Methods to measure chromatin contacts at genomic regions bound by histone modifications or proteins are important tools to investigate chromatin organization. However, such methods do not capture the possible involvement of other epigenomic features such as G-quadruplex DNA secondary structures (G4s). To bridge this gap, we introduce ViCAR (viewpoint HiCAR), for the direct antibody-based capture of chromatin interactions at folded G4s. Through ViCAR, we showcase the first G4-3D interaction landscape. Using histone marks, we also demonstrate how ViCAR improves on earlier approaches yielding increased signal-to-noise. ViCAR is a practical and powerful tool to explore epigenetic marks and 3D genome interactomes.

HDAC8, a member of class I HDACs, plays a pivotal role in cell cycle regulation by deacetylating the cohesin subunit SMC3. While cyclins and CDKs are well-established cell cycle regulators, our knowledge of other regulators remains limited. Here we reveal the acetylation of K202 in HDAC8 as a key cell cycle regulator responsive to stress. K202 acetylation in HDAC8, primarily catalyzed by Tip60, restricts HDAC8 activity, leading to increased SMC3 acetylation and cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, cells expressing the mutant form of HDAC8 mimicking K202 acetylation display significant alterations in gene expression, potentially linked to changes in 3D genome structure, including enhanced chromatid loop interactions. K202 acetylation impairs cell cycle progression by disrupting the expression of cell cycle-related genes and sister chromatid cohesion, resulting in G2/M phase arrest. These findings indicate the reversible acetylation of HDAC8 as a cell cycle regulator, expanding our understanding of stress-responsive cell cycle dynamics.

Genomic information is folded in a three-dimensional (3D) structure, a rarely explored evolutionary driver of speciation. Technological advances now enable the study of 3D genome structures (3DGSs) across the Tree of Life. At the onset of 3D speciation genomics, we discuss the putative roles of 3DGSs in speciation.

Vision depends on the interplay between photoreceptor cells of the neural retina and the underlying retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Most genes involved in inherited retinal diseases display specific spatiotemporal expression within these interconnected retinal components through the local recruitment of cis-regulatory elements (CREs) in 3D nuclear space.
To understand the role of differential chromatin architecture in establishing tissue-specific expression at inherited retinal disease loci, we mapped genome-wide chromatin interactions using in situ Hi-C and H3K4me3 HiChIP on neural retina and RPE/choroid from human adult donor eyes. We observed chromatin looping between active promoters and 32,425 and 8060 candidate CREs in the neural retina and RPE/choroid, respectively. A comparative 3D genome analysis between these two retinal tissues revealed that 56% of 290 known inherited retinal disease genes were marked by differential chromatin interactions. One of these was ABCA4, which is implicated in the most common autosomal recessive inherited retinal disease. We zoomed in on retina- and RPE-specific cis-regulatory interactions at the ABCA4 locus using high-resolution UMI-4C. Integration with bulk and single-cell epigenomic datasets and in vivo enhancer assays in zebrafish revealed tissue-specific CREs interacting with ABCA4.
Through comparative 3D genome mapping, based on genome-wide, promoter-centric, and locus-specific assays of human neural retina and RPE, we have shown that gene regulation at key inherited retinal disease loci is likely mediated by tissue-specific chromatin interactions. These findings do not only provide insight into tissue-specific regulatory landscapes at retinal disease loci, but also delineate the search space for non-coding genomic variation underlying unsolved inherited retinal diseases.

Enhancers bind transcription factors, chromatin regulators, and non-coding transcripts to modulate the expression of target genes. Here, we report 3D genome structures of single mouse ES cells as they are induced to exit pluripotency and transition through a formative stage prior to undergoing neuroectodermal differentiation. We find that there is a remarkable reorganization of 3D genome structure where inter-chromosomal intermingling increases dramatically in the formative state. This intermingling is associated with the formation of a large number of multiway hubs that bring together enhancers and promoters with similar chromatin states from typically 5-8 distant chromosomal sites that are often separated by many Mb from each other. In the formative state, genes important for pluripotency exit establish contacts with emerging enhancers within these multiway hubs, suggesting that the structural changes we have observed may play an important role in modulating transcription and establishing new cell identities.

In a recent study, Pourmorady and colleagues uncovered a noncoding role for olfactory receptor (OR)-coding mRNA in mediating nuclear architecture and singular OR choice. The OR mRNAs reinforce the prevailing enhancer hub and inhibit other competitors, facilitating transition from polygenic to singular OR expression.

Nuclear actin has been implicated in dynamic chromatin rearrangements in diverse eukaryotes. In mammalian cells, it is required to reposition double-strand DNA breaks to enable homologous recombination repair and to enhance transcription by facilitating RNA Pol II recruitment to gene promoters. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, nuclear actin modulates interphase chromosome dynamics and is required to reposition the induced INO1 gene to the nuclear periphery. Here, we have investigated the role of actin in driving intergenic interactions between Heat Shock Factor 1 (Hsf1)-regulated Heat Shock Protein (HSP) genes in budding yeast. These genes, dispersed on multiple chromosomes, dramatically reposition following exposure of cells to acute thermal stress, leading to their clustering within dynamic biomolecular condensates. Using an auxin-induced degradation strategy, we found that conditional depletion of nucleators of either linear or branched F-actin (Bni1/Bnr1 and Arp2, respectively) had little or no effect on heat shock-induced HSP gene coalescence or transcription. In addition, we found that pretreatment of cells with latrunculin A, an inhibitor of both filamentous and monomeric actin, failed to affect intergenic interactions between activated HSP genes and their heat shock-induced intragenic looping and folding. Moreover, latrunculin A pretreatment had little effect on HSP gene expression at either RNA or protein levels. In notable contrast, we confirmed that repositioning of activated INO1 to the nuclear periphery and its proper expression do require actin. Collectively, our work suggests that transcriptional activation and 3D genome restructuring of thermally induced, Hsf1-regulated genes can occur in the absence of actin.

Cis-regulatory elements govern gene expression programs to determine cell identity during development. Recently, the possibility that multiple enhancers are orchestrated in clusters of enhancers has been suggested. How these elements are arranged in the 3D space to control the activation of a specific promoter remains unclear. Our recent work revealed that the TGFβ pathway drives the assembly of enhancer clusters and precise gene activation during neurogenesis. We discovered that the TGFβ pathway coactivator JMJD3 was essential in maintaining these structures in the 3D space. To do that, JMJD3 required an intrinsically disordered region involved in forming phase-separated biomolecular condensates found in the enhancer clusters. Our data support the existence of a relationship between 3D-conformation of the chromatin, biomolecular condensates, and TGFβ-driven response during mammalian neurogenesis. In this review, we discuss how signaling (TGFβ), epigenetics (JMJD3), and biochemical properties (biomolecular condensates nucleation) are coordinated to modulate the genome structure to guarantee proper neural development. Moreover, we comment on the potential underlying mechanisms and implications of the enhancer-mediated regulation. Finally, we point out the knowledge gaps that still need to be addressed.

Numerous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted to date revealed genetic variants associated with various diseases, including breast and prostate cancers. Despite the availability of these large-scale data, relatively few variants have been functionally characterized, mainly because the majority of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) map to the non-coding regions of the human genome. The functional characterization of these non-coding variants and the identification of their target genes remain challenging.
In this communication, we explore the potential functional mechanisms of non-coding SNPs by integrating GWAS with the high-resolution chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) data for breast and prostate cancers. We show that more genetic variants map to regulatory elements through the 3D genome structure than the 1D linear genome lacking physical chromatin interactions. Importantly, the association of enhancers, transcription factors, and their target genes with breast and prostate cancers tends to be higher when these regulatory elements are mapped to high-risk SNPs through spatial interactions compared to simply using a linear proximity. Finally, we demonstrate that topologically associating domains (TADs) carrying high-risk SNPs also contain gene regulatory elements whose association with cancer is generally higher than those belonging to control TADs containing no high-risk variants.
Our results suggest that many SNPs may contribute to the cancer development by affecting the expression of certain tumor-related genes through long-range chromatin interactions with gene regulatory elements. Integrating large-scale genetic datasets with the 3D genome structure offers an attractive and unique approach to systematically investigate the functional mechanisms of genetic variants in disease risk and progression.

The nature of genome organization into two basic structural compartments is as yet undiscovered. However, it has been indicated to be a mechanism of gene expression regulation. Using the classification approach, we ranked genomic marks that hint at compartmentalization. We considered a broad range of marks, including GC content, histone modifications, DNA binding proteins, open chromatin, transcription and genome regulatory segmentation in GM12878 cells. Genomic marks were defined over CTCF or RNAPII loops, which are basic elements of genome 3D structure, and over 100 kb genomic windows. Experiments were carried out to empirically assess the whole set of features, as well as the individual features in classification of loops/windows, into compartment A or B. Using Monte Carlo Feature Selection and Analysis of Variance, we constructed a ranking of feature importance for classification. The best simple indicator of compartmentalization is DNase-seq open chromatin measurement for CTCF loops, H3K4me1 for RNAPII loops and H3K79me2 for genomic windows. Among DNA binding proteins, this is RUNX3 transcription factor for loops and RNAPII for genomic windows. Chromatin state prediction methods that indicate active elements like promoters, enhancers or heterochromatin enhance the prediction of loop segregation into compartments. However, H3K9me3, H4K20me1, H3K27me3 histone modifications and GC content poorly indicate compartments.