many concerns about their disease and the future. This survey of people with MSA and their carers aimed to increase understanding of end-of-life care and palliative care for this group.
METHODS: A survey was undertaken by the MSA Trust of people living with MSA and carers of those with the condition between August and October 2022.
RESULTS: 520 people responded: 215 people with MSA, 214 carers and 91 former carers. The modal class for age in people with MSA was 65-74 years, with 52% male. 76% of people living with MSA had thought to some extent about what they wanted to happen towards the end of their lives. 38% of respondents had discussed end-of-life care options with a healthcare professional and of those who had, over 81% found the conversation helpful. Nevertheless, for 37% of former carers, the death had been unexpected. Only a minority of people living with MSA had been referred for specialist palliative care. 65% of the former carers reported that they were satisfied with the quality of end-of-life care.
CONCLUSIONS: People with MSA and their carers continue to face many complex physical and emotional issues that would benefit from palliative care. Discussions about care at the end of life were generally perceived as helpful, but although the deterioration was often discussed, many families seemed unprepared for the death. Palliative care services were involved but this appeared limited.