Objective.研究2000年,2005年,2010年和2015年美国药学院协会(AACP)年度会议摘要的手稿出版率趋势。方法。对PubMed的系统搜索,Scopus,谷歌学者被执行。“新的”学院和药学院被定义为1996年后获得认证。应用应急表和t检验。结果。评估了1382份摘要。总体发表率为20%,15年的发表率没有差异。2000年、2005年和2010年的平均出版时间为15个月。出版频率最高的杂志是《美国药学教育杂志》。初步分析确定了几个发表的预测因子,包括合作,博士制药项目或学术医学中心的存在,和使用推理统计。比较“新”和传统学校时,手稿的出版没有区别。结论。尽管药学院,学院和教职员工有所增加,但AACP摘要的发表率仍保持稳定。机构之间的合作是出版的最强预测因素,强调其重要性。观察到的低发表率可能归因于缺乏对初级教师的培训,论坛不足以发布作品,或者教师之间奖学金动机不一致。应该进一步审查这些障碍。
Objective. To examine trends in manuscript publication rates for abstracts presented at the 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (
AACP) annual meetings. Methods. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed. \"New\" colleges and schools of pharmacy were defined as receiving accreditation after 1996. Contingency tables and t-tests were applied. Results. There were 1382 abstracts evaluated. The overall publication rate was 20% and there was no difference in publication rates over 15 years. The median time to publication for years 2000, 2005, and 2010 was 15 months. The most frequent journal for publication was the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. The primary analysis identified several predictors for publication, including collaboration, presence of a PhD pharmaceutical program or academic medical center, and use of inferential statistics. There was no difference in manuscript publication when comparing \"new\" and legacy schools. Conclusion. The publication rate of
AACP abstracts has remained steady despite the increase in pharmacy schools and colleges and faculty. Collaboration among institutions was the strongest predictor for publication, highlighting its importance. The low publication rate observed may be attributed to a lack of training for junior faculty, insufficient forums to publish work, or misaligned motivations for scholarship among faculty. These barriers should be examined further.