UNASSIGNED: The majority of patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) achieve complete remission with established treatment regiments. In patients with intolerance or insufficient response to these drugs, the remaining options are limited and novel treatment approaches necessary. In primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and fibrates have improved prognosis dramatically, but there remains a proportion of patients with refractory disease.In patients with refractory AIH and/or PBC, we used a novel treatment strategy with the anti-B cell activating factor, belimumab. The first three patients had concomitant Sjögren\'s disease. The connecting element between all three diseases is B cell activation, including elevated levels of the B cell activating factor (BAFF). Furthermore, belimumab has been shown to be beneficial in Sjögren\'s disease.
UNASSIGNED: To retrospectively investigate treatment response in six patients with AIH or PBC with or without concomitant Sjögren\'s disease treated with the anti-BAFF therapy belimumab at the University Hospital in Bern, Switzerland.
UNASSIGNED: In all three patients with AIH, belimumab improved disease control and helped by-pass or reduce problematic side effects from corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors. In PBC patients (n = 3), there was no clear improvement of liver function tests, despite reduction or normalization of IgM. All patients with concomitant Sjögren\'s disease (n = 3) had an improvement of sicca symptoms and two out of three patients experienced an initially marked reduction in fatigue, which lessened over time.
UNASSIGNED: Belimumab may be a promising treatment option for patients with AIH and further investigations are needed. In PBC however, response was not convincing. The effects on sicca symptoms and fatigue were encouraging.

UNASSIGNED: Most patients with autoimmune hepatitis respond to standard treatment with steroids and azathioprine. While the disease is usually fatal if untreated, patients who respond well to therapy have an excellent prognosis. Nevertheless, second-line treatment is necessary in approximately 20% of patients, due to either intolerance or insufficient response to first line treatment.While data for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients intolerant to azathioprine is encouraging, MMF seems of less benefit in patients with insufficient response to first line treatment, but analyzed data on this issue is limited.
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMF as a second-line therapy in patients with AIH.
UNASSIGNED: Retrospective analysis of a monocentric database of AIH patients who received medical care from 2000 to 2022. Clinical, immunological and biochemical parameters were assessed at different time points including last follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 144 patients with AIH were identified. Fifty out of 144 (35%) AIH patients received MMF. Forty (80%) received MMF due to first line treatment intolerance, while ten (20%) due to insufficient response to first line treatment.Remission with MMF monotherapy was 81.5% in the intolerance group versus 30% in the insufficient response group. Patients switched to MMF because of an insufficient response, more often needed additional prednisolone doses higher than 5 mg/day, a switch to third-line treatment or combination regiments, to achieve disease control.
UNASSIGNED: Patients treated with MMF because of intolerance to first line treatment show a good disease control under MMF in the majority of cases. Efficacy is considerably lower in the patients switched to MMF because of an insufficient response to first line treatment.

UNASSIGNED: We have shown previously that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) might be used as first-line treatment instead of azathioprine (AZA) in individuals with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Herein, we present our long-term prospective data on response and outcome after first-line therapy with MMF in treatment-naïve individuals with AIH, as similar data are missing.
UNASSIGNED: During the 21 years of the study, 292 individuals with AIH were included (females: 213; median age: 59 [17-85] years). Patients received either prednisolone 0.5-1 mg/kg/day alone (n = 19) or in combination with AZA 1-2 mg/kg/day (n = 64) or MMF (n = 183). The tapering schedule of prednisolone was identical between groups. We assessed the rates of complete biochemical response (CBR) at 6 months, 12 months, and the end of follow-up; non-response (4 weeks of treatment); CBR off prednisolone; adverse effects; CBR off treatment; histological remission; and overall and liver-related mortality between the AZA and MMF groups.
UNASSIGNED: The MMF group had lower non-response (p = 0.02) and higher CBR rates at 12 months (86 vs. 71.8%; p <0.05) and the end of follow-up (96 vs. 87.2%; p = 0.03) than the AZA group. Treatment change was more frequent in the AZA group (43.7 vs. 11%; p <0.001), mostly because of intolerance, whereas MMF was proven safe (serious complications 3.8 vs. 18.8%; p = 0.0003). MMF-treated patients were more frequently eligible to stop immunosuppression according to the guidelines (p <0.05). Cirrhosis at diagnosis, age at diagnosis >60 years, and longer disease duration were independent predictors of liver-related mortality.
UNASSIGNED: MMF seems an efficient alternative first-line treatment option for AIH, bearing lower non-response at 4 weeks and higher CBR rates at 12 months and the end of follow-up than AZA. In addition, MMF was proven to be safe, leading more frequently to the eligibility for stopping immunosuppression according to the guidelines.
UNASSIGNED: For more than 40 years, azathioprine (AZA) has been considered the standard treatment for induction and maintenance of response in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). However, treatment usually needs to be maintained for life, as relapses are common after AZA cessation. Therefore, alternative treatment options are needed. Herein, we showed that the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as an alternative first-line immunosuppressant was much more efficient in the long-term than AZA as attested by the lower non-response rates at 4 weeks and higher response rates at 12 months and the end of follow-up. Moreover, AZA-treated patients were more prone to change treatment because of intolerance, whereas MMF-treated patients were more often eligible to achieve treatment withdrawal.

UNASSIGNED: Systemic glucocorticoids are first-line treatment options for autoimmune blistering diseases; however, their long-term use is associated with significant toxicities.
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the side effects of steroid-sparing agents and compare them with those of steroids.
UNASSIGNED: We searched Cochrane Reviews, Embase, MEDLINE, and Scopus between October 1978 and May 2020 using the keywords \"bullous pemphigoid,\" \"pemphigus,\" \"autoimmune blistering diseases,\" and \"side effects.\" A total of 31 randomized controlled trials and retrospective case series were critically appraised.
UNASSIGNED: This review includes a total of 1685 patients with autoimmune blistering diseases, of whom 781 had bullous pemphigoid and 904 had either pemphigus vulgaris or pemphigus foliaceous.
UNASSIGNED: A major limitation is that because adjuvants are generally used in combination with steroids, only 12 of the studies reviewed included a \"steroid-only\" arm to allow for a direct comparison of side effects. Additionally, there is inadequate literature and lack of standardized grade reporting of specific side effects of each steroid-sparing agent.
UNASSIGNED: In the future, researchers should consider implementing the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, for reporting of all side effects to allow for consistency and standardization. It would be useful to have an index similar to the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index to quantify these side effects.

As solid organ transplantation becomes more prevalent, more individuals are living as members of the immunosuppressed population with an elevated risk for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Although great progress has been made in understanding the pathogenesis of cSCC in general, little is known about the drivers of tumorigenesis in immunosuppressed patients and organ-transplant recipients, specifically. This systematic review sought to synthesize information regarding the genetic and epigenetic alterations as well as changes in protein and mRNA expression that place this growing population at risk for cSCC, influence treatment response, and promote tumor aggressiveness. This review will provide investigators with a framework to identify future areas of investigation and clinicians with additional insight into how to best manage these patients.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical manifestation of hepatic involvement in sarcoidosis can vary from asymptomatic disease to severe complications such as cirrhosis and portal hypertension. However, data on hepatic sarcoidosis are limited, and evidence-based recommendations are lacking. Our study aimed to assess the features and clinical course of hepatic sarcoidosis in a predominantly Caucasian cohort.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including all patients with hepatic sarcoidosis between 2004 and 2020 in 5 German centres. The median follow-up time was 36 months (range 0.0-195). Data on demographic parameters, clinical manifestations, diagnostic test results, treatment, and outcome were collected.
RESULTS: A total of 1,476 patients with sarcoidosis and 62 patients with hepatic involvement (4.2%) were identified. Of the patients, 51.6% were female, and 80.6% were Caucasian. Most patients were asymptomatic and were observed to have a cholestatic pattern of liver enzyme elevations. Cirrhosis was detected in 9 patients (14.5%), of whom 6 developed clinical manifestations of portal hypertension. Fifty-four patients were medically treated, most commonly with glucocorticoids (69.4%) or ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (40.3%). Levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) decreased by 60.8% on average from baseline in patients treated with glucocorticoids and by 59.9% in patients treated with UDCA. Seventeen patients received treatment augmentation with a second line agent, of whom 8 patients normalised ALP levels during follow-up. None of the patients underwent liver transplantation or developed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Three of the patients died during follow-up owing to liver-related complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic involvement in sarcoidosis was found in 4.2% of patients with sarcoidosis and was clinically significant in 14.5% of those. These findings highlight the importance of early identifying, monitoring, and treating hepatic sarcoidosis, given its increased mortality when associated with end-stage liver disease.
BACKGROUND: Clinical diagnostic and surveillance of hepatic involvement in sarcoidosis has not been standardised, and management of hepatic involvement is a clinical challenge, since it remains poorly characterised in many ways. Our results show that one-third of patients with hepatic sarcoidosis presented with clinically significant portal hypertension, 14.5% suffered from cirrhosis, and 3 patients died owing to liver-related complications. Regarding pharmacological treatment options, corticosteroids and UDCA were the medical agents most frequently used, and both of them have been shown to induce biochemical response in the majority of patients. These findings highlight the importance of correctly and early identifying hepatic involvement in sarcoidosis, because of the potentially progressive course of disease.

Polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM) are different disease subtypes of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). The main clinical features of PM and DM include progressive symmetric, predominantly proximal muscle weakness. Laboratory findings include elevated creatine kinase (CK), autoantibodies in serum, and inflammatory infiltrates in muscle biopsy. Dermatomyositis can also involve a characteristic skin rash. Both polymyositis and dermatomyositis can present with extramuscular involvement. The causative factor is agnogenic activation of immune system, leading to immunologic attacks on muscle fibers and endomysial capillaries. The treatment of choice is immunosuppression. PM and DM can be distinguished from other IIMs and myopathies by thorough history, physical examinations and laboratory evaluation and adherence to specific and up-to-date diagnosis criteria and classification standards. Treatment is based on correct diagnosis of these conditions.

UNASSIGNED: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a disease of unknown aetiology with a favourable response to immunosuppression. However, in the clinic, it appears that <50% of patients achieve complete response on standard treatment. Serum B cell-activating factor (BAFF) levels are elevated in patients with AIH and are likely to contribute to disease pathogenesis. Given that belimumab, a BAFF inhibitor, has been shown to be effective in other autoimmune diseases, we investigated its use as a third-line add-on treatment option in patients with advanced AIH who did not respond to conventional treatment.
UNASSIGNED: Herein, we report for the first time two patients, a 27-year-old female and a 58-year-old male, both with AIH-related compensated cirrhosis at diagnosis, who were refractory to standard immunosuppressive therapies and received add-on third-line therapy with belimumab.
UNASSIGNED: Both patients achieved a complete response and remained in remission while receiving low-dose corticosteroids. No adverse events related to belimumab and/or disease decompensation were observed.
UNASSIGNED: These preliminary findings indicate belimumab as a promising treatment option for patients with AIH and refractory and advanced liver-related fibrosis.
UNASSIGNED: A small proportion of patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are refractory to standard treatments; these patients bear the highest probability of developing decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma because third-line treatment options are not well established. In this case study, we showed that third-line add-on therapy with belimumab, a B cell-activating factor inhibitor, could be an alternative and promising treatment option in patients with advanced AIH who did not respond to conventional treatment.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic immune mediated liver disease characterized by elevated transaminases, hyper gammaglobulinemia, presence of autoantibodies and interface hepatitis in the absence of a known etiology of liver disease. Thiopurines (azathioprine [AZA]/6-mercaptopurine [6MP]) and steroids remain the first line of treatment of AIH in both children and adults. However, a small proportion of AIH patients are either non-responders or develop side effects with AZA. The metabolism of AZA is complex and mediated by multiple enzymes. After absorption and getting converted to 6MP, it is converted to 6-thiouric acid, 6-methyl mercaptopurine (6MMP) and 6-thioguanine (6TG) by different enzymes. Elevated 6MMP levels are associated with hepatotoxicity and also poor efficacy due to simultaneous lower levels of 6TG, which is the active drug metabolite related to both efficacy and myelosuppression. Allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor shifts the metabolism of AZA away from 6MMP toward 6TG. This combination of allopurinol with reduced dose of AZA is an alternative to more expensive and toxic second line therapy to induce remission in patients with AIH. This article discusses the mechanism of action of allopurinol in inducing response to AZA, reviews the published literature on this combination therapy and gives guidelines on the use of allopurinol in patients with AIH.

暂无摘要。