Acute portal vein thrombosis

急性门静脉血栓形成
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)是门静脉高压症(PH)并发症的关键治疗方法。虽然国际指南为其在肝硬化中的使用提供了明确的适应症,在非肝硬化PH中,经验知识尤其稀缺,特别是在非恶性非肝硬化门静脉血栓形成(NNPVT)和门窦血管疾病(PSVD)患者中。与肝硬化患者相比,这些罕见疾病患者表现出不同的临床特征。通常以年轻为特征,即使在严重PH的情况下,肝脏功能也能保持,广泛内脏血栓形成的倾向更高,复杂的TIPS放置,为其创造带来独特的挑战。这篇综述的目的是综合现有的关于有效性的文献,安全,具体适应症,和成人NNPVT或PSVD患者的TIPS的临床结果,还重点介绍了在门静脉海绵体瘤中插入TIPS的技术挑战。
    Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) emerges as a key treatment for portal hypertension (PH) complications. While international guidelines provide clear indications for its use in cirrhosis, empirical knowledge is notably scarcer in non-cirrhotic PH, particularly in nonmalignant noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (NNPVT) and in patients with portosinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD). Patients afflicted by these rare diseases exhibit distinct clinical profiles compared to their cirrhotic counterparts, often characterized by a younger age, predominantly preserved hepatic functionality even in cases of severe PH, and a higher propensity for extensive splanchnic thrombosis, which intricately complicates TIPS placement, posing unique challenges for its creation. The objective of this review is to synthesize existing literature on the effectiveness, safety, specific indications, and clinical outcomes of TIPS in adult patients with NNPVT or PSVD, focusing also on the technical challenges of TIPS insertion in the presence of portal cavernoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    没有任何危险因素和血栓事件家族史的新冠肺炎感染患者仍有发生血栓和/或其他新冠肺炎相关并发症的风险,因此,有必要研究这种情况。
    在这项研究中,我们介绍了一名60岁的Covid-19患者,症状轻微,入院时同时发生动脉和静脉血栓事件,主诉为胸痛和模糊的腹痛。该患者在入住ICU前两周被诊断为新冠肺炎。12导联心电图显示II期病理性Q波ST段抬高和T波倒置,III,aVF,V5和V6中的T反转。定量肌钙蛋白升高,证实了下ST段抬高MI。腹部彩色多普勒超声和CT增强扫描显示门静脉无血流和血栓形成。胸部CT扫描显示正常模式。我们开始静脉注射普通肝素(UFH),双重抗血小板,β受体阻滞剂,他汀类药物静脉注射硝酸盐,和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂。冠状动脉造影显示右冠状动脉在近端完全切断。在这里,我们报告了与其他类似研究相比,与我们的患者相关的三个主要不常见特征。首先,我们病例的血栓性事件发生时没有肺部受累,患者仅在入院前两周出现流感样症状.第二个主要区别是患者的动脉和静脉血栓事件同时发生,这在大多数情况下并不常见。患者同时出现门静脉血栓形成和近期ST段抬高型心肌梗死(MI)。最后,MI和门静脉血栓形成症状都很微妙,令人困惑,这可能会导致误诊。两周后的彩色多普勒超声随访显示,门静脉血栓形成再通,心肌灌注扫描在RCA区域没有活力和可逆性缺血。
    本报告指出,入院时对Covid-19的谨慎诊断可以在预防心血管事件方面发挥至关重要的作用;即使是无症状到轻度感染的患者,仍可能有更高的发生临床并发症的风险(例如,血栓形成事件)。
    UNASSIGNED: Covid-19 infected patients without any risk factors and family history of a thrombotic event can be still at risks of developing thrombotic and/or other Covid-19-related complications, and therefore, there is a substantial need to study such cases.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, we present a 60-years-old Covid-19 patient with mild symptoms who was admitted to the hospital with simultaneous arterial and venous thrombotic event, with chief complaint of chest pain and vague abdominal pain. The patient was diagnosed with Covid-19 two weeks before admission to the ICU. A 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed pathologic Q-wave ST-segment elevation and T-wave inversion in II, III, aVF, and T inversion in V5 and V6. Quantitative troponin was elevated which confirmed inferior ST-elevation MI. Abdominal color Doppler sonography and CT scan with contrast demonstrated an absent flow in the portal vein and thrombosis. A chest CT scan illustrated a normal pattern. We started IV unfractionated heparin (UFH), dual antiplatelet, beta-blocker, statin, intravenous nitrate, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Coronary angiography showed the right coronary artery was totally cut off at the proximal part.Here we report three main un-common characteristics associated with our patient compared to other similar studies. First, the thrombotic event in our case occurred without pulmonary involvement and the patient only had a flu-like symptom two weeks before admission. The second main difference is that the patient\'s arterial and venous thrombotic events had simultaneously happened, which is not common in most cases. Patient presented simultaneous portal vein thrombosis and recent ST-segment elevation Myocardial Infarction (MI). Finally, both MI and portal vein thrombosis symptoms were subtle and confusing, which could cause misdiagnosis. A post two-weeks color Doppler sonography follow-up showed portal vein thrombosis recanalization and myocardial perfusion scan had no viability and reversible ischemia in RCA territory.
    UNASSIGNED: This report addresses that a cautious diagnosis of Covid-19 at the time of admission can play a vital role in preventing cardiovascular events; where even asymptomatic to mildly infected patients could be still at higher risks of developing clinical complications (e.g., thrombotic events).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    与肝损伤相关的闭合性腹部创伤继发的门静脉血栓形成(PVT)在健康个体以及轻微的肝损伤中极为罕见,它的发病率和死亡率很高。此外,急性无症状PVT难以诊断。我们介绍了一名年轻的创伤患者,其孤立的轻度肝损伤与急性PVT相关。一名27岁的男子在机动车碰撞后出现在急诊室。他的主要调查结果并不引人注目。他的二次调查显示,上腹部有很大的挫伤(7cm×7cm),有明显的压痛和局部保护。整个腹部的CT血管造影显示,肝段2/3和4b的肝损伤等级为3级(根据美国创伤外科分类协会),在肝门附近延伸,肝静脉和门静脉未闭,没有其他实体器官损伤。伤后第7天全腹部随访CT显示左门静脉有1.8cm血栓,右门静脉和肝静脉未闭,肝脏裂伤的大小减小。在受伤后第4天重复进行肝功能测试,并显示转氨酶改善。患者根据基于体重的剂量接受低分子量肝素的静脉抗凝治疗。抗凝治疗后2周进行的整个腹部CT显示左门静脉有少量残留血栓。患者接受静脉抗凝治疗共3个月。在1个月的随访中,2个月,6个月,受伤后一年,患者没有任何可检测到的异常症状.PVT钝性轻度肝损伤是一种极为罕见的并发症。如果血栓不治疗,严重的发病率和死亡率会随之而来。然而,其在无症状患者中的诊断仍然具有挑战性。对于高度怀疑的PVT,需要定期成像,尤其是在肝脏损伤与接近肝门的撕裂,即使是在轻伤的情况下。
    Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) secondary to blunt abdominal trauma associated with liver injury is extremely rare in healthy individuals as well as in minor liver injury, and it carries a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Moreover, acute asymptomatic PVT is difficult to diagnose. We present a young trauma patient with isolated minor liver injury associated with acute PVT. A 27-year-old man presented to the emergency department after a motor vehicle collision. His primary survey findings were unremarkable. His secondary survey showed a large contusion (7 cm × 7 cm) at the epigastrium with marked tenderness and localized guarding. The CT angiography of the whole abdomen revealed liver injury grade 3 in hepatic segments 2/3 and 4b (according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma classification) extending near the porta hepatis with patent hepatic and portal veins and without other solid organ injury. The follow-up CT of the whole abdomen on post-injury day 7 showed a 1.8-cm thrombus in the left portal vein with patent right portal and hepatic veins, and a decreased size of the hepatic lacerations. A liver function test was repeated on post-injury day 4, and it revealed improved transaminitis. The patient received intravenous anticoagulant therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin according to weight-based dosing for treatment. The CT of the whole abdomen performed 2 weeks after anticoagulant therapy showed small residual thrombosis in the left portal vein. The patient received intravenous anticoagulant therapy for a total 3 months. On the follow-up visits at 1 month, 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the injury, the patients did not have any detectable abnormal symptoms. PVT post-blunt minor liver injury is an extremely rare complication. If the thrombosis is left untreated, serious morbidity and mortality can ensue. However, its diagnosis in asymptomatic patients is still challenging. Periodic imaging is necessary for highly suspected PVT, especially in liver injury with lacerations close to the porta hepatis, even in cases of a minor injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:近年来,新的口服抗凝剂(NOAC)已变得普遍,并且越来越多地用于治疗端口静脉血栓形成。利伐沙班和达比加群治疗肝硬化合并急性门静脉血栓形成(PVT)的疗效和安全性差异尚不清楚。
    方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了我们研究所2020年1月至2021年12月的所有连续肝硬化急性门静脉血栓形成患者。患者接受利伐沙班或达比加群口服抗凝治疗。人口统计,临床,收集患者影像学资料。影像学检查证实了急性PVT的诊断。使用Child-Pugh评分和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分评估肝硬化的严重程度。结果包括再通(完整,局部,和持续遮挡),肝功能,出血,和生存。使用对数秩检验比较事件发生时间结果的Kaplan-Meier分布。使用Cox比例风险模型以95%置信区间(CI)计算风险比(HR)。
    结果:共纳入94例患者,52例患者(55%)接受了利伐沙班,42例(45%)接受了达比加群。在41例患者中观察到PVT的完全和部分再通。完全再通没有显着差异,部分再通,两组之间的持续闭塞。通过多变量分析,D-二聚体(HR1.165,95%CI1.036-1.311,p=0.011)是完全再通的独立预测因子。两组抗凝后Child-Pugh评分(p=0.001)均有显著改善,分别。然而,两组间无差异。生存率为94%,利伐沙班和达比加群组有95%(对数秩p=0.830)。利伐沙班组有3例患者(6%)和达比加群组有1例患者(2%)出现严重出血(p=0.646)。利伐沙班组有6例患者(12%)出现轻微出血,达比加群组有5人(12%)(p=0.691)。
    结论:利伐沙班和达比加群治疗肝硬化合并急性门静脉血栓形成的疗效和安全性相当。D-二聚体有助于预测肝硬化患者PVT再通。
    BACKGROUND: New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been becoming prevalent in recent years and are increasingly used in the treatment of port vein thrombosis. The difference of the efficacy and safety between rivaroxaban and dabigatran remains unclear in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT).
    METHODS: This retrospective study included all consecutive cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis in our institute from January 2020 to December 2021. The patients received oral anticoagulation with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. The demographic, clinical, and imaging data of patients were collected. The diagnosis of acute PVT was confirmed by imaging examinations. The severity of liver cirrhosis was assessed using Child-Pugh score and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Outcomes included recanalization (complete, partial, and persistent occlusion), liver function, bleedings, and survival. The log-rank test was used to compare Kaplan-Meier distributions of time-to-event outcomes. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
    RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were included, 52 patients (55%) received rivaroxaban and 42 (45%) with dabigatran. The complete and partial recanalization of PVT was observed in 41 patients. There was no significant difference in complete recanalization, partial recanalization, and persistent occlusion between the two groups. With multivariate analysis, D-dimer (HR 1.165, 95% CI 1.036-1.311, p = 0.011) was independent predictors of complete recanalization. The Child-Pugh score (p = 0.001) was significantly improved in both two groups after anticoagulation, respectively. However, there was no difference between the two groups. The probability of survival was 94%, 95% in the rivaroxaban and dabigatran groups (log-rank p = 0.830). Major bleedings were reported in 3 patients (6%) in rivaroxaban group and 1 patient (2%) in dabigatran group (p = 0.646). Six patients (12%) in rivaroxaban group experienced minor bleeding, and five (12%) from dabigatran group (p = 0.691).
    CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety were comparable between rivaroxaban and dabigatran in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis. And D-dimer can contribute to the prediction of PVT recanalization in cirrhotic patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    急性门静脉血栓形成(PVT)是肝硬化的并发症。病毒感染的存在,如乙型肝炎(HBV)和丙型肝炎(HCV)可以进一步增加肝硬化患者发生PVT的风险,特别是在罕见的情况下,当HBV和HCV双重感染。我们提出了一个患者的HCV肝硬化,其临床状况是代偿失调继发叠加HBV感染的发展,住院期间发生急性PVT。该病例提供了急性PVT的独特表现,该急性PVT在因失代偿性肝病住院后几天内发展。重复成像时没有门静脉血流的间隔证明了这一点。尽管最初的演示文稿对PVT不利,在我们患者的临床状态改变后,重新考虑差异导致诊断。活动性HBV感染可能是患者肝硬化失代偿和表现的最初触发因素;随后的凝血病和门静脉血流改变引发了急性PVT的发展。肝硬化患者血栓前和抗血栓并发症的风险仍然很高,叠加感染的存在大大增加了风险。血栓并发症如PVT的诊断可能具有挑战性,因此强调了在尽管影像学阴性但临床怀疑仍然很高的情况下重复成像的重要性。对于患有PVT的肝硬化患者,应考虑在个体基础上进行抗凝预防和治疗。及时诊断,早期干预,密切监测PVT患者对改善临床结局至关重要.本报告的目的是说明伴随肝硬化急性PVT诊断的诊断挑战,以及讨论这种情况的最佳管理的治疗选择。
    Acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a complication of liver cirrhosis. The presence of viral infections such as hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) can further increase cirrhotic patients\' risk of developing PVT, especially in the rare case when there is superinfection with both HBV and HCV. We present a patient with HCV cirrhosis whose clinical condition was decompensated secondary to the development of superimposed HBV infection, who developed acute PVT during hospitalization. This case offers a unique presentation of acute PVT that developed within several days of hospitalization for decompensated liver disease, as proven by the interval absence of portal venous flow on repeat imaging. Despite the workup on the initial presentation being negative for PVT, reconsideration of differentials after the change in our patient\'s clinical status led to the diagnosis. Active HBV infection was likely the initial trigger for the patient\'s cirrhosis decompensation and presentation; the subsequent coagulopathy and alteration in the portal blood flow triggered the development of an acute PVT. The risk for both prothrombotic and antithrombotic complications remains high in patients with cirrhosis, a risk that is vastly increased by the presence of superimposedinfections. The diagnosis of thrombotic complications such as PVT can be challenging, thus stressing the importance of repeat imaging in instances where clinical suspicion remains high despite negative imaging. Anticoagulation should be considered for cirrhotic patients with PVT on an individual basis for both prevention and treatment. Prompt diagnosis, early intervention, and close monitoring of patients with PVT are crucial for improving clinical outcomes. The goal of this report is to illustrate diagnostic challenges that accompany the diagnosis of acute PVT in cirrhosis, as well as discuss therapeutic options for optimal management of this condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    门静脉血栓形成(PVT)是一种罕见的疾病,可导致许多并发症,比如静脉曲张出血,肝性脑病,和慢性肝病。PVT有多种病因,包括肝脏疾病,感染,和高凝性疾病。肝硬化,以肝纤维化为特征的慢性进行性肝病,是PVT发展的危险因素之一。其次,吸烟也会增加PVT的风险。这项研究的目的是确定有和没有肝硬化吸烟的PVT患者的预后。这项研究是使用2016年,2017年和2018年的国家住院患者样本(NIS)数据库进行的。该研究确定了33,314名诊断为PVT的吸烟患者,其中14991人患有肝硬化,18,323人没有肝硬化。PVT和肝硬化患者的院内死亡率明显较高,上消化道出血,急性肾损伤,腹膜炎与无肝硬化患者相比。研究结果表明,吸烟的PVT和肝硬化患者发生不良结局的风险更高。
    Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare condition that can lead to numerous complications, like variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, and chronic liver disease. PVT has various etiologies, including liver disease, infections, and hyper-coagulable disorders. Cirrhosis, a chronic progressive liver condition characterized by liver fibrosis, is one of the risk factors for the development of PVT. Secondly, smoking also increases the risk of PVT. The aim of this study is to identify outcomes in patients with PVT who smoked with and without cirrhosis. This study was performed using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for the years 2016, 2017, and 2018. The study identified 33,314 patients diagnosed with PVT who smoked, of which 14,991 had cirrhosis, and 18,323 did not have cirrhosis. Patients with PVT and cirrhosis had significantly higher in-hospital mortality, upper gastrointestinal bleeds, acute kidney injury, and peritonitis compared to patients without cirrhosis. The results of the study show that patients with PVT and cirrhosis who smoke have a higher risk of unfavorable outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    常染色体显性多囊肾病(ADPKD)常累及多囊肝病(PLD)。在严重的情况下,PLD可发展各种并发症。然而,与PLD相关的致命性急性门静脉血栓形成(APVT)尚未见报道.一名64岁男性报告轻度意识障碍。由于ADPKD伴PLD,他因终末期肾病而接受维持性血液透析。因为肝囊肿反复感染,他有高水平的C反应蛋白.关于轻度意识障碍,肝性脑病的诊断是根据血清氨升高而做出的,无任何其他异常肝功能检查。他入院几天后,肝胆酶升高,急性肝功能衰竭进展。增强的腹部计算机断层扫描提示血栓完全闭塞门静脉的可能性。基于缺乏明显的门体络脉,诊断为APVT.患者入院19天后死亡。反复囊性感染的PLD患者出现肝功能衰竭,APVT的形成可能是致命性肝衰竭快速进展的原因之一。总之,这是第一篇报道PLD患者APVT受累的论文.
    Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) often involves polycystic liver disease (PLD). In severe cases, PLD can develop various complications. However, fatal acute portal vein thrombosis (APVT) associated with PLD has not been reported. A 64-year-old male reported mild consciousness disorder. He had been under maintenance hemodialysis for end-stage renal disease due to ADPKD with PLD. Because of recurring hepatic cyst infections, he had sustained high levels of C-reactive protein. Regarding the mild consciousness disorder, a diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy was made based on an elevation of serum ammonia without any other abnormal liver function tests. Several days after his admission, hepatobiliary enzymes elevated, and acute liver failure progressed. Enhanced abdominal computed tomography suggested the possibility of complete occlusion of the portal vein by a thrombus. Based on an absence of obvious portosystemic collaterals, a diagnosis of APVT was made. The patient died 19 days after admission. Patients with PLD with repeated cystic infections have been seen to develop liver failure, and APVT formation may be one cause of the rapid progression of fatal liver failure. In conclusion, this is the first paper to report on the involvement of APVT in patients with PLD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一名37岁的妇女在急诊室出现腹痛和恶心约三周。除了服用口服避孕药作为常规药物外,她没有静脉血栓栓塞的已知危险因素。计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描显示门户,肠系膜上静脉和脾静脉血栓形成。血栓形成试验呈阴性,除了亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶(MTHFR)基因的突变存在杂合性。同型半胱氨酸和叶酸水平正常。开始抗凝。八个月后的随访CT显示门静脉海绵样变。
    A 37-year-old woman presented in the emergency room with abdominal pain and nausea for about three weeks. She had no known risk factors for venous thromboembolism beyond taking oral contraceptives as a regular medication. Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed portal, superior mesenteric and splenic vein thrombosis. Thrombophilia tests were negative, except for the presence of heterozygosity for mutation of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene. Homocysteine levels and folic acid were normal. Anticoagulation was started. Follow-up CT after eight months showed cavernous transformation of the portal vein.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    2019年新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行在世界上产生了持久的影响。它表现出各种临床表现,从无症状状态到呼吸系统异常,多器官参与,血栓形成,和死亡。该病例描述了一名46岁的女性,表现为顽固性腹痛,导致门静脉血栓形成(PVT)。诊断归因于未解决的COVID-19感染。
    The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created a lasting impact in the world. It presents with various clinical manifestations, ranging from an asymptomatic state to respiratory system abnormalities, multi-organ involvement, thrombosis, and death. This case describes a 46-year-old female presenting with intractable abdominal pain leading to portal vein thrombosis (PVT), a diagnosis attributed to an unresolved COVID-19 infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:门静脉血栓形成(PVT)是肝胆胰手术后的严重并发症。关于肝门部胆管癌肝切除术后复发PVT的研究很少。
    方法:我们报告一例66岁女性,诊断为肝门部胆管癌,并接受右半肝切除术治疗。第六天,患者出现急性门静脉血栓形成,行急诊门静脉切开手术取栓。在血栓切除术后的第七天,患者再次出现急性门静脉血栓,再次行门静脉血栓切除术+门静脉桥接术。术后仍有血栓形成。然后患者接受肠系膜上动脉造影+间接门静脉导管溶栓和局部溶栓+抗凝和全身抗凝治疗。患者患有复杂的腹部感染。总住院时间为84天。出院时门静脉无血栓形成。
    UNASSIGNED:尽管手术经过精心的术前计划和精细的术中血管吻合,术后发生PVT。门静脉血栓形成的因素很多,有很多治疗方法。
    结论:PVT通常发生在肝硬化患者术后和肝移植后。肝门部胆管癌肝切除术后复发PVT是一种罕见的并发症。
    UNASSIGNED: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a serious complication after hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery. There have been few studies on recurrent PVT after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
    METHODS: We report the case of a 66-year-old woman who was diagnosed with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and treated with right hemihepatectomy. On the sixth day, the patient developed acute portal vein thrombosis, and emergency portal vein incision and surgical thrombectomy were performed. On the seventh day after thrombectomy, the patient developed acute portal vein thrombosis again, and portal vein thrombectomy+portal vein bridging was performed again. There was still thrombosis after the operation. The patient was then treated with superior mesenteric arteriography + indirect portal vein catheterization thrombolysis and local thrombolysis + anticoagulation and systemic anticoagulation therapy. The patient had a complicated abdominal infection. The total hospital stay was 84 days. There was no thrombosis in the portal vein at discharge.
    UNASSIGNED: Although the procedure was carefully performed with a preoperative plan and fine intraoperative vascular anastomosis, postoperative PVT occurred. There are many factors of portal vein thrombosis, and there are many treatment methods.
    CONCLUSIONS: PVT often develops in patients with liver cirrhosis postoperatively and after liver transplantation. Recurrent PVT after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is a rare complication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号