Acute Aortic Syndrome

急性主动脉综合征
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文回顾了主动脉外科领域的最新文献和相关文献。强调的具体领域包括斯坦福A型解剖的结果,急性主动脉综合征的管理,主动脉瘤的管理,和创伤性主动脉损伤。虽然重点是2023年的文章,但也包括了前几年的文献,鉴于这篇文章是系列文章中的第一篇。值得注意的是,我们讨论了2022年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会主动脉疾病诊断和治疗指南的相关章节.
    This article reviews the recent and relevant literature to the field of aortic surgery. Specific areas highlighted include outcomes of Stanford type A dissection, management of acute aortic syndromes, management of aortic aneurysms, and traumatic aortic injury. Although the focus was on articles from 2023, literature from prior years also was included, given that this article is the first of a series. Notably, the pertinent sections from the 2022 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management Aortic Disease are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:非A非B(NANB)主动脉夹层是一种罕见且经常无法识别的疾病。然而,考虑到解剖主动脉的不可预测的行为,它们的正确识别至关重要,可能导致死亡率和发病率增加。我们研究了放射学计算机血管断层扫描(CTA)报告在急性NANB诊断中的准确性以及与延迟识别或误诊相关的风险。
    方法:对2017年1月至2023年5月在伦敦(UK)大学医院收治的所有连续急性主动脉夹层(AAD)患者的治疗前对比CTA进行回顾性审查,以回顾性验证CTA报告诊断NANBAAD的准确性(B1-2D与延迟诊断相关的风险(发病率,死亡率,和重新入院)被评估为次要结局。该研究是根据STROBE指南进行的。
    结果:总体而言,对588例主动脉CTA进行了检查,共检查n=393例(66.8%)A型AAD,n=171(29%)B型AAD和n=25(4.3%)NANBAAD(n=16,64%男性,平均年龄60.56,DS+/-14.6岁)。虽然在A型或B型AAD组中没有发现误诊的病例,在NANB中,只有大约三分之一的病例(n=9,36%)立即显示为“NANB”(n=2,8%)或“逆行延伸到足弓的B”(n=7,28%),n=8例(32%)通常被描述为“牙弓夹层”(n=6,24%)或“A型和B型”AAD(n=2,8%)。其余32%的患者接受了未提及足弓的诊断,报告n=6例(24%)为“A型”,n=2例(8%)为“B型”AAD。尽管用于描述NANBAAD的术语存在异质性,没有心脏填塞的病例,新发灌注不良或神经系统并发症的报告,在等待正确诊断时,没有突然死亡,也没有家庭出院和再次入院。
    结论:用于描述NANB主动脉夹层的术语的异质性突出表明需要提高意识,采用基于指南的分类系统,和进一步的教育,以更好地理解和正确地解决这个具有挑战性的实体,在模棱两可或疑难病例中尽量减少误诊。
    OBJECTIVE: Non-A non-B (NANB) aortic dissections are uncommon and frequently unrecognized diseases. However, their proper identification is crucial given the unpredictable behaviour of the dissected aorta with potential mortality and increased morbidity. We investigate the accuracy of radiological computed angio-tomography (CTA) reports in the diagnosis of acute NANB and the risk related to delayed recognition or misdiagnosis.
    METHODS: The pre-treatment contrast CTA of all consecutive patients admitted with acute aortic dissection (AAD) in a University Hospital in London (UK) between January 2017 and May 2023 were reviewed to retrospectively verify the accuracy of CTA reports in the diagnosis of NANB AAD (B1-2D The risk related to the delayed diagnosis (morbidity, mortality, and hospital re-admissions) were evaluated as secondary outcomes. The study was conducted according to the STROBE guidelines.
    RESULTS: Overall, 588 aortic CTAs were reviewed for a total of n=393 (66.8%) type A AADs, n=171 (29%) type B AADs and n=25(4.3%) NANB AADs (n=16, 64% men, mean age 60.56, DS+/- 14.6 years). While no case of misdiagnosis was identified in Type A or B AAD groups, in NANBs only about a third of cases (n=9, 36%) were immediately indicated as \"NANB\" (n=2, 8%) or \"B with retrograde extension into the arch\" (n=7, 28%), n=8 cases (32%) were described generically as \"arch dissections\" (n=6, 24%) or \"type A and B\" AAD (n=2, 8%). The remaining 32% of patients received a diagnosis that did not include mention of the arch, as n=6(24%) cases were reported to be \"type A\" and n=2(8%) to be \"type B\" AADs. Despite the heterogeneity of terms used to describe NANB AAD, no case of cardiac tamponade, new onset malperfusion nor neurological complications were reported, and no sudden death nor home-discharge and readmission while waiting for the proper diagnosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneity of terms used to describe NANB aortic dissection highlights the need for increased awareness, adoption of in guideline based classification systems, and further education to better understand and correctly address this challenging entity, minimizing misdiagnosis in ambiguous or difficult cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:A型主动脉夹层手术后结局的性别差异仍然是一个持续争论的问题。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估性别对A型主动脉夹层手术后短期和长期结果的影响。
    方法:一项多中心欧洲注册回顾性研究纳入了2005年至2021年间来自8个欧洲国家18家医院的所有连续A型主动脉夹层手术患者。早期和晚期死亡,在不同性别之间比较主动脉再手术的累积发生率。
    结果:共有3902例患者接受了A型主动脉夹层手术,其中1185名(30.4%)为女性。在倾向得分匹配后,766对男性和女性进行了比较。性别之间的术后早期结局没有统计学差异。性别之间的十年生存率相当(47.8%vs47.1%;Log-rank检验,p=0.679),以及远端或近端主动脉再手术的累积发生率。与国家相比的十年相对生存率-,year-,年龄-,和性别匹配的一般人群中男性(0.65)高于女性(0.58)。时间段子分析揭示了多年来两种性别的手术技术的进步。然而,随着时间的推移,这两个人群的中风增加,尤其是女性。
    结论:在过去的16年里,男性和女性的TAAD手术技术取得了显著进步,达到相当的早期和晚期死亡率。尽管有这些发现,晚期相对生存率仍然有利于男性。
    OBJECTIVE: Gender difference in the outcome after type A aortic dissection (TAAD) surgery remains an issue of ongoing debate. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of gender on the short- and long-term outcome after surgery for TAAD.
    METHODS: A multicentre European registry retrospectively included all consecutive TAAD surgery patients between 2005 and 2021 from 18 hospitals across 8 European countries. Early and late mortality, and cumulative incidence of aortic reoperation were compared between genders.
    RESULTS: A total of 3902 patients underwent TAAD surgery, with 1185 (30.4%) being females. After propensity score matching, 766 pairs of males and females were compared. No statistical differences were detected in the early postoperative outcome between genders. Ten-year survival was comparable between genders (47.8% vs 47.1%; log-rank test, P = 0.679), as well as cumulative incidences of distal or proximal aortic reoperations. Ten-year relative survival compared to country-, year-, age- and sex-matched general population was higher among males (0.65) compared to females (0.58). The time-period subanalysis revealed advancements in surgical techniques in both genders over the years. However, an increase in stroke was observed over time for both populations, particularly among females.
    CONCLUSIONS: The past 16 years have witnessed marked advancements in surgical techniques for TAAD in both males and females, achieving comparable early and late mortality rates. Despite these findings, late relative survival was still in favour of males.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性A型主动脉夹层是与显著的发病率和死亡率相关的破坏性主动脉疾病。临床医生应该对突发胸痛的患者保持高度怀疑,尽管诊断可能被广泛的伴随症状和体征所混淆。准确,及时地识别急性夹层对于确保及时转诊合适的患者进行明确的手术管理至关重要。这篇综述集中在急性A型主动脉夹层的诊断,并讨论了血液学检查,和心电图,必要的超声心动图和放射学检查,以确认诊断和评估相关并发症。还回顾了急性A型夹层患者的急性医学管理。
    Acute type A aortic dissection is a devastating aortic disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Clinicians should maintain a high degree of suspicion in patients presenting with sudden-onset chest pain, although the diagnosis may be confounded by the broad spectrum of attendant symptoms and signs. Accurate and timely identification of the acute dissection is of paramount importance to ensure suitable patients are referred promptly for definitive surgical management. This review focuses on the diagnosis of acute type A aortic dissection and discusses the haematological tests, and electrocardiographic, echocardiographic and radiological investigations necessary to confirm the diagnosis and assess for associated complications. The acute medical management of patients with acute type A dissection is also reviewed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评价主动脉夹层检测风险评分(ADD-RS)单独或联合D-二聚体检测急性主动脉综合征(AAS)的准确性。
    方法:我们搜索了MEDLINE,EMBASE,和Cochrane图书馆从成立到2024年2月。此外,彻底检索了纳入研究的参考清单和其他系统综述。与参考标准测试(例如,计算机断层血管造影(CTA),心电门控CTA,超声心动图,磁共振血管造影术,操作,或尸检)被包括在内。两名审阅者独立选择和提取数据。使用QUADAS-2工具评估偏倚风险。使用层次元分析模型综合数据。
    结果:我们从2017年确定的引文中选择了13项研究,包括六项评估ADD-RS与D-二聚体>500ng/L的组合的研究。汇总敏感性和特异性(95%可信区间)为:ADD-RS>094.6%(90%,97.5%)和34.7%(20.7%,51.2%),ADD-RS>143.4%(31.2%,57.1%)和89.3%(80.4%,94.8%);ADDRS>0或D-二聚体>500ng/L99.8%(98.7%,100%)和21.8%(12.1%,32.6%);ADDRS>1或D-二聚体>500ng/L98.3%(94.9%,99.5%)和51.4%(38.7%,64.1%);ADDRS>1或ADDRS=1,D-二聚体>500ng/L93.1%(87.1%,96.3%)和67.1%(54.4%,77.7%)。
    结论:ADD-RS和D-二聚体的组合可用于选择可疑AAS患者进行成像,在敏感性(93.1%至99.8%)和特异性(21.8%至67.1%)之间进行权衡。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD-RS) used alone or in combination with D-dimer for detecting acute aortic syndrome (AAS) in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of AAS.
    METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2024. Additionally, the reference lists of included studies and other systematic reviews were thoroughly searched. All diagnostic accuracy studies that assessed the use of ADD-RS alone or with D-Dimer for diagnosing AAS compared with a reference standard test (e.g. computer tomographic angiography (CTA), ECG-gated CTA, echocardiography, magnetic resonance angiography, operation, or autopsy) were included. Two reviewers independently selected and extracted data. Risk of bias was appraised using QUADAS-2 tool. Data were synthesised using hierarchical meta-analysis models.
    RESULTS: We selected 13 studies from the 2017 citations identified, including six studies evaluating combinations of ADD-RS alongside D-dimer>500ng/L. Summary sensitivities and specificities (95% credible interval) were: ADD-RS>0 94.6% (90%, 97.5%) and 34.7% (20.7%, 51.2%), ADD-RS>1 43.4% (31.2%, 57.1%) and 89.3% (80.4%, 94.8%); ADD RS>0 or D-Dimer>500ng/L 99.8% (98.7%, 100%) and 21.8% (12.1%, 32.6%); ADD RS>1 or D-Dimer>500ng/L 98.3% (94.9%, 99.5%) and 51.4% (38.7%, 64.1%); ADD RS>1 or ADD RS = 1 with D-dimer>500ng/L 93.1% (87.1%, 96.3%) and 67.1% (54.4%, 77.7%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Combinations of ADD-RS and D-dimer can be used to select patients with suspected AAS for imaging with a range of trade-offs between sensitivity (93.1% to 99.8%) and specificity (21.8% to 67.1%).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    靶向血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂途径的酪氨酸激酶抑制剂在治疗转移性肾癌方面显示出有希望的结果。然而,它们会增加患高血压和心血管并发症的风险。
    在这项研究中,我们报告了一例73岁的女性,她的4期肾细胞癌患者接受阿西替尼和派博利珠单抗治疗.她有顽固性胸痛和高收缩压,对阿片类药物没有反应。她的计算机断层扫描血管造影结果显示急性壁内血肿,降主动脉破裂。她接受了紧急胸主动脉腔内修复术。术后,她完全康复,没有任何神经或心血管问题。
    由于服用VEGF抑制剂和免疫疗法引起的心血管血流动力学并发症的严重程度,以及缺乏充分控制此类事件的抗高血压策略,需要对其心血管安全性进行明确和紧急的评估。该病例强调了心血管肿瘤学在处理此类急性主动脉灾难中的关键作用。
    UNASSIGNED: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor pathway with immune checkpoint blockade have shown promising outcomes in managing metastatic renal cancer. However, they increase the risk of a person developing high blood pressure and cardiovascular complications.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, we report the case of a 73-year-old woman on axitinib and pembrolizumab for her Stage 4 renal cell carcinoma. She presented with intractable chest pain and high systolic blood pressure, not responding to opiates. Her computed tomography angiography results showed an acute intra-mural haematoma with a rupture in the descending thoracic aorta. She underwent emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Post-operatively, she recovered fully without any neurological or cardiovascular issues.
    UNASSIGNED: The severity of cardiovascular haemodynamic complications arising from the consumption of VEGF inhibitors and from immunotherapy and the lack of anti-hypertensive strategies to adequately manage such events require an unequivocal and urgent assessment of their cardiovascular safety. This case highlights the crucial role of cardiovascular oncology in managing such acute aortic catastrophes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    A pulmonary artery periadventitial hematoma is a rare complication of a Stanford type A intramural hematoma. As the proximal ascending aorta and pulmonary artery share a common adventitial layer, extravasated blood from the intramural hematoma in the ascending thoracic aorta may extend to beneath the adventitia of the pulmonary artery. The authors describe a case involving a 66-year-old male with acute chest pain who presented with a pulmonary artery periadventitial hematoma associated with a Stanford type A intramural hematoma.
    폐동맥 외막주위 혈종은 Stanford A형 대동맥벽내 혈종의 드문 합병증이다. 근위부 상행 대동맥과 폐동맥은 공통된 혈관외막을 공유하고 있기 때문에 대동맥벽내 혈종의 혈액은 폐동맥으로 확산될 수 있다. 저자들은 급성 흉통을 호소하는 66세 남성에게서 보인 Stanford A형 대동맥벽내 혈종과 연관된 폐동맥 외막주위 혈종의 증례를 보고하고자 한다.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    教学要点:在要求紧急管理的同时,有限的内膜撕裂(LIT),急性主动脉综合征(AAS)的一种罕见亚型,在准确和及时的诊断方面提出了挑战。
    Teaching point: While demanding urgent management, limited intimal tear (LIT), a rare subtype of acute aortic syndrome (AAS), poses challenges in terms of accurate and timely diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号