Acute heart failure

急性心力衰竭
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性心力衰竭(AHF)恶化的患者在COVID-19感染的情况下容易出现并发症。关于AHF和COVID-19患者的种族/族裔和性别差异的数据仍然有限。
    我们的目标是评估种族的影响,种族,使用来自国家住院患者样本(NIS)的数据,以及性别对AHF合并COVID-19感染的院内结局的影响。
    我们通过使用ICD-10-CM从NIS(2020)中提取数据,以确定2020年诊断为AHF和COVID-19的所有住院治疗。性别之间的联系,种族/民族,结果采用多变量逻辑回归模型进行检验.
    我们在2020年确定了总共158,530例加权AHF住院并感染COVID-19。大多数是白人(63.9%),23.3%是黑人种族,12.8%是西班牙裔,大多数是男性(n=84,870[53.5%])。调整后,与白人男性相比,白人女性住院死亡几率最低(aOR0.83,[0.78-0.98]),西班牙裔男性住院死亡几率最高(aOR1.27[1.13-1.42]).总的来说,心脏骤停(aOR1.54[1.27-1.85])和AKI(aOR1.36[1.26-1.47]的几率较高,虽然PCI等程序性干预措施的赔率(OR0.23[0.10-0.55]),与白人男性相比,黑人男性的呼吸机放置(aOR0.85[0.75-0.97])较低。
    在白人和黑人种族群体中,男性与更高的住院死亡率相关,而在西班牙裔组中没有发现这种关联.与白人男性相比,西班牙裔男性的死亡几率最高。
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with acute heart failure (AHF) exacerbation are susceptible to complications in the setting of COVID-19 infection. Data regarding the racial/ethnic and sex disparities in patients with AHF and COVID-19 remains limited.
    UNASSIGNED: We aim to evaluate the impact of race, ethnicity, and sex on the in-hospital outcomes of AHF with COVID-19 infection using the data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS).
    UNASSIGNED: We extracted data from the NIS (2020) by using ICD-10-CM to identify all hospitalizations with a diagnosis of AHF and COVID-19 in the year 2020. The associations between sex, race/ethnicity, and outcomes were examined using a multivariable logistic regression model.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified a total of 158,530 weighted AHF hospitalizations with COVID-19 infection in 2020. The majority were White (63.9 %), 23.3 % were Black race, and 12.8 % were of Hispanic ethnicity, mostly males (n = 84,870 [53.5 %]). After adjustment, the odds of in-hospital mortality were lowest in White females (aOR 0.83, [0.78-0.98]) and highest in Hispanic males (aOR 1.27 [1.13-1.42]) compared with White males. Overall, the odds of cardiac arrest (aOR 1.54 [1.27-1.85]) and AKI (aOR 1.36 [1.26-1.47] were higher, while odds for procedural interventions such as PCI (aOR 0.23 [0.10-0.55]), and placement on a ventilator (aOR 0.85 [0.75-0.97]) were lower among Black males in comparison to White males.
    UNASSIGNED: Male sex was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality in white and black racial groups, while no such association was noted in the Hispanic group. Hispanic males had the highest odds of death compared with White males.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:严重的主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)是美国最常见的瓣膜疾病。接受紧急或紧急经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的患者比接受非紧急手术的患者具有更差的临床结果。没有研究检查手术TAVR时机对AS并发急性心力衰竭(AHF)结局的影响。
    目的:我们的目的是评估早期(<48小时)与早期(<48小时)之间的院内死亡率和临床结局的差异使用真实世界的US数据库,AHF住院患者的晚期(≥48小时)TAVR.
    方法:我们查询了全国住院患者样本数据库,以确定诊断为AHF的住院情况,主动脉瓣疾病,和TAVR程序(2015-2020年)。使用逻辑回归模型检查TAVR时机与临床结果之间的关联。
    结果:共确定了25,290个加权AHF住院,其中6855例患者(27.1%)接受了早期TAVR,和18435(72.9%)晚期TAVR。晚期TAVR患者住院死亡率较高(2.2%vs.2.8%,p<0.01)在未调整分析上,但在人口统计学调整后没有显著差异,临床,和医院特征[aOR1.00(0.82-1.23)]。晚期TAVR与更高的心脏骤停几率(aOR1.50,95%CI:1.18-1.90)和使用机械循环支持相关(aOR2.05,95%CI:1.68-2.51)。晚期TAVR与住院时间更长(11天vs.4天,p<0.01)和更高的成本(72,851美元与53,209美元,p<0.01)。
    结论:在大约25%的AHF患者中进行了早期TAVR,在调整前显示出改善的住院结果,调整后无显著差异。
    BACKGROUND: Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular disease in the USA. Patients undergoing urgent or emergent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have worse clinical outcomes than those undergoing non-urgent procedures. No studies have examined the impact of procedural TAVR timing on outcomes in AS complicated by acute heart failure (AHF).
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate differences in in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes between early (<48 hours) vs. late (≥48 hours) TAVR in patients hospitalized with AHF using a real-world US database.
    METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample database to identify hospitalizations with a diagnosis of AHF, aortic valve disease, and a TAVR procedure (2015-2020). The associations between TAVR timing and clinical outcomes were examined using logistic regression model.
    RESULTS: A total of 25,290 weighted AHF hospitalizations were identified, of which 6,855 patients (27.1%) underwent early TAVR, and 18,435 (72.9%) late TAVR. Late TAVR patients had higher in-hospital mortality rate (2.2% vs. 2.8%, p<0.01) on unadjusted analysis but no significant difference following adjustment for demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics [aOR 1.00 (0.82-1.23)]. Late TAVR was associated with higher odds of cardiac arrest (aOR 1.50, 95% CI: 1.18-1.90) and use of mechanical circulatory support (aOR 2.05, 95% CI: 1.68-2.51). Late TAVR was associated with longer hospital stay (11 days vs. 4 days, p<0.01) and higher costs ($72,851 vs. $53,209, p<0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Early TAVR was conducted in approximately 25% of the AS patients admitted with AHF, showing improved in-hospital outcomes before adjustment, with no significant differences observed after adjustment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:利尿剂抵抗是急性心力衰竭(AHF)的相关临床问题,而是一个标准化的,定量定义仍然缺失。这项分析的目的是强调先前提出的利尿剂反应定义之间的差异,并提出新的基于尿钠(NaU)的利尿剂效率(DE)定义,以识别利尿剂抵抗(DR)患者。
    方法:利尿剂反应的三个历史定义和新的基于NaU的DE定义,评估每40mg呋塞米首次利尿剂推注后的总NaU,在回顾性分析中应用于静脉(i.v.)环利尿剂治疗的AHF人群。基线特征,我们收集了出院和中期随访时的住院临床数据和结局,并对DR和非DR患者的每个定义进行了比较.
    结果:在53例患者中,39(73.6%),51(96.2%)和3(5.7%)根据体重得出的DR,利尿衍生,和现货NaU定义,分别。基于NaU的新定义的中位值为31mmol/40mg,并对患者进行相应的分层。DR患者显示较低的累积利尿(5200mL,3300-6700vs9825,mL6200-12,200,p=0.007)和体重减轻(4kg,1-5vs6公斤,3-8.5,p=0.023),在方案指导的静脉利尿剂治疗结束时,更高的BNP水平(808,443-1037vs351,209-859,p=0.062),与非DR患者相比,由于DR的充血减少而停止的频率较低(57.7vs85.2%,p=0.026)。DR患者的6个月死亡率或HF住院频率更高(OR18.6,95%CI2.1-161.2,p=0.008)。
    结论:基于NaU的DE定义可能会解决以前提出的其他定义的差异。
    BACKGROUND: Diuretic resistance is a relevant clinical issue in acute heart failure (AHF), but a standardized, quantitative definition is still missing. The aim of this analysis was to highlight discrepancies between previously proposed definitions of diuretic response and to propose a new urinary sodium (NaU)-based definition of diuretic efficiency (DE) to identify diuretic resistant (DR) patients.
    METHODS: Three historical definitions of diuretic response and a new NaU-based DE definition, evaluating total NaU after the first diuretic bolus per 40 mg furosemide administered, were applied in a retrospective analysis to an AHF population treated with intravenous (i.v.) loop diuretics. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital clinical data and outcomes at discharge and mid-term follow-up were collected and compared among DR and non-DR patients for each definition.
    RESULTS: Among 53 patients, 39 (73.6%), 51 (96.2%) and 3 (5.7%) were DR according to weight-derived, diuresis-derived, and spot NaU definition, respectively. The median value of the new NaU-based definition was 31 mmol/40 mg and patients were stratified accordingly. DR patients showed lower cumulative diuresis (5200 mL, 3300-6700 vs 9825, mL 6200-12,200, p = 0.007) and weight loss (4 kg, 1-5 vs 6 kg, 3-8.5, p = 0.023), higher BNP levels (808, 443-1037 vs 351, 209-859, p = 0.062) at the conclusion of protocol-guided i.v diuretic therapy, which was less frequently stopped due to decongestion in DR as compared to non-DR patients (57.7 vs 85.2%, p = 0.026). Six-months mortality or HF hospitalizations were more frequent in DR patients (OR 18.6, 95% CI 2.1-161.2, p = 0.008).
    CONCLUSIONS: The NaU-based DE definition might solve discrepancies of other previously proposed definitions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:建议早期评估利尿剂反应以指导急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)的利尿剂治疗。然而,它在日常实践中的实施受到实施障碍和时间限制增加的阻碍。急性代偿性心力衰竭(EASY-HF)患者的尿钠分析评估了其可行性,使用即时尿钠传感器的护士主导的基于尿钠的利尿剂滴定方案的有效性和安全性。
    结果:EASY-HF研究是单中心,随机化,一项开放标签研究,比较ADHF患者治疗医师自行决定的利尿剂治疗作为标准护理(SOC)和护士主导的利尿指导方案.LAQUAtwin钠计(HORIBA)用作即时传感器以测量尿钠浓度。主要终点是48小时后的钠尿。次要终点包括方案和护理点传感器的安全性和用户友好性。60名患者被随机分配到SOC(n=30)与原型治疗(n=30)。平均年龄为80±8岁,25%为女性,中位N末端B型利钠肽前体为4667(2667-7709)ng/L。48h后的钠尿明显高于原生质组与SOC组(820±279vs.657±273mmol;p=0.027)。预定义的安全终点在两组之间相似。基于传感器的协议被评估为易于使用的护理人员,比收集尿液更受欢迎。
    结论:通过护理点尿钠传感器的护士主导的利尿剂滴定方案是可行的,与SOC相比,ADHF的利钠尿增加是安全的。
    OBJECTIVE: Early evaluation of the natriuretic response is recommended to guide diuretic therapy in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). However, its implementation in daily practice is hampered by implementation barriers and increased time constraints. The Readily Available Urinary Sodium Analysis in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (EASY-HF) study assessed the feasibility, efficacy and safety of a nurse-led urinary sodium-based diuretic titration protocol with the use of a point-of-care urinary sodium sensor.
    RESULTS: The EASY-HF study was a single-centre, randomized, open-label study comparing diuretic management at the treating physician\'s discretion as standard of care (SOC) with a nurse-led natriuresis-guided protocol in patients with ADHF. The LAQUAtwin Sodium Meter (HORIBA) was used as point-of-care sensor to measure urine sodium concentration. The primary endpoint was natriuresis after 48 h. Secondary endpoints included safety profile and user-friendliness of both the protocol and the point-of-care sensor. Sixty patients were randomized towards SOC (n = 30) versus protocolized care (n = 30). The mean age was 80 ± 8 years, 25% were women and median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide was 4667 (2667-7709) ng/L. Natriuresis after 48 h was significantly higher in the protocolized versus SOC group (820 ± 279 vs. 657 ± 273 mmol; p = 0.027). Pre-defined safety endpoints were similar among both groups. The sensor-based protocol was evaluated as easy to use by the nursing staff, and preferred over urinary collections.
    CONCLUSIONS: A nurse-led diuretic titration protocol via a point-of-care urinary sodium sensor was feasible, safe and resulted in an increased natriuresis in ADHF compared to SOC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本倾向评分匹配队列研究的目的是评估我们虚拟病房(HFVW)中远程医疗指导门诊治疗急性心力衰竭(HF)的结果与住院急性HF患者的比较。
    结果:这项队列研究(2022年5月至2023年10月)评估了在HF专科医生大众中使用静脉推注速尿进行远程医疗指导的门诊急性HF治疗的结果。使用逻辑回归进行倾向评分匹配(PSM),以调整HFVW和标准护理之间基线患者特征的潜在差异[获得指南-HF评分,临床虚弱评分(CFS),Charlson合并症指数(CCI),NT-proBNP,和射血分数]。比较了1、3、6和12个月时的临床结果(再住院和死亡率)与标准护理-SC(2021年无远程医疗管理的急性HF患者)。在标准护理-SC队列中,将550例HFVWADHF患者(年龄73.1±10.9岁;46%为女性)与404例ADHF患者(74.2±11.8;P=0.15和49%为女性)进行了比较。在倾向评分匹配基线患者特征后,与SC相比,HFVW的再住院率显着降低(1个月-HFVW8.6%vs.SC-21.5%,P<0.001;3个月-21%vs.30%,P=0.003;6个月-28%vs41%,P<0.001和12个月-47%vs.57%,P=0.005),死亡率在1个月时也较低(5%vs.13.7%;P<0.001),3个月(9.5%vs.15%;P=0.001),6个月(15%与21%;P=0.03),和12个月(20%与26%;P=0.04)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,与标准护理相比,HFVW管理与较低的再入院几率相关(1个月比值比(OR)=0.3[95%置信区间0.2-0.5],P<0.0001;3个月OR=0.15[0.1-0.3],P<0.0001;6个月OR=0.35[0.2-0.6],P=0.0002;12个月OR=0.25[0.15-0.4],P≤0.001和死亡率(1个月OR=0.26[0.14-0.48],P<0.0001;3个月OR=0.11[0.04-0.27],P<0.0001;6个月OR=0.35,[0.2;0.61],P=0.0002;12个月OR=0.6[0.48;0.73],P=0.03。较高的GWTG-HF评分独立预测再住院几率增加(1个月OR=1.2[1.1-1.3],P<0.001;3个月OR=1.5[1.37;1.64],P<0.0001;6个月OR=1.3[1.2-1.4],P<0.0001;12个月OR=1.1[1.05-1.2],P=0.03)以及死亡率(1个月OR=1.21[1.1-1.3],P<0.0001;3个月OR=1.3[1.2-1.4],P<0.0001;6个月OR=1.2[1.1-1.3],P<0.0001;12个月OR=1.3[1.1-1.7],P=0.02)。同样,较高的CFS也独立预测了再次住院的可能性增加(1个月OR=1.9[1.5-2.4],P<0.0001;3个月OR=1.8[1.3-2.4],P=0.0003;6个月OR=1.4[1.1-1.8],P=0.015;12个月或1.9[1.2-3],P=0.01])和死亡率(1个月OR=2.1[1.6-2.8],P<0.0001;3个月OR=1.8[1.2-2.6],P=0.006;6个月OR=2.34[1.51-5.6],P=0.0001;12个月OR=2.6[1.6-7],P=0.02)。每日步数增加,而HFVW独立预测再住院的几率降低(1个月OR=0.85[0.7-0.9],P=0.005),3个月OR=0.95[0.93-0.98],P=0.003和1个月死亡率(OR=0.85[0.7-0.95],P=0.01),而CCI预测12个月的不良结局(OR=1.2[1.1-1.4],P=0.03)。
    结论:远程医疗指导的ADHF专科HFVW管理可能为合适患者的住院治疗提供安全有效的替代方案。HFVW的每日步数可以帮助预测短期不良临床结局的风险。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this propensity score matched cohort study was to assess the outcomes of telehealth-guided outpatient management of acute heart failure (HF) in our virtual ward (HFVW) compared with hospitalized acute HF patients.
    RESULTS: This cohort study (May 2022-October 2023) assessed outcomes of telehealth-guided outpatient acute HF management using bolus intravenous furosemide in a HF-specialist VW. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using logistic regression to adjust for potential differences in baseline patient characteristics between HFVW and standard care [Get With The Guidelines-HF score, clinical frailty score (CFS), Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI), NT-proBNP, and ejection fraction]. Clinical outcomes (re-hospitalizations and mortality) were compared at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months versus standard care-SC (acute HF patients managed without telehealth in 2021). Five hundred fifty-four HFVW ADHF patients (age 73.1 ± 10.9 years; 46% female) were compared with 404 ADHF patients (74.2 ± 11.8; P = 0.15 and 49% female) in the standard care-SC cohort. After propensity score matching for baseline patient characteristics, re-hospitalizations were significantly lower in the HFVW compared with SC (1 month-HFVW 8.6% vs. SC-21.5%, P < 0.001; 3 months-21% vs. 30%, P = 0.003; 6 months-28% vs 41%, P < 0.001 and 12 months-47% vs. 57%, P = 0.005) and mortality was also lower at 1 month (5% vs. 13.7%; P < 0.001), 3 months (9.5% vs. 15%; P = 0.001), 6 months (15% vs. 21%; P = 0.03), and 12 months (20% vs. 26%; P = 0.04). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that compared with standard care, HFVW management was associated with lower odds of readmission (1-month odds ratio (OR) = 0.3 [95% Confidence Interval CI 0.2-0.5], P < 0.0001; 3 month OR = 0.15 [0.1-0.3], P < 0.0001; 6-month OR = 0.35 [0.2-0.6], P = 0.0002; 12-month OR = 0.25 [0.15-0.4], P ≤ 0.001 and mortality (1-month OR = 0.26 [0.14-0.48], P < 0.0001; 3-month OR = 0.11 [0.04-0.27], P < 0.0001; 6-month OR = 0.35, [0.2; 0.61], P = 0.0002; 12-month OR = 0.6 [0.48; 0.73], P = 0.03. Higher GWTG-HF score independently predicted increased odds of re-hospitalization (1-month OR = 1.2 [1.1-1.3], P < 0.001; 3-month OR = 1.5 [1.37; 1.64], P < 0.0001; 6-month OR = 1.3 [1.2-1.4], P < 0.0001; 12-month OR = 1.1 [1.05-1.2], P = 0.03) as well as mortality (1-month OR = 1.21 [1.1-1.3], P < 0.0001; 3-month OR = 1.3 [1.2-1.4], P < 0.0001; 6-month OR = 1.2 [1.1-1.3], P < 0.0001; 12-month OR = 1.3 [1.1-1.7], P = 0.02). Similarly higher CFS also independently predicted increased odds of re-hospitalizations (1-month OR = 1.9 [1.5-2.4], P < 0.0001; 3-month OR = 1.8 [1.3-2.4], P = 0.0003; 6-month OR = 1.4 [1.1-1.8], P = 0.015; 12-month OR 1.9 [1.2-3], P = 0.01]) and mortality (1-month OR = 2.1 [1.6-2.8], P < 0.0001; 3-month OR = 1.8 [1.2-2.6], P = 0.006; 6-month OR = 2.34 [1.51-5.6], P = 0.0001; 12-month OR = 2.6 [1.6-7], P = 0.02). Increased daily step count while on HFVW independently predicted reduced odds of re-hospitalizations (1-month OR = 0.85[0.7-0.9], P = 0.005), 3-month OR = 0.95 [0.93-0.98], P = 0.003 and 1-month mortality (OR = 0.85 [0.7-0.95], P = 0.01), whereas CCI predicted adverse 12-month outcomes (OR = 1.2 [1.1-1.4], P = 0.03).
    CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth-guided specialist HFVW management for ADHF may offer a safe and efficacious alternative to hospitalization in suitable patients. Daily step count in HFVW can help predict risk of short-term adverse clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)患者中,由于缺乏有效剂量的利尿剂滴定而导致的充血不完全是再入院的常见原因。利钠反应预测方程(NRPE)是一种新颖的工具,被证明可以快速准确地预测利钠反应,并且不需要尿液收集。然而,NRPE尚未经过外部验证。这项研究的目的是从外部验证NRPE在ADHF和液体超负荷患者中的辨别能力。
    结果:纳入需要静脉环利尿剂的ADHF患者。利尿剂给药后约2小时获得斑点尿样,并由研究人员定时收集6小时的尿液。使用NRPE使用斑点尿样中的尿钠和尿肌酐来预测6小时利钠反应。主要目标是验证NRPE以区分利尿剂利钠反应不良(利尿剂给药后6小时钠输出量<50mmol)。将NRPE与尿钠进行比较,并测量尿量,这是国际指南目前推荐的评估利尿剂反应的方法。分析了49例患者的87例利尿剂给药。患者的平均年龄为57±17岁,67%为男性。平均估计肾小球滤过率为65±28mL/min/1.73m2,射血分数为35±15%。在研究当天给予的静脉内呋塞米等同物的中位剂量为80mg(IQR40-160)。在39%的访视中出现了不良的利钠反应。NRPE在6小时尿液收集过程中预测不良利钠反应的AUC为0.91(95%CI0.85-0.98)。与NRPE相比,点尿钠浓度(AUC0.75)和相应护理班次期间的尿量(AUC0.74)显示出较低的辨别能力。
    结论:在这个ADHF患者队列中,NRPE优于点尿钠浓度和与利尿剂反应相关的所有其他指标,以预测不良的利尿剂反应.我们的发现支持在其他设置中使用该方程,以快速准确地预测利钠反应。
    OBJECTIVE: Incomplete decongestion due to lack of titration of diuretics to effective doses is a common reason for readmission in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). The natriuretic response prediction equation (NRPE) is a novel tool that proved to be rapid and accurate to predict natriuretic response and does not need urine collection. However, the NRPE has not been externally validated. The goal of this study was to externally validate the discrimination capacity of the NRPE in patients with ADHF and fluid overload.
    RESULTS: Patients admitted with ADHF who required intravenous loop diuretics were included. A spot urine sample was obtained ~2 h following diuretic administration, and a timed 6-h urine collection by study staff was carried out. Urine sodium and urine creatinine from the spot urine sample were used to predict the 6-h natriuretic response using the NRPE. The primary goal was to validate the NRPE to discriminate poor loop diuretic natriuretic response (sodium output <50 mmol in the 6 h following diuretic administration). The NRPE was compared with urine sodium and measured urine output which are the methods currently recommended by international guidelines to assess diuretic response. Eighty-seven diuretic administrations from 49 patients were analysed. Mean age of patients was 57 ± 17 years and 67% were male. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 65 ± 28 mL/min/1.73 m2, and ejection fraction was 35 ± 15%. Median dose of intravenous furosemide equivalents administered the day of the study was 80 mg (IQR 40 - 160). Poor natriuretic response occurred in 39% of the visits. The AUC of the NRPE to predict poor natriuretic response during the 6-h urine collection was 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.98). Compared with the NRPE, spot urine sodium concentration (AUC 0.75) and urine output during the corresponding nursing shift (AUC 0.74) showed lower discrimination capacity.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with ADHF, the NRPE outperformed spot urine sodium concentration and all other metrics related to diuretic response to predict poor natriuretic response. Our findings support the use of this equation at other settings to allow rapid and accurate prediction of natriuretic response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心源性休克的SCAI分类简单,适合快速评估。其在原发性急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者中的预测行为尚不完全清楚。我们旨在评估SCAI分类预测AHF住院和长期死亡率的能力。
    我们进行了一项单中心研究,并对2015年至2020年间收治的连续AHF患者的前瞻性收集数据进行了回顾性分析。主要终点是住院和所有原因的长期死亡率。
    总共,包括856名患者。未调整的住院死亡率如下:A,0.6%;B,2.7%;C,21.5%;D54.3%;和E,90.6%(对数排名,P<.0001),长期死亡率如下:A,24.9%;B,24%;C,49.6%;D,62.9%;和E,95.5%(对数排名,P<.0001)。经过多变量调整后,每个SCAI休克期仍与死亡率增加相关(与A期相比,所有P<.001).除了长期终点,A期和B期的校正死亡率无差异(P=.1).
    在一组AHF患者中,SCAI心源性休克分类与住院和长期死亡率相关。这一发现支持了在这种情况下进行分类的基本原理。
    UNASSIGNED: SCAI classification in cardiogenic shock is simple and suitable for rapid assessment. Its predictive behavior in patients with primary acute heart failure (AHF) is not fully known. We aimed to evaluate the ability of the SCAI classification to predict in-hospital and long-term mortality in AHF.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a single-center study and performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients admitted with AHF between 2015 and 2020. The primary end points were in-hospital and long-term mortality from all causes.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 856 patients were included. The unadjusted in-hospital mortality was as follows: A, 0.6%; B, 2.7%; C, 21.5%; D 54.3%; and E, 90.6% (log rank, P < .0001), and long-term mortality was as follows: A, 24.9%; B, 24%; C, 49.6%; D, 62.9%; and E, 95.5% (log rank, P < .0001). After multivariable adjustment, each SCAI SHOCK stage remained associated with increased mortality (all P < .001 compared with stage A). With the exception of the long-term end point, there were no differences between stages A and B for adjusted mortality (P = .1).
    UNASSIGNED: In a cohort of patients with AHF, SCAI cardiogenic shock classification was associated with in-hospital and long-term mortality. This finding supports the rationale of the classification in this setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性心力衰竭(AHF)是一种常见的急诊科(ED)表现,可能有不良的结果,但通常不需要住院。几乎没有证据可以指导态度决定。
    作者试图创建一个风险评分来预测AHF患者的短期严重结局(SSO)。
    我们汇集了3个前瞻性队列的数据:2个已发表的研究和1个新队列。3组前瞻性招募了在10个三级护理医院ED中需要治疗AHF的患者。主要结果是SSO,定义为死亡<30天,插管或非侵入性通气(NIV),心肌梗塞,或复发至ED<14天。逻辑回归模型评估了13个预测因子,使用基于AIC的降压程序,并引导内部验证。
    在3个队列中的2,246名患者中(N=559;1,100;587),平均年龄是77.4岁,54.5%为男性,3.1%接受静脉注射硝酸甘油,5.2%收到EDNIV,48.6%住院。共有281例(12.5%)SSO,其中70例死亡(3.1%),其中许多患者出院。最终的HEARTRISK6量表包括6个变量:心脏瓣膜病,心动过速,需要NIV,肌酐,肌钙蛋白,和失败的重新评估(步行测试)。选择HEARTRISK6总分入院阈值≥1或≥2会产生,分别,SSO的敏感性为88.3%(95%CI:83.9%-91.8%)和71.5%(95%CI:65.9%-76.7%),特异性为24.7%(95%CI:22.8%-26.7%)和50.1%(95%CI:47.9%-52.4%)。
    使用3个大型前瞻性收集的数据集,我们为ED中的AHF患者创建了一个简明而敏感的风险量表.HEARTRISK6量表的实施可能会导致更安全,更有效的处置决策。
    UNASSIGNED: Acute heart failure (AHF) is a common emergency department (ED) presentation that may have poor outcomes but often does not require hospital admission. There is little evidence to guide dispositional decisions.
    UNASSIGNED: The authors sought to create a risk score for predicting short-term serious outcomes (SSO) in patients with AHF.
    UNASSIGNED: We pooled data from 3 prospective cohorts: 2 published studies and 1 new cohort. The 3 cohorts prospectively enrolled patients who required treatment for AHF at 10 tertiary care hospital EDs. The primary outcome was SSO, defined as death <30 days, intubation or noninvasive ventilation (NIV), myocardial infarction, or relapse to ED <14 days. The logistic regression model evaluated 13 predictors, used an AIC-based step-down procedure, and bootstrapped internal validation.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 2,246 patients in the 3 cohorts (N = 559; 1,100; 587), the mean age was 77.4 years, 54.5% were male, 3.1% received intravenous nitroglycerin, 5.2% received ED NIV, and 48.6% were admitted to the hospital. There were 281 (12.5%) SSOs including 70 deaths (3.1%) with many in discharged patients. The final HEARTRISK6 Scale included 6 variables: valvular heart disease, tachycardia, need for NIV, creatinine, troponin, and failed reassessment (walk test). Choosing HEARTRISK6 total-point admission thresholds of ≥1 or ≥2 would yield, respectively, sensitivities of 88.3% (95% CI: 83.9%-91.8%) and 71.5% (95% CI: 65.9%-76.7%) and specificities of 24.7% (95% CI: 22.8%-26.7%) and 50.1% (95% CI: 47.9%-52.4%) for SSO.
    UNASSIGNED: Using 3 large prospectively collected datasets, we created a concise and sensitive risk scale for patients with AHF in the ED. Implementation of the HEARTRISK6 scale could lead to safer and more efficient disposition decisions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号