OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study the etiologies and clinical profile and to describe the factors associated with mortality in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients at our center.
METHODS: Patients meeting the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) definition of ACLF were included. We studied etiologies and clinical profile and analyzed the factors associated with mortality in patients with ACLF. We also analyzed the mortality rates based on the number of organ failures and the grade of ACLF.
RESULTS: 114 patients were included. Alcohol (82, 71.9%), drugs (22, 19.3%), and viral hepatitis (17, 14.9%) were the commonest precipitating factors of ACLF. The commonest cause of chronic disease was alcohol (83, 72.8%). Fifty-three (46.5%), 60 (52.6%), 44 (38.6%), 32 (28.1%), and 24 (21.1%) experienced renal, coagulation, cerebral, respiratory, and circulation failures, respectively. Overall, the in-hospital mortality rate stood at 54 (48.6%), with a median stay of eight days. Advanced hepatic encephalopathy and ventilator support independently predicted mortality. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score outperformed all other prognostic scores in predicting mortality in ACLF.
CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol was the most common precipitating factor for ACLF. The in-hospital mortality rate was 48.6%. Advanced hepatic encephalopathy and ventilator support independently predicted mortality. The SOFA score is a more accurate predictor of mortality in ACLF when compared to other prognostic scores.

UNASSIGNED: Until now, there has been disagreement regarding the prevalence, causes, predisposing factors, and outcome of ACLF (Acute-on-chronic liver failure). As a result, we have undertaken this research study.
UNASSIGNED: ACLF is a complex syndrome with a poor prognosis.
UNASSIGNED: In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated the prevalence, causes, predisposing factors, and outcomes of adult cirrhotic patients with ACLF and acute decompensation (AD). ACLF was defined based on the criteria established by APASL (Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver). The severity of organ failure was assessed using both EASL-CLIF (European Association for the Study of the Liver- Chronic Liver Failure) and NACSELD (North American Consortium for the Study of End-Stage Liver Disease) scores. To investigate the impact of different independent variables on mortality, survival analysis methods were used.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 156 patients\' data were analyzed in this study. The mean age of patients with ACLF (56.62±16.19 years) was significantly lower compared to the AD group (62.30±14.28 years). Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and infection were the most common causes and predisposing factors in both AD and ACLF groups, respectively, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The most common organ failures observed were hepatic encephalopathy and respiratory failure. The probability of death at any given time for was significantly higher in ACLF patients than in the AD group (log rank test; P<0.001). The results of Cox regression analysis revealed that low blood pressure (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.96-0.99; P<0.001) and decreased blood pH (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.28-0.99; P=0.04) were significant risk factors associated with increased mortality.
UNASSIGNED: ACLF patients had a lower average age and higher mortality rates compared to AD. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis was found to be the most common underlying disease in ACLF patients, while infections were identified as the predominant predisposing factor. All cases of mortality in the ACLF group were categorized as grade 3 and 4 based on the EASL-CLIF severity score. Hemodynamic instability and metabolic acidosis emerged as the most significant risk factors associated with increased mortality.

OBJECTIVE: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a major public health concern. We aimed to assess the definitions, etiologic spectrum, organ failure (OF), and outcomes of ACLF globally.
METHODS: Three databases were searched for studies on ACLF from 1990 until September 2022. Information regarding definitions, acute precipitants, underlying chronic liver disease (CLD), OF, and mortality were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed for pooled prevalence rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) using random-effects model for each definition of ACLF.
RESULTS: Of the 11,451 studies identified, 114 articles (142 cohorts encompassing 210,239 patients) met the eligibility criteria. Most studies (53.2%) used the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) definition, followed by Asia-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) (33.3%). Systemic infection was the major acute precipitant, and alcohol use was the major cause of CLD in EASL-defined studies, whereas alcohol was both the major acute precipitant and cause of CLD in APASL-defined studies. Liver failure was the major OF in APASL-based studies, whereas renal failure was predominant in EASL-based studies. Thirty-day mortality varied across definitions: APASL: 38.9%, 95% CI, 31.2%-46.9%; EASL: 47.9%, 95% CI, 42.2%-53.5%; and NACSELD: 52.2%, 95% CI, 51.9%-52.5%. Diagnostic overlap between definitions ranged from 7.7% to 80.2%. Meta-regression suggested that the World Health Organization region influenced 30-day mortality in studies using EASL definition.
CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity in the definition of ACLF proposed by different expert societies and regional preferences in its use result in differences in clinical phenotype and outcomes. A uniform definition would enhance the comparability and interpretation of global data.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) is associated with excellent survival in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). There is a lack of data assessing the healthcare utilization and outcomes of patients with APASL-defined ACLF undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Our aim was to assess pre-LT healthcare utilization and post-LT outcomes in such patients.
METHODS: Patients with ACLF who underwent LDLT at our center between 1st April 2019 and 1st October 2021 were included.
RESULTS: Seventy-three ACLF patients willing to undergo LDLT were listed; eighteen patients died within 30 days. Fifty-five patients underwent LDLT (age:38.05 ± 14.76 years; alcohol:52.7%; males:81.8%). Most were in grade II ACLF (87.3%) at the time of LDLT (APASL ACLF Research Consortium [AARC] score: 9.05 ± 1; MELD NA: 28.15 ± 4.13). Survival rate was 72.73%; mean follow-up period of 925.21 days; 58.2% (32/55) developed complications during the first year post-LT; 45% (25/55) and 12.7% (7/55) developed infections within and after 3 months. Pre-LT, each patient required a median of 2 (1-4) admissions for 17 (4-45) days. Fifty-six percent (31/55) of patients underwent plasma exchange pre-LDLT. A median amount of Rs. 8,25,090 (INR 26,000-43,58,154) was spent to stabilize the patient (who were sicker and waited longer to undergo LDLT); though post-LT survival benefit was not observed.
CONCLUSIONS: LDLT was associated with 73% survival and, thus, is a viable option in those with APASL-defined ACLF. There was a pre-LT high healthcare resource utilization of plasma exchange, with the intention of optimization, while survival benefit has not been demonstrated.

Acute-on-Chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a clinical syndrome with high short-term mortality. Alcoholic ACLF is prevalent in European and American countries, while hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related ACLF is more common in the Asia-Pacific region. There is still a lack of a unified definition standard for ACLF, due to various etiologies and pathogeneses in different continents. Currently, liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment for liver failure. However, the shortage of liver sources is still a global problem, which seriously limits the clinical application of an LT. Premature LT aggravates the shortage of liver resources to a certain extent, and too much delay significantly increases the risk of complications and death. Therefore, this study reviews the current literature on LT in the treatment of ACLF and discusses further the challenges for ACLF patients, the timing of LT for ACLF, and the choice of the patient population.

Asian-Pacific nations are home to more than half the world\'s population and similar to other global super regions, metabolic dysfunction associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is the principal cause for chronic liver disease. To address the challenges ahead for tackling the disease at-scale, the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) was the first pan-national society to endorse and lead the process for redefining the disease and adopting the more appropriate term \"MAFLD\" with its accompanying set of positive diagnostic criteria. As with this initiative, APASL and Hepatology International will continue to strive to lead the field and work with sister societies towards full adoption of MAFLD. This will advance the science and practice of Hepatology and help incorporate MAFLD within multidisciplinary care teams. Ultimately, it will lead to more cogent clinical trials built on innovative design platforms that include patients with any disease related to metabolic dysfunction. For our patients, an outcome of these endeavours will be the provision of holistic person-centred care for this disease that is so common in our region.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a well-established treatment modality in acute liver failure patients, but its efficacy in treating acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients is yet to be established.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of TPE in patients with alcohol-associated ACLF who were nonresponders to standard medical treatment (SMT) and without immediate prospects for liver transplantation.
METHODS: Twenty-eight alcohol-related ACLF (grade II) patients (14 cases and 14 controls) were enrolled in the study. Cases underwent standard volume TPE along with SMT while the controls were on SMT alone. The change (baseline to day 10) in laboratory parameters, cytokine concentrations, clinical severity scores along with 30 and 90 day mortality rates were noted and compared between the two groups. The adverse events (AEs) were noted in the groups and analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 51 TPE procedures were performed in 14 patients (average of 3.62 procedures/patient). TPE was effective in reduction of serum bilirubin, ammonia, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and severity scores (ACLF Research Consortium, Maddrey\'s discriminant function, and model for end-stage liver disease) (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the reduction of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor-α concentrations among cases. Among the cases who received the complete TPE interventions, 30- and 90-day mortality rates were lower in the cases as compared to controls albeit only the 90-day mortality was significantly different. Procedure-related AEs was observed in 2% of procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: TPE is an effective and well-tolerated bridge therapy in patients with alcohol-associated ACLF of moderate severity not improving on SMT and without immediate prospects for liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Hepatitis B reactivation related to the use of immunosuppressive therapy remains a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality in hepatitis B endemic Asia-Pacific region. This clinical practice guidelines aim to assist clinicians in all disciplines involved in the use of immunosuppressive therapy to effectively prevent and manage hepatitis B reactivation.
METHODS: All publications related to hepatitis B reactivation with the use of immunosuppressive therapy since 1975 were reviewed. Advice from key opinion leaders in member countries/administrative regions of Asian-Pacific Association for the study of the liver was collected and synchronized. Immunosuppressive therapy was risk-stratified according to its reported rate of hepatitis B reactivation.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the necessity to screen all patients for hepatitis B prior to the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy and to administer pre-emptive nucleos(t)ide analogues to those patients with a substantial risk of hepatitis and acute-on-chronic liver failure due to hepatitis B reactivation.

BACKGROUND: Multiple predictive models of mortality exist for acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients that often create confusion during decision-making. We studied the natural history and evaluated the performance of prognostic models in ACLF patients.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data of ACLF patients from APASL-ACLF Research Consortium (AARC) was analyzed for 30-day outcomes. The models evaluated at days 0, 4, and 7 of presentation for 30-day mortality were: AARC (model and score), CLIF-C (ACLF score, and OF score), NACSELD-ACLF (model and binary), SOFA, APACHE-II, MELD, MELD-Lactate, and CTP. Evaluation parameters were discrimination (c-indices), calibration [accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV)], Akaike/Bayesian Information Criteria (AIC/BIC), Nagelkerke-R2, relative prediction errors, and odds ratios.
RESULTS: Thirty-day survival of the cohort (n = 2864) was 64.9% and was lowest for final-AARC-grade-III (32.8%) ACLF. Performance parameters of all models were best at day 7 than at day 4 or day 0 (p < 0.05 for C-indices of all models except NACSELD-ACLF). On comparison, day-7 AARC model had the numerically highest c-index 0.872, best accuracy 84.0%, PPV 87.8%, R2 0.609 and lower prediction errors by 10-50%. Day-7 NACSELD-ACLF-binary was the simple model (minimum AIC/BIC 12/17) with the highest odds (8.859) and sensitivity (100%) but with a lower PPV (70%) for mortality. Patients with day-7 AARC score > 12 had the lowest 30-day survival (5.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: APASL-ACLF is often a progressive disease, and models assessed up to day 7 of presentation reliably predict 30-day mortality. Day-7 AARC model is a statistically robust tool for classifying risk of death and accurately predicting 30-day outcomes with relatively lower prediction errors. Day-7 AARC score > 12 may be used as a futility criterion in APASL-ACLF patients.

There are different operating definitions for acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) in different geographic regions. Consortia in Western countries have developed definitions that apply to patients with cirrhosis, while consortia in Asia have developed definitions that apply to patients with chronic liver diseases with or without cirrhosis. Investigators of the Chinese and Western Consortia believe that ACLF can be precipitated by acute insults that are intrahepatic (e.g. alcoholic hepatitis) or extrahepatic (e.g. bacterial infection, gastrointestinal haemorrhage), and that extrahepatic organ system failures can be used to define ACLF. In contrast, the Asia Pacific consortium believe that ACLF is only defined by an acute onset of liver failure in response to an acute hepatic insult. Of note, although ACLF has received different operating definitions, every definition recognises that ACLF is a distinct clinical entity. This article provides an updated overview of the distinctive features of ACLF according to the definitions used to characterise it. In addition, we discuss future directions for research aimed at identifying the hallmarks of ACLF.