ABO Blood-Group System

ABO 血型系统
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定Najran省不同供体群体的输血传播性感染(TTI)的患病率。此外,建立TTI的发育与捐献者血型之间的潜在关联,由ABO/Rh血型系统确定。
    方法:4120名献血者的献血数据,从2020年1月到12月,进行了回顾性审查。对血液进行TTI标记物筛查,包括乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg),抗乙型肝炎核心(抗HBc),抗丙型肝炎病毒(抗HCV),抗人类免疫缺陷病毒1和2(抗HIV1和2),抗人嗜T淋巴细胞病毒1型和2型(抗HTLV-1和2),和梅毒抗原.
    结果:在10.9%的供体中检测到阳性TTI标记。检测最多的TTI标记是抗HBc(8.9%),其次是HBsAg(0.7%)。在<1%的供体中单独检测到其他标志物。抗HBc阳性在非沙特献血者中显著升高。年龄组与抗HCV之间存在关联(p=0.002),抗HTLV(p=0.004)和梅毒抗原(p=0.02)标志物阳性。AB阳性血型对TTI标志物表现出最大的阳性,其次是O阳性血型。同样,ABO组和HBsAg之间发现关联(p=0.01),抗HBc(p=0.001),和抗-HCV(p<0.001)标志物阳性。
    结论:本研究强调对捐献血液实施强有力的筛查措施。需要未来的研究来广泛评估TTI状态,以增强我们对TTI趋势的理解。
    OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the prevalence of transfusion transmissible infections (TTIs) across diverse donor groups in the Najran province. Additionally, to establish a potential association between the development of TTI and the donors\' blood group, as determined by the ABO/Rh blood grouping system.
    METHODS: Blood donation data of 4120 donors, spanning from January to December 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. The blood were screened for TTI markers, including hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-hepatitis B core (anti-HBc), anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV), anti-human immunodeficiency viruses 1 and 2 (anti-HIV1&2), anti-human T-lymphotropic virus types 1 and 2 (anti-HTLV-1&2), and syphilis antigen.
    RESULTS: Positive TTI markers were detected in 10.9% of the donors. The most detected TTI marker was anti-HBc (8.9%), followed by HBsAg (0.7%). Other markers were individually detected in <1% of the donors. Anti-HBc-positive was significantly elevated among non-Saudi blood donors. There was an association between age groups and anti-HCV (p=0.002), anti-HTLV (p=0.004) and syphilis antigen (p=0.02) markers positivity. The AB positive blood group exhibited the most positivity for TTI markers, followed by O positive blood group. Similarly, association was found between ABO group and HBsAg (p=0.01), anti-HBc (p=0.001), and anti-HCV (p<0.001) markers positivity.
    CONCLUSIONS: Emphasis on implementing robust screening measures for donated blood is underscored by this study. There is the need for future study to extensively evaluate TTI status to enhance our understanding of the trend in TTI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项荟萃分析评估了ABO血型与中心静脉导管相关性血栓形成(CRT)的相关性。
    方法:数据来自2015年1月至2021年12月四川省肿瘤医院的8477例患者,以及以前在中英文数据库中发表的文章。我们医院的数据是通过查看电子病历收集的。搜索数据库包括CNKI,VIP,万芳,中国生物医学,PubMed,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,EMBASE,CINAHL,和OVID(截至2023年7月)。所有统计分析均使用SPSS22.0和Revman5.3进行。Bonferroni方法用于调整α检验水平,以降低多重比较中I错误的风险。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。使用两个独立样本T检验分析连续变量。卡方检验用于分析分类数据。
    结果:在搜索中确定了总共818项研究。然而,只有4项研究符合纳入标准.结合我们医院的数据,纳入5项研究,共18407例.这些研究仅集中于外周插入中心静脉导管(PICC)。根据我们医院的数据,Logistic回归显示骨髓抑制[比值比(OR),1.473;P=0.005)和放疗(OR,1.524;P<0.001)是症状性PICC-VTE的独立危险因素。A型血(或,1.404;P=0.008),B(或,1.393;P=0.016),和AB(或,1.861;P<0.001)与有症状的PICC-VTE的风险明显高于O型血。血液肿瘤的PICC-VTE的风险明显高于乳腺癌(OR,0.149;P<0.001),和妇科肿瘤(OR,0.386;P=0.002)。在ABO血型与PICC相关性血栓的meta分析中,I2统计量在任何成对比较中都不显著,固定效应模型随后用于所有分析.荟萃分析表明,O型血个体的症状性PICC相关血栓发生率(3.30%)明显低于A型血个体(4.92%),B(5.20%),或AB型(6.58%)血型(均P<0.0083)。然而,在A之间的成对比较中,B,AB,差异无统计学意义(P>0.0083).
    结论:根据我们单中心分析的结果,我们发现骨髓抑制,放射治疗,血液肿瘤,非O型血是症状性PICC相关血栓形成的独立危险因素。在进一步探讨ABO血型与PICC相关血栓形成的Meta分析中,我们发现ABO血型可能影响PICC相关血栓形成,O型血个体发生PICC相关血栓的风险低于非O型血个体。
    BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis evaluated the association of ABO blood type on central venous catheter-related thrombosis (CRT).
    METHODS: Data were derived from 8477 patients at Sichuan Cancer Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021 and articles previously published in Chinese and English databases. Data from our hospital were collected by reviewing electronic medical records. Searched databases included CNKI, VIP, Wan Fang, China Biomedical, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, and OVID (up to July 2023). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 and Revman 5.3. The Bonferroni method was used to adjust the α test level for reducing the risk of I errors in the multiple comparisons. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Continuous variables were analyzed using a two-independent sample T test. The chi-squared test was used to analyze categorical data.
    RESULTS: A total of 818 studies were identified in the search. However, only four studies met the inclusion criteria. Combined with data from our hospital, five studies were included with a total of 18407 cases. Those studies only focused on peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). According to the data from our hospital, logistic regression revealed that myelosuppression [odds ratio (OR), 1.473; P = 0.005) and radiotherapy(OR, 1.524; P<0.001) were independent risk factors for symptomatic PICC- VTE. Blood types A (OR, 1.404; P = 0.008), B (OR, 1.393; P = 0.016), and AB (OR, 1.861; P<0.001) were associated with a significantly higher risk of symptomatic PICC-VTE than blood type O. And the hematologic tumor has a significantly higher risk of PICC-VTE than breast cancer (OR, 0.149; P < 0.001), and gynecological tumor (OR, 0.386; P = 0.002). In the meta-analysis of the association between ABO blood type and PICC related thrombosis, the I2 statistic was not significant in any of the pairwise comparisons, and a fixed-effects model was subsequently used for all analyses. The meta-analysis indicated that the incidence of symptomatic PICC related thrombosis was significantly lower in individuals with the O blood type (3.30%) than in those with the A (4.92%), B (5.20%), or AB (6.58%) blood types (all P < 0.0083). However, in the pairwise comparisons among A, B, and AB, the differences were nonsignificant (P > 0.0083).
    CONCLUSIONS: According to the results from our single center analysis, we found that myelosuppression, radiotherapy, hematologic tumor, and non-O blood type were independent risk factors for symptomatic PICC related thrombosis. In the meta-analysis of further exploration of ABO blood type and PICC related thrombosis, we found that ABO blood type may influence PICC related thrombosis, and individuals with the O blood type had a lower risk of PICC related thrombosis than those with non-O blood type.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨A3表型个体的血清学特征和分子机制。
    方法:选择2022年5月12日在中国医科大学附属第四医院就诊的27岁汉族女性作为研究对象。用标准血清学技术确定ABO血型。对ABO基因进行PCR产物的直接测序。使用特异性引物对ABO基因的外显子6和7进行测序以确定单倍型。采用生物信息学软件对突变蛋白进行结构分析。
    结果:ABO血型的血清学分型提示一种罕见的A3表型。先证者被发现具有杂合c.261delG,通过直接测序c.467C>T和c.745C>T变体。单链测序显示,她拥有ABO*A3.07和ABO*O.01.01等位基因。ABO*A3.07等位基因含有c.745C>T(p。R249W)在ABO*A1.02等位基因背景下的变体。通过PolyPhen2软件预测p.R249W取代可能是有害的。自由能变化(ΔΔG)值预测它对GTA蛋白具有去稳定作用。同时,3D结构的建模预测p.R249W氨基酸取代可能会改变GTA蛋白的氢键网络。
    结论:α-1,3-N-乙酰氨基半乳糖转移酶基因的p.R249W取代可能会降低GTA蛋白结构和功能的抗原表达。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the serological characteristics and molecular mechanism underlying an individual with A3 phenotype.
    METHODS: A 27-year-old ethnic Han Chinese woman presented at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University on May 12, 2022 was selected as the study subject. ABO blood type was determined with standard serological techniques. The ABO gene was subjected to direct sequencing of PCR products. Exons 6 and 7 of the ABO gene were sequenced using specific primers to determine the haplotypes. Bioinformatic software was used to analyze the structure of the mutant protein.
    RESULTS: Serological typing of the ABO blood group has suggested a rare A3 phenotype. The proband was found to harbor heterozygous c.261delG, c.467C>T and c.745C>T variants by direct sequencing. Single strand sequencing revealed that she has harbored ABO*A3.07 and ABO*O.01.01 alleles. The ABO*A3.07 allele has contained a c.745C>T (p.R249W) variant on the background of an ABO*A1.02 allele. The p.R249W substitution was predicted to be probably damaging by the PolyPhen2 software. The free energy change (ΔΔG) value predicted it to have a destabilizing effect on the GTA protein. Meanwhile, modeling of the 3D structure has predicted that the p.R249W amino acid substitution may alter the hydrogen bond network of the GTA protein.
    CONCLUSIONS: The p.R249W substitution of the α-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase gene may reduce the antigen expression owing to a great destabilizing effect on the structure and function of the GTA protein.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨一个Bw亚型中国家系的血清学特征和遗传变异。
    方法:选择一名32岁女性先证者,于2020年12月10日在解放军联勤保障部队第960医院进行了产前检查,并从其谱系中选取5名成员作为研究对象。收集外周血样本,用血清学方法进行ABO血型表型鉴定,用荧光PCR进行ABO血型基因分型。通过对先证者中ABO基因的整个编码区进行直接测序并对外显子1-7进行克隆测序来进行遗传测试和单倍型分析。
    结果:先证者的血型血清学显示Bw,通过荧光PCR确定她的ABO血型基因型为B/O。直接测序结果表明,先证者与ABO*O.01.01/ABO*B.01基因型匹配,并携带c.1A>G变体。克隆测序已经证实c.1A>G变体已经发生在ABO*B.01等位基因中。家庭分析显示先证者的母亲是O型血,她丈夫有B表型,她的三个孩子都是正常的B型血.DNA测序显示先证者的两个儿子的基因型为ABO*B.01和c.1A>G/ABO*B.01。先证者的女儿是ABO*O.01.01/ABO*B.01,而她的母亲是ABO*O.01.01/ABO*O.01.02。新的c.1A>G变体序列已在数据库中注册,编号为MZ076785,1。
    结论:α-1,3半乳糖转氨酶基因外显子1的新c.1A>G变体可能是该家系中B抗原表达降低的基础。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the serological characteristics and genetic variant in a Chinese pedigree with Bw subtype.
    METHODS: A 32-year-old female proband who had undergone prenatal examination on December 10, 2020 at the 960th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force and five members from her pedigree were selected as the study subjects. Peripheral blood samples were collected and subjected to ABO blood group phenotyping with serological methods and ABO blood group genotyping with fluorescent PCR. Genetic testing and haplotype analysis were carried out by direct sequencing of the entire coding region of the ABO gene in the proband and cloned sequencing of exons 1-7.
    RESULTS: The blood type serology of the proband showed Bw, and her ABO blood type genotype determined by fluorescence PCR was B/O. The direct sequencing results showed that the proband had matched the ABO*O.01.01/ABO*B.01 genotype and carried a c.1A>G variant. Cloned sequencing has confirmed the c.1A>G variant to have occurred in the ABO*B.01 allele. Family analysis revealed that the mother of the proband had an O blood type, her husband had a B phenotype, and her three children had a normal B blood type. DNA sequencing showed that the two sons of the proband had a genotype of ABO*B.01 and c.1A>G/ABO*B.01. The daughter of the proband was ABO*O.01.01/ABO*B.01, whilst her mother was ABO*O.01.01/ABO *O.01.02. The novel c.1A>G variant sequence has been registered with the database with a number MZ076785 1.
    CONCLUSIONS: The novel c.1A>G variant of exon 1 of α- 1,3 galactose aminotransferase gene probably underlay the reduced expression of B antigen in this pedigree.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有致敏和O型血的患者等待死亡供体肾移植(DDKT)的时间增加。虽然需要分配收益来解决DDKT机会中的不平等,DDKT在这一弱势群体中是否具有可比较的结局还需要进一步研究.这项研究评估了这些结果,并开发了一种平衡股权和效用的新分配系统。
    来自韩国两个中心的国家和医院队列的患者分为B1至B4(根据面板反应性抗体[PRA]阳性和ABO血型)和A1至A4(基于最大PRA%和血型),分别。进行竞争风险和Cox回归分析,以评估PRA和血型对移植物衰竭和死亡率的影响。分别。基于DDKT的机会和移植后的结果,我们开发了一种新的肾脏分配评分系统.
    国家和医院队列包括3,311和819名患者,分别,谁接受了DDKT。尽管DDKT机会存在差异,不同PRA和血型组的移植物失败率和死亡率无差异.此外,根据不同DDKT时机的类别,移植后结局没有差异.根据DDKT的危险比,开发了一种新的评分系统,为弱势群体提供额外的分数。
    基于PRA和ABO血型的新分配方法为DDKT机会较少的弱势患者提供了好处,并且可以在不牺牲韩国效用的情况下提高公平性。DDKT的等待时间很长。
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with sensitization and blood type O experience increased waiting times for deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). While allocation benefits are needed to resolve inequity in DDKT opportunity, whether DDKT has comparable outcomes in this disadvantaged population requires further study. This study assessed these outcomes and developed a new allocation system that balances equity and utility.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients from national and hospital cohorts from two centers in Korea were categorized as B1 to B4 (according to panel reactive antibody [PRA] positivity and ABO blood type) and A1 to A4 (based on the maximal PRA% and blood type), respectively. Competing risk and Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the effects of PRA and blood type on graft failure and mortality, respectively. Based on DDKT opportunities and posttransplant outcomes, a new scoring system for kidney allocation was developed.
    UNASSIGNED: The national and hospital cohorts included 3,311 and 819 patients, respectively, who underwent DDKT. Despite the disparities in DDKT opportunities, the graft failure rates and mortality did not differ among the different PRA and blood type groups. Furthermore, posttransplantation outcomes did not differ according to the categories with different DDKT opportunities. A new scoring system to provide additional points to disadvantaged populations was developed based on the hazard ratios for DDKT.
    UNASSIGNED: A new allocation approach based on PRA and ABO blood types offers benefits to disadvantaged patients with fewer DDKT opportunities and could enhance equity without sacrificing utility in Korea, which has a long waiting time for DDKT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the distribution characteristics of Rh phenotype in pregnant and postpartum women in Chongqing area, and to explore the clinical significance of Rh phenotype in pregnant and postpartum women and the feasibility of Rh phenotype compatible blood transfusion.
    METHODS: The ABO blood group and Rh phenotype of 65 161 pregnant and postpartum women were detected by microcolumn gel method, and 48 122 males in the same period were taken as controls. The data were analyzed by Chi-square test.
    RESULTS: There were 112 870 cases (99.64%) of RhD+ in 113 283 samples. In RhD+ cases, CCDee (48.39%) and CcDEe (32.88%) were the main phenotypes. The first case of D-- phenotype in Chongqing area was detected. 413 cases (0.36%) of RhD- were detected, with ccdee (52.78%) and Ccdee (33.41%) as the main phenotypes. Compared with RhD- group, RhD+ group showed statistically significant difference in Rh phenotype distribution (P < 0.01). Among 65 161 maternal samples, the positive rate of 5 antigens of Rh blood group from high to low was D > e > C > c > E, and there was no significant difference compared with male samples (P >0.05). There was no significant difference in the distribution of Rh phenotype between males and pregnant/postpartum women, as well as between pregnant/postpartum women with different ABO blood groups (P >0.05). In pregnant and postpartum women, there was no significant difference in distribution of Rh phenotype among the normal pregnancy population, the population with adverse pregnancy history, the population using human assisted reproductive technology (ART) and the population with infertility (P >0.05). There was no significant difference in the distribution of Rh phenotype between the 4 populations mentioned above and the inpatients in the local general Grade A hospitals and the blood donors (P >0.05). In RhD positive pregnant and postpartum women, the probability of finding compatible blood for CcDEe phenotype was 100%, the probability of finding compatible blood for CCDee, CcDee and CCDEe phenotypes was 45%-60%, the probability of finding compatible blood for ccDEE, ccDEe and CcDEE phenotypes was 5%-10%, and the probability of finding compatible blood for other phenotypes was lower than 0.5%. The supply of blood with CCDee and ccDEE phenotypes can meet the compatible transfusions requirements of 7 Rh phenotypes in more than 99% of patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Rh phenotype detection should be carried out for pregnant and postpartum women, and it is feasible to carry out Rh phenotype-matched or compatible blood transfusion for pregnant and postpartum women who need blood transfusion.
    UNASSIGNED: 孕产妇Rh表型分布特征及相容性输血的可行性探讨.
    UNASSIGNED: 分析重庆地区孕产妇Rh表型分布特征,探讨Rh表型在孕产妇中的临床意义及实行Rh表型相容性输血的可行性。.
    UNASSIGNED: 采用微柱凝胶法对65 161例孕产妇进行ABO血型和Rh表型检测,以同期48 122例男性为对照,通过χ2检验对数据进行比较分析。.
    UNASSIGNED: 113 283例样本中,RhD+ 112 870例(99.64%),以CCDee(48.39%)和CcDEe(32.88%)为主要表型,并检出重庆地区首例Rh缺失型D--表型;RhD-413例(0.36%),以ccdee(52.78%)和Ccdee(33.41%)为主要表型;RhD+组与RhD-组的Rh表型分布差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。在65 161例孕产妇中,Rh 5种抗原的阳性率由高到低为D>e>C>c>E,与男性相比差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);孕产妇Rh表型分布与男性相比差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);不同ABO血型的孕产妇间Rh表型分布差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。在孕产妇中,正常妊娠人群、有不良流产史人群、采用人类辅助生殖技术人群和不孕症患者人群间Rh表型分布无明显差异(P >0.05), 4个孕产妇人群与本地区综合性三甲医院住院患者和献血者相比,Rh表型分布差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。RhD阳性孕产妇中,CcDEe表型找到相容性血液的概率为100%,CCDee、CcDee和CCDEe表型找到相容血液的概率为45%-60%,ccDEE、ccDEe、CcDEE表型找到相容血液的概率为5%-10%,其余表型的相容概率均低于0.5%;提供CCDee和ccDEE两个表型的血液即可满足99%以上患者7种Rh表型相容性输血需求。.
    UNASSIGNED: 应对孕产妇进行Rh表型检测,对需要输血的孕产妇推行Rh表型相同或相容性输血是切实可行的输血举措。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    短期暴露于空气污染物可能会增加急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的风险。这项研究评估了短期暴露于细颗粒物(PM2.5)以及细PM和粗PM(PM10)空气污染在ACS事件中的作用以及血型对这一现象的影响。对9026例患者的回顾性数据库进行了评估。研究设计是使用条件逻辑回归模型的案例交叉。主要分析集中在PM2.5水平上,直到ACS事件发生后1天,对所有患者使用阈值模型预测因子。二次分析使用2-7天移动平均值和来自特定ABO血型的患者的单独阈值模型预测因子。用非阈值模型和PM10水平进行了额外的分析。在1天的滞后时间内短期暴露于PM2.5和PM10水平升高与所有患者的ACS风险升高相关(PM2.5:OR=1.012每+10µg/m3,95%CI1.003,1.021;PM10:OR=1.014每+10µg/m3,CI1.002,1.025)。分析表明,暴露于PM2.5与A滞后1天的ACS风险增加有关,B或AB组(OR=1.012每+10µg/m3,CI1.001,1.024),而不是O组(OR=1.011每+10µg/m3,CI0.994,1.029)。其他分析显示,PM10暴露与ACS风险呈正相关,根据血型分层的7天移动平均模型显示,对于O组患者,PM2.5和PM10暴露与ACS风险升高相关。短期PM2.5和PM10暴露与ACS风险升高相关。短期暴露于PM2.5与A患者的ACS风险呈正相关,B,或AB血型持续1天,而O组的风险延迟至7天。
    Short-term exposure to air pollutants may contribute to an increased risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study assessed the role of short-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) as well as fine and coarse PM (PM10) air pollution in ACS events and the effect of blood groups on this phenomenon. A retrospectively collected database of 9026 patients was evaluated. The study design was a case-crossover using a conditional logistic regression model. The main analysis focused on PM2.5 levels with a 1 day lag until the ACS event, using threshold-modelled predictor for all patients. Secondary analyses utilized separate threshold-modelled predictors for 2-7-days moving averages and for patients from specific ABO blood groups. Additional analysis was performed with the non-threshold models and for PM10 levels. Short-term exposure to increased PM2.5 and PM10 levels at a 1-day lag was associated with elevated risks of ACS (PM2.5: OR = 1.012 per + 10 µg/m3, 95% CI 1.003, 1.021; PM10: OR = 1.014 per + 10 µg/m3, CI 1.002, 1.025) for all patients. Analysis showed that exposure to PM2.5 was associated with increased risk of ACS at a 1-day lag for the A, B or AB group (OR = 1.012 per + 10 µg/m3, CI 1.001, 1.024), but not O group (OR = 1.011 per + 10 µg/m3, CI 0.994, 1.029). Additional analysis showed positive associations between exposure to PM10 and risk of ACS, with 7-days moving average models stratified by blood group revealing that exposures to PM2.5 and PM10 were associated with elevated risk of ACS for patients with group O. Short-term exposures to PM2.5 and PM10 were associated with elevated risk of ACS. Short-term exposure to PM2.5 was positively associated with the risk of ACS for patients with A, B, or AB blood groups for a 1-day lag, while risk in O group was delayed to 7 days.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:ABO血型系统在临床上与心血管疾病的发病率增加有关。有关恒河猴(Rh)因子和这些结果的初步数据也已发表。我们的目的是分析血型对颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后短期和长期结局的影响。
    方法:从2012年至2019年,前瞻性随访转诊中心因动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉狭窄而接受CEA的患者。我们的主要结果是长期主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和全因死亡率。次要结果是非心脏手术(MINS)后的围手术期并发症和心肌损伤。中位随访时间为50个月(四分位距21-69)。使用时间至事件分析来确定ABO和Rh组在长期结局中的效果。
    结果:包括184例患者,平均年龄70.1±9.1岁。18例(25.7%)O型患者和48例(42.1%)非O型患者出现冠状动脉疾病(比值比[OR]:2.3135-95%置信区间[CI]1.245-4.297,P=0.008)。Rh+患者表现出更明显的充血性心力衰竭,23(14,7%),P=0.03。非O患者的长期MACE发生率较高(调整后的危险比:2.034;CI:1.032-4.010,P=0.040)。Rh患者,围手术期MINS的发生率较高。然而,与MACE的长期风险无统计学显著关联.
    结论:长期分析中MACE的发生率在非O型血患者中更高,30天MINS在Rh患者中更常见。应该对这些患者进行更完整的术前心脏研究。
    UNASSIGNED: ABO blood group system has been clinically related to an increased incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Preliminary data relating Rhesus (Rh) factor and these outcomes also have been published. Our aim was to analyse the impact of blood group on the short and long-term outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
    UNASSIGNED: From 2012 to 2019, patients from a referral centre who underwent CEA for atherosclerotic carotid stenosis were prospectively followed. Our primary outcomes were long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were perioperative complications and myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS). Median follow-up was 50 months (interquartile range 21-69). Time-to-event analysis was used to determine the effect of ABO and Rh groups in long-term outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: One hundred and eighty-four patients were included, with a mean age of 70.1 ± 9.1 years. Eighteen (25.7%) patients with O type and 48 (42.1%) patients with non-O type presented coronary artery disease (odds ratio [OR]: 2.313, 5-95% confidence interval (CI) 1.245-4.297, p = .008). Patients Rh+ presented significantly more congestive heart failure, 23 (14.7%), p = .03. The incidence of MACE in the long-term was higher in non-O patients (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.034; CI: 1.032-4.010, p = .040). Rh- patients, presented a higher incidence of perioperative MINS. However, there was no statistically significant association with long-term risk of MACE.
    UNASSIGNED: The incidence of MACE in long-term analysis was higher in non-O blood type and 30-day MINS was significantly more common amongst Rh- patients. The benefit from a more complete preoperative cardiac study in these patients should be performed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血型是冠状动脉疾病的潜在遗传因素。然而,不同ABO血型与非心脏手术(MINS)后心肌损伤之间的关系尚不清楚.这项研究验证了ABO血型是否是潜在的MINS影响因素。这项回顾性队列研究包括1201名患者,他们在2019年至2020年在大学附属三级医院接受了选择性非心脏手术和术后第1天和第2天的强制性肌钙蛋白测试。主要结果是ABO血型和MINS之间的关联,使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析进行评估。路径分析用于研究血型与MINS之间的直接和间接影响。血型B型患者的MINS发生率(102/1201,8.5%)高于非B型患者[血型B型:44/400(11.0%)与非B:58/801(7.2%);调整后的比值比=1.57(1.03-2.38);p=0.036]。在混杂因素模型中,术前高血压和冠状动脉疾病病史与MINS风险相关[调整比值比:2.00(1.30-3.06),p=0.002;2.81(1.71-4.61),p分别<0.001]。路径分析没有发现高血压的任何中介作用,糖尿病,或血型和MINS之间的冠状动脉疾病。因此,B型血与较高的MINS风险相关;需要研究这种关联的潜在介质.
    Blood group is a potential genetic element in coronary artery disease. Nevertheless, the relationship between different ABO blood groups and myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) is poorly understood. This study verified whether ABO blood group is a potential MINS influencing factor. This retrospective cohort study included 1201 patients who underwent elective non-cardiac surgery and a mandatory troponin test on postoperative days 1 and 2 from 2019 to 2020 at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital. The primary outcome was associations between ABO blood groups and MINS, assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic-regression analyses. Path analysis was used to investigate direct and indirect effects between blood group and MINS. MINS incidence (102/1201, 8.5%) was higher in blood-type B patients than in non-B patients [blood-type B: 44/400 (11.0%) vs. non-B: 58/801 (7.2%); adjusted odds ratio = 1.57 (1.03-2.38); p = 0.036]. In the confounding factor model, preoperative hypertension and coronary artery disease medical history were associated with MINS risk [adjusted odds ratio: 2.00 (1.30-3.06), p = 0.002; 2.81 (1.71-4.61), p < 0.001, respectively]. Path analysis did not uncover any mediating role for hypertension, diabetes, or coronary artery disease between blood type and MINS. Therefore, blood-type B is associated with higher MINS risk; potential mediators of this association need to be investigated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性下消化道出血(ALGIB)的血型与再出血之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨O型血与ALGIB患者临床结局之间的关系。该研究纳入了2336例ALGIB患者,这些患者在初次内窥镜检查中发现了出血源(来自CODEBLUE-J研究)。评估结果包括再出血和其他临床参数。O型血和非O型血患者30天内再出血率分别为17.9%和14.9%,分别。同样,血型为O的患者1年内的比率为21.9%,非血型为O的患者为18.2%。在使用年龄的多变量分析中,性别,演示时的生命体征,验血结果,合并症,抗血栓药物,活动性出血,和内镜治疗的类型为协变量,O型血患者在30天内(比值比[OR]1.31;95%置信区间[CI]1.04-1.65;P=0.024)和1年内(OR1.29;95%CI1.04-1.61;P=0.020)表现出明显较高的再出血风险。O血型和非O血型患者的血栓形成和死亡率无显著差异.在ALGIB患者中,O型血已被确定为短期和长期再出血的独立危险因素.
    The relationship between blood group and rebleeding in acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between blood group O and clinical outcomes in patients with ALGIB. The study included 2336 patients with ALGIB whose bleeding source was identified during initial endoscopy (from the CODE BLUE-J Study). The assessed outcomes encompassed rebleeding and other clinical parameters. The rebleeding rates within 30 days in patients with blood group O and those without blood group O were 17.9% and 14.9%, respectively. Similarly, the rates within 1 year were 21.9% for patients with blood group O and 18.2% for those without blood group O. In a multivariate analysis using age, sex, vital signs at presentation, blood test findings, comorbidities, antithrombotic medication, active bleeding, and type of endoscopic treatment as covariates, patients with blood group O exhibited significantly higher risks for rebleeding within 30 days (odds ratio [OR] 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.65; P = 0.024) and 1 year (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.04-1.61; P = 0.020) compared to those without blood group O. However, the thrombosis and mortality rates did not differ significantly between blood group O and non-O patients. In patients with ALGIB, blood group O has been identified as an independent risk factor for both short- and long-term rebleeding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号