Accidents, Aviation

事故,Aviation
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文概述了飞行员和空中交通管制员(ATC)面临的心理健康挑战,其紧张的职业生活可能会对全球飞行安全和安保产生负面影响。精神健康障碍对其飞行表现的不利影响构成了特定的安全风险,尤其是在突然意外的惊吓情况下。因此,早期检测,预测和预防飞行员和ATC的心理健康恶化,尤其是那些高危人群,对于尽量减少人为因素造成的潜在空难事件至关重要。人工智能(AI)的最新研究证明了机器和深度学习的潜力,边缘和云计算,虚拟现实和可穿戴多模式生理传感器,用于监测和预测心理健康障碍。飞行员和ATCs生理的纵向监测和分析,认知和行为状态可以帮助预测处于未公开或新出现的精神健康障碍风险的个体。利用人工智能工具和方法来识别和选择这些人进行预防性心理健康培训和干预,可能是一种有希望和有效的方法,可以防止由于人为因素和相关心理健康问题而导致的潜在空难事故。基于这些见解,本文主张使用AI工具和技术在现代航空中设计多学科的心理健康生态系统,促进更有效和有效的心理健康管理,从而提高飞行安全和安保标准。这个拟议的生态系统需要多学科专家的合作,包括心理学家,神经科学家,生理学家,精神病医生,等。以应对现代航空中的这些挑战。
    This article provides an overview of the mental health challenges faced by pilots and air traffic controllers (ATCs), whose stressful professional lives may negatively impact global flight safety and security. The adverse effects of mental health disorders on their flight performance pose a particular safety risk, especially in sudden unexpected startle situations. Therefore, the early detection, prediction and prevention of mental health deterioration in pilots and ATCs, particularly among those at high risk, are crucial to minimize potential air crash incidents caused by human factors. Recent research in artificial intelligence (AI) demonstrates the potential of machine and deep learning, edge and cloud computing, virtual reality and wearable multimodal physiological sensors for monitoring and predicting mental health disorders. Longitudinal monitoring and analysis of pilots\' and ATCs physiological, cognitive and behavioral states could help predict individuals at risk of undisclosed or emerging mental health disorders. Utilizing AI tools and methodologies to identify and select these individuals for preventive mental health training and interventions could be a promising and effective approach to preventing potential air crash accidents attributed to human factors and related mental health problems. Based on these insights, the article advocates for the design of a multidisciplinary mental healthcare ecosystem in modern aviation using AI tools and technologies, to foster more efficient and effective mental health management, thereby enhancing flight safety and security standards. This proposed ecosystem requires the collaboration of multidisciplinary experts, including psychologists, neuroscientists, physiologists, psychiatrists, etc. to address these challenges in modern aviation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究旨在调查创新的尾涡警报(WVA)航空电子设备对飞行员的操作和精神状态的影响,旨在通过减轻与尾流涡流相遇(WVE)相关的风险来提高航空安全。尾流涡流,由喷气式飞机产生,对尾随或交叉飞机构成重大危险。尽管存在分离规则,涉及WVE的事件继续发生,尤其是影响小型飞机,如公务机,导致飞机不适和偶尔的机舱受伤。为了应对这些挑战,这项研究的重点是开发和验证一个可以提交给空中交通管制员的警报系统,使他们能够警告机组人员。这使飞行人员能够避免尾流涡流或固定机舱以防止受伤。该研究采用了多维方法,包括对人类表现和人为因素(HF)问题的分析,以确定警报对飞行员角色的潜在影响。任务,和精神状态。它还利用人类保证水平(HALs)根据新系统的安全关键程度评估必要的人为因素支持。进行了逼真的飞行模拟,以收集飞行员的行为数据,WVE过程中的主观和神经生理反应。该数据允许客观评估WVA对飞行员操作的影响,行为和精神状态(精神负荷,压力水平和唤醒)。特别是,结果突显了警报系统在促进飞行员准备方面的有效性,意识和船员资源管理(CRM)。结果还强调了航空电子设备能够增强航空安全并减少与尾流涡流相遇相关的风险的重要性。特别是,我们展示了如何提供及时的信息和提高态势感知,WVA将最大程度地减少WVE的发生,并有助于更安全的航空运营。
    The study aimed at investigating the impact of an innovative Wake Vortex Alert (WVA) avionics on pilots\' operation and mental states, intending to improve aviation safety by mitigating the risks associated with wake vortex encounters (WVEs). Wake vortices, generated by jet aircraft, pose a significant hazard to trailing or crossing aircrafts. Despite existing separation rules, incidents involving WVEs continue to occur, especially affecting smaller aircrafts like business jets, resulting in aircraft upsets and occasional cabin injuries. To address these challenges, the study focused on developing and validating an alert system that can be presented to air traffic controllers, enabling them to warn flight crews. This empowers the flight crews to either avoid the wake vortex or secure the cabin to prevent injuries. The research employed a multidimensional approach including an analysis of human performance and human factors (HF) issues to determine the potential impact of the alert on pilots\' roles, tasks, and mental states. It also utilizes Human Assurance Levels (HALs) to evaluate the necessary human factors support based on the safety criticality of the new system. Realistic flight simulations were conducted to collect data of pilots\' behavioural, subjective and neurophysiological responses during WVEs. The data allowed for an objective evaluation of the WVA impact on pilots\' operation, behaviour and mental states (mental workload, stress levels and arousal). In particular, the results highlighted the effectiveness of the alert system in facilitating pilots\' preparation, awareness and crew resource management (CRM). The results also highlighted the importance of avionics able to enhance aviation safety and reducing risks associated with wake vortex encounters. In particular, we demonstrated how providing timely information and improving situational awareness, the WVA will minimize the occurrence of WVEs and contribute to safer aviation operations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:农用飞机的运营与独特的挑战有关。特别是,这些措施包括保持意识到与非常低的高度飞行相关的障碍。导线撞击是这些操作中事故的常见原因。方法:焦点小组在由国家农业航空协会主办的2022年Ag航空博览会期间完成,飞行员经历了线击事件(N=22)。研究人员使用人为因素框架对转录本进行编码。结果:值得注意的是,计划外的“修剪通行证”是线击事件中飞行的关键阶段。可能影响他们表现的认知风险因素包括情境意识,决策选择,和执行的压力。超过一半的受试者报告在碰撞前知道电线。可能的预防策略包括由于安全风险而不在现场喷洒,更好地注意他们在现场的位置,避免偏离计划路线。讨论:线击事件经常是由于一时的注意力失误而发生的,即使飞行员已经知道电线。这项研究表明,有针对性的方法来防止农业航空业务中的线击,需要解决一些认知风险和人为因素,而不是实施更多的飞行前监控。这些结果直接基于飞行员的感知,对预防未来的导线罢工事故具有重要意义。更广泛地在农业经营和通用航空领域。BaumgartnerHM,DiDomenicaR,胡PT,托马斯·S·飞行员对农业航空运营中导线罢工的看法。AerospMed嗡嗡声表演。2024;95(6):305-312。
    INTRODUCTION: Agricultural aircraft operations are associated with unique challenges. In particular, these include maintaining awareness of obstacles associated with flight at very low altitudes. Wire strikes are a common cause of accidents in these operations.METHODS: Focus groups were completed during the 2022 Ag Aviation Expo hosted by the National Agricultural Aviation Association with pilots who had experienced wire-strike events (N = 22). The researchers coded the transcripts using a human factors framework.RESULTS: Notably, unplanned \"trim passes\" were a key stage of flight during wire-strike events. Cognitive risk factors that may have affected their performance included situation awareness, decision-making choices, and pressure to perform. Over half of subjects reported being aware of the wire before collision. Possible prevention strategies include not spraying the field due to safety risks, paying better attention to where they were in the field, and avoiding deviation from the planned route.DISCUSSION: Wire-strike events often occur due to momentary lapses in attention, even when the pilot is already aware of the wire. This study shows that targeted approaches to prevent wire strikes in agricultural aviation operations require addressing a number of cognitive risks and human factors, rather than implementing increased preflight surveillance. These results have implications for preventing future wire-strike accidents based directly on pilot perceptions, both within agricultural operations and general aviation more broadly.Baumgartner HM, DiDomenica R, Hu PT, Thomas S. Pilot perceptions of wire strikes in agricultural aviation operations. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(6):305-312.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:尽管意外的飞机降落在水面上(称为沟渠)是罕见的事件,事故发生后,由于不利条件,乘员受伤/死亡的可能性立即增加。然而,到目前为止,很少有研究解决这个问题。在这里,调查了沟渠事件和沟渠后生存情况。方法:从美国国家运输安全委员会数据库中确定了美国的沟渠(1982-2022)。乘员伤害严重程度,飞机类型,飞行员经验,飞行条件,并提取了居住者的数量。泊松分布,卡方检验(双尾),Mann-WhitneyU测试,采用Kruskal-Wallis单向方差分析。结果:共鉴定出96个切口。由于报告中缺乏标准化的报告矩阵,系统的调查受到阻碍。总的来说,77份报告纳入分析。在所有沟渠中,169名居民中有128名(76%)在沟渠中幸存下来并获救。重要的是,最初的沟渠事件被95%的居住者幸存下来。然而,32名(19%)乘员在沟渠后因溺水(21/32例)或原因不明而死亡。考虑每个沟渠事件的概率,在所有沟渠中的26个(34%),一名或多名乘员受到致命伤害。讨论:紧急开沟的初始存活率很高。溺水是抛弃后死亡的主要原因,总生存率降低到76%。需要进一步调查以确定致命结局的危险因素和/或提高抛弃后的生存概率。SchickVC,BoydDD,HipplerC,HinkelbeinJ.在机动飞机上抛弃后生存,1989-2022年。AerospMed嗡嗡声表演。2024;95(5):254–258。
    INTRODUCTION: Although an unintended aircraft landing on water (referred to as ditching) is a rare event, the potential for occupant injury/fatality increases immediately following the event due to adverse conditions. However, to date, few studies have addressed the subject. Herein, ditching events and post-ditching survival were investigated.METHODS: Ditchings (1982-2022) in the United States were identified from the National Transportation Safety Board database. Occupant injury severity, aircraft type, pilot experience, flight conditions, and number of occupants were extracted. Poisson distribution, the Chi-squared test (2-tailed), Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance were employed.RESULTS: A total of 96 ditchings were identified. A systematic survey was hampered by the lack of a standardized reporting matrix in the reports. In total, 77 reports were included in the analysis. Across all ditchings, 128 of 169 (76%) occupants survived ditching and were rescued. Importantly, the initial ditching event was survived by 95% of all occupants. However, 32 (19%) occupants died post-ditching by drowning (21/32 cases) or for undetermined reasons. Considering probability per ditching event, in 26 (34%) of all ditchings, one or more occupants was/were fatally injured.DISCUSSION: Initial survival of the emergency ditching is high. Drowning was the leading cause of death after ditching and reduced the overall survival to 76%. Further investigation is needed to identify risk factors for fatal outcomes and/or improve probability of survival after ditching.Schick VC, Boyd DD, Hippler C, Hinkelbein J. Survival after ditching in motorized aircraft, 1989-2022. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(5):254-258.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在航空系统的风险和安全评估中,工程师一般比较关注硬件或软件故障的风险,不太关注人为错误带来的风险。在本文中,提出了一种(FRAHE)方法来识别这种关键错误类型并确定人为错误的风险严重性。该方法考虑了人为错误概率以及人为错误对系统的影响。本文采用模糊推理方法来解决由于信息不足和错误数据稀缺而引起的不确定性和不精确问题,并建立了人为错误的风险评估模型。该模型可用于精确描述输出风险严重程度与输入风险指标之间的关系,包括人为错误概率,错误影响概率,以及人为错误的后果。给出了该方法任务的案例研究,以证明该模型的可用性和合理性。基于风险的建模方法不仅可以为减少严重错误的发生提供有价值的信息,而且可以用于进行前瞻性分析以防止不安全事件或航空事故。
    In risk and safety assessments of aviation systems, engineers generally pay more attention to the risks of hardware or software failure and focus less on the risks caused by human errors. In this paper, a (FRAHE) method is proposed for identifying this critical error type and determining the risk severity of human errors. This method accounts for the human error probability as well as the impacts of human errors on the system. The fuzzy inference approach is employed in this paper to address the uncertainty and issues of imprecision that arise from insufficient information and scarce error data and a risk assessment model of human error is developed. The model can be used to precisely describe the relationship between the output risk severity and the input risk indicators, including the human error probability, the error impact probability, and the human error consequence. A case study of the approach task is presented to demonstrate the availability and reasonability of the model. The risk-based modeling method can not only provide valuable information for reducing the occurrence of critical errors but also be used to conduct prospective analyses to prevent unsafe incidents or aviation accidents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:继续飞行到恶劣天气中仍然是通用航空(GA)安全性的重要问题。各种各样的体验性,认知,和动机因素被建议作为解释。先前的研究表明,与其他类型的事故相比,不良天气事故发生在计划飞行中的时间更长,这表明以前的时间和精力投入可能是一个促成因素。这项研究的目的是通过实验确定先前承诺对模拟VFR飞行中通用航空飞行员的决策和风险承担的影响。
    方法:36名有执照的飞行员进行了两次模拟飞行,旨在模拟沿海天气恶化的遭遇,以及飞机穿越山脉时在飞机下方形成的大量云层。在决定继续或停止飞行后,飞行员完成了一系列的风险感知,冒险,和态势感知措施。
    结果:42%的航班违反了视觉飞行规则。事先承诺,就已经飞行的距离而言,导致在沿海“飞毛腿跑”的情况下继续飞行到恶劣天气的趋势增加。继续飞行员对风险的感知不同,并表现出比其他人更高的风险承受能力。这些“更大胆”的飞行员也比其他飞行员更活跃,更有资格。
    结论:任何个人决定继续或停止飞行无疑都有多种因素。容忍较高风险水平的意愿似乎就是其中一个因素。这种意愿会随着飞行时间的增加而增加,并且似乎也与个人飞行资格和经验有关。
    结论:所有飞行员都可以从精心设计的模拟器课程中受益,这些课程旨在安全地教授实用的风险管理策略,并提供明确和即时的反馈。
    BACKGROUND: Continuing flight into adverse weather remains a significant problem in general aviation (GA) safety. A variety of experiential, cognitive, and motivational factors have been suggested as explanations. Previous research has shown that adverse weather accidents occur further into planned flights than other types of accident, suggesting that previous investment of time and effort might be a contributing factor. The aim of this study was to experimentally determine the effect of prior commitment on general aviation pilots\' decision-making and risk-taking in simulated VFR flights.
    METHODS: Thirty-six licensed pilots \'flew\' two simulated flights designed to simulate an encounter with deteriorating coastal weather and a developing extensive cloud base underneath the aircraft as it crossed a mountain range. After making a decision to continue or discontinue the flight, pilots completed a range of risk perception, risk taking, and situational awareness measures.
    RESULTS: Visual flight rules were violated in 42% of the flights. Prior commitment, in terms of distance already flown, led to an increased tendency to continue the flight into adverse weather in the coastal \'scud running\' scenario. Continuing pilots perceived the risks differently and showed greater risk tolerance than others. These \'bolder\' pilots also tended to be more active and better qualified than the others.
    CONCLUSIONS: There are undoubtedly multiple factors underlying any individual decision to continue or discontinue a flight. The willingness to tolerate a higher level of risk seems to be one such factor. This willingness can increase with time invested in the flight and also seems to be related to individual flight qualifications and experience.
    CONCLUSIONS: All pilots might benefit from carefully structured simulator sessions designed to safely teach practical risk management strategies with clear and immediate feedback.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:与工作相关的压力在飞行员中很常见,具有广泛的含义,包括精神健康症状的潜在发展,有时甚至是精神疾病。本评论主张使用叙述作为一种工具,以促进飞行员的预防性健康行为,并打击有关与心理健康有关的航空医学认证的错误信息。HoffmanWR,麦克尼尔·M,TvaryanasA.叙事作为航空心理健康和认证工具的未开发潜力。AerospMed嗡嗡声表演。2024;95(3):165–166。
    INTRODUCTION: Work-related stress is common in pilots, with broad implications, including the potential development of mental health symptoms and sometimes even psychiatric disease. This commentary argues for the use of narrative as a tool to promote preventive health behaviors in pilots and combat misinformation about aeromedical certification related to mental health.Hoffman WR, McNeil M, Tvaryanas A. The untapped potential of narrative as a tool in aviation mental health and certification. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(3):165-166.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    导言:健康相关因素会影响航空安全。这项研究调查了已发表的,美国国家运输安全委员会(NTSB)调查的历史航空事故,以了解被确定为事故原因的医疗条件和药物使用情况。方法:本研究采用两部分方法:1)进行范围审查,以概述当前涉及医疗因素和飞行安全的医学文献;2)从2013年1月至2022年10月,对NTSB数据库中的航空事故报告进行全面审查。结果:文献综述表明,精神病,心血管,神经系统药物是致命飞机事故中报告的主要药物类别。年龄没有被发现是一个危险因素。对NTSB数据库的审查表明,在15654起事故中,医学因素与703例(4.5%)事故相关.NTSB数据显示,心血管(1.3%),精神病(0.23%),和内分泌疾病(0.17%)是飞行员中最常见的疾病。在事故报告中,心血管药物(1.49%),镇静抗组胺药(0.91%),和酒精(0.70%)是事故发生时最常用的药物。讨论:与健康相关的因素是与事故相关的因素中很小但可能被低估的比例。心血管疾病和治疗是最重要的因素。重要的是要继续调查健康相关因素与事故发生之间的关系。朱Y,狼我,AlsibaiRA,阿巴斯,AlsawafY,SaadiS,法拉MH,王正,MuradMH.航空事故中飞行员的健康相关因素。AerospMed嗡嗡声表演。2024;95(2):79-83。
    INTRODUCTION: Health-related factors can impact aviation safety. This study investigated the published, historical aviation accidents that have been investigated by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) to understand medical conditions and medication use that have been determined to be causal to mishaps.METHODS: A two-part approach was adopted for this study: 1) a scoping review was conducted to provide an overview of the current medical literature addressing medical factors and flight safety; and 2) a comprehensive review of aviation accident reports from the NTSB database from January 2013 to October 2022.RESULTS: The literature review demonstrated that psychiatric, cardiovascular, and neurological medications were the major categories of medications reported in fatal aircraft accidents. Age was not found to be a risk factor. Review of the NTSB database demonstrated that, among 15,654 mishaps, medical factors were associated in 703 (4.5%) accidents. NTSB data showed that cardiovascular (1.3%), psychiatric (0.23%), and endocrine diseases (0.17%) were the most commonly reported diseases among pilots. In accident reports, cardiovascular medications (1.49%), sedating antihistamines (0.91%), and alcohol (0.70%) were the most commonly used medications at the time of the accidents.DISCUSSION: Health-related factors were a small yet likely underestimated proportion of the factors associated with accidents. Cardiovascular diseases and treatment were the most important factors. It is important to continue to investigate the association between health-related factors and the commission of mishaps.Zhu Y, Wolf ME, Alsibai RA, Abbas AS, Alsawaf Y, Saadi S, Farah MH, Wang Z, Murad MH. Health-related factors among pilots in aviation accidents. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(2):79-83.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:通用航空(GA),主要由轻型(≤12,500磅)飞机组成,与航空承运人相比,安全记录较差。为了提高安全性,自1991年以来,一直向GA飞行员提倡航空决策(ADM)实践。在这里,我们确定了GA飞行员无视这种做法的程度。方法:从国家运输安全委员会AccessR数据库中确定了涉及单引擎飞机中私人飞行员(PPL)的致命事故(1991-2019)(N=1481)。其中,使用PAVE(飞行员,飞机,环境,外部压力)/IMSAFE(疾病,医学,压力,酒精,疲劳,吃)和PPP(感知,process,执行)模型,分别。统计检验使用泊松分布,费希尔精确检验,和Mann-WhitneyU-tests.结果:在1481起事故中,846例被鉴定为ADM相关缺陷。选择离开危险环境(PAVE),无视健康(IMSAFE),飞机熟悉度差(PAVE)是最常见的类别(54%,21%,20%,分别)错误的go/no-goADM。在过去的30年中,与环境类别错误的决定有关的致命事故下降了64%,在其他领域几乎没有递减。在与环境有关的事故类别中,决定离开预报的不利天气(例如,降低的可见性,结冰,雷暴)构成最普遍的子类别(56%,N=195)。令人惊讶的是,在这个子类别中,不考虑结冰和雷暴预报,仪表级PPL的事故占比超过九倍和三倍,分别。结论:飞行员与ADM相关的事故几乎没有减少,飞机,和外部压力域,有必要采取新的策略来解决PPL的这些缺陷。BoydDD,沙夫MT。航空决策不足对致命通用航空事故的贡献。AerospMed嗡嗡声表演。2023年;94(11):807-814。
    INTRODUCTION: General aviation (GA), mainly comprised of light (≤12,500 lb) aircraft, maintains an inferior safety record compared with air carriers. To improve safety, aeronautical decision-making (ADM) practices have been advocated to GA pilots since 1991. Herein, we determined the extent to which GA pilots disregard such practices.METHODS: Fatal accidents (1991-2019) involving private pilots (PPLs) in single-engine airplanes were identified (N = 1481) from the National Transportation Safety Board AccessR database. Of these, deficient go/no-go and in-flight ADM-related mishaps were scored using the PAVE (pilot, aircraft, environment, external pressure)/IMSAFE (illness, medicine, stress, alcohol, fatigue, eating) and PPP (perceive, process, perform) models, respectively. Statistical testing used Poisson distributions, Fisher exact tests, and Mann-Whitney U-tests.RESULTS: Of the 1481 accidents, 846 were identified as deficient ADM-related. Electing to depart into a hazardous environment (PAVE), disregarding wellness (IMSAFE), and poor aircraft familiarity (PAVE) represented the most common categories (54%, 21%, and 20%, respectively) of errant go/no-go ADM. A 64% decline in fatal accidents related to errant go/no-go decisions for the environment category was evident over the 30-yr period, with little decrements in the other domains. Within the errant environment-related category accidents, the decision to depart into forecasted adverse weather (e.g., degraded visibility, icing, thunderstorms) constituted the most prevalent subcategory (56%, N = 195). Surprisingly, of this subcategory, accidents were overrepresented by over nine- and threefold for instrument-rated PPLs disregarding icing and thunderstorm forecasts, respectively.CONCLUSION: With little decrement in ADM-related accidents in the pilot, aircraft, and external pressure domains, new strategies to address such deficiencies for PPLs are warranted.Boyd DD, Scharf MT. Deficient aeronautical decision-making contributions to fatal general aviation accidents. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(11):807-814.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号