Advance care planning (ACP) is a process of discussion, reflection and communication, enabling planning for future medical treatment. Despite evidence of benefits of ACP to patients, families and the healthcare system, many die without an opportunity for such conversations, particularly those living with progressive non-malignant conditions. The Royal College of General Practitioners and Marie Curie Daffodil Standards launched in 2020 provide primary care with a structure for improving end-of-life care, including delivery of ACP. Proactive identification of patients is integral to the approach.We report on a quality improvement project which aimed to assess the take-up rate and acceptability in general practice of a timely and personalised ACP conversation using a \'What matters to you\' (WMTY) framework, and to ensure that different diagnostic and demographic groups were included.Patients without previous ACP and potentially in the last year of life were offered an ACP conversation; a survey sought feedback.81% accepted the offer and in most cases, future care guidance was documented using the recognised format in Gloucestershire for recording ACP conversations, the Recommended Summary for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) plan. Clinician and patient satisfaction was high.We concluded that an ACP discussion using a \'WMTY\' format was highly acceptable to most. With recognised enablers in place and known barriers minimised, valuable personalised conversations occurred. Reframing the conversation to focus on how someone wants to live, while including their priorities for death, could alter how such conversations are perceived by clinicians and the public. It could remove negative associations (such as linking these conversations with an imminent death), which may increase motivation for all to initiate discussions.ACP conversations are evidenced best practice and could become routine in general practice with adjustments to practice processes and clinician education; the Daffodil Standards facilitate continued quality improvement.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify demographic factors, area-based social determinants of health (SDOH), and clinical features associated with medical decision-making after pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
METHODS: This is a retrospective, exploratory, descriptive analysis of patients < 18 years old admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) after OHCA from 2011 to 2022 (n = 217) at an urban tertiary care, free-standing children\'s hospital. Outcomes of interest included: (1) whether a new advance care plan (ACP) (defined as a written advance directive including do not resuscitate and/or do not intubate) was ordered during hospitalization, and (2) whether the patient was discharged with new medical technology (defined as tracheostomy and/or feeding tube). Logistic regression models identified features associated with these outcomes.
RESULTS: Of the 217 patients, 78 patients (36%) had a new ACP placed during their admission. Of the survivors, 26% (27/102) were discharged home with new medical technology. Factors associated with ACP were greater change in Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) score (aOR = 1.49, 95% CI [1.28-1.73], p-value < 0.001) and palliative care consultation (aOR = 2.39, 95% CI [1.16-4.89], p-value 0.018). Factors associated with new medical technology were lower change in PCPC score (aOR = 0.76, 95% C.I. [0.61-0.95], p-value = 0.015) and palliative care consultation (aOR = 7.07, 95% CI [3.01-16.60], p-value < 0.001). There were no associations between area-based SDOH and outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Understanding factors associated with decision-making related to ACP after OHCA is critical to optimize counseling for families. Multi-institutional studies are warranted to identify whether these findings are generalizable.

UNASSIGNED: Advance care planning enables people to record their future health and care wishes and appoint someone as an advocate. An advance directive can be made in the event that a person is incapacitated, so that their wishes are still upheld. The beliefs of the nephrology team might affect patients\' choices and willingness to sign an advance directive. To increase the number of dialysis patients who have signed an advance directive, it is necessary to educate the nephrology medical staff.
UNASSIGNED: To explore the intention to sign an advance directive and its related factors among nephrology medical staff.
UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional and correlational design was used. This study recruited 160 nephrology medical staff. Data were analysed by using the Statistical Package for Social Science 21.0 for Windows.
UNASSIGNED: The results found that the longer someone has worked as part of the nephology medical staff, the more knowledgeable they were about an advance directive. This led to them being more likely to want to sign an advance directive for themselves.
UNASSIGNED: In order to improve the knowledge and awareness of advance directives among nephrology medical staff, hospital managers should provide continuing education on this topic.

Telehealth has been adopted as an alternative to in-person primary care visits. With multiple participants able to join remotely, telehealth can facilitate the discussion and documentation of advance care planning (ACP) for those with Alzheimer\'s disease-related disorders (ADRDs). We measured hospitalization-associated utilization outcomes, instances of hospitalization and 90-day re-hospitalizations from payors\' administrative databases and verified the data via electronic health records. We estimated the hospitalization-associated costs using the Nevada State Inpatient Dataset and compared the estimated costs between ADRD patients with and without ACP documentation in the year 2021. Compared to the ADRD patients without ACP documentation, those with ACP documentation were less likely to be hospitalized (mean: 0.74; standard deviation: 0.31; p < 0.01) and were less likely to be readmitted within 90 days of discharge (mean: 0.16; standard deviation: 0.06; p < 0.01). The hospitalization-associated cost estimate for ADRD patients with ACP documentation (mean: USD 149,722; standard deviation: USD 80,850) was less than that of the patients without ACP documentation (mean: USD 200,148; standard deviation: USD 82,061; p < 0.01). Further geriatrics workforce training is called for to enhance ACP competencies for ADRD patients, especially in areas with provider shortages where telehealth plays a comparatively more important role.

China is entering an era of aging population with an increased mortality rate among this category of population. Health professional students\' attitudes toward death directly affect their quality of palliative care in their future careers. It is thus important to understand their death attitudes and associated factors to guide future educational and training development.
This study aimed to investigate death attitudes and analyze the associated factors among health professional students in China.
In this cross-sectional study, 1,044 health professional students were recruited from 14 medical colleges and universities. The Chinese version of the Death Attitude Profile-Revised (DAP-R) was used to evaluate their death attitudes. A multiple linear regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors of attitudes toward death.
Health professional students tended to accept death more neutrally. Multivariate analysis showed that their negative death attitudes were associated with age (β = -0.31, p < 0.001) and religious belief (β = 2.76, p = 0.015), while positive death attitudes were associated with age (β = -0.42, p < 0.001), hearing of Advance Care Plan (ACP) (β = 2.21, p = 0.001), and attending funeral/memorial services (β = 2.69, p = 0.016).
Our study stresses the importance of including death and palliative care education in healthcare courses among health professional students in China. Incorporation of ACP education along with experiences of funeral/memorial services may help promote health professional students\' positive attitudes toward death and improve the quality of palliative care in their future careers.

CL is a 94-year-old male who is brought to the Emergency Department from an assisted living facility due to a new onset of weakness and altered mental status. He was in his usual state of moderately compensated health, requiring assistance for most activities of daily living due to medical frailty and a previous right brain CVA with residual mild left sided weakness. On the day of admission, the staff found him lethargic and disoriented. The family requested a surgical consult for percutaneous, endoscopic, gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement. A review of the patient\'s records showed that the patient had refused a PEG tube during his last two hospitalizations. During the last admission, the hospitalist documented that the patient repeatedly refused nutritional support stating \"if it\'s my time, I\'ve lived a full life. I\'m ready to die and join my wife.\" There was no advance care plan (\"living will\"), but CL did sign a \"Selection of Surrogate Decision-maker\" form previously, assigning his nephew as primary surrogate. Under pressure from multiple family members, including the designated surrogate, the attending requested a surgical consultation. The surgical team determined that the patient did not have capacity and scheduled CL for PEG tube placement. The care team had concerns regarding the conflict between the patient\'s previously (and consistently) stated desires and the family\'s wishes; an ethics consult was requested.

BACKGROUND: The characteristics and outcomes of palliative patients who visited the Emergency Department (ED) in Thailand, a country in which no standard palliative care system existed, have not been comprehensively studied. We aimed to report the characteristics of ED palliative patients and investigate factors associated with mortality.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, between March 2019 and February 2021 by means of interviewing palliative patients and/or their caregivers and medical record review. Palliative patients with either incurable cancer or other end-stage chronic diseases were included.
RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were enrolled. Their mean age was 73 years, 61.5% were female, and 53.8% had incurable cancer. Of these, 20.3% had previously visited the palliative clinic. Approximately 60% had advanced directives, 4.9% had a living will, and 27.5% had plans on their preferred place of death. The most common chief complaint was dyspnea (43.4%), and the main reason for ED visits was \'cannot control symptoms\' (80%). At the ED, 17% of the patients had been seen by the palliative care team, and 23.1% died. Although 51% were admitted, 48.9% could not survive to discharge. Cancer, having received morphine, a palliative performance scale > 30, and ED palliative consultation were independently associated with hospital mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: The recognition and utilization of palliative care were largely inadequate, especially for non-cancer patients. An improvement and promotion in the palliative care system from the ED through home care are mandatory to improve the quality of life of palliative patients.

Background: Each health provider/agency in Southland, New Zealand, previously had its own forms and processes to document and communicate the planned scope of treatment; this project attempted to consolidate and streamline these variable processes into one actionable medical order that is valid in all settings. Aim: The hypothesis was that the intervention would reduce unnecessary hospitalizations in the final year of life. Design: The Clinical Order Articulating Scope of Treatment (COAST) form was a single-page medical order designed to document and communicate the resuscitation status and scope of medical treatment for adult patients believed to be in the final year of life, as evidenced by a \"no\" response to the Surprise Question. This three-phase initiative piloted the use of the COAST form in Southland from May 2019 to January 2020. Results: One hundred eighty-three patients with COAST forms consented to study participation. Sixty-one percent had a malignant primary diagnosis. The average number of emergency department (ED) presentations in the 12 months before COAST form implementation was 1.5 per person, and the average number of hospital admissions per person was 2.2. This was reduced to 0.5 and 0.5, respectively, in the 12 months following COAST implementation (p = 0.00). Three patients had no ED presentations/hospital admissions in the 12 months before COAST implementation, compared with 29 following COAST implementation, and 66.7% of patients died between May 2019 and February 2021. Conclusions: Patients with a COAST form had significantly fewer ED presentations and hospital admissions in the 12 months following implementation.

The ED is an increasingly important venue for the initiation of palliative care. We sought to characterise the opinions, experience, training and education of ED staff in Aotearoa/New Zealand (NZ) with regard to specific aspects of palliative care in the NZ ED setting.
All NZ FACEMs were personally emailed a simple unstructured 16-part survey asking questions about initiating palliative care, goals of care, initiation and availability of advance care plans, frailty screening, availability of palliative expertise, training and education, cultural safety and pastoral care of staff. All EDs were contacted and a link provided for non-FACEM ED staff who wished to participate. Free-text comments were analysed for dominant themes.
All NZ EDs had at least one participant. There was a high level of senior medical staff engagement with 60% of NZ FACEMs participating. More than 300 free-text comments from this group were available for theme analysis. A total of 93% of NZ FACEM respondents agree that palliative care should be able to be initiated in the ED. Only 25% of this group knew of training in serious illness conversations in the ED while only 34% felt culturally competent when providing end-of-life care for Māori and their whanau (family). Pastoral care for ED staff appears to be ad hoc. Time and privacy limitations were common themes.
There is significant opportunity for quality improvement in the initiation and provision of palliative care from the ED. Attention to how departments provide pastoral care to their staff is needed.

A high proportion of patients are being supported with end-of-life (EoL) care in the community, many of which are known to district nursing (DN) caseloads. Over time, community specialist practitioner district nursing (CSPDN) teams build therapeutic relationships with patients, and they are adept at providing EoL care. They are also now actively and routinely undertaking verification of death (VoD). Thus, they are in a prime position to promote and facilitate community tissue donation among patients and their families. The Government has recognised a need to promote organ and tissue donation, implementing the Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act (2019), whereby every person over the age of 18 years is now considered for organ and tissue donation with the anticipation of more recipients receiving life-changing tissue transplantation. DN teams seem to lack awareness of the change in law and, therefore, are not actively promoting this in practice. Further, there is no available community-focused guidance or training to support DNs to have these difficult and complex conversations enabling exploration of patients\' wishes with regard to promote tissue donation. Therefore, guidance and education are needed in order to improve overall referrals, in the hope that they lead to an increase in donation.