Sclerosing stromal tumors are a rare type of ovarian tumor in the category of sex cord stromal tumors, which arise from the ovarian connective tissue. This report concerns a case of a sclerosing stromal tumor in a 19-year-old nulliparous woman who presented with the chief complaints of menstrual irregularities and dyspareunia. Preoperative imaging revealed a complex right adnexal mass with blood flow and without associated ascites. Tumor markers were all normal except lactate dehydrogenase, which was elevated. The elevated lactate dehydrogenase, in combination with patient age and menstrual irregularities, initially misdirected the clinicians toward suspicion for dysgerminoma or other malignant germ cell tumor of the ovary. Clinicians should beware of excluding the diagnosis of sex cord stromal tumor on the differential in a young person with an adnexal mass and elevated lactate dehydrogenase.

暂无摘要。

After the introduction of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), several studies with diverse characteristics have been published to assess its diagnostic performance. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of O-RADS MRI scoring for adnexal masses, accounting for the risk of selection bias.
The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched for eligible studies. Borderline or malignant lesions were considered malignant. All O-RADS MRI scores ≥4 were considered positive. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio (LR) values were calculated, considering the risk of selection bias.
Fifteen eligible studies were found, and five of them had a high risk of selection bias. Between-study heterogeneity was low-to-moderate for sensitivity but substantial for specificity (I2 values were 35.5% and 64.7%, respectively). The pooled sensitivity was significantly lower in the studies with a low risk of bias compared with those with a high risk of bias (93.0% and 97.5%, respectively; P = 0.043), whereas the pooled specificity was not different (90.4% for the overall population). The negative and positive LRs were 0.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05–0.11] and 10.0 (95% CI 7.7–12.9), respectively, for the studies with low risk of bias and 0.03 (95% CI 0.01–0.10) and 10.3 (95% CI 3.8–28.3), respectively, for those with high risk of bias.
The overall diagnostic performance of the O-RADS system is very high, particularly for ruling out borderline/malignant lesions, but with a moderate ruling-in potential. Studies with a high risk of selection bias lead to an overestimation of sensitivity.
The O-RADS system demonstrates considerable diagnostic performance, particularly in ruling out borderline or malignant lesions, and should routinely be used in practice. The high between-study heterogeneity observed for specificity suggests the need for improvement in the consistent characterization of the benign lesions to reduce false positive rates.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model in Japanese women, population with a distinct adnexal mass distribution compared with European women, and to evaluate the model\'s utility by gynecology trainees and ultrasound specialists.
METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study analyzed ultrasound data from January 2017 to March 2020 of 206 women with adnexal masses. Patients who underwent ultrasonography and serum CA-125 measurement and received postsurgery histological diagnosis were included. The ADNEX model\'s diagnostic performance was evaluated by two trainees and two specialists using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and measures of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for overall performance and each examiner.
RESULTS: Of the 206 included Japanese women, the prevalence of malignancy was 30.1%, including borderline cases. The overall AUC for distinguishing malignancy was 0.848 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.817-0.880). The AUC for each examiner ranged from 0.791 to 0.898, with Specialist 2 showing the highest accuracy and sensitivity varying between 0.677 and 0.839. A moderate degree of agreement was noted among the four examiners (Fleiss\' kappa was 0.586). The performance of trainees and specialists differed significantly in evaluating the solid tissue and the papillary projections in both malignant and benign groups (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The IOTA ADNEX model effectively differentiates benign and malignant adnexal masses in Japanese women. Although the accuracy matched up moderately among the four examiners, better accuracy is expected with training in evaluating solid tissue and papillary projections.

Asymptomatic adnexal masses are commonly encountered in daily radiology practice. Although the vast majority of these masses are benign, a small subset have a risk of malignancy, which require gynecologic oncology referral for best treatment outcomes. Ultrasound, using a combination of both transabdominal, transvaginal, and duplex Doppler technique can accurately characterize the majority of these lesions. MRI with and without contrast is a useful complementary modality that can help characterize indeterminate lesions and assess the risk of malignancy is those that are suspicious. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

UNASSIGNED: Uterine leiomyomas are benign tumors characterized by pelvic pain and abnormal bleeding. Their evolution can lead to degenerative changes, occasionally mimicking malignancies on imaging, presenting diagnostic challenges.
UNASSIGNED: A 31-year-old nulliparous woman presented with symptoms of bloating, cramping, and abdominal distension. Imaging suggested an advanced ovarian malignancy, showing a complex adnexal mass and elevated CA-125 levels. During exploratory laparotomy, what was suspected to be ovarian cancer was instead identified as a large uterine mass on pathologic evaluation revealing a benign leiomyoma with extensive hydropic change.
UNASSIGNED: This case highlights the diagnostic intricacies associated with large complex adnexal masses and illustrates how benign conditions like leiomyomas with hydropic degeneration can mimic ovarian cancer. This emphasizes the importance of comprehensive preoperative and intraoperative assessments to tailor management and avoid unindicated radical procedures.

UNASSIGNED: IOTA proposed Simple Ultrasound Rules in 2009 for preoperative diagnosis of ovarian masses based on ultrasound only. It is an accurate, simple and inexpensive method. RMI, however, requires CA125 level. While RMI-4 is the latest, RMI-1 is still the most widely used method. The present study was done to compare IOTA Rules with RMI-1 and RMI-4.
UNASSIGNED: To differentiate benign and malignant adnexal masses preoperatively using IOTA simple rules and compare its accuracy with RMI-1 and RMI-4.
UNASSIGNED: A prospective observational study was performed from 1st November 2019 to 31st March 2021 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ABVIMS and Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi. This study was conducted on 70 patients with adnexal masses who underwent pre-operative evaluation using IOTA Simple Rules, RMI-1 and RMI-4. Histopathology was used to compare the results.
UNASSIGNED: Out of 70 patients, 59 (84.3%) cases were benign and 11 (15.7%) were malignant. The IOTA Rules were applicable to 60 cases (85.7%), and the results were inconclusive in 10 cases (14.3%). Where applicable, the sensitivity and specificity of the IOTA Rules (88.9% and 94.1%, respectively) were significantly higher than RMI-1 (45.5% and 93.2%, respectively) and RMI-4 (45.5% and 89.8%, respectively). When inconclusive results were included as malignant, the sensitivity of the IOTA Rules increased (88.9% vs 90.9%); however, the specificity decreased (94.1% vs 81.4%).
UNASSIGNED: IOTA Simple Rules were more accurate at diagnosing benign from malignant adnexal masses than RMI-1 and RMI-4. However, the rules were not applicable to 14% of the cases.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the experience of a tertiary health center about the management of adnexal masses that have been diagnosed during pregnancy or detected accidentally during cesarean delivery.
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 160 women who underwent concurrent surgery for adnexal mass during cesarean section, 24 women who delivered vaginally and subsequently had surgery due to the prenatal diagnosis of adnexal mass and 10 women who underwent surgery for adnexal mass during pregnancy. Corresponding to the delivery and surgery times, 200 women who had no diagnosis of pregnancy-associated adnexal mass served as controls.
RESULTS: The women in the control group and study groups had statistically similar gestational age at delivery, birth weight and preterm delivery (p > 0.05 for all). Miscarriage was significantly more frequent in women undergoing surgery for adnexal mass during pregnancy (p = 0.001). The women who had surgery for adnexal mass during pregnancy, at the time of cesarean section and following delivery were statistically similar with respect to surgery type and histopathological diagnosis (p > 0.05 for both). Malignancy was detected in none of the patients who underwent surgery for adnexal mass during pregnancy. Acute abdomen was the indication for the emergency surgery in six patients (3.5%) who had surgery for adnexal mass during pregnancy. Four patients (2.4%) had surgery for adnexal mass during pregnancy due to the high index of suspicion for malignancy.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of malignancy was relatively lower in this cohort of adnexal masses detected during pregnancy and cesarean delivery. Surgical management of adnexal masses should be postponed to postpartum period as such management leads to an increased risk of miscarriage. Unless there is a need for emergent surgery or cancer staging, vaginal delivery should be encouraged in women diagnosed with adnexal mass during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the risk of cancer among older patients with stable adnexal masses in community-based settings to determine the duration of observation time needed.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the ovarian cancer risk among older patients with stable adnexal masses on ultrasound.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients in a large community-based health system aged ≥50 years with an adnexal mass <10 cm on ultrasound between 2016 and 2020 who had at least 1 follow-up ultrasound performed ≥6 weeks after initial ultrasound. Masses were considered stable on follow-up examination if they did not exhibit an increase of >1 cm in the greatest dimension or a change in standardized reported ultrasound characteristics. Ovarian cancer risk was determined at increasing time intervals of stability after initial ultrasound.
RESULTS: Among 4061 patients with stable masses, the average age was 61 years (range, 50-99), with an initial mass size of 3.8 cm (range, 0.2-9.9). With a median follow-up of 3.7 years, 11 cancers were detected, with an absolute risk of 0.27%. Ovarian cancer risk declined with longer duration of stability, from 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.30-1.17) per 1000 person-years at 6 to 12 weeks, 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.19-1.07) at 13 to 24 weeks, 0.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.87) at 25 to 52 weeks, and 0.00 (95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.00) at >52 weeks. Expressed as number needed to reimage, ongoing ultrasound imaging would be needed for 369 patients whose masses show stability at 6 to 12 weeks, 410 patients at 13 to 24 weeks, 583 patients at 25 to 52 weeks, and >1142 patients with stable masses at 53 to 104 weeks to detect 1 case of ovarian cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: In a diverse community-based setting, among patients aged ≥50 years with an adnexal mass that was stable for at least 6 weeks after initial ultrasound, the risk of ovarian cancer was very low at 0.27%. Longer demonstrated duration of stability was associated with progressively lower risk, with no cancer cases observed after 52 weeks of stability. These findings suggest that the benefit of ultrasound monitoring of stable masses beyond 12 months is minimal and may be outweighed by potential risks of repeated imaging.

We recently characterized the clinical performance of a multivariate index assay (MIA3G) to assess ovarian cancer risk for adnexal masses at initial presentation. This study evaluated how MIA3G varies when applied longitudinally to monitor risk during clinical follow-up.
The study evaluated women presenting with adnexal masses from eleven centers across the US. Patients received an initial blood draw at enrollment and at the standard-of-care follow-up visits. MIA3G was determined for all visits but physicians did not have access to MIA3G scores to determine clinical management. The primary outcome was the relative change value (RCV) of MIA3G over the period of clinical observation.
A total of 510 patients of 785 enrolled met study criteria. Of these, 30.8% had a second, 25.4% a third and 22.2% a fourth blood draw following initial collection. The median duration from initial draw was 131 d to second draw, 301.5 d to the third draw and 365.5 d to the fourth draw. MIA3G RCV of >50% was observed in 22-26% patients, whereas 70-75% patients had MIA3G RCV >5%. An empirical baseline RCV of 56% - transformed to 1 in logarithmic scale - was calculated from averaging RCVs of all patients who had no malignancy risk after 210 days. RCV > 1 log was associated with higher incidence of surgical intervention (29.6%) compared to RCV < 1 log (16.9%).
Variation in MI3AG does not change the accuracy of the test for excluding malignancy, while marked changes may be associated with a slightly higher likelihood of surgical intervention. In addition to MIA3G score itself, the MIA3G RCV may be important for clinical management.