OBJECTIVE: Gastro-oesophageal reflux is common in newborns, especially in premature infants. Treatment by medication is controversial as the drugs prescribed have not been consistently proven to be effective and are known to have adverse effects. This study sought to identify trends in the prescription of anti-reflux medication in a large group of French neonatal units.
METHODS: Data on prescriptions of anti-reflux treatments-proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), antacids, histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), and prokinetics-from 2014 to 2022 for infants with a corrected gestational age <45 weeks, were extracted from a prescription database (Logipren®) used by 63 French neonatal units, and then analysed.
RESULTS: Of all infants recorded in the database during the study period (n = 152 743), 10.2% (n = 15 650) were prescribed anti-reflux medication (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.0-10.4%), mainly as monotherapy (77.5%). The rate was higher in the subgroup of preterm infants born before 28 weeks of gestation (n = 9493) (20.6%, 95% CI 19.8-21.4%; n = 1956). PPIs were the most commonly prescribed anti-reflux medications (6.9% of infants, 95% CI 6.8-7.0), followed by antacids (5.2%, 95% CI 5.1-5.3%), while H2RAs and prokinetics were rarely prescribed. Over the period, the prescription rate remained stable for PPIs, decreased for H2RAs (τ = -0.86, P = .02), and, among preterm infants born at gestational ages of 28-31 or 32-36 weeks, increased for antacids.
CONCLUSIONS: Anti-reflux medications were frequently prescribed by neonatal units, especially for extremely premature infants. Most of these prescriptions were for PPIs and antacids.

OBJECTIVE: Managing drug-food interactions is essential for optimizing the effectiveness and safety profile of quinolones. Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed the influence of dietary interventions on the bioavailability of 22 quinolones.
METHODS: All studies describing or investigating the impact of food, beverages, antacids, and mineral supplements on pharmacokinetic parameters or pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices of orally taken quinolones were considered for inclusion. We excluded reviews, in vitro and in silico studies, studies performed on animals, and those involving alcohol. We performed the search in Medline (via PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library, covering reports from database inception to December 2022. We used the following tools to assess the risk of bias: version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for parallel trials, the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for cross-over studies, and the NIH quality assessment tool for before-after studies. We performed quantitative analyses for each quinolone if two or more food-effect studies with specified and comparable study designs were available. If meta-analyses were not applicable, we qualitatively summarized the results.
RESULTS: We included 109 studies from 101 reports. Meta-analyses were conducted for 12 antibiotics and qualitative synthesis was employed for the remaining drugs. Of the studies, 60.5% were open-label, cross-over, as recommended by FDA. We judged 46% of studies as having a high risk of bias and only 4% of having a low risk of bias. Among 19 quinolones with available food impact data, 14 (74%) had potentially clinically important interactions. For nalidixic acid, oxolinic acid, and tosufloxacin, food exerted a high positive impact on bioavailability (AUC or Cmax increased by > 45%), whereas, for all the remaining drugs, postprandial absorption was lower. The most significant negative influence of food (AUC or Cmax decreased by > 40%) occurred for delafloxacin capsules and norfloxacin, whereas the moderate influence (AUC or Cmax decreased by 30-40%) occurred for nemonoxacin and rufloxacin. All 14 analysed quinolones showed a substantial reduction in bioavailability when co-administered with antacids and mineral supplements, except for calcium preparations. The impact of beverages was evaluated for 10 quinolones, with 50% experiencing significantly reduced absorption in the presence of milk (the highest negative impact for ciprofloxacin). Moreover, both ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin demonstrated compromised bioavailability when consumed with orange juice, particularly calcium-fortified.
CONCLUSIONS: Several factors may influence interactions, including the physicochemical characteristics of quinolones, the type of intervention, drug formulation, and the patient\'s health status. We assessed the quality of evidence as low due to the poor actuality of included studies, their methodological diversity, and uneven data availability for individual drugs.

BACKGROUND: Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) may affect the upper digestive tract; up to 20% of population in Western nations are affected by GERD. Antacids, histamine H2-receptor antagonists, and Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) are considered the referring medications for GERD. Nevertheless, PPIs must be managed carefully because their use, especially chronic, could be linked with some adverse effects. An effective and safe alternative pharmacological tool for GERD is needed. After the identification of potentially new medications to flank PPIs, it is mandatory to revise and improve good clinical practices even through a consensus process.
OBJECTIVE: To optimize diagnosis and treatment guidelines for GERD through a consensus based on Delphi method.
METHODS: The availability of clinical studies describing the action of the multicomponent/multitarget medication Nux vomica-Heel, subject of the consensus, is the basic prerequisite for the consensus itself. A modified Delphi process was used to reach a consensus among a panel of Italian GERD specialists on the overlapping approach PPIs/Nux vomica-Heel as a new intervention model for the management of GERD. The Voting Consensus group was composed of 49 Italian Medical Doctors with different specializations: Gastroenterology, otolaryngology, geriatrics, and general medicine. A scientific committee analyzed the literature, determined areas that required investigation (in agreement with the multiple-choice questionnaire results), and identified two topics of interest: (1) GERD disease; and (2) GERD treatment. Statements for each of these topics were then formulated and validated. The Delphi process involved two rounds of questioning submitted to the panel experts using an online platform.
RESULTS: According to their routinary GERD practice and current clinical evidence, the panel members provided feedback to each questionnaire statement. The experts evaluated 15 statements and reached consensus on all 15. The statements regarding the GERD disease showed high levels of agreement, with consensus ranging from 70% to 92%. The statements regarding the GERD treatment also showed very high levels of agreement, with consensus ranging from 90% to 100%. This Delphi process was able to reach consensus among physicians in relevant aspects of GERD management, such as the adoption of a new approach to treat patients with GERD based on the overlapping between PPIs and Nux vomica-Heel. The consensus was unanimous among the physicians with different specializations, underlying the uniqueness of the agreement reached to identify in the overlapping approach between PPIs and Nux vomica-Heel a new intervention model for GERD management. The results support that an effective approach to deprescribe PPIs through a progressive decalage timetable (reducing PPIs administration to as-needed use), should be considered.
CONCLUSIONS: Nux vomica-Heel appears to be a valid opportunity for GERD treatment to favor the deprescription of PPIs and to maintain low disease activity together with the symptomatology remission.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant medications can affect the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The association between histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), major antacids similar to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and the efficacy of pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treatment has been poorly evaluated. We evaluated the impact of PPIs and H2RAs on oncological outcomes in mUC patients treated with pembrolizumab.
METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included patients with mUC treated with pembrolizumab. Patients prescribed PPIs or H2RAs within 30 days before and after the initial administration were extracted. The overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rates (ORR) were assessed. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were employed to assess the association between PPIs or H2RAs and survival outcomes.
RESULTS: Overall, 404 patients were eligible for this study; 121 patients (29.9%) used PPIs, and 34 (8.4%) used H2RAs. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly worse OS, CSS, and PFS in patients using PPIs compared to no PPIs (P = .010, .018, and .012, respectively). In multivariable analyses, the use of PPIs was a significant prognostic factor for worse OS (HR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.08-1.87, P = .011), CSS (HR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.09-1.93, P = .011), and PFS (HR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.05-1.73, P = .020). PPIs were not associated with ORRs. The use of H2RAs was not associated with survival or ORRs.
CONCLUSIONS: PPIs were significantly associated with worse survival of patients with mUC treated with pembrolizumab, and H2RAs could be an alternative during administration. Both the oncological and gastrointestinal implications should be carefully considered when switching these antacids.

The effect of food composition, tablet crushing, and antacid coadministration on maribavir pharmacokinetics was assessed in 2 Phase 1 studies in healthy adults. In the first, a single maribavir 400-mg dose was administered under fasting conditions, with a low-fat/low-calorie or a high-fat/high-calorie meal. In the second, a single maribavir 100-mg dose was administered under fasting conditions, as a crushed tablet, or as a whole tablet alone or with an antacid. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios were within 80%-125% for area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), but not for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for low-fat/low-calorie and high-fat/high-calorie meals versus fasting or for whole tablet with antacid versus whole tablet alone. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for AUC and Cmax were within 80%-125% for crushed versus whole tablet. Maribavir median time to Cmax value in plasma under fed conditions was delayed versus fasting conditions, but there was no statistical difference for crushed versus whole tablet or with versus without antacid. As the antiviral efficacy of maribavir is driven by AUC but not Cmax, findings suggest that maribavir can be administered with food or antacids or as a crushed tablet.

OBJECTIVE: Since the first report of gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic-gland type in 2010, the clinicopathological characteristics of gastric neoplasm of the fundic-gland type (GNFG) have become clearer; however, their risk factors remain unclear. This exploratory study aimed to identify the risk factors for GNFG.
METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective, matched case-control study using medical information recorded at our health management center from January 2014 to July 2023. During this period, 39 240 people underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. GNFG were extracted as cases and matched to controls, according to age and sex, in a 1:8 ratio, excluding those with a history of gastrointestinal surgery and those with a history or comorbidity of cancer. Univariate analysis was used to compare patient background and endoscopic findings. Multivariable analysis was performed, adjusting for factors with P values < 0.1 and antacid use.
RESULTS: A total of 20 GNFG cases and 160 matched healthy controls were included. In the univariate analysis, only reflux esophagitis was significantly more common in GNFG (40.0% vs 18.1%; P = 0.036). Factors antacids and duodenitis had P values < 0.1. Logistic regression analysis was performed, adjusting for antacids, reflux esophagitis, and duodenitis. Antacids and reflux esophagitis were the independent risk factors for GNFG (odds ratio = 3.68 [95% confidence interval: 1.04-11.91] and 3.25 [95% confidence interval: 1.11-9.35]).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the sample of patients with GNFG was small, antacids and reflux esophagitis were identified as a risk factor. The pathogenesis of antacids and reflux esophagitis may be involved in the development of GNFG.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent gastrointestinal condition characterized by regurgitating stomach contents into the esophagus, causing mucosal damage or erosion. Clinical physical protection treatment mainly relies on the use of floating rafts. Bletilla striata (BS) is widely regarded as the first-choice drug for treating digestive tract injuries in Chinese Medicine. The rapid-floating gel-raft (B-R) was prepared via a one-step swelling method using natural BS polysaccharide and glyceryl monooleate. Panax notoginseng saponins (PNS) were loaded to further prepare P/B-R according to clinical experience. Possessing hydrophobic dense, stratified porous structure and stable rheological properties, an outperforming floating performance of P/B-R was proven compared with Gaviscon® (alginate-antacid formulation) in vitro. In vivo imaging results showed that P/B-R can retain and adhere to the gastric mucosa of rats for up to 90 min, protecting and repairing the mucosa. Besides physical protection in situ, the systemic effects of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory actions for treating GERD were achieved through the intestinal release of PNS. Acid-labile PNS was protected by P/B-R against gastric acid, attaining the desired release and permeability. A significantly effective mucosa injury protective effect of P/B-R was found in ethanol-induced gastric damage model on rats. Moreover, P/B-R exhibits excellent biosafety at the cellular level.

The misuse of growth-promoting drugs such as beta-2 agonists and steroids is a known problem in farming and sports competitions. Prior to the analysis of biological samples via liquid chromatography (LC)-mass spectrometry (MS) or gas chromatography (GC)-MS, sufficient sample preparation is required to reliably identify or determine the residues of drugs. In practice, broad screening methods are often used to save time and analyze as many compounds as possible. This review was conceptualized to analyze the literature from 2018 until October 2023 for sample preparation procedures applied to animal specimens before LC- or GC-MS analysis. The animals were either used in farming or sports. In the present review, solid phase extraction (SPE) was observed as the dominant sample clean-up technique for beta-2 agonists and steroids, followed by protein precipitation. For the extraction of beta-2 agonists, mixed-mode cation exchanger-based SPE phases were preferably applied, while for the steroids, various types of SPE materials were reported. Furthermore, dispersive SPE-based QuEChERs were utilized. Combinatory use of SPE and liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) was observed to cover further drug classes in addition to beta-2 agonists in broader screening methods.

This study aimed to develop a sodium alginate (Na alginate) and mung bean protein (MBP) raft complex to improve gastric reflux symptoms. Na alginate and MBP complexes with different ratios (1:1, 2:1, and 3:1, respectively) were used for raft formulations through a wet Maillard reaction. Structural properties of raft strength, reflux resistance, intrinsic fluorescence emission spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were investigated for rafts. The suspension 1:1 Na alginate/MBP with 0 h Maillard reaction time exhibited the lowest sedimentation volume among the suspensions. In contrast, 3:1 Na alginate/MBP with 6 h Maillard reaction time showed the highest sedimentation volume. Based on the results, the 3:1 Na alginate/MBP rafts had the best results, and the results were within acceptable limits. Functional properties, including antioxidant properties, the Helicobacter pylori inhibition assay, the pancreatic lipase inhibition assay, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, were investigated for rafts. The Na alginate/MBP raft has similar characteristics to Gaviscon syrup and can be used for obesity, Helicobacter pylori infection, high blood pressure, and gastric reflux.

Abexol is a mixture of primary aliphatic alcohols purified from beeswax (Apis mellifera), that produces anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and gastroprotective effects, as well as it is safe and well tolerated. To investigate and compare the efficacy and safety of Abexol (suspension versus tablets) in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms.
Monocentric study, open-label, randomized design, with two parallel groups receiving Abexol tablets (150 mg/d) or Abexol suspension (75 mg/d) for 8 weeks. Primary efficacy variable (significant improvement in the total score of Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale [GSRS]). Significant reduction in the intensity of the gastrointestinal-symptoms and the reduction in the consumption of antacids are considered secondary efficacy variable. Short form-36 (SF-36) quality of life questiongenonaire was evaluated as collateral variable. Data were analyzed as per intention to treat.
A significantly decrease in the overall score of the survey was observed with respect to the baseline level (p < 0.001) of 81.4% in the Abexol suspension group and 77.9% in the Abexol tablets group. At the end of the trial, most gastrointestinal- symptoms disappeared or reduced significantly. The frequency of consumption of neutralizing antacids was low. The significantly improvement in the perception of the state of health obtained in the Abexol is in correspondence with the improvement achieved in some of the components evaluate in the SF-36 questionnaire. Both treatments were safe and well tolerated.
Abexol suspension showed efficacy and safety similar to Abexol tablets in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms, but using half the dose.