The GAINED phase 3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01659099) evaluated a PET-driven consolidative strategy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. In this post hoc analysis, we aimed to compare the prognostic value of the per-protocol PET interpretation criteria (Menton 2011 consensus) with the change in the SUVmax (ΔSUVmax) alone. Methods: Real-time central review of 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 581 patients after 2 cycles (PET2) and 4 cycles (PET4) of immunochemotherapy using the Menton 2011 criteria, combining the ΔSUVmax (cutoffs of 66% and 70% at PET2 and PET4, respectively) and the Deauville scale. In \"special cases,\" when the baseline SUVmax was less than 10.0 or the interim residual tumor SUVmax was greater than 5.0, the Menton 2011 experts\' consensus agreed that the ΔSUVmax may not be reliable and that the Deauville score is preferable. Prognostic values of Menton 2011 and ΔSUVmax were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analyses in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Seventeen percent of patients at PET2 (100/581) and 8% at PET4 (49/581) had PET-negative results by ΔSUVmax but were considered to have PET-positive results according to Menton 2011 with residual SUVmax of greater than 5.0. For the population with PET2-positive results, 2-y PFS was 70% (range, 58%-80%) with ΔSUVmax alone, whereas the outcome tended to be better for those who were considered to have PET-positive results by Menton 2011, 81% (range, 72%-87%). Conversely, all 10 patients with baseline SUVmax of less than 10.0 had PET2-positive results by ΔSUVmax but were considered to have PET2-negative results by Menton 2011. These patients had the same 2-y PFS as patients with PET2-negative/PET4-negative results, indicating that the ΔSUVmax yielded false-positive results in this situation. Conclusion: We recommend the use of the ΔSUVmax alone rather than the Menton 2011 criteria for assessing the interim metabolic response in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, except when the baseline SUVmax is less than 10.0.

We aimed to determine the added value of baseline metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and interim PET (I-PET) to the age-adjusted international prognostic index (aaIPI) to predict 2-y progression-free survival (PFS) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Secondary objectives were to investigate optimal I-PET response criteria (using Deauville score [DS] or quantitative change in SUVmax [ΔSUVmax] between baseline and I-PET4 [observational I-PET scans after 4 cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone administered in 2-wk intervals with intensified rituximab in the first 4 cycles [R(R)-CHOP14]). Methods: I-PET4 scans in the HOVON-84 (Hemato-Oncologie voor Volwassenen Nederland [Haemato Oncology Foundation for Adults in the Netherlands]) randomized clinical trial (EudraCT 2006-005174-42) were centrally reviewed using DS (cutoff, 4-5). Additionally, ΔSUVmax (prespecified cutoff, 70%) and baseline MTV were measured. Multivariable hazard ratio (HR), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were obtained for 2-y PFS. Results: In total, 513 I-PET4 scans were reviewed according to DS, and ΔSUVmax and baseline MTV were available for 367 and 296 patients. The NPV of I-PET ranged between 82% and 86% for all PET response criteria. Univariate HR and PPV were better for ΔSUVmax (4.8% and 53%, respectively) than for DS (3.1% and 38%, respectively). aaIPI and ΔSUVmax independently predicted 2-y PFS (HR, 3.2 and 5.0, respectively); adding MTV brought about a slight improvement. Low or low-intermediate aaIPI combined with a ΔSUVmax of more than 70% (37% of patients) yielded an NPV of 93%, and the combination of high-intermediate or high aaIPI and a ΔSUVmax of 70% or less yielded a PPV of 65%. Conclusion: In this study on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, I-PET after 4 cycles of R(R)-CHOP14 added predictive value to aaIPI for 2-y PFS, and both were independent response biomarkers in a multivariable Cox model. We externally validated that ΔSUVmax outperformed DS in 2-y PFS prediction.

In diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, early assessment of treatment response by 18F-FDG PET may trigger treatment modification. Reliable identification of good and poor responders is important. We compared 3 competing methods of interim PET evaluation. Methods: Images from 449 patients participating in the \"PET-Guided Therapy of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas\" trial were reanalyzed by applying the visual Deauville score and the SUV-based qPET (q = quantitative) and ΔSUVmax scales to interim PET scans performed after 2 cycles of chemotherapy. qPET relates residual lymphoma 18F-FDG uptake to physiologic liver uptake, converting the ordinal Deauville scale into a continuous scale and permitting a direct comparison with the continuous ΔSUVmax scale, which is based on SUVmax changes between baseline and interim scans. Positive and negative predictive values were calculated for progression-free survival. Results: When established thresholds were used to distinguish between good and poor responders (visual Deauville score 1-3 vs. 4-5; ΔSUVmax > 66% vs. ≤ 66%), the positive predictive value was significantly lower with Deauville than ΔSUVmax (38.4% vs. 56.6%; P = 0.03). qPET and ΔSUVmax were strongly correlated on the log scale (Pearson r = 0.75). When plotted along corresponding percentiles, the positive predictive value curves for qPET and ΔSUVmax were superimposable, with low values up to the 85th percentile and a steep rise thereafter. The recommended threshold of 66% SUVmax reduction for the identification of poor responders was equivalent to qPET = 2.26, corresponding to score 5 on the visual Deauville scale. The negative predictive value curves were also superimposable but remained flat between 80% and 70%. Conclusion: Continuous scales are better suited for interim PET-based outcome prediction than the ordinal Deauville scale. qPET and ΔSUVmax essentially carry the same information. The proportion of poor-risk patients identified is less than 15%.

UNASSIGNED: The open-label, randomised Phase 2 AVATAXHER study (NCT01142778) demonstrated that early PET assessment identified HER2-positive breast cancer patients who responded poorly to neoadjuvant docetaxel plus trastuzumab. Adding neoadjuvant bevacizumab for PET-predicted poor-responders improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates (43.8% vs 24.0%). We investigated long-term study outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Patients were treated in three groups. All patients initially received two cycles of standard neoadjuvant therapy with [¹⁸F]-FDG PET conducted before each cycle. Those with ≥70% change in the maximum standardised uptake value (∆SUVmax) received four further cycles of standard neoadjuvant therapy (PET responders). PET-predicted poor-responders (∆SUVmax <70%) were randomised (2:1) to neoadjuvant therapy with (Group A) or without (Group B) bevacizumab for cycles 3-6. All patients received one further cycle of trastuzumab before surgery plus adjuvant trastuzumab (11 cycles).
UNASSIGNED: 142 patients were randomized and treated (PET responders, n = 69; Group A, n = 48; Group B, n = 25). 5-year disease-free survival rates were 90.5% (95% CI: 80.0-95.6%) in PET responders, 90.2% (95% CI: 75.9-96.2%) in Group A, and 76.0% (95% CI: 54.2-88.4%) in Group B. However, no difference was observed between randomised arms in a sensitivity analysis. During adjuvant therapy, the incidence of Grade ≥3 (Group A: 25.6%; Group B 12.5%) and serious adverse events (Group A: 18.6%; Group B 12.5%) was higher in Group A vs Group B, but with no apparent effect on cardiac events.
UNASSIGNED: In patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, an intervention based on early PET assessment and improvement of pCR does not modify disease-free survival.
UNASSIGNED: Roche France.

The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of early changes in 18 F-fluoroestradiol (FES) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) during fulvestrant 500 mg therapy in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer.
Patients underwent 18 F-FES PET/CT scans at both baseline (scan 1) and day 28 (scan 2). The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of all metastatic sites was determined in each scan, and the percentage reduction in SUVmax (ΔSUVmax) was calculated as [(SUVmax on scan 1-SUVmax on scan 2)/ SUVmax on scan 1] * 100%.
In total, 294 18 F-FES-positive lesions from 36 patients were identified. The 18 F-FES SUVmax varied widely among lesions (median 5.7; range 1.8-32.4) and patients (median 5.1; range 2.5-13.2). After treatment, the median SUVmax among lesions and patients was 2.1 and 2.1, respectively. The ΔSUVmax ranged from -5.1% to 100%, with a median reduction of 61.3%. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cutoff point to discriminate patients who could derive clinical benefit from fulvestrant was determined to be 38.0%. Patients with a median ΔSUVmax ≥38.0% experienced significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those with ΔSUVmax <38.0% (28.0 months vs. 3.5 months, p = .003). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ΔSUVmax ≥38.0% was an independent predictor of PFS benefit in patients receiving fulvestrant therapy.
Changes in SUVmax measured by serial imaging of 18 F-FES PET/CT could be used early to predict PFS benefit in patients receiving fulvestrant therapy.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of 18 F-fluoroestradiol (FES) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in predicting response to fulvestrant 500 mg therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. This study highlights the utility of FES PET/CT as a predictive factor to discriminate patients who might benefit from fulvestrant. Moreover, these findings showed that this molecular imaging technique might be a potential tool for physicians to make individualized treatment strategies.

The predictive value of pre-autologous stem cell transplantation (pre-ASCT) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans according to different criteria remains elusive in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
A total of 46 DLBCL patients treated with pre-ASCT were enrolled in the present study, and two methods, Deauville score and maximal standardized uptake value reduction (ΔSUVmax), were used to evaluate the PET/CT scans before transplantation.
In patients with Deauville 1-3 and ≥4, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 82.8 and 11.8% (p < 0.001), respectively, while the 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 89.7 and 41.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). When using the ΔSUVmax cut-off of 66% criterion, in patients with a ΔSUVmax of >66 and ≤66%, the 2-year PFS rates were 78.1 and 7.1%, respectively (p < 0.001), while the 2-year OS rates were 87.5 and 35.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the univariate analysis, the ΔSUVmax, Deauville score, NCCN-IPI and serum lactate dehydrogenase levels were significantly correlated with the 2-year PFS/OS. Furthermore, the multivariate analysis revealed that the Deauville score was an independent prognostic factor for 2-year PFS.
The present results indicate that PET/CT scans at pre-ASCT can predict the survival of DLBCL patients, and the Deauville score is better than ΔSUVmax in prognostic prediction.

OBJECTIVE: To compare sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of Deauville score (DS) vs. ΔSUVmax in interim-treatment PET (iPET) and end-treatment PET (ePET), in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and follicular lymphoma (FL).
METHODS: Retrospective longitudinal multicentre study including 138 patients (46 DLBCL, 46 HL, 46 FL), on whom 3 18F-FDG PET/CT were performed: baseline, iPET, and ePET. Visual (DS) and semi-quantitative (ΔSUVmax) parameters were determined for iPET and ePET. Predictive value was determined in relation to disease-free interval.
RESULTS: Statistical analysis. iPET for DLBCL, HL, and FL: 1) sensitivity of DS: 76.92/83.33/61.53%; specificity: 78.78/85/81.81%; 2) sensitivity of ΔSUVmax: 53.84/83.33/61.53%; specificity: 87.87/87.50/78.78%. ePET for DLBCL, HL and FL: 1) sensitivity of DS: 61.53/83.33/69.23%; specificity: 90.90/85/87.87%; 2) sensitivity of ΔSUVmax: 69.23/83.33/69.23%; specificity: 90.90/87.50/84.84%. Predictive assessment. iPET study: in DLBCL, DS resulted in 10.3% recurrence of negative iPET, and 17.1% in ΔSUVmax at disease-free interval; in HL, both parameters showed a 2.8% recurrence of negative iPET; in FL, DS resulted in 15.6% recurrence of negative iPET, and 16.1% in ΔSUVmax, with no statistical significance. ePET study: in DLBCL, DS resulted in 14.3% recurrence of negative ePET, and 11.8% in ΔSUVmax at disease-free interval; in HL and FL, both methods showed 2.8 and 12.5% recurrence in negative ePET, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: DS and ΔSUVmax did not show significant differences in DLBCL, HL and FL. Their predictive value also did not show significant differences in HL and FL. In DLBCL, DS was higher in iPET, and ΔSUVmax in ePET.