For a second ipsilateral breast tumor event, salvage mastectomy is the standard of care while second conservative treatment is a possible option. However, level 1 proofs are missing, leading to perform salvage mastectomy for patients who could receive second conservative treatment and consequently avoid psychological/quality of life salvage mastectomy deleterious impacts. A phase 3 randomized trial comparing salvage mastectomy to second conservative treatment is needed. Here we discuss what would be to us the optimal design of such trial to confirm the non-inferiority between the two salvage options, with a focus on methodological aspects in terms of patient characteristics and statistical issues.

Propensity scores have been proposed in the early 1980s, and are increasingly used in epidemiology since the 2000s. They are is used to minimize the selection bias in observational studies, leading to a comparability between the exposure groups close to that observed in randomized trials. However, they have important limitations. Besides, new statistical techniques to improve the propensity score performances are more and more complex, while the build and the use of propensity score require a strict methodology to avoid bias, imprecision and non-reproducibility. This overview, designed for clinicians, is aimed at describing the advantages, techniques of use and limitations of propensity scores. A reading grid is provided in order to help interpreting studies using propensity scores.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) has focused on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, despite initial positive results, significant recurrences have occurred, partly because of pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection or non-PV ectopic foci, including the superior vena cava (SVC).
OBJECTIVE: This prospective, randomized study sought to investigate the efficacy of additional SVCI combined with PVI in symptomatic PAF patients referred for ablation.
METHODS: From November 2011 to May 2013, RFA was performed remotely using a CARTO(®) 3 System in patients randomized to undergo PVI for symptomatic drug-refractory PAF, with (PVI+SVCI group) or without (PVI alone group) SVCI. PVI and SVCI were confirmed by spiral catheter recording during ablation. Procedural data, complications and freedom from atrial tachycardia (AT) and atrial fibrillation (AF) were assessed.
RESULTS: Over an 18-month period, 100 consecutive patients (56±9years; 17 women) with symptomatic PAF were included in the study (PVI+SVCI, n=51; PVI, n=49); the CHA2DS2-VASc score was 0.9±1. Median duration of procedure (±interquartile), 2.5±1hours; total X-ray exposure, 13.3±8minutes; transseptal puncture and catheter positioning, 8±5minutes; left atrium electroanatomical reconstruction, 3±2minutes; and catheter ablation, 3.7±3minutes. After a median follow-up of 15±8months, and having undergone a single procedure, 84% of patients were symptom free, while 86% remained asymptomatic after undergoing two procedures. The cumulative risks of atrial arrhythmias (AT or AF) were interpreted using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test. Long-term follow-up revealed no significant difference between groups, with atrial arrhythmias occurring in six (12%) patients in the PVI+SVCI group and nine (18%) patients in the PVI alone group (P=0.6). One transient phrenic nerve palsy and one phrenic nerve injury with partial recovery occurred in the PVI+SVCI group.
CONCLUSIONS: SVCI combined with PVI did not reduce the risk of subsequent AF recurrence, and was responsible for two phrenic nerve injuries. Accordingly, the benefit-to-risk ratio argues against systematic SVCI.

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) accounts for 10-40% of hospital-acquired pneumonia, and even more in intensive care units. The current guidelines for the treatment of MRSA nosocomial pneumonia include vancomycin and linezolid. The authors of 2 prospective randomized trials comparing vancomycin and linezolid in nosocomial pneumonia had concluded to the non-inferiority of linezolid. A slight superiority of linezolid was observed in the MRSA pneumonia subgroup, in terms of clinical success and survival, but no definite conclusion could be drawn.
METHODS: A prospective randomized study was made to compare a fixed linezolid dose to dose-optimized vancomycin for the treatment of bacteriologically proven MRSA nosocomial pneumonia (ZEPHyR Study).
RESULTS: Among the 165 patients treated by linezolid (57.6%) in the PP population, 95 were clinically cured at the end of the study, compared to 81 of the 174 patients treated by vancomycin (46.6%) (IC 95% of the difference 0.5%-21.6%, P=0.042). Nephrotoxicity in the mITT population reached 8.4% in the linezolid group compared to 18.2% in the vancomycin group.
CONCLUSIONS: LNZ was superior to vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA nosocomial pneumonia.

暂无摘要。