ACLF

ACLF
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在研究我们中心的慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)患者的病因和临床特征,并描述与死亡率相关的因素。
    方法:纳入符合亚太肝脏研究协会(APASL)ACLF定义的患者。我们研究了ACLF患者的病因和临床特征,并分析了与死亡率相关的因素。我们还根据器官衰竭的数量和ACLF的等级分析了死亡率。
    结果:114例患者被纳入。酒精(82,71.9%),药物(22,19.3%),病毒性肝炎(17,14.9%)是ACLF最常见的诱发因素。慢性疾病的最常见原因是酒精(83,72.8%)。53人(46.5%),60(52.6%),44(38.6%),32(28.1%),和24(21.1%)经历肾脏,凝血,大脑,呼吸,和循环故障,分别。总的来说,住院死亡率为54例(48.6%),平均停留8天.晚期肝性脑病和呼吸机支持独立预测死亡率。序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在预测ACLF死亡率方面优于所有其他预后评分。
    结论:酒精是ACLF最常见的沉淀因子。住院死亡率为48.6%。晚期肝性脑病和呼吸机支持独立预测死亡率。与其他预后评分相比,SOFA评分是ACLF死亡率更准确的预测指标。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study the etiologies and clinical profile and to describe the factors associated with mortality in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients at our center.
    METHODS: Patients meeting the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) definition of ACLF were included. We studied etiologies and clinical profile and analyzed the factors associated with mortality in patients with ACLF. We also analyzed the mortality rates based on the number of organ failures and the grade of ACLF.
    RESULTS: 114 patients were included. Alcohol (82, 71.9%), drugs (22, 19.3%), and viral hepatitis (17, 14.9%) were the commonest precipitating factors of ACLF. The commonest cause of chronic disease was alcohol (83, 72.8%). Fifty-three (46.5%), 60 (52.6%), 44 (38.6%), 32 (28.1%), and 24 (21.1%) experienced renal, coagulation, cerebral, respiratory, and circulation failures, respectively. Overall, the in-hospital mortality rate stood at 54 (48.6%), with a median stay of eight days. Advanced hepatic encephalopathy and ventilator support independently predicted mortality. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score outperformed all other prognostic scores in predicting mortality in ACLF.
    CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol was the most common precipitating factor for ACLF. The in-hospital mortality rate was 48.6%. Advanced hepatic encephalopathy and ventilator support independently predicted mortality. The SOFA score is a more accurate predictor of mortality in ACLF when compared to other prognostic scores.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:组胺在晚期慢性肝病(ACLD)中的作用知之甚少。我们调查了ACLD阶段的血浆组胺水平及其预后价值。
    方法:我们纳入了有ACLD证据的患者,由门脉高压(肝静脉压力梯度[HVPG]≥6mmHg)和/或瞬时弹性成像≥10kPa的肝脏硬度测量定义,在2017年至2020年之间进行了HVPG测量。急性慢性肝衰竭(ACLF)和/或肝脏相关死亡被定义为复合终点。
    结果:在251名患者中,82.5%患有临床上显着的门静脉高压症(HVPG中位数:17mmHg[四分位距(IQR)12-21]),基线时失代偿的患者为135例(53.8%)。血浆组胺中位数为8.5nmol/L(IQR:6.4-11.5),37.1%的患者显示升高的值(>9.9nmol/L)。在Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)阶段和终末期肝病(MELD)或HVPG模型的各个阶段,组胺水平都没有显着差异。组胺水平与循环功能障碍的标志物相关(即钠,肾素和醛固酮)。在29.2个月的中位随访期间,68例患者发生ACLF或肝脏相关死亡。在单变量和多变量分析中(调整年龄,性别,HVPG以及MELD,临床分期,和血清白蛋白或CTP和血清钠),组胺水平升高仍然与复合终点相关.基于CTP的多变量模型调整后的子分布风险比(asHR):1.010(95%CI:1.004-1.021),p<.001;基于MELD的多变量模型asHR:1.030(95%CI:1.017-1.040),p<.001。
    结论:高水平的组胺与ACLD患者的循环功能障碍有关,并且与ACLF或肝脏相关死亡的风险增加独立相关。有必要对组胺信号传导与高动力循环和ACLF的发展之间的联系进行进一步的机理研究。
    OBJECTIVE: The role of histamine in advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) is poorly understood. We investigated plasma histamine levels across ACLD stages and their prognostic value.
    METHODS: We included patients with evidence of ACLD, defined by portal hypertension (hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] ≥6 mmHg) and/or a liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography ≥10 kPa, who underwent HVPG measurement between 2017 and 2020. Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) and/or liver-related death were defined as composite endpoint.
    RESULTS: Of 251 patients, 82.5% had clinically significant portal hypertension (median HVPG: 17 mmHg [interquartile range (IQR) 12-21]) and 135 patients (53.8%) were decompensated at baseline. Median plasma histamine was 8.5 nmol/L (IQR: 6.4-11.5), 37.1% of patients showed elevated values (>9.9 nmol/L). Histamine levels did not differ significantly across Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) stages nor strata of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) or HVPG. Histamine levels correlated with markers of circulatory dysfunction (i.e. sodium, renin and aldosterone). During a median follow-up of 29.2 months, 68 patients developed ACLF or liver-related death. In univariate as well as in multivariate analysis (adjusting for age, sex, HVPG as well as either MELD, clinical stage, and serum albumin or CTP and serum sodium), elevated histamine levels remained associated with the composite endpoint. CTP-based multivariate model adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio (asHR): 1.010 (95% CI: 1.004-1.021), p < .001; MELD-based multivariate model asHR: 1.030 (95% CI: 1.017-1.040), p < .001.
    CONCLUSIONS: High levels of histamine were linked to circulatory dysfunction in ACLD patients and independently associated with increased risks of ACLF or liver-related death. Further mechanistic studies on the link between histamine signalling and development of hyperdynamic circulation and ACLF are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    1型肝肾综合征(HRS)是肝硬化患者的肾功能迅速恶化。关于血管收缩剂对1型HRS的功效的数据显示出混合的结果。
    文献搜索比较药物治疗HRS与安慰剂或其他药物治疗HRS的随机对照试验。主要结果是HRS逆转(血清肌酐<1.5mg/dL,2个读数),次要结局为无肝移植(LT)生存率和严重不良事件(SAE).
    对1244名患者进行的16项研究(平均年龄50.3岁。,67.5%男性,血清肌酐为3.07mg/dL,血清钠127.2mEq/L,和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分为30.9,Child-Pugh评分为11)与血管收缩剂治疗的1型HRS与安慰剂或其他药物进行了分析。所有患者均接受静脉白蛋白输注。(A)特利加压素与安慰剂:使用特利加压素的HRS逆转的赔率是3.3倍,对无LT患者的存活没有差异。特利加压素与较高的SAE几率相关。(B)Nor-肾上腺素(NE)与特利加压素:HRS逆转无差异,无LT生存,和SAE。(C)特利加压素或NE与米多君和奥曲肽:用米多君和奥曲肽逆转HRS的几率降低91%。SAE没有差异(64个中的10个与58个中的10个,P=0.812)。非响应者与响应者的平均MELD得分较高(29vs27.8),P=.014和血清肌酐(3.5vs3.1),P=.027。
    特利加压素和NE在HRS逆转方面相似且优于米多君奥曲肽组合。无治疗可改善无LT患者的生存率。较低的基线血清肌酐和MELD评分对治疗的反应更好。特利加压素和NE的不良反应风险相似。需要研究作为基础,以确定对具有良好安全性的治疗反应的候选人。
    UNASSIGNED: Type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a rapid deterioration in kidney function in patients with cirrhosis. Data on efficacy of vasoconstrictors for type 1 HRS have shown mixed results.
    UNASSIGNED: Literature searched for randomized controlled trials comparing pharmacological therapy for HRS vs placebo or another drug for HRS. Primary outcome was HRS reversal (serum creatinine <1.5mg/dL on 2 readings), and secondary outcomes were liver transplant (LT) free survival and serious adverse events (SAE).
    UNASSIGNED: Sixteen studies on 1244 patients (mean age 50.3 yrs., 67.5% males, serum creatinine of 3.07 mg/dL, serum sodium 127.2 mEq/liter, and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of 30.9, and Child-Pugh score 11) with type 1 HRS treated with vasoconstrictors vs placebo or another drug were analyzed. All the patients received intravenous albumin infusion. (A) terlipressin vs placebo: Odds of HRS reversal were 3.3 folds with terlipressin without difference on LT-free patient survival. Terlipressin was associated with higher odds of SAE. (B) Nor-epinephrine (NE) vs terlipressin: No difference on HRS reversal, LT-free survival, and SAE. (C) Terlipressin or NE vs midodrine and octreotide: 91% lower odds of HRS reversal with midodrine and octreotide. There were no differences on SAE (10 of 64 vs 10 of 58, P = .812). Non-responders vs responders had higher mean MELD score (29 vs 27.8), P = .014 and serum creatinine (3.5 vs 3.1), P = .027.
    UNASSIGNED: Terlipressin and NE are similar and superior to midodrine octreotide combination for HRS reversal. No therapy improves LT-free patient survival. Response to treatment is better with lower baseline serum creatinine and MELD score. The risk of adverse effects is similar with terlipressin and NE. Studies are needed as basis to identify candidates with best response to treatment with excellent safety profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性对慢性肝衰竭(ACLF)是由于急性肝损伤导致的肝衰竭综合征,在有或没有肝硬化的慢性肝病(CLD)患者中有或没有肝外器官衰竭首次出现。该定义仍然存在争议;因此,案件的同质性和明确性是一个未满足的需求。就CLD的病因而言,存在范式转变,即使在发展中国家,代谢功能障碍相关的脂肪肝疾病(MAFLD)和乙醇也是主要原因。MAFLD是NAFLD命名法的变化,以证明这些患者组的代谢紊乱。从基于排除的标准到已经发展到需要积极标准的诊断的转变具有深远的意义。显然,它的流行程度有所不同,疾病进展,和肝脏相关事件,以及代谢危险因素和MAFLD本身的管理,这需要进一步了解。随着MAFLD的全球崛起,MAFLD-ACLF的发病率正在增加。过量饮酒会导致肝脏代谢和毒性损伤,导致脂肪肝的途径几乎相似,肝炎,和肝硬化。由于存在MAFLD特有的代谢风险因素,MAFLD作为ACLF患者的额外潜在慢性肝损伤的相互作用是复杂的。由于缺乏这些具体数据,目前尚不清楚MAFLD如何影响ACLF的临床病程。这篇叙述性评论旨在了解其独特的效果,后果,以及作为ACLF慢性肝损伤成分的MAFLD的管理。
    Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a syndrome of liver failure due to an acute hepatic insult leading to liver failure with or without extra-hepatic organ failure in a patient of chronic liver disease (CLD) with or without cirrhosis presenting for the first time. The definition is still with controversy; hence, homogeneity and clarity of the case is an unmet need. There is a paradigm shift noted as far as the etiology of CLD is concerned with rise in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and ethanol as the dominant cause even in developing countries. MAFLD is the change in nomenclature from NAFLD to justify the metabolic derangement in these group of patients. The shift from an exclusion-based criteria to one that has evolved to a diagnosis that requires positive criteria has profound significance. Clearly there is a difference in terms of its prevalence, disease progression, and liver-related events, as well as management of metabolic risk factors and MAFLD itself which requires further understanding. In tandem with the global rise in MAFLD, the incidence of MAFLD-ACLF is increasing. Excessive alcohol consumption causes metabolic and toxic injury to the liver resulting in nearly similar pathway of fatty liver, hepatitis, and cirrhosis. The interaction of MAFLD as an additional underlying chronic liver injury in ACLF patients is complex due to the presence of metabolic risk factors that are unique to MAFLD. There is lack of clarity on how MAFLD affects the clinical course of ACLF due to scarcity of this specific data. This narrative review aims to understand the unique effects, consequences, and management of MAFLD as the chronic liver injury component in ACLF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    乙型肝炎病毒相关的慢性急性肝衰竭(HBV-ACLF)是与不利的生存率相关的危急情况。最近的研究表明,血小板与单核细胞的比率(PMR)被认为是几种疾病的有效预后指标。然而,尚无研究评估PMR在HBV-ACLF患者中的预后价值。因此,本研究旨在调查这些患者PMR与28天生存率之间的关系.
    在这项回顾性研究中,数据,包括临床和实验室参数,收集了184例HBV-ACLF患者。使用终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分评估疾病严重程度。进行Logistic回归分析以确定影响28天生存率的预测因子。进行受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析以评估所识别的预测因子的预测能力。
    在28天的随访期间,56例(30.4%)HBV-ACLF患者死亡。非存活者的PMR显著低于存活者(P<0.001)。Logistic回归表明,PMR(赔率,0.983;95%置信区间,0.976-0.990;P=0.001)和MELD评分(赔率,1.317;95%置信区间,1.200-1.446;P<0.001)是HBV-ACLF患者死亡的独立危险因素。PMR的ROC曲线下面积为0.760(敏感性=0.840,特异性=0.620,P=0.001),截止值为23.1,MELD评分的ROC曲线下面积为0.819(敏感性=0.700,特异性=0.860,P=0.001)。PMR和MELD评分表现相似(Z=1.229;P=0.219)。此外,联合使用PMR和MELD评分可使ROC曲线下面积进一步增加至0.858,比单独使用任一因素更准确预测预后(均P<0.05)。
    PMR可以作为预测HBV-ACLF患者死亡率的可靠工具。此外,将PMR与MELD评分相结合可以提高预测这些患者28日死亡率的预后准确性.然而,我们需要进一步的更大规模的研究来证实我们的发现.
    UNASSIGNED: Hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF) is a critical condition associated with unfavorable survival rates. Recent studies have indicated that the platelet-to-monocyte ratio (PMR) is considered an effective prognostic marker in several diseases. However, there has been no study to evaluate the prognostic value of PMR in HBV-ACLF patients. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between PMR and 28-day survival in these patients.
    UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective study, data, including clinical and laboratory parameters, were collected for 184 HBV-ACLF patients. Disease severity was assessed using the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors influencing 28-day survival. Receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the predictive abilities of the identified predictors.
    UNASSIGNED: During the 28-day follow-up period, 56 (30.4%) HBV-ACLF patients died. PMR was significantly lower in non-survivors than in survivors (P <0.001). Logistic regression demonstrated that PMR (Odds ratio, 0.983; 95% Confidence interval, 0.976-0.990; P=0.001) and MELD score (Odds ratio, 1.317; 95% Confidence interval, 1.200-1.446; P <0.001) were independent risk factors for mortality in HBV-ACLF patients. The area under ROC curve for PMR was 0.760 (sensitivity=0.840, specificity=0.620, P=0.001) at a cut-off value of 140.6, and the area under ROC curve for MELD score was 0.819 (sensitivity=0.700, specificity=0.860, P=0.001) at a cut-off value of 23.1. PMR and MELD score exhibited similar predictive performances (Z=1.229; P=0.219). Furthermore, the combined use of PMR and MELD score further increased the area under the ROC curve to 0.858, which more accurate prognosis prediction than use of either factor alone (both P< 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: The PMR could serve as a reliable tool for predicting mortality in HBV-ACLF patients. Additionally, combining the PMR with the MELD score could improve prognostic accuracy for predicting 28-day mortality in these patients. However, further and larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性急性肝衰竭(ACLF)作为肝病学和肝移植社区的临床概念已经走了很长一段路。尽管该术语是在1995年提出的,但在2009年出现了对该实体的首次认可以及共识定义。随后,该实体引起了极大的兴趣,激发了几次共识会议,并激励国家协会组建专业的ACLF亲和力团体(例如,特殊利益集团)。世界各地已经建立了多中心联盟来研究这种情况,包括北美终末期肝病研究联盟,慢性肝功能衰竭财团,亚太肝病研究协会ACLF研究协会,慢性肝病事件和失代偿的演变和注册,还有LiverHope联盟.总的来说,这些联盟已经在数十个国家招募了成千上万患有ACLF或处于ACLF风险的患者,并详细表征了预测因素,发病机制,和ACLF患者的进展。也许最重要的是,他们已经产生了表征ACLF患者面临的额外发病率和死亡率的基本数据,为这种情况下迫切需要治疗策略提供了令人信服的理由。
    Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has come a long way as a clinical concept within the hepatology and liver transplant communities. Though the term was proposed in 1995, the first recognition of the entity along with a consensus definition emerged in 2009. Subsequently, the entity has sparked great interest, inspired several consensus conferences, and inspired national societies to form professional ACLF affinity groups (eg, special interest group). Multicenter consortia have been established all over the world to study this condition, including the North American Consortium for the Study of End-Stage Liver Disease, Chronic Liver Failure consortium, Asian Pacific Association for the Study of Liver Diseases ACLF Research Consortium, Chronic Liver disease Evolution And Registry for Events and Decompensation, and the LiverHope Consortium. Collectively, these consortia have enrolled tens of thousands of patients with or at risk for ACLF across dozens of countries and characterized in detail the predictors, pathogenesis, and progression of patients with ACLF. Perhaps most importantly, they have produced essential data characterizing the excess morbidity and mortality that patients with ACLF face, making a compelling case for the urgent need for therapeutic strategies for this condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭(HBV-ACLF)患者的早期预后评估对于指导临床管理和降低死亡率很重要。本研究的目的是动态监测HBV-ACLF患者的临床特征,从而允许构建新的预后评分模型来预测HBV-ACLF患者的预后。前瞻性收集518例HBV-ACLF患者的临床数据,并随机分为训练和验证集。我们基于动态时间点构建了第1天,第2天和第(13)天预后评分模型。发现第3天构建的预后风险评分具有最佳的预测能力。此评分系统中包含的因素,称为DSM-ACLF-D3,年龄,肝性脑病,碱性磷酸酶,总胆红素,甘油三酯,极低密度脂蛋白,血糖,中性粒细胞计数,纤维蛋白,INR。ROC分析显示,DSM-ACLF-D3预测的28天和90天死亡率的曲线下面积(分别为0.901和0.889)明显优于其他五个评分系统:COSSH-ACLFII(0.882和0.836),COSSH-ACLFs(0.863和0.832),CLIF-CACLF(0.838和0.766),MELD(0.782和0.762)和MELD-Na(0.756和0.731)。因此,动态监测临床因素的变化可以显着提高评分模型的准确性。通过DSM-ACLF-D3对概率密度函数和风险分层的评估也得出了最佳的死亡率预测值。基于动态数据的新型DSM-ACLF-D3预后评分模型可以提高预警,HBV-ACLF患者的预测和临床管理。
    Early prognostic assessment of patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF) is important for guiding clinical management and reducing mortality. The aim of this study was to dynamically monitor the clinical characteristics of HBV-ACLF patients, thereby allowing the construction of a novel prognostic scoring model to predict the outcome of HBV-ACLF patients. Clinical data was prospectively collected for 518 patients with HBV-ACLF and randomly divided into training and validation sets. We constructed day-1, day-2, and day-(1 + 3) prognostic score models based on dynamic time points. The prognostic risk score constructed for day-3 was found to have the best predictive ability. The factors included in this scoring system, referred to as DSM-ACLF-D3, were age, hepatic encephalopathy, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, triglycerides, very low-density lipoprotein, blood glucose, neutrophil count, fibrin, and INR. ROC analysis revealed the area under the curve predicted by DSM-ACLF-D3 for 28-day and 90-day mortality (0.901 and 0.889, respectively) was significantly better than those of five other scoring systems: COSSH-ACLF IIs (0.882 and 0.836), COSSH-ACLFs (0.863 and 0.832), CLIF-C ACLF (0.838 and 0.766), MELD (0.782 and 0.762) and MELD-Na (0.756 and 0.731). Dynamic monitoring of the changes in clinical factors can therefore significantly improve the accuracy of scoring models. Evaluation of the probability density function and risk stratification by DSM-ACLF-D3 also resulted in the best predictive values for mortality. The novel DSM-ACLF-D3 prognostic scoring model based on dynamic data can improve early warning, prediction and clinical management of HBV-ACLF patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患者异质性对个人管理和临床试验设计提出了重大挑战,尤其是复杂的疾病。现有的分类依赖于结果预测分数,可能忽略导致异质性的关键因素,而不一定影响预后。
    方法:为了解决患者异质性,我们开发了ClustALL,同时面临各种临床数据挑战的计算管道,如混合类型,缺少值,和共线性。ClustALL能够无监督地识别患者分层,同时过滤针对群体中的微小变化(基于群体)和算法参数中的有限调整(基于参数)具有鲁棒性的分层。
    结果:应用于急性失代偿期肝硬化患者的欧洲队列(n=766),ClustALL确定了五个稳健的分层,仅使用入院时的数据。所有分层包括肝功能受损的标志物和器官功能障碍或衰竭的数量。其中大多数包括突发性事件。当关注这些分层之一时,患者被分为三组,以典型的临床特征为特征;值得注意的是,3组分层显示了预后价值.在随访期间重新评估患者分层,描绘患者的结果,进一步改善了分层的预后价值。我们在来自拉丁美洲(n=580)的独立前瞻性多中心队列中验证了这些发现。
    结论:通过将ClustALL应用于急性失代偿期肝硬化患者,我们确定了三个患者群.随着时间的推移,这些集群提供了可以指导未来临床试验设计的见解。ClustALL是一种新颖而强大的分层方法,能够解决大多数复杂疾病中患者分层的多重挑战。
    BACKGROUND: Patient heterogeneity poses significant challenges for managing individuals and designing clinical trials, especially in complex diseases. Existing classifications rely on outcome-predicting scores, potentially overlooking crucial elements contributing to heterogeneity without necessarily impacting prognosis.
    METHODS: To address patient heterogeneity, we developed ClustALL, a computational pipeline that simultaneously faces diverse clinical data challenges like mixed types, missing values, and collinearity. ClustALL enables the unsupervised identification of patient stratifications while filtering for stratifications that are robust against minor variations in the population (population-based) and against limited adjustments in the algorithm\'s parameters (parameter-based).
    RESULTS: Applied to a European cohort of patients with acutely decompensated cirrhosis (n = 766), ClustALL identified five robust stratifications, using only data at hospital admission. All stratifications included markers of impaired liver function and number of organ dysfunction or failure, and most included precipitating events. When focusing on one of these stratifications, patients were categorized into three clusters characterized by typical clinical features; notably, the 3-cluster stratification showed a prognostic value. Re-assessment of patient stratification during follow-up delineated patients\' outcomes, with further improvement of the prognostic value of the stratification. We validated these findings in an independent prospective multicentre cohort of patients from Latin America (n = 580).
    CONCLUSIONS: By applying ClustALL to patients with acutely decompensated cirrhosis, we identified three patient clusters. Following these clusters over time offers insights that could guide future clinical trial design. ClustALL is a novel and robust stratification method capable of addressing the multiple challenges of patient stratification in most complex diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虚弱和肌肉减少是公认的与肝硬化患者预后较差相关的因素,包括肝移植(LT)候选人。LT前功能和肌肉退化的含义也影响LT后的结果。肝硬化和慢性急性肝衰竭(ACLF)的患者生存率较低,在LT之前和之后。有必要更好地识别那些将受益于LT的ACLF患者。这篇综述旨在提供有关LT设置中ACLF患者的虚弱和肌肉减少症的可用数据。对已发表的文献进行了详尽的回顾。关于患有ACLF的LT候选患者的虚弱和肌少症的数据很少且异质。这篇综述还介绍了评估肝脏文献以外的危重患者虚弱和肌肉减少症的研究,以丰富该领域的知识。在患有ACLF的LT候选人中,虚弱和肌少症似乎会导致更差的结果,在LT之前和之后。对于那些重病患者,评估肌肉减少症可能是最谨慎的方法。建议通过计算机断层扫描评估骨骼肌指数来评估肌肉减少症。肌肉超声和生物电阻抗分析的作用有待确定。衰弱和肌肉减少症是至关重要的因素考虑在LT候选人与ACLF最好的改善患者的结果。
    Frailty and sarcopenia are well-recognized factors related to worse outcomes in patients with cirrhosis, including liver transplant (LT) candidates. Implications of pre-LT functional and muscle deterioration also affect post-LT outcomes. Patients with cirrhosis and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) have a lower survival rate, both before and after LT. There is a need to better identify those patients with ACLF who would benefit from LT. This review aims to present the available data about frailty and sarcopenia in patients with ACLF in the LT setting. An exhaustive review of the published literature was conducted. Data regarding frailty and sarcopenia in LT candidates with ACLF are scarce and heterogeneous. Studies evaluating frailty and sarcopenia in critically ill patients outside the liver literature are also presented in this review to enrich the knowledge of this field in expansion. Frailty and sarcopenia seem to contribute to worse outcomes in LT candidates with ACLF, both before and after LT. Sarcopenia evaluation may be the most prudent approach for those very sick patients. Skeletal muscle index assessed by computed tomography is recommended to evaluate sarcopenia. The role of muscle ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis is to be determined. Frailty and sarcopenia are crucial factors to consider on a case-by-case basis in LT candidates with ACLF to improve patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性急性肝衰竭(ACLF)的逐渐临床恶化导致28天死亡率高。有几种预测ACLF早期死亡率的预测评分。血清磷酸盐,它是三磷酸腺苷(ATP)合成的主要成分,用于肝脏合成功能,导致血清磷酸盐水平低于正常或降低。因此,高于正常水平的血清磷酸盐可以用作肝细胞储备减少的标志物。因此,我们旨在将血清磷酸盐水平与可用的预后评分进行比较,以评估ACLF患者的死亡率.
    根据亚太肝脏研究协会(APASL)定义,研究了100名连续的ACLF患者。基线血液检查和病毒生物标志物的测定,血清磷酸盐,并对第1、3和7天的乳酸水平进行了前瞻性随访,将基线血清磷酸盐水平与常规评分进行比较,以预测28天死亡率.
    CLIF-SOFA(准确率76-91%),其次是CLIF-C评分(准确率73-84%)和AARC评分(准确率70-85%),与CTP相比具有统计学上的最高准确率,MELD,和MELD-Na在所有的三天。所有三天的血清磷酸盐值(准确率69-86%)均不优于CLIF-SOFA评分,但优于第3天和第7天的所有其他预后评分。
    第3天的高血清磷酸盐水平超过6.4mg/dl,其筛查短期死亡率的准确性与CLIF-SOFA几乎相当。因此,血清磷酸盐测量可用作简单的床边实验室研究,以预测ACLF患者的死亡率和低资源环境中的早期干预措施。
    UNASSIGNED: The gradual clinical worsening of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) leads to a high 28-day mortality rate. There are several prognostication scores for predicting early mortality in ACLF. Serum phosphate, which is the main component of adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP) synthesis, is utilized for liver synthetic functions, leading to subnormal or decreased serum phosphate levels. Hence more than normal levels of serum phosphate can be used as a marker of decreased liver cell reserve. Hence, we aimed to compare serum phosphate levels with available prognostic scores to assess mortality among ACLF patients.
    UNASSIGNED: 100 consecutive ACLF patients according to the Asia Pacific Association for Study of the Liver (APASL) definition were studied. The baseline blood workups and determination of viral bio-markers, serum phosphate, and lactate levels on days 1, 3, and 7 were carried out and prospectively followed up, and the baseline serum phosphate levels were compared with the usual scores to predict the 28-day mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: CLIF-SOFA (accuracy 76-91%) followed by CLIF-C score (accuracy 73-84%) and AARC score (accuracy 70-85%) had the statistically significantly highest accuracy as compared with CTP, MELD, and MELD-Na on all three days. Serum phosphate values (accuracy 69-86%) on all three days were not better than the CLIF-SOFA score but better than all other prognostic scores on days 3 and 7.
    UNASSIGNED: The high serum phosphate levels on day 3 with a value of more than 6.4 mg/dl showed almost comparable accuracy with CLIF-SOFA for screening short-term mortality. Hence serum phosphate measurement can be used as a simple bedside laboratory investigation to predict mortality in ACLF patients and early interventions in low-resource settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号