在许多连续的癌症理论中,干细胞理论是目前最被接受的理论。肿瘤干细胞位于特定环境的小生境中,自我更新,并被认为是许多复发的原因。它们可以用干细胞标记突出显示,但是这些标记物通常也标记肿瘤细胞,这可能代表与预后相关的表型改变。在这项研究中,我们试图将肿瘤结局与以下干细胞标志物的表达相匹配:ALDH1,AnnexinA1,CD44,CD117,CD166,Nanog和oct-4.来自三阴性乳腺癌的组织微阵列块对列出的标志物进行免疫染色,它们在大多数肿瘤细胞中的表达(弥漫性阳性)与预后相关。在调查的106个肿瘤中,弥漫性阳性见于7(ALDH1),33(AnnexinA1),53(CD44),44(仅CD117膜),49(CD117),72(CD166),19(Nanog),和11(oct-4)例。中位随访时间为83个月,ALDH1和CD117表达与DFS相关,而CD44、CD117和CD166与OS估计值相关,基于卡普兰-迈耶分析。在多变量Cox比例风险模型中(包括在单变量分析中具有统计学影响的检查标志物和临床病理数据),pN类别和缺乏ALDH1表达是DFS的独立预测因素,pN类别和弥漫性CD44染色是OS的独立预测因子。在包括所有检查的临床病理数据和标志物的多变量分析中,只有CD117对OS有统计学影响.我们未能证明在三阴性乳腺癌中测试的大多数干细胞标志物的预后影响。但缺乏ALDH1染色和CD44表达似乎具有预后价值,需要在独立研究中进一步检查。
Among the many consecutive theories of cancer, the stem cell theory is currently the most accepted one. Cancer stem cells are located in small niches with specific environment, renew themselves and are believed to be responsible for many recurrences. They can be highlighted with stem cell markers, but often these markers also label tumor cells, and this may represent a phenotypical change associated with prognosis. In this study, we attempted to match tumor outcomes with the expression of the following stem cell markers:
ALDH1, AnnexinA1, CD44, CD117, CD166, Nanog and oct-4. Tissue microarray blocks from triple-negative breast cancers were immunostained for the listed markers, and their expression by the majority of tumor cells (diffuse positivity) was correlated with prognosis. Of the 106 tumors investigated, diffuse positivity was seen in 7 (
ALDH1), 33 (AnnexinA1), 53 (CD44), 44 (CD117 membranous only), 49 (CD117), 72 (CD166), 19 (Nanog), and 11 (oct-4) cases. With a median follow-up of 83 months,
ALDH1 and CD117 expression was associated with DFS, whereas CD44, CD117 and CD166 were associated with OS estimates, based on Kaplan-Meier analyses. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard models (including the examined markers and clinicopathological data which had a statistical impact in the univariate analysis), the pN category and the lack of
ALDH1 expression were independent prognosticators for DFS, and the pN category and diffuse CD44 staining were independent prognosticators for OS. In the multivariate analysis including all of the examined clinicopathological data and markers, only CD117 showed a statistical impact on OS. We failed to demonstrate a prognostic impact for most stem cell markers tested in triple-negative breast cancer, but lack of
ALDH1 staining and CD44 expression appears as of prognostic value, requiring further examination in independent studies.