BACKGROUND: It is known that non-adherence to psychiatric medications has harmful consequences for both patients and society.
OBJECTIVE: To collect information on the incidence of non-adherence, and the factors and causes affecting adherence to psychopharmacological treatment in patients with severe and persistent mental disorders.
METHODS: A systematic review of scientific articles on adult patients (>17 years) published in the last five years (2015-2020) on specialised databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Scielo and BioMed. Original articles from indexed journals with an impact factor >0.5, in English or Spanish, with an analytical, prospective, retrospective, cross-sectional and randomised design were included. Once the articles were identified, they were analysed, extracting the information necessary to answer the research questions.
RESULTS: Fifteen articles were included. Of these, 40% (n = 6) were published in 2020, 20% (n = 3) were produced in China and 53.3% (n = 8) had an observational design. A total of 5,837 patients were included, of which 50.6% were men (n = 2,955), with moderate adherence (n = 10; 66.7%) reported in 10 investigations. Non-adherence varies from 7.7% to 60.6%. The factors that affect adherence are specific to the patient (age and sex), their family support network, and related to the disease or the treatment. The main cause of non-adherence is lack of insight.
CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to treatment with psychotropic drugs is multifactorial. Access to mental health services should be improved, with an emphasis placed on patient education and providing greater knowledge of mental illness. Interventions to promote education and interaction with the psychiatrist could be beneficial.

OBJECTIVE: This article describes a study protocol for evaluating adherence to oral chemotherapy (OCT) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Spain.
METHODS: This multicenter, observational, prospective study will be conducted by 6 hospital pharmacists from 6 Spanish hospitals. The study will include men and women aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who are being treated or have been prescribed OCT. Once included, the patient will be active and prospectively followed up for 3 months, including 4 study visits to record information on sociodemographic variables, antineoplastic treatment and adherence, pharmaceutical care, clinical variables, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) (the 3-level version of EQ-5D, the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire, and the PRO version of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). Twelve months after patient inclusion, we will record information on the disease progression status and dispensed prescriptions. The primary outcome is the percentage of treatment adherence that will be calculated based on the pill count as follows: the difference between the number of pills dispensed minus the number of unused pills will be divided by the number of days of treatment multiplied by the number of pills/day prescribed by the oncologist; this quotient will be multiplied by 100 to obtain the percentage of adherence. Based on the that pill count reconciliation, those with a percentage adherence >80% will be primarily categorized as adherent. Secondarily, treatment adherence will be also calculated based on the proportion of days covered and the 4-items Morisky Green Levine Medication Adherence Scale. To analyze the impact of patients\' and treatment characteristics on adherence, bivariate analyses will be performed using different adherence cut-off points. To evaluate the impact of adherence on treatment efficacy as evaluated by progression-free survival, we will be using the Kaplan-Meier method and compare it with the log-rank test and univariate Cox regression analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: We expect that our study will provide initial information on key aspects of adherence to OCT (i.e., measurement, facilitators, and barriers) and its relationship with patients\' and clinically relevant outcomes in the setting of NSCLC, and that this information will help in designing pharmaceutical interventions to improve adherence.

OBJECTIVE: Improving understanding of actual pulmonary hypertension (PH) treatment adherence patterns is crucial to properly treating these patients. We aimed to primarily assess adherence to treatments used for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) specific therapies, identify potential factors related to it and secondly describe its treatment patterns.
METHODS: A 6-month observational cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital was conducted. Patients with PH-targeted therapy who picked it up in the ambulatory hospital pharmacy and who had been on treatment with the same drug for at least 1 year were included. Adherence was assessed as: 1) Proportion of days covered (PDC); and 2) Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire (SMAQ). PDC ≥80% was considered adherent. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the study outcomes. Logistic regressions were estimated to identify the association between baseline characteristics and factors associated with adherence. P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
RESULTS: A total of 63 patients with 127 different treatments were included, 71.4% were females with a mean age (SD) of 59 (15) years. PAH was the most common diagnosis (74.6%). Double therapy was used in 39.7% of patients, being the combination of Macitentan + Tadalafil and Ambrisentan + Tadalafil the most prescribed. Endothelin receptor antagonists were the most used treatment (40.2%). Adherence according to PDC was 93.7%, showing no great differences depending on the targeted drug used, and according to SMAQ 61.9%. The agreement degree of both methods was slight (65.1%; Kappa 0.12). Only female sex (OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.06-0.90; p = 0.035) was associated with worse adherence in the SMAQ method but not in the PDC. Adverse events were reported by a 55.6% of participants and the perception of effective treatment was high (95.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to PH therapy differs depending on the assessment method; PDC showed greater adherence rate than SMAQ. According to SMAQ, female sex may have a negative impact on adherence in this cohort, but PDC revealed no factors influencing it. No notable differences in adherence between treatment types were found and generally patients felt the treatments were effective in controlling their disease.

OBJECTIVE: To stablish the relationship between socioeconomic status of a cohort of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) with glycemic control, therapeutic adherence and diabetes quality of life (DQoL).
UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional, observational study with consecutive inclusion was carried out. Participants aged 8-18 years with T1D duration >1 year. Data on family structure, family income, parents\' educational level and parental role on primary diabetes care supervision were registered. Adherence (DMQ-Sp) and DQoL (PedsQl) were analyzed. Linear and logistic regression models adjusted for demographics, family structure and parental role on primary diabetes care responsibility were applied.
RESULTS: A total of 323 patients (T1D duration 5,3 ± 3,3 years; HbA1c 7,7 ± 1,0%; age 13,3 ± 2,8 years; 49,8% females) were included. Patients living in a nuclear family and those whose main diabetes care supervision was shared by both parents showed lower HbA1c [adjusted for demographics and family structure (7,06; CI 95% 6,52-7,59); adjusted for demographics and role on primary diabetes care supervision (7,43; CI 95% 6,57-8,28)]. DMQ-Sp score (adjusted for demographics and role on main supervision) was higher in patients whose parents shared the diabetes care supervision (84,56; CI 95% 73,93-95,19). Parents sharing diabetes care supervision showed a significantly higher PedsQl score (both 74,63 ± 12,70 vs mother 68,53 ± 14,59; p = 0,001).
CONCLUSIONS: Children and adolescents with T1D had lower HbA1c, better therapeutic adherence and better DQoL when lived in a nuclear family, with higher socioeconomic status and the responsibility for supervising diabetes care was shared by both parents.

Heart failure is a prevalent syndrome with high mortality rates, representing a significant economic burden in terms of healthcare. The lack of systematic information about the treatment and adherence of patients with heart failure limits the understanding of these aspects and potentially the improvement of clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics, therapeutic management, adherence, persistence, and clinical results, as well as the association between these variables, in a cohort of patients with heart failure in Andalusia.
METHODS: This study will be an observational, population-based, retrospective cohort study. Data of patients discharged from an Andalusian hospital with a diagnosis of heart failure between 2014 and 2023 will be extracted from the Andalusian population health database.
METHODS: The statistical analysis will incorporate the following strategies: (1) Descriptive analysis of the characteristics of the population cohort, adherence measures, and clinical outcomes. (2) Bivariate analyses to study the association of covariates with adherence, persistence, and clinical results. (3) Multivariate logistic regression and Cox regression analysis including relevant covariates. (4) To evaluate changes over time, multivariate Poisson regression models will be used. By conducting this comprehensive study, we aim to gain valuable insights into the clinical characteristics, treatment management, and adherence of heart failure patients in Andalusia, as well as to identify factors that may influence clinical outcomes. These findings could be critical both for the development of optimised strategies that improve medical care and quality of life of patients and for mitigating the health burden of HF in the region.

OBJECTIVE: Adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is essential for the effectiveness of screening programs. Even though organized screening programs can improve the quality of the process and adherence, there are still challenges to overcome. The aim of the present study, in which we implemented a biennial organized screening program for CRC, was to describe adherence and participation patterns.
METHODS: A longitudinal, descriptive study was conducted, in which a team of trained patient navigators carried out interventions, with reminders via cellphone communication, to follow a cohort of 301 subjects eligible for CRC screening, utilizing a fecal immunochemical test (FIT). All the follow-up subjects received a FIT kit.
RESULTS: A total of 747 cellphone calls were made and divided into three interventions. From the initial cohort, 126 subjects completed their biennial screening process through the FIT, indicating a consistent adherence rate of 41.8% to our program. The participation patterns were: 126 consistent participants (41.8%), 160 inconsistent participants (53.2%), and 15 participants that were never contacted (5%).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our study underlines the importance of organized screening programs in the early detection of CRC. The implementation of follow-up interventions, through reminders and the training of patient navigators, can improve adherence, but there is a need for examining new strategies, to overcome barriers to communication via cellphone.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are outcomes evaluated by patients based on their perception of their disease and treatment.
OBJECTIVE: Determine antipsoriatic treatment-related adherence, quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction.
METHODS: We conducted an observational cross-sectional, prospective, and single-center study in which PROs surveys were conducted on adherence (Morisky-Green [MG] test), treatment satisfaction (Spanish Questionnaire of Treatment Satisfaction in Psoriasis [CESTEP]) and QoL (Skindex-29 and DLQI). Additional variables include: PASI, BSA.
METHODS: Jamovi®2.3.26.
RESULTS: A total of 100 surveys were conducted. Based on the MG questionnaire, we found that 75% (75/100) of patients were adherent vs 94% (94/100) from the dispensation records. Regarding CESTEP, a mean score of 7.4±7.7 (close to maximum satisfaction 0) was obtained, while DLQI yielded a score of 2.6±4.6 (indicating a small effect on QoL), and SKINDEX-29 a score of 14.6±15.4 (68% indicating mild (< 5) or very mild (6-17) impact according to Nijsten et al.). Based on CESTEP a p.Rho Spearman value of 0.338 (p=0.004) was obtained in relation to PASI when the study was conducted with a BSA of 0.255 (p=0.050), DLQI results of 0.508 (p <0.001) and Skindex-29 results of 0.397(p <0.001). At the time of the study, the correlation matrix between DLQI result and PASI was 0.365 (p=0.002) with a BSA of 0.347 (p=0.007). Skindex-29 results with PASI were 0.380 (p=0.001) and with BSA, 0.295 (p=0.022).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients on therapy exhibit a good QoL, high adherence and satisfaction with their treatment. A significant correlation was seen among satisfaction, QoL, and PASI-BSA at the time of the study.

Heart failure is a prevalent syndrome with high mortality rates, representing a significant economic burden in terms of healthcare. The lack of systematic information about the treatment and adherence of patients with heart failure limits the understanding of these aspects and potentially the improvement of clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics, therapeutic management, adherence, persistence and clinical results, as well as the association between these variables, in a cohort of patients with heart failure in Andalusia.
METHODS: This study will be an observational, population-based, retrospective cohort study. Data of patients discharged from an Andalusian hospital with a diagnosis of heart failure between 2014 and 2023 will be extracted from the Andalusian population health database.
METHODS: The statistical analysis will incorporate the following strategies: 1) Descriptive analysis of the characteristics of the population cohort, adherence measures, and clinical outcomes. 2) Bivariate analyses to study the association of covariates with adherence, persistence and clinical results. 3) Multivariate logistic regression and Cox regression analysis including relevant covariates. 4) To evaluate changes over time, multivariate Poisson regression models will be used. By conducting this comprehensive study, we aim to gain valuable insights into the clinical characteristics, treatment management, and adherence of heart failure patients in Andalusia, as well as to identify factors that may influence clinical outcomes. These findings could be critical both for the development of optimized strategies that improve medical care and quality of life of patients and for mitigating the health burden of HF in the region.

A szervtranszplantáció folyamata kihívásokkal teli, speciális út mind az érintettek, mind hozzátartozóik számára. A pszichoszociális tényezőkről közel fél évszázada tudjuk, hogy jelentősen befolyásolják a transzplantációs folyamatot. A szívtranszplantált populáció gondozása során a recipiens együttműködése (adherencia) nélkülözhetetlen, ennek egyik befolyásoló faktora a társas támogatás. Számos más betegcsoportban alkalmaznak sorstársi támogatásra épülő intervenciókat, úgynevezett sorstársi mentorprogramokat. Ezek fő céljai az ellenőrzött információátadás, valamint a lelki támogatás. Összefoglaló közleményünk célja a sorstársi mentorprogramokról szóló nemzetközi publikációk áttekintése a felnőtt-szívtranszplantációs programok gyakorlatában. Orv Hetil. 2024; 165(10): 379–384.

BACKGROUND: In heart failure, cardiac rehabilitation has been recommended as an intervention strategy that improves functional capacity, health-related quality of life and survival. However, adherence to these programs is low. The objective was to determine the factors related to non-adherence to cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure in Colombia.
METHODS: Observational and retrospective study. Patients with heart failure were linked in a clinic in Colombia, adherence to cardiac rehabilitation was measured with ≥80% of scheduled sessions. Sociodemographic and clinical variables, functional aerobic capacity (Sit to Stand and 6-minute walk test), Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), quality of life Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLFHQ) and depression Patient health questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) were taken into account.
RESULTS: 300 patients were linked with heart failure with age 63.16 ± 12.87 men 194 (64.7%). adherence to cardiac rehabilitation was 66.67%, there were statistically significant differences between the groups in arterial hypertension, LVEF, cholesterol, LDL, Triglycerides, SBP, DBP, distance traveled, VO2e, METs, DASI and PHQ-9 p-value =<0.05. The logistic regression model adjusted for sex and age showed OR for non-adherence to CR arterial hypertension 2.23[1.22-4.07], LDL outside of goals 2.15[1.20-3.88], triglycerides outside goals 2.34[1.35-4.07], DASI<4METs 2.38 [1.04-5.45] and PHQ-9 1.06[1.00-1.12].
CONCLUSIONS: High blood pressure, LDL, triglycerides, DASI and depression with the PHQ-9 questionnaire are related factors for not having adherence to cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure.