AIP index

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先前的研究已将糖代谢异常的参与者的血浆动脉粥样硬化指数(AIP)和心血管疾病(CVD)联系起来。然而,目前尚不清楚AIP控制水平是否会影响糖尿病患者和糖尿病前期患者心血管疾病的进一步发病率.因此,我们的研究旨在探讨糖代谢异常患者AIP控制水平与CVD风险之间的关系.
    方法:糖代谢异常的参与者来自中国健康与退休纵向研究。CVD被定义为自我报告的心脏病和/或中风。使用k均值聚类分析,AIP控制水平,即甘油三酯与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇摩尔浓度的对数转换比,分为五类。研究了糖代谢异常个体中AIP控制水平与心血管事件之间的关系。多变量逻辑回归分析和限制性三次样条分析的应用。
    结果:2,659名参与者中的398人(14.97%)最终在3年内进展为CVD。在调整了各种混杂因素后,与具有最佳AIP控制的第1类相比,控制良好的2类OR为1.31(95%CI,0.90-1.90),中度控制的3类OR为1.38(95%CI,0.99-1.93),控制较差的4类的OR为1.46(95%CI,1.01-2.10),持续高水平的5类的OR为1.56(95%CI,1.03-2.37)。在受限三次样条回归中,累积AIP指数与CVD呈线性关系。进一步的亚组分析表明,在农业户口的个体中观察到类似的结果,吸烟史,舒张压≥80mmHg,和正常的体重指数。此外,AIP控制水平和亚组变量之间没有交互作用.
    结论:在糖代谢异常的中老年参与者中,具有最差控制的恒定较高的AIP可能具有较高的CVD发生率。监测长期AIP变化将有助于在糖代谢异常的个体中早期识别CVD的高风险。
    The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in participants with abnormal glucose metabolism have been linked in previous studies. However, it was unclear whether AIP control level affects the further CVD incidence among with diabetes and pre-diabetes. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate the association between AIP control level with risk of CVD in individuals with abnormal glucose metabolism.
    Participants with abnormal glucose metabolism were included from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. CVD was defined as self-reporting heart disease and/or stroke. Using k-means clustering analysis, AIP control level, which was the log-transformed ratio of triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in molar concentration, was divided into five classes. The association between AIP control level and incident CVD among individuals with abnormal glucose metabolism was investigated multivariable logistic regression analysis and application of restricted cubic spline analysis.
    398 (14.97%) of 2,659 participants eventually progressed to CVD within 3 years. After adjusting for various confounding factors, comparing to class 1 with the best control of the AIP, the OR for class 2 with good control was 1.31 (95% CI, 0.90-1.90), the OR for class 3 with moderate control was 1.38 (95% CI, 0.99-1.93), the OR for class 4 with worse control was 1.46 (95% CI, 1.01-2.10), and the OR for class 5 with consistently high levels was 1.56 (95% CI, 1.03-2.37). In restricted cubic spline regression, the relationship between cumulative AIP index and CVD is linear. Further subgroup analysis demonstrated that the similar results were observed in the individuals with agricultural Hukou, history of smoking, diastolic blood pressure ≥ 80mmHg, and normal body mass index. In addition, there was no interaction between the AIP control level and the subgroup variables.
    In middle-aged and elderly participants with abnormal glucose metabolism, constant higher AIP with worst control may have a higher incidence of CVD. Monitoring long-term AIP change will contribute to early identification of high risk of CVD among individuals with abnormal glucose metabolism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非糖尿病性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者被认为会遇到代谢功能障碍,尽管这些变化可能对患者难以察觉,但它们可能会影响预后。目前,没有系统来支持患者感知这些微妙的变化,也没有既定的预测模型。血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数(AIP)指数已经被证明对动脉粥样硬化有用,尽管还需要进一步的研究。特别是对于那些没有高血糖的人。
    这是一项针对5538名接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的非糖尿病CAD患者的前瞻性研究。根据他们的AIP指数将参与者分配到三组中的一组。然后根据主要不良心脏事件(MACE)将高AIP指数病例与低指数患者进行比较。还进行了限制性三次样条(RCS)分析,以研究AIP指数水平与MACE风险比(HR)之间的相互关系。
    与AIP指数低的患者相比,AIP指数高的患者遇到了代谢功能障碍,即较高的身体质量指数(BMI),总胆固醇(TC),甘油三酯(TG),和尿酸以及较低的HDL-C。上述相互关系中的每一个都是显著的,p值小于0.001。与低AIP指数组相比,高AIP指数组的MACE数量也显着增加(HR:1.37,95%CI1.04-1.81;p=0.025)。J形RCS曲线突出显示0.18点之后HR的变化(HR/SD:1.20,95%CI0.96-1.50)。进一步的亚组分析支持了主要发现,所有HR都大于1。
    AIP指数可用于PCI术后2年的非糖尿病CAD患者的预后。危险比与AIP指数之间的关系似乎是J形的。虽然,应进一步开展针对具有潜在代谢功能障碍的非糖尿病患者的多中心研究,以确定AIP指数的价值.
    Non-diabetic coronary artery disease (CAD) patients are thought to encounter metabolic dysfunction and while these changes may be imperceptible to the patient they probably influence outcomes. At present, there is no system to support patients sensing these subtle changes, nor is there an established model for prognoses. The Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP) index has already proven useful for atherosclerosis although further research is needed, especially for those without hyperglycemia.
    This is a prospective study of 5538 non-diabetic CAD patients who had received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Participants were assigned to one of three groups according to their AIP index. High AIP index cases were then compared to low index patients according to major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was also conducted to investigate interrelations between AIP index levels and hazard ratios (HR) for MACEs.
    Patients with a high AIP index encountered metabolic dysfunction compared to those with a low AIP index i.e., higher Body Mass Index (BMI), Total Cholesterol (TC), Triglycerides (TG), and uric acid as well as lower HDL-C. Each of the aforementioned interrelations were significant with p values of less than 0.001. There was also a significant increase in the number of MACEs in the high AIP index group compared to the low AIP index group (HR: 1.37, 95% CI 1.04-1.81; p = 0.025). A J-shaped RCS curve highlighted a change in the HR after the 0.18 juncture (HR per SD: 1.20, 95% CI 0.96-1.50). Further subgroup analysis supported the main findings, all with HRs greater than one.
    The AIP index could be used in prognostics for non-diabetic CAD patients 2 years after PCI. The relationship between hazard ratio and the AIP index appears to be J-shaped. Although, further multi-center studies designed for non-diabetic patients with potential metabolic dysfunction should be conducted to determine the value of the AIP index.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号