Acute bleeding

急性出血
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性出血会降低血压(BP),有时会导致低血容量性休克。此时,外周动脉应该收缩并增加外周血管阻力以提高血压。然而,没有足够的动脉僵硬度指数。我们使用新的BP非依赖性血管指数评估快速出血期间动脉僵硬度的变化,aBeta和ifBeta,通过将心踝血管指数理论应用于弹性(主动脉)和肌肉(髂总-股)动脉来确定,分别,在兔子
    在戊巴比妥麻醉下,将11只日本白兔固定在仰卧位。15%的血液总量以2mL/kg/min的速度耗尽6分钟;15分钟后,抽取的血液以相同的速率再次输血。主动脉起源处的压力波(oA),腹主动脉远端(dA),左髂总动脉远端(fA),同时测量oA处的流动波。β使用以下公式计算:β=2ρ/PP×ln(SBP/DBP)×PWV2,其中ρ,SBP,DBP,PP是血液密度,收缩压,舒张压,和脉压,分别。aBeta,如果贝塔,和主动脉-髂-股β(aifBeta)使用aPWV计算,如果PWV,和aifPWV,分别。
    BP在oA时显著下降,dA,和急性出血期间的fA。aBeta和aifBeta从出血前的3.7和5.0(对照)显着增加到5.0(约34%)和6.3(约26%),而ifBeta从出血前的20.5显著下降至出血完成后的17.1(约17%)。通过输注取出的血液观察到这些指标的逆反应。
    总动脉僵硬度(aifBeta)增加;然而,弹性和肌肉动脉在出血期间变硬和变软,分别。这些结果将在血压下降期间提供有用的诊断信息。
    UNASSIGNED: Acute hemorrhage decreases blood pressure (BP) and sometimes causes hypovolemic shock. At this time, peripheral arteries are supposed to contract and increase peripheral vascular resistance to raise BP. However, there has not been an adequate index of a degree of arterial stiffness. We assessed changes in arterial stiffness during rapid bleeding using new BP-independent vascular indices, aBeta and ifBeta, determined by applying the cardio-ankle vascular index theory to the elastic (aorta) and muscular (common iliac-femoral) arteries, respectively, in rabbits.
    UNASSIGNED: Eleven Japanese white male rabbits were fixed at the supine position under pentobarbital anesthesia. Fifteen percent of the total blood volume was depleted at a rate of 2 mL/kg/min for 6 min; 15 min later, the withdrawn blood was re-transfused at the same rate. Pressure waves at the origin of the aorta (oA), distal end of the abdominal aorta (dA), distal end of the left common iliac artery (fA), and flow waves at oA were measured simultaneously. Beta was calculated using the following formula: beta = 2ρ/PP × ln(SBP/DBP) × PWV2, where ρ, SBP, DBP, and PP are blood density, systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures, respectively. aBeta, ifBeta, and aortic-iliac-femoral beta (aifBeta) were calculated using aPWV, ifPWV, and aifPWV, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: BP declined significantly at oA, dA, and fA during the acute bleeding. aBeta and aifBeta increased significantly from 3.7 and 5.0 before the bleeding (control) to 5.0 (about 34%) and 6.3 (about 26%) on average, while ifBeta decreased significantly from 20.5 before the bleeding to 17.1 (about 17%) after the completion of the bleeding. Reverse reactions of those indices were observed by transfusing the removed blood.
    UNASSIGNED: Total arterial stiffness (aifBeta) increased; however, the elastic and muscular arteries stiffened and softened during the bleeding, respectively. These results would give useful diagnostic information during fall in BP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    急性动脉出血是一种破坏性的,有时是致命的并发症,发生在头颈部癌症患者身上。然而,由于难以在咽喉和口腔中施加压力,实现止血可能是具有挑战性的。在这种情况下,血管内治疗(ET)已在近年来进行。本报告旨在描述ET对急性出血的益处。此外,我们的发现强调了早期诊断和治疗肿瘤相关出血的重要性,不仅可以立即挽救生命,还可以恢复放疗和化疗,在某些情况下,这可能会导致有利的长期预后。我们描述了两例原发性肿瘤出血,其中ET治疗成功。神经外科医生进行了这些治疗,在两种情况下都实现了有效的止血。未观察到并发症或再出血。对于口咽肿瘤出血,ET是比颈动脉主干出血更好的选择。ET的疗效取决于所涉及的血管,早期识别罪犯动脉可以预测预后。ET应被视为头颈部癌症急性动脉出血的一种选择。
    Acute arterial hemorrhage is a damaging and sometimes lethal complication that occurs in patients with head and neck cancer. However, achieving hemostasis can be challenging because of the difficulty in applying pressure in the throat and oral cavity. In this context, endovascular treatment (ET) has been performed in recent years. This report aims to describe the benefits of ET for acute bleeding. Additionally, our findings emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of tumor-related bleeding, not only for immediate life-saving benefits but also for the potential resumption of irradiation and chemotherapy, which can lead to favorable long-term prognoses in some instances. We describe two cases of primary tumor bleeding where treatment was successful with ET. Neurosurgeons performed these treatments, and effective hemostasis was achieved in both cases. No complications or rebleeding were observed. ET is a better option for hemorrhage from oropharyngeal tumors than for hemorrhage from the main trunk of the carotid artery. The efficacy of ET is dependent on the vessels involved, and early identification of the culprit artery can predict the prognosis. ET should be considered an option for acute arterial hemorrhage in head and neck cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    止血放疗是一种非侵入性治疗消化道(GI)肿瘤出血,促进肿瘤缩小,血液供应减少,和纤维化组织的形成。在传统干预措施不足或禁忌的情况下有效,并且可以预防有胃肠道出血史的患者的复发性出血。低分割时间表对于肿瘤控制和患者依从性也是有效的。
    Hemostatic radiotherapy is a non-invasive treatment for bleeding gastrointestinal (GI) tumors, promoting tumor shrinkage, blood supply reduction, and fibrotic tissue formation. It is effective in cases where traditional interventions are insufficient or contraindicated and can prevent recurrent bleeding in patients with GI bleeding histories. Hypofractionation schedules are also effective for tumor control and patient compliance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胃癌(GC)是全球范围内发病率和死亡率高的恶性肿瘤,急性出血是其常见的临床并发症。胃镜止血是治疗GC急性出血的重要方法,其疗效和安全性仍存在争议.
    目的:系统分析胃镜下止血治疗急性胃出血的疗效和安全性。
    方法:PUBMED,WebofScience,威利图书馆,EMBASE,万方,CNKI,和VIP数据库搜索了截至2023年2月20日发表的与胃镜止血治疗急性GC相关的研究。根据纳入和排除标准筛选文献,数据被提取,并对文献质量进行评价。使用RevMan软件(5.3版)进行荟萃分析,而发表偏倚的Begg检验使用Stata13.0软件进行。
    结果:检索到6项随机对照试验和2项回顾性分析。五项研究有很低的,两个有一个不确定的,其中一个有很高的偏见风险。与对照组相比,胃镜止血的止血率增加[相对危险度(RR)=1.24;95%可信区间(CI):1.08~1.43;P=0.003];再出血率(RR=0.27;95CI:0.09~0.80;P=0.02),手术转移率(RR=0.16;95CI:0.06至0.43;P=0.0003),血清C反应蛋白水平[均差(MD)=-5.16;95CI:-6.11至4.21;P<0.00001],白细胞介素-6水平(MD=-6.37;95CI:-10.33至-2.42;P=0.002),肿瘤坏死因子-α水平(MD=-2.29;95CI:-4.06~-0.52;P=0.01)降低,生活质量改善率升高(RR=1.95;95%CI=1.41~2.71;P<0.0001)。Begg检验显示没有明显的发表偏倚。
    结论:内镜止血的有效性和安全性均高于对照组,提示是治疗急性GC出血的有效方法。
    BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is a malignant tumor with a high incidence and mortality rate worldwide for which acute bleeding is a common clinical complication. Gastroscopic hemostasis is an important method for treating acute bleeding in GC; however, its efficacy and safety remain controversial.
    OBJECTIVE: To systematically analyze the efficacy and safety of gastroscopic hemostasis for the treatment of acute gastric hemorrhage.
    METHODS: The PUBMED, Web of Science, Wiley Library, EMBASE, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP databases were searched for studies related to gastroscopic hemostatic treatment for acute GC published through February 20, 2023. The literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data were extracted, and literature quality was evaluated. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan software (version 5.3), while Begg\'s test for publication bias was performed using Stata 13.0 software.
    RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials and two retrospective analyses were retrieved. Five studies had a low, two had an uncertain, and one had a high risk of bias. Compared with the control group, the hemostatic rate of gastroscopic hemostasis was increased [relative risk (RR) = 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08 to 1.43; P = 0.003]; the rate of rebleeding (RR = 0.27; 95%CI: 0.09 to 0.80; P = 0.02), rate of surgery transfer (RR = 0.16; 95%CI: 0.06 to 0.43; P = 0.0003), serum C-reactive protein level [mean difference (MD) = -5.16; 95%CI: -6.11 to 4.21; P < 0.00001], interleukin-6 level (MD = -6.37; 95%CI: -10.33 to -2.42; P = 0.002), and tumor necrosis factor-α level (MD = -2.29; 95%CI: -4.06 to -0.52; P = 0.01) were decreased; and the quality of life improvement rate was increased (RR = 1.95; 95%C I= 1.41-2.71; P < 0.0001). Begg\'s test revealed no significant publication bias.
    CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of endoscopic hemostasis were higher than those of the control group, suggesting that it is an effective treatment for acute GC hemorrhage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究的目的是确定哪种虚拟非对比(VNC)重建算法,应用于计算机断层扫描血管造影的对比阶段,在评估活动性出血时,最佳匹配真实非造影(TNC)图像。
    方法:接受三相扫描的患者(对比前,动脉,门静脉造影)在光子计数探测器CT(PCD-CT)(120kV,图像质量等级68)怀疑活动(肿瘤,术后,自发性或其他)出血回顾性纳入本研究。常规(VNCConv)和钙保存VNC算法(VNCPC)来自动脉(art)和门静脉(pv)对比扫描,并由两个独立和盲法评估者进行了定量和定性分析。
    结果:40名患者(22名女性,平均年龄76岁)。对于大多数分析的组织区域,CT值的测量显示出TNC和VNC之间的显着差异,尽管差异很小,但没有VNC算法或对比相位的明显优势(例如ΔHU脂肪TNC到VNCPCpv3.1HU)。然而,定性分析显示,在图像质量方面优先考虑VNCPCpv(在5点Likert量表上,VNCConvart=3.5±0.8,VNCPCart=3.7±0.7,VNCConvpv=3.7±0.7,VNCPCpv=3.8±0.7)和残余钙对比度(VNCConvart=3.0±0.8,VNCPCart=3.5±0.7,VNCPCp
    结论:当多个对比后阶段可用时,基于门静脉阶段的VNCPC系列是最适合替代额外的造影前扫描,具有显著降低患者辐射剂量的前景。
    OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was to determine which virtual non-contrast (VNC) reconstruction algorithm, applied to which contrast phase of computed tomography angiography, best matches true non-contrast (TNC) images in the assessment of active bleeding.
    METHODS: Patients who underwent a triphasic scan (pre-contrast, arterial, portal venous contrast) on a photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) (120 kV, image quality level 68) with suspected active (tumor, postoperative, spontaneous or other) bleeding were retrospectively included in this study. Conventional (VNCConv) and a calcium-preserving VNC algorithm (VNCPC) were derived from both arterial (art) and portal venous (pv) contrast scans, and analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively by two independent and blinded raters.
    RESULTS: 40 patients (22 female, mean age 76 years) were included. Measurements of CT values showed significant albeit small differences between TNC and VNC for most analyzed tissue regions without clear superiority of a VNC algorithm or contrast phase (e.g. ΔHU fat TNC to VNCPCpv 3.1 HU). However, qualitative analysis showed a preference to VNCPCpv in terms of image quality (on a 5-point Likert scale VNCConvart = 3.5 ± 0.8, VNCPCart = 3.7 ± 0.7, VNCConvpv = 3.7 ± 0.7, VNCPCpv = 3.8 ± 0.7) and residual calcium contrast (VNCConvart = 3.0 ± 0.8, VNCPCart = 3.5 ± 0.7, VNCConvpv = 3.6 ± 0.7, VNCPCpv = 3.9 ± 0.6).
    CONCLUSIONS: When multiple post-contrast phases are available, VNCPC series based on portal venous phase are the most suitable replacement for an additional pre-contrast scan, with the prospect of a significant reduction in patient radiation dose.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胰胆管系统是一个复杂而脆弱的解剖区域。微小的变化会导致严重的并发症。导致严重并发症的胰胆管疾病包括恶性肿瘤,胰腺炎,十二指肠溃疡,十二指肠憩室,血管畸形,以及医源性或创伤性损伤。不同的治疗策略,比如保守,介入性(例如,栓塞,支架移植应用,或胆道干预),或者手术治疗,可在疾病早期阶段使用。十二指肠穿孔等严重并发症患者的治疗选择,急性出血,或败血症是有限的。如果侵入性较小的程序用尽,紧急胰十二指肠切除术(EPD)可能是唯一的选择。这项研究的目的是分析针对良性非创伤适应症进行EPD的单中心经验,并回顾有关EPD的文献。在2015年1月至2022年1月之间,由于良性非创伤适应症,有11名患者在我们机构接受了EPD。数据分析了性别,年龄,指示,操作参数,住院时间,术后发病率,和死亡率。此外,我们使用PubMed数据库进行了文献调查,并回顾了报告的EPD病例.分析了11例因良性非创伤指征引起的EPD病例。适应症包括消化性十二指肠溃疡并穿透肝胰管和胰腺,十二指肠溃疡伴急性无法控制的出血,并渗透到胰腺中,十二指肠憩室巨大穿孔伴腹膜炎和败血症。平均手术时间为369分钟,中位住院时间为35.8天.11例患者中有4例发生术后并发症(36.4%)。术后90天总死亡率为9.1%(1例)。我们回顾了17项研究和22例病例报告,揭示了269例EPD。文献中仅报道了20例用于良性非创伤适应症的EPD。为良性非创伤适应症进行的EPD仍然是罕见的事件,只有31例报告病例。对文献中所有可用病例的数据分析显示,术后死亡率增加了25.8%。如果侵入性较小的方法用尽,环保署仍然是一个拯救生命的程序,结果可以接受。由具有较高肝胆胰手术经验的外科医生执行,可以达到10%以下的死亡率。
    The pancreaticobiliary system is a complex and vulnerable anatomic region. Small changes can lead to severe complications. Pancreaticobiliary disorders leading to severe complications include malignancies, pancreatitis, duodenal ulcer, duodenal diverticula, vascular malformations, and iatrogenic or traumatic injuries. Different therapeutic strategies, such as conservative, interventional (e.g., embolization, stent graft applications, or biliary interventions), or surgical therapy, are available in early disease stages. Therapeutic options in patients with severe complications such as duodenal perforation, acute bleeding, or sepsis are limited. If less invasive procedures are exhausted, an emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy (EPD) can be the only option left. The aim of this study was to analyze a single-center experience of EPD performed for benign non-trauma indications and to review the literature concerning EPD. Between January 2015 and January 2022, 11 patients received EPD due to benign non-trauma indications at our institution. Data were analyzed regarding sex, age, indication, operative parameters, length of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity, and mortality. Furthermore, we performed a literature survey using the PubMed database and reviewed reported cases of EPD. Eleven EPD cases due to benign non-trauma indications were analyzed. Indications included peptic duodenal ulcer with penetration into the hepatopancreatic duct and the pancreas, duodenal ulcer with acute uncontrollable bleeding, and penetration into the pancreas, and a massive perforated duodenal diverticulum with peritonitis and sepsis. The mean operative time was 369 min, and the median length of hospital stay was 35.8 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 4 out of 11 patients (36.4%). Total 90-day postoperative mortality was 9.1% (1 patient). We reviewed 17 studies and 22 case reports revealing 269 cases of EPD. Only 20 cases of EPD performed for benign non-trauma indications are reported in the literature. EPD performed for benign non-trauma indications remains a rare event, with only 31 reported cases. The data analysis of all available cases from the literature revealed an increased postoperative mortality rate of 25.8%. If less invasive approaches are exhausted, EPD is still a life-saving procedure with acceptable results. Performed by surgeons with a high level of experience in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery, mortality rates below 10% can be achieved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:T2MI是由心肌氧供应和需求之间的不匹配引起的。个体的一个子集是由急性出血引起的T2MI。传统的MI治疗包括抗血小板,抗凝剂,血运重建会使出血恶化.在这项研究中,我们的目的是描述和报告临床判定的因出血导致的T2MI患者的临床结局,按治疗方法分层。
    方法:在2009年至2022年期间,使用MassGeneralBrighamResearch患者数据注册,然后进行手动医师裁决,以识别由出血引起的T2MI个体。我们定义了3个治疗组:(1)侵入性管理组,(2)接受抗血小板和抗凝治疗但没有手术的药物组,和(3)未接受手术或抗凝/抗血小板治疗的保守管理组.基线特征,诊断测试,治疗方案,和30天的临床结果,死亡率,再次出血,提取再入院率,并采用卡方检验比较治疗组的结局.
    结果:我们确定了5712名患有急性出血的个体,其中1017人(17.8%)在入院期间被编码为具有T2MI。在医生手动裁定后,73例(7.2%)符合出血引起的T2MI标准。在出血引起的T2MI患者中,18个被侵入性管理,39人单独接受药物治疗,16个是保守管理的。侵入性管理组的死亡率较低(5.6%vs37.5%,p=0.021)但再入院率更高(22.2%对0%,p=0.045)比保守管理组。药物组的死亡率较低(10.3%vs37.5%,p=0.017)但再入院率更高(35.9%vs0%,p=0.005)比保守管理组。最后,3个不同组的再出血发生率无差异.
    结论:与急性出血相关的T2MI个体是高危人群。与采用保守治疗的患者相比,采用标准手术治疗的患者的再入院率较高,但死亡率较低。虽然这些结果没有风险调整,很可能反映了治疗选择偏差,他们至少提高了为这类高危人群测试缺血减少方法的可能性.未来的临床试验需要验证出血引起的T2MI的任何治疗策略。
    BACKGROUND: Type ll myocardial infarction (T2MI) is caused by a mismatch between myocardial oxygen supply and demand. One subset of individuals is T2MI caused by acute hemorrhage. Traditional MI treatments including antiplatelets, anticoagulants, and revascularization can worsen bleeding. We aim to report outcomes of T2MI patients due to bleeding, stratified by treatment approach.
    METHODS: The MGB Research Patient Data Registry followed by manual physician adjudication was used to identify individuals with T2MI caused by bleeding between 2009 and 2022. We defined 3 treatment groups: (1) invasively managed, (2) pharmacologic, and (3) conservatively managed Clinical parameters and outcomes for 30-day, mortality, rebleeding, and readmission were abstracted compared between the treatment groups.
    RESULTS: We identified 5,712 individuals coded with acute bleeding, of which 1,017 were coded with T2MI during their admission. After manual physician adjudication, 73 individuals met the criteria for T2MI caused by bleeding. 18 patients were managed invasively, 39 received pharmacologic therapy alone, and 16 were managed conservatively. The invasively managed group experienced lower mortality (P = .021) yet higher readmission (P = .045) than the conservatively managed group. The pharmacologic group also experienced lower mortality (P= .017) yet higher readmission (P = .005) than the conservatively managed group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with T2MI associated with acute hemorrhage are a high-risk population. Patients treated with standard procedures experienced higher readmission but lower mortality than conservatively managed patients. These results raise the possibility of testing ischemia-reduction approaches for such high-risk populations. Future clinical trials are required to validate treatment strategies for T2MI caused by bleeding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    克罗恩病(CD)仍然是一种慢性疾病,无法治愈的疾病,对外科医生提出了独特的挑战。必须考虑多种因素以允许制定适当的治疗计划。药物治疗通常先于或补充手术管理。CD手术治疗的适应症包括急性和慢性疾病并发症以及药物治疗失败。当患者具有阻塞性表型而难以接受药物治疗时,选择性手术就会发挥作用。毒性结肠炎,急性梗阻,穿孔,急性脓肿,或大出血代表急诊手术的适应症。这些患者通常处于危急状态,并且存在腹内败血症和术前免疫抑制和营养不良状态,这使他们面临更高的并发症和死亡风险。包括外科医生在内的多学科团队,胃肠病学家,放射科医生,营养支持服务,和肠造口治疗师需要最佳的病人护理和决策。每个紧急情况的管理应根据患者年龄进行个性化,疾病类型和持续时间,和病人的护理目标。此外,疾病的复发性要求我们继续寻找创新的医学疗法和手术技术,以减少重复外科手术的需要。在这次审查中,我们旨在讨论CD的急性并发症及其治疗。
    Crohn\'s disease (CD) remains a chronic, incurable disorder that presents unique challenges to the surgeon. Multiple factors must be considered to allow development of an appropriate treatment plan. Medical therapy often precedes or complements the surgical management. The indications for operative management of CD include acute and chronic disease complications and failed medical therapy. Elective surgery comes into play when patients are refractory to medical treatment if they have an obstructive phenotype. Toxic colitis, acute obstruction, perforation, acute abscess, or massive hemorrhage represent indications for emergency surgery. These patients are generally in critical conditions and present with intra-abdominal sepsis and a preoperative status of immunosuppression and malnutrition that exposes them to a higher risk of complications and mortality. A multidisciplinary team including surgeons, gastroenterologists, radiologists, nutritional support services, and enterostomal therapists are required for optimal patient care and decision making. Management of each emergency should be individualized based on patient age, disease type and duration, and patient goals of care. Moreover, the recurrent nature of disease mandates that we continue searching for innovative medical therapies and operative techniques that reduce the need to repeat surgical operations. In this review, we aimed to discuss the acute complications of CD and their treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经批准:因为尚未批准用于创伤凝血支持的药物,本研究旨在评估静脉注射氨甲环酸(TXA)对急性创伤性出血患者的有效性。
    未经评估:在目前的随机对照临床试验中,68例因腹部钝性创伤而出现急性出血和失血性休克的患者,骨盆,和胸部,随机分为TXA和安慰剂两组。
    UNASSIGNED:两组收缩压无统计学差异,脉搏率,底量超标,血清血红蛋白变化,出血量,血栓性事件的发生率,和死亡人数(p>0.05)。但是收缩压,脉搏率,碱过量,和血清血红蛋白,各组随时间变化显著(p<0.05)。TXA组住院时间的中位数低于安慰剂组(6天对10天,p=0.004)。此外,两组之间的pack细胞中位数有显著差异,血小板消耗,和出血量(p<0.05)。
    UNASSIGNED:使用TXA与减少血液产生和缩短住院时间有关,然而,TXA组和安慰剂组之间的血栓事件发生率和死亡率无差异.
    UNASSIGNED: Because no medication has been approved for coagulation support in trauma, the current study was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous injection of Tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients with acute traumatic bleeding.
    UNASSIGNED: In the current randomized controlled clinical trial, 68 patients with acute bleeding and hemorrhagic shock presentation due to blunt trauma of the abdomen, pelvis, and thorax, randomly assigned into two groups of TXA and placebo.
    UNASSIGNED: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of Systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, Base excess, serum hemoglobin changes, bleeding volume, the incidence of thrombotic events, and the number of deaths (p > 0.05). But Systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, base excess, and serum hemoglobin, changed significantly within each group over time(p < 0.05). The median time for the length of hospital stay among the TXA group was lower than the Placebo group (6 days vs 10 days, p = 0.004). Also, there was a significant difference between the two groups about the median of pack cell, Platelet consumption, and bleeding Volume (p < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: The use of TXA is associated with lower use of blood production and reduced length of hospital stay, however, thrombotic events incidence and mortality rates between the TXA and placebo groups were not different.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估经动脉栓塞对晚期口腔癌患者在接受确定性同步放化疗(CCRT)时出现出血并发症的止血效果。此外,评估经动脉栓塞对同步放化疗后治疗反应的影响,以及干预后患者组的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。方法:自2018年9月至2021年6月,对16例无法手术的患者进行回顾性描述性研究,接受明确同步放化疗的局部晚期口腔癌,经历急性出血并发症,并在越南国立肿瘤医院接受了各种栓塞材料的选择性血管内介入治疗。结果:选择性栓塞后,16/16例患者停止出血;1例患者在3周后第二次再次出血。由于干预而中断放化疗的平均持续时间为6.7天。在CCRT之后,15/16(93.75%)患者获得了缓解,9/16(56.25%)患者达到完全缓解。中位OS为14个月(范围,3-26个月),中位PFS为10个月(范围,3-20个月)。无明显并发症,特别是神经副作用。结论肿瘤出血是CCRT治疗局部晚期口腔癌常见且严重的并发症。栓塞是控制急性出血的一种安全有效的方法,对确定性同步放化疗的结果无不良影响。
    Objectives: Evaluation of the hemostatic effect of trans-arterial embolization on patients with advanced oral cavity cancer who had bleeding complications while undergoing definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Additionally, assess the effect of trans-arterial embolization on treatment response following concurrent chemoradiotherapy, as well as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the group of patients following the intervention. Method: From September 2018-June 2021, a retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 16 patients with inoperable, locally advanced oral cavity cancer who received definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy, experienced acute bleeding complications, and received selective intravascular intervention with various embolization materials at Vietnam National Cancer Hospital. Results: After selective embolization, 16/16 patients ceased bleeding; 1 patient re-bled for the second time after 3 weeks. The average duration of chemoradiotherapy interruption due to intervention was 6.7 days. After CCRT, 15/16 (93.75%) patients achieved a response, with 9/16 (56.25%) patients achieving a complete response. The median OS was 14 months (range, 3-26 months), and the median PFS was 10 months (range, 3-20 months). There were no significant complications, particularly neurological side effects. ConclusionsTumor bleeding is a common and serious complication of CCRT treatment in patients with locally advanced oral cavity cancer. Embolization is a safe and effective method of controlling acute bleeding that has no adverse effect on the outcome of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号