背景:这项荟萃分析评估了ABO血型与中心静脉导管相关性血栓形成(CRT)的相关性。
方法:数据来自2015年1月至2021年12月四川省肿瘤医院的8477例患者,以及以前在中英文数据库中发表的文章。我们医院的数据是通过查看电子病历收集的。搜索数据库包括CNKI,VIP,万芳,中国生物医学,PubMed,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,EMBASE,CINAHL,和OVID(截至2023年7月)。所有统计分析均使用SPSS22.0和Revman5.3进行。Bonferroni方法用于调整α检验水平,以降低多重比较中I错误的风险。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。使用两个独立样本T检验分析连续变量。卡方检验用于分析分类数据。
结果:在搜索中确定了总共818项研究。然而,只有4项研究符合纳入标准.结合我们医院的数据,纳入5项研究,共18407例.这些研究仅集中于外周插入中心静脉导管(PICC)。根据我们医院的数据,Logistic回归显示骨髓抑制[比值比(OR),1.473;P=0.005)和放疗(OR,1.524;P<0.001)是症状性PICC-VTE的独立危险因素。A型血(或,1.404;P=0.008),B(或,1.393;P=0.016),和AB(或,1.861;P<0.001)与有症状的PICC-VTE的风险明显高于O型血。血液肿瘤的PICC-VTE的风险明显高于乳腺癌(OR,0.149;P<0.001),和妇科肿瘤(OR,0.386;P=0.002)。在ABO血型与PICC相关性血栓的meta分析中,I2统计量在任何成对比较中都不显著,固定效应模型随后用于所有分析.荟萃分析表明,O型血个体的症状性PICC相关血栓发生率(3.30%)明显低于A型血个体(4.92%),B(5.20%),或AB型(6.58%)血型(均P<0.0083)。然而,在A之间的成对比较中,B,AB,差异无统计学意义(P>0.0083).
结论:根据我们单中心分析的结果,我们发现骨髓抑制,放射治疗,血液肿瘤,非O型血是症状性PICC相关血栓形成的独立危险因素。在进一步探讨ABO血型与PICC相关血栓形成的Meta分析中,我们发现ABO血型可能影响PICC相关血栓形成,O型血个体发生PICC相关血栓的风险低于非O型血个体。
BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis evaluated the association of ABO blood type on central venous catheter-related thrombosis (CRT).
METHODS: Data were derived from 8477 patients at Sichuan Cancer Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021 and articles previously published in Chinese and English databases. Data from our hospital were collected by reviewing electronic medical records. Searched databases included CNKI, VIP, Wan Fang, China Biomedical, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, and OVID (up to July 2023). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 and Revman 5.3. The Bonferroni method was used to adjust the α test level for reducing the risk of I errors in the multiple comparisons. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Continuous variables were analyzed using a two-independent sample T test. The chi-squared test was used to analyze categorical data.
RESULTS: A total of 818 studies were identified in the search. However, only four studies met the inclusion criteria. Combined with data from our hospital, five studies were included with a total of 18407 cases. Those studies only focused on peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). According to the data from our hospital, logistic regression revealed that myelosuppression [odds ratio (OR), 1.473; P = 0.005) and radiotherapy(OR, 1.524; P<0.001) were independent risk factors for symptomatic PICC- VTE. Blood types A (OR, 1.404; P = 0.008), B (OR, 1.393; P = 0.016), and AB (OR, 1.861; P<0.001) were associated with a significantly higher risk of symptomatic PICC-VTE than blood type O. And the hematologic tumor has a significantly higher risk of PICC-VTE than breast cancer (OR, 0.149; P < 0.001), and gynecological tumor (OR, 0.386; P = 0.002). In the meta-analysis of the association between ABO blood type and PICC related thrombosis, the I2 statistic was not significant in any of the pairwise comparisons, and a fixed-effects model was subsequently used for all analyses. The meta-analysis indicated that the incidence of symptomatic PICC related thrombosis was significantly lower in individuals with the O blood type (3.30%) than in those with the A (4.92%), B (5.20%), or AB (6.58%) blood types (all P < 0.0083). However, in the pairwise comparisons among A, B, and AB, the differences were nonsignificant (P > 0.0083).
CONCLUSIONS: According to the results from our single center analysis, we found that myelosuppression, radiotherapy, hematologic tumor, and non-O blood type were independent risk factors for symptomatic PICC related thrombosis. In the meta-analysis of further exploration of ABO blood type and PICC related thrombosis, we found that ABO blood type may influence PICC related thrombosis, and individuals with the O blood type had a lower risk of PICC related thrombosis than those with non-O blood type.