AACP

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    美国药学院协会(AACP)长期以来一直强调战略参与的价值,认识到这对药学教育的成功至关重要,促进药学和公共卫生实践的扩展,履行机构使命,和满足方案需求。2023-2024年战略参与委员会(SEC或委员会)负责实施倡导冠军,创建倡导资源指南,以支持倡导冠军与各种公共和私人利益相关者的互动,以新的Connect社区和网络研讨会系列的形式为倡导冠军提供正式培训,并在2024年年会上进行焦点小组,以确定倡导指南的优势和进一步支持倡导冠军的机会。
    The American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy has long emphasized the value of strategic engagement, recognizing that it is critical to the success of pharmacy education, contributing to the expansion of pharmacy and public health practice, the fulfillment of institutional missions, and the meeting of programmatic needs. The 2023-2024 Strategic Engagement Committee was charged with operationalizing advocacy champions, creating an advocacy resource guide to support advocacy champions in their engagement with diverse public and private stakeholders, offering formal training to advocacy champions in the form of a new connect community and webinar series, and conducting focus groups at the 2024 Annual Meeting to determine strengths of the advocacy guide and opportunities to support advocacy champions further.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2023-2024美国药学院协会(AACP)研究和研究生事务委员会(RGAC或委员会)负责制定专注于研究人员职业和专业发展的计划。新的教师,和药学学院的研究生。在审查了药学教师可用于资助写作的现有资源后,委员会认识到需要更全面,多样化,和为药学教师量身定制的资源。因此,委员会集中精力创建一个密集的赠款编写课程,适用于没有事先获得重大资助奖励的独立药学研究人员,这将支持职业发展和研究补助金申请的写作,并迎合转化教师的需求,临床科学,和药学实践,以及同伴和居民。为了实施这项资助写作课程和其他计划,以推进药学教师的研究进展,委员会提出三项建议供AACP考虑,一项建议供药学学院考虑。
    The 2023-2024 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Research and Graduate Affairs Committee (\"the Committee\") was charged with developing programs focused on career and professional development for researchers, new faculty, and graduate students in colleges and schools of pharmacy. After reviewing exiting resources available to pharmacy faculty for grant writing, the Committee recognized a need for more comprehensive, diverse, and tailored resources for pharmacy faculty. The Committee, therefore, focused its effort on creating an intensive grant writing course intended for independent pharmacy researchers without previous major grant awards that would support writing for career development and research grant applications and cater to faculty in translational, clinical sciences, and pharmacy practice, along with fellows and residents. To implement this grant writing course and other programs to advance research progress by pharmacy faculty, the Committee proposes 3 recommendations for consideration by the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy and 1 suggestion for consideration by colleges and schools of pharmacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Objective.研究2000年,2005年,2010年和2015年美国药学院协会(AACP)年度会议摘要的手稿出版率趋势。方法。对PubMed的系统搜索,Scopus,谷歌学者被执行。“新的”学院和药学院被定义为1996年后获得认证。应用应急表和t检验。结果。评估了1382份摘要。总体发表率为20%,15年的发表率没有差异。2000年、2005年和2010年的平均出版时间为15个月。出版频率最高的杂志是《美国药学教育杂志》。初步分析确定了几个发表的预测因子,包括合作,博士制药项目或学术医学中心的存在,和使用推理统计。比较“新”和传统学校时,手稿的出版没有区别。结论。尽管药学院,学院和教职员工有所增加,但AACP摘要的发表率仍保持稳定。机构之间的合作是出版的最强预测因素,强调其重要性。观察到的低发表率可能归因于缺乏对初级教师的培训,论坛不足以发布作品,或者教师之间奖学金动机不一致。应该进一步审查这些障碍。
    Objective. To examine trends in manuscript publication rates for abstracts presented at the 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) annual meetings. Methods. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed. \"New\" colleges and schools of pharmacy were defined as receiving accreditation after 1996. Contingency tables and t-tests were applied. Results. There were 1382 abstracts evaluated. The overall publication rate was 20% and there was no difference in publication rates over 15 years. The median time to publication for years 2000, 2005, and 2010 was 15 months. The most frequent journal for publication was the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. The primary analysis identified several predictors for publication, including collaboration, presence of a PhD pharmaceutical program or academic medical center, and use of inferential statistics. There was no difference in manuscript publication when comparing \"new\" and legacy schools. Conclusion. The publication rate of AACP abstracts has remained steady despite the increase in pharmacy schools and colleges and faculty. Collaboration among institutions was the strongest predictor for publication, highlighting its importance. The low publication rate observed may be attributed to a lack of training for junior faculty, insufficient forums to publish work, or misaligned motivations for scholarship among faculty. These barriers should be examined further.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号