ASCVD, Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

ASCVD,动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)临床应用的扩大,我们对这些药物潜在不良反应的认识不断拓宽.新的证据支持ICI治疗与加速的动脉粥样硬化和动脉粥样硬化心血管(CV)事件之间的关联。我们讨论了生物学上的合理性和支持抑制这些免疫检查点对动脉粥样硬化性CV疾病的影响的临床证据。Further,我们提供了在ICI治疗患者中降低动脉粥样硬化风险的潜在诊断和药理学策略的观点.我们对ICI相关动脉粥样硬化的病理生理学的理解尚处于早期阶段。需要进一步的研究来确定将ICI治疗与动脉粥样硬化联系起来的机制,利用ICI疗法为CV生物学提供的洞察力,并开发稳健的方法来管理可能有动脉粥样硬化性CV疾病风险的患者队列。
    As the clinical applications of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) expand, our knowledge of the potential adverse effects of these drugs continues to broaden. Emerging evidence supports the association between ICI therapy with accelerated atherosclerosis and atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) events. We discuss the biological plausibility and the clinical evidence supporting an effect of inhibition of these immune checkpoints on atherosclerotic CV disease. Further, we provide a perspective on potential diagnostic and pharmacological strategies to reduce atherosclerotic risk in ICI-treated patients. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of ICI-related atherosclerosis is in its early stages. Further research is needed to identify the mechanisms linking ICI therapy to atherosclerosis, leverage the insight that ICI therapy provides into CV biology, and develop robust approaches to manage the expanding cohort of patients who may be at risk for atherosclerotic CV disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    风险评估是当前动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)一级预防方法的基本步骤。当考虑药物治疗用于ASCVD的一级预防时,美国现行的预防指南建议使用合并队列方程(PCE)来评估10年ASCVD风险,并开始患者和临床医生共同决策的重要过程.临床医生应通过将原始数据转化为易于理解并更有效地用于治疗计划决策的信息来支持患者的决策过程。在这项工作中,我们提供了一个工具来帮助患者可视化ASCVD风险和降低风险干预措施的预计影响.我们相信这种视觉工具可以促进ASCVD风险与患者的沟通,并提高患者对风险的理解以及降低风险干预措施的潜在影响,我们相信这可以帮助患者获得更多的信息,授权决策,实现更大的风险降低。
    Risk assessment is a fundamental step in the current approach to primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). When considering pharmacotherapy for primary prevention of ASCVD, current prevention guidelines in the United States recommend the use of the pooled cohort equations (PCE) to assess 10-year ASCVD risk and begin the important process of shared decision-making between patients and clinicians. Clinicians should support patients in the decisionmaking process by turning raw data into information that is easily understood and more effectively utilized for decisions around the treatment plan. In this work, we present a tool to help patients visualize ASCVD risk and the projected impact of risk-lowering interventions. We believe this visual tool can facilitate communication of ASCVD risk to patients, and improve patient understanding of risk and the potential impact of risklowering interventions, which we believe may help patients make more informed, empowered decisions that achieve greater risk reduction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    该病例报告描述了一名67岁的非洲裔美国妇女,患有纯合子家族性高胆固醇血症,由LDLR基因中的2种致病变异引起。初始手术,药理学,低密度脂蛋白单采干预措施不足;添加前蛋白转化酶枯草杆菌蛋白酶-kexin9型和血管生成素样3抑制剂可将她的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇降低至<70mg/dL。(难度等级:高级。).
    This case report describes a 67-year-old African-American woman with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia caused by 2 pathogenic variants in the LDLR gene. Initial surgical, pharmacological, and low-density lipoprotein apheresis interventions were insufficient; the addition of proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 and angiopoietin-like 3 inhibitors lowered her low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to <70 mg/dL. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]浓度升高是动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的独立危险因素,包括冠状动脉疾病,中风,外周动脉疾病,等等。新出现的数据表明,即使在有效降低血浆低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的情况下,Lp(a)也会增加心血管事件的风险。然而,存在令人困惑的问题,包括潜在的遗传因素,Lp(a)测定,可能的个人进行分析,风险增加的临界点,和临床干预。在中国人口中,Lp(a)表现出独特的患病率,并以特定的方式调节各种心血管疾病。因此,阐明Lp(a)在心血管疾病中的作用,探索中国人群Lp(a)患病率增加的防治措施是有价值的。北京心脏学会专家的这份科学声明将介绍与Lp(a)相关研究的详细知识,并结合中国人口观察,以提供关键点的参考。
    Elevated concentration of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, including coronary artery disease, stroke, peripheral artery disease, and so on. Emerging data suggest that Lp(a) contributes to the increased risk for cardiovascular events even in the setting of effective reduction of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Nevertheless, puzzling issues exist covering potential genetic factors, Lp(a) assay, possible individuals for analysis, a cutoff point of increased risk, and clinical interventions. In the Chinese population, Lp(a) exhibited a distinctive prevalence and regulated various cardiovascular diseases in specific ways. Hence, it is valuable to clarify the role of Lp(a) in cardiovascular diseases and explore prevention and control measures for the increase in Lp(a) prevalence in the Chinese population. This Beijing Heart Society experts\' scientific statement will present the detailed knowledge concerning Lp(a)-related studies combined with Chinese population observations to provide the key points of reference.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    几十年来,阿司匹林一直是心血管疾病一级预防的基石,然而,它在一级预防中的使用近年来受到了挑战。根据最近的试验,2022年USPSTF指南降低了在一级预防中使用阿司匹林的建议,这些试验表明在一级预防中使用阿司匹林具有低到中性的益处和增加的出血风险。然而,这些试验纳入的患者患动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的风险相对较低,出血风险较高,这可能导致试验结果为阴性.当根据个体风险个性化治疗时,预防ASCVD是理想的。冠状动脉钙(CAC)评分是动脉粥样硬化的有力标志,并以分级方式可靠地预测ASCVD风险。多项研究表明,使用CAC≥100来识别将从一级预防中使用阿司匹林中受益的患者。此外,aCAC=0确定阿司匹林会导致净伤害的患者。在从一级预防到二级预防的连续风险中,CAC可能确定亚临床ASCVD患者使用阿司匹林的风险水平。ACC/AHA2019一级预防指南建议使用CAC重新分类风险并指导他汀类药物和阿司匹林的个性化分配。尽管USPSTF过去没有认可CAC的使用,鉴于使用CAC指导包括阿司匹林在内的初级预防治疗的大量证据,在临床实践中,使用CAC来确定阿司匹林的获益超过其风险的斑块负担水平,并在一级预防中个性化分配阿司匹林似乎是合理的.未来评估预防性治疗作用的研究和随机试验应使用CAC评分进行风险分层。
    Aspirin has been a cornerstone for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease for decades, however its use in primary prevention has been challenged in recent years. The 2022 USPSTF guidelines lowered the recommendation for the use of aspirin in primary prevention based on the recent trials that demonstrated a low to neutral benefit and an increased bleeding risk with the use of aspirin in primary prevention. However, these trials enrolled patients at a relatively low risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and higher bleeding risk which could have contributed to the negative results of the trials. ASCVD prevention is ideal when therapies are personalized based on individual risk. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is a robust marker of atherosclerosis and reliably predicts the ASCVD risk in a graded fashion. Several studies have demonstrated the use of a CAC≥100 to identify patients who will benefit from the use of aspirin in primary prevention. Furthermore, a CAC=0 identifies patients in whom aspirin would lead to net harm. In the continuum of risk from primary to secondary prevention, CAC is likely to identify the level of risk that warrants aspirin use in patients with subclinical ASCVD. The ACC/AHA 2019 primary prevention guidelines recommend the use of CAC to reclassify risk and guide personalized allocation of statins and aspirin. Although the USPSTF has not endorsed the use of CAC in the past, given an extensive body of evidence for use of CAC to guide primary preventive therapies including aspirin, it seems reasonable to use CAC to identify the level of plaque burden at which the benefit of aspirin outweighs its risk in clinical practice and personalize theallocation of aspirin in primary prevention. Future studies and randomized trials assessing the role of preventive therapies should use CAC score for risk stratification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大约一半的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的表型易感性具有遗传基础。尽管单个等位基因变体通常对ASCVD的风险影响很小,一份新出现的数据表明,将许多这些基因变异汇总并加权到"分数"中,可以进一步区分个体的风险,而不仅仅是传统的风险因素。与人口遗传学理论一致,这样的多基因风险评分(PRS)似乎是种族特异性的,因为它们的元素包含总是种族特异性的单核苷酸变体.当前可用的PRS主要来自欧洲血统,因此可以预见,在非欧洲参与者中表现不佳。这一事实对它们在亚太地区的使用有影响。本文介绍了PRS的知识现状,支持它们在该地区使用的可用数据,并强调了在亚太地区安全有效地实施这些措施的需求。
    Approximately one-half of the phenotypic susceptibility to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) has a genetic basis. Although individual allelic variants generally impart a small effect on risk for ASCVD, an emerging body of data has shown that the aggregation and weighting of many of these genetic variations into \"scores\" can further discriminate an individual\'s risk beyond traditional risk factors alone. Consistent with the theory of population genetics, such polygenic risk scores (PRS) appear to be ethnicity specific because their elements comprise single-nucleotide variants that are always ethnicity specific. The currently available PRS are derived predominantly from European ancestry and thus predictably perform less well among non-European participants, a fact that has implications for their use in the Asia-Pacific region. This paper describes the current state of knowledge of PRS, the available data that support their use in this region, and highlights the needs moving forward to safely and effectively implement them in clinical care in the Asia-Pacific region.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    复合杂合子家族性高胆固醇血症患者的表型与纯合子家族性高胆固醇血症患者相似,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇显著升高,并且有心血管疾病的风险。尽管新的治疗方案正在出现,使用不同疗法的逐步方法尚未得到很好的描述。(难度等级:中级。).
    Compound heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients are phenotypically similar to homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients, present with significant elevations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and are at risk of cardiovascular disease. Although new treatment options are emerging, the stepwise approach to the use of different therapies has not been well described. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:当代患病率,意识,在美国,严重高胆固醇血症(SH)和家族性高胆固醇血症(FH)的控制以及相关的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险尚不清楚。
    未经评估:使用电子健康记录,我们评估了奥姆斯特德县的SH和FH负担,明尼苏达,US,2004年至2015年。我们将SH定义为低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平≥190mg/dl,而没有高胆固醇血症的继发原因,将FH定义为荷兰脂质临床网络评分≥6。对照是年龄和性别匹配的LDL-C水平<190mg/dl的个体。
    未经评估:SH的年龄和性别调整的点和时期患病率(年龄递归方法)分别为4.44%和8.95%,分别为;21人中有1人患有FH(~1:233名成年人),46.2%有记录诊断.指南建议的目标(LDL-C<100mg/dl和<70mg/dl在一级和二级预防设置,分别)在33.1%和21.2%的SH病例中实现,总体上实现这一目标的女性少于男性(18.6%vs.23.7%,p=0.022)。在对常规风险因素进行调整后,SH患者发生冠心病(CHD)的风险比为1.21(1.05-1.39;p=0.010),患有SH和CHD家族史的患者为2.16(1.57-2.96;p<0.001),患有FH的患者为4.61(2.66-7.97;p<0.001)。SH与CHD的关联随年龄而改变(p交互作用=0.015),这样风险在年轻时更大。
    UNASSIGNED:SH是冠心病发病的一个独立危险因素。意识和控制力都很低,强调需要解决的治疗差距(在女性中更为突出)。
    UNASSIGNED: Contemporary prevalence, awareness, and control of severe hypercholesterolemia (SH) and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and the associated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in the US are unknown.
    UNASSIGNED: Using electronic health records, we assessed the burden of SH and FH in Olmsted County, Minnesota, US, between 2004 and 2015. We defined SH as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level ≥190 mg/dl without secondary causes of hypercholesterolemia and FH as a Dutch Lipid Clinic Network score ≥6. Controls were age- and sex-matched individuals with LDL-C level <190 mg/dl.
    UNASSIGNED: The age- and sex-adjusted point and period prevalence (age-recursive method) of SH was 4.44% and 8.95%, respectively; 1 in 21 had FH (∼1:233 adults), and 46.2% had a recorded diagnosis. Guideline recommended targets (LDL-C <100 mg/dl and <70 mg/dl in the primary and secondary prevention settings, respectively) were achieved in 33.1% and 21.2% of SH cases, with less women overall achieving the target than men (18.6% vs. 23.7%, p=0.022). After adjustment for conventional risk factors, the hazard ratio for incident coronary heart disease (CHD) in those with SH was 1.21 (1.05-1.39; p=0.010), in those with SH and a family history of CHD was 2.16 (1.57-2.96; p<0.001) and in those with FH was 4.61 (2.66-7.97; p<0.001). The association of SH with CHD was modified by age (p-interaction = 0.015), such that the risk was greater at younger ages.
    UNASSIGNED: SH was prevalent and an independent risk factor for incident CHD. Awareness and control were low, highlighting a treatment gap (more prominent in women) that needs to be addressed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:为了表征现有的心电图(ECG)-人工智能(AI)算法在免疫介导的坏死性肌病(IMNM)中左心室功能障碍(LVD)的实用性。
    UNASSIGNED:在我们的三级护理神经肌肉诊所内对符合欧洲神经肌肉中心诊断标准(2000年1月1日至2020年12月31日)的IMNM患者进行了一项回顾性队列观察性研究。应用了使用12导联标准ECG检测LVD的经过验证的AI算法。输出表示为LVD的百分比概率。回顾了免疫治疗前后的心电图。将LVD预测的概率评分与超声心动图进行比较,免疫治疗反应,和死亡率。
    UNASSIGNED:在具有可用超声心动图的IMNM患者中,74%(89个中的68个)的LVD预测中,ECG-AI算法具有可接受的准确性(区分阈值,0.74;95%CI,0.6-0.87)。这转化为检测LVD的80.0%的灵敏度和62.8%的特异性。最佳截止概率预测是LVD的7倍(赔率比,6.75;95%CI,2.11-21.51;P=.001)。早期发现发生在18%(89中的16例)最初的超声心动图正常且没有心肺症状的患者中。其中6人随后进展为LVD心肺功能衰竭。接受免疫治疗的患者的LVD概率评分有所改善(中位数斜率,-3.96;R=-0.12;P=.002)。LVD概率评分异常时,死亡率风险高7倍(风险比,7.33;95%CI,1.63-32.88;P=.009)。
    未经批准:在IMNM中,AI-ECG算法帮助检测LVD,加强推进超声心动图测试的决策,同时也告知死亡风险,这在决定免疫治疗升级和监测方面很重要。
    UNASSIGNED: To characterize the utility of an existing electrocardiogram (ECG)-artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) in immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM).
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective cohort observational study was conducted within our tertiary-care neuromuscular clinic for patients with IMNM meeting European Neuromuscular Centre diagnostic criteria (January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2020). A validated AI algorithm using 12-lead standard ECGs to detect LVD was applied. The output was presented as a percent probability of LVD. Electrocardiograms before and while on immunotherapy were reviewed. The LVD-predicted probability scores were compared with echocardiograms, immunotherapy treatment response, and mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: The ECG-AI algorithm had acceptable accuracy in LVD prediction in 74% (68 of 89) of patients with IMNM with available echocardiograms (discrimination threshold, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.6-0.87). This translates into a sensitivity of 80.0% and specificity of 62.8% to detect LVD. Best cutoff probability prediction was 7 times more likely to have LVD (odds ratio, 6.75; 95% CI, 2.11-21.51; P=.001). Early detection occurred in 18% (16 of 89) of patients who initially had normal echocardiograms and were without cardiorespiratory symptoms, of which 6 subsequently advanced to LVD cardiorespiratory failure. The LVD probability scores improved for patients on immunotherapy (median slope, -3.96; R = -0.12; P=.002). Mortality risk was 7 times greater with abnormal LVD probability scores (hazard ratio, 7.33; 95% CI, 1.63-32.88; P=.009).
    UNASSIGNED: In IMNM, an AI-ECG algorithm assists detection of LVD, enhancing the decision to advance to echocardiogram testing, while also informing on mortality risk, which is important in the decision of immunotherapy escalation and monitoring.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)在全世界范围内流行,是心肌梗死等急性心血管事件的病因。缺血性卒中,不稳定型心绞痛,和死亡。ASCVD也会影响痴呆症的风险,慢性肾脏病外周动脉疾病和运动,性反应受损,以及许多其他内脏损伤,对衰老的质量和速度产生不利影响。低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)与ASCVD风险之间的关系是整个现代医学中最高度确定和研究的问题之一。LDL-C升高是动脉粥样硬化诱导的必要条件。基础科学调查,前瞻性纵向队列,和随机临床试验都验证了这种关联.然而,尽管有大量的临床试验支持需要减少血液中动脉粥样硬化脂蛋白的负担,实现危险分层LDL-C目标降低的高危和极高危患者的百分比较低,并且在过去30年中一直较低.动脉粥样硬化是一种可预防的疾病。作为临床医生,现在是我们更加认真地采取原始和初级预防的时候了。尽管治疗方法过多,大多数有ASCVD风险的患者治疗不良或不充分,让他们容易受到疾病进展的影响,急性心血管事件,以及由于多个内脏器官功能丧失而导致的不良老化。在这里,我们讨论了需要大大加大力度降低风险,减轻疾病负担,并提供更全面和更早的风险评估,以最佳地预防ASCVD及其并发症。提供的证据支持治疗应该针对低得多的胆固醇管理目标,应该考虑比今天普遍使用的更多的因素,并且应该在生命的早期开始。
    Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is epidemic throughout the world and is etiologic for such acute cardiovascular events as myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, unstable angina, and death. ASCVD also impacts risk for dementia, chronic kidney disease peripheral arterial disease and mobility, impaired sexual response, and a host of other visceral impairments that adversely impact the quality and rate of progression of aging. The relationship between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and risk for ASCVD is one of the most highly established and investigated issues in the entirety of modern medicine. Elevated LDL-C is a necessary condition for atherogenesis induction. Basic scientific investigation, prospective longitudinal cohorts, and randomized clinical trials have all validated this association. Yet despite the enormous number of clinical trials which support the need for reducing the burden of atherogenic lipoprotein in blood, the percentage of high and very high-risk patients who achieve risk stratified LDL-C target reductions is low and has remained low for the last thirty years. Atherosclerosis is a preventable disease. As clinicians, the time has come for us to take primordial and primary prevention more serously. Despite a plethora of therapeutic approaches, the large majority of patients at risk for ASCVD are poorly or inadequately treated, leaving them vulnerable to disease progression, acute cardiovascular events, and poor aging due to loss of function in multiple visceral organs. Herein we discuss the need to greatly intensify efforts to reduce risk, decrease disease burden, and provide more comprehensive and earlier risk assessment to optimally prevent ASCVD and its complications. Evidence is presented to support that treatment should aim for far lower goals in cholesterol management, should take into account many more factors than commonly employed today and should begin significantly earlier in life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号