暂无摘要。

This bicentric retrospective cohort study evaluates reversal of muscle relaxation in real life achieved either by neostigmine or sugammadex in two hospitals using different types of neuromuscular monitoring (acceleromyography and kinemyography). The research question concerns compliance with recommendations. Patients who underwent an abdominal surgery under general anesthesia in the period from January 2017 through December 2020 with a neuromuscular block with rocuronium were included in the study. Data were extracted from the Centricity anesthesia information management system. In total, 2242 patients were assessed: 459 in center 1 (61 having received neostigmine and 398 sugammadex) and 1783 in center 2 (531 and 1252, respectively). Patients\' characteristics differed between centers, with more high-risk patients in center 1. The mean train-of-four (TOF) ratio after supramaximal current determination (supramaximal threshold) was higher in center 1 (p < 0.001). Most patients received neostigmine while the TOF ratio was < 40% (68.6% in center 1 and 62.4% in center 2), while extubation was performed while the TOF ratio was > 90% in 61.0% in center 1 and in 32.1% in center 2 (p < 0.001). Patients received sugammadex irrespective of the number of responses to TOF before reversal, and extubation was performed while the TOF ratio was > 90% in 85.0% in center 1 and in 53.6% in center 2 (p < 0.001). No side effect was encountered. Despite guidelines for the TOF ratio before extubation, recommendations were not adequately respected and more vigilance is mandatory. The TOF test before use gave values that were 100% far apart with an underestimation with acceleromyography and an overestimation using kinemyography.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of sugammadex for the reversal of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in patients with neuromuscular diseases remains unclear. We summarised the available evidence and evaluated the quality of data reporting and the validity of published reports.
METHODS: We searched for reports (any design) on the usage of sugammadex (any regimen) for the reversal of an NMBA in patients (any age) with any neuromuscular disease. We used a modified CARE checklist (maximum score 23) to assess the quality of data reporting and an original specific validity checklist (maximum score 41) that was developed through a Delphi process.
RESULTS: We retrieved 126 observational reports (386 patients). Most dealt with myasthenia gravis patients receiving rocuronium. The train-of-four ratio returned to ≥0.9 in 258 of 265 (97.4%) patients in whom neuromonitoring was used. Adverse events occurred in 14 of 332 (4.2%) patients in whom adverse events were reported as present or absent. In 90 case reports, the median score of the 23-point CARE checklist was 13.5 (inter-quartile range [IQR] 11-16). In all 126 reports, the median score of the 41-point validity checklist was 23 (IQR 20-27). Scores were positively correlated.
CONCLUSIONS: These uncontrolled observations (of mainly low to moderate quality and validity) do not allow confident assessment of the efficacy and safety of sugammadex for the reversal of NMBAs in patients with neuromuscular diseases. Reporting of observational data should follow established guidelines, include specific information to ensure validity, and emphasise what the new data add to current knowledge.
UNASSIGNED: PROSPERO 2019 (CRD42019119924).

Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is a potential solution for safe and effective anesthesia administration in rural regions of sub-Saharan Africa, where access to inhalational anesthesia may be limited. However, challenges such as equipment and medication availability, as well as a shortage of trained anesthesiologists, can limit the use of TIVA. In this study, the safety and efficacy of TIVA were evaluated in a case series of 25 female patients undergoing thyroid surgery in a rural area of sub-Saharan Africa. The TIVA protocol involved the use of propofol, fentanyl, rocuronium, and sugammadex. Results showed that TIVA was a safe and effective method of anesthesia administration in this setting, with no major adverse events reported. The use of TIVA may offer advantages such as faster recovery times, reduced incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and reduced risk of environmental pollution compared to inhalational anesthesia. However, the cost and monitoring requirements of TIVA may pose challenges in resource-limited settings. Further research is needed to determine the optimal use of TIVA in this context.

暂无摘要。

A 10-year-old, neutered male, Golden Retriever dog presented for surgical correction of a descemetocele. Acepromazine (0.02 mg/kg) and methadone (0.5 mg/kg) were administered intramuscularly for sedation, propofol (2 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) were administered intravenously for anaesthetic induction and isoflurane in oxygen was utilised for anaesthetic maintenance. Rocuronium (0.5 mg/kg), a neuromuscular blocking agent, was administered intravenously to facilitate central positioning of the eye for surgery. Within 10 min of rocuronium administration, the dog became tachycardic and hypotensive. Hemodynamic aberrations did not resolve with initial interventions but were successfully mitigated with the administration of diphenhydramine (0.8 mg/kg) intravenously. The dog remained stable throughout the remainder of the procedure and experienced a smooth and uneventful recovery. While it is difficult to confirm that the hemodynamic changes observed in this clinical case resulted solely from administration of rocuronium, the observance of the cardiovascular changes, timing of events and response to therapy suggest that rocuronium elicited a histamine response that was successfully treated with diphenhydramine.

Muscle relaxants have broad application in anesthesiology. They can be used for safe intubation, preparing the patient for surgery, or improving mechanical ventilation. Muscle relaxants can be classified based on their mechanism of action into depolarizing and non-depolarizing muscle relaxants and centrally acting muscle relaxants. Non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) (eg, tubocurarine, atracurium, pipecuronium, mivacurium, pancuronium, rocuronium, vecuronium) act as competitive antagonists of nicotine receptors. By doing so, these drugs hinder the depolarizing effect of acetylcholine, thereby eliminating the potential stimulation of muscle fibers. Depolarizing drugs like succinylcholine and decamethonium induce an initial activation (depolarization) of the receptor followed by a sustained and steady blockade. These drugs do not act as competitive antagonists; instead, they function as more enduring agonists compared to acetylcholine itself. Many factors can influence the duration of action of these drugs. Among them, electrolyte disturbances and disruptions in acid-base balance can have an impact. Acidosis increases the potency of non-depolarizing muscle relaxants, while alkalosis induces resistance to their effects. In depolarizing drugs, acidosis and alkalosis produce opposite effects. The results of studies on the impact of acid-base balance disturbances on non-depolarizing relaxants have been conflicting. This work is based on the available literature and the authors\' experience. This article aimed to review the use of anesthetic muscle relaxants in patients with acid-base disturbances.

OBJECTIVE: Variable indications exist for neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in the critical care transport setting beyond facilitation of intubation.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients (≥ 18 years) who underwent critical care transport from July 1, 2020, to May 2, 2023, and received NMBAs during transport that was not associated with intubation. The primary outcome was the indication for NMBA administration. Secondary outcomes included the characterization of NMBA use, mean Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score before NMBA administration, sedation strategy used, and continuation of NMBAs within 48 hours of hospital admission.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. The most common indication for NMBA administration was ventilator dyssynchrony (n = 71, 56.4%). The majority of patients received rocuronium during transport (n = 113, 89.7%). The mean pre-NMBA Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score was -3.7 ± 2.4. The most common sedation strategy was a combination of continuous infusion and bolus sedatives (76.2%). One hundred (79.4%) patients had sedation changes in response to NMBA administration. Seventy-two (57.1%) received NMBAs during the first 48 hours of their intensive care unit admission.
CONCLUSIONS: NMBAs were frequently administered for ventilator dyssynchrony and continuation of prior therapy. Optimization opportunities exist to ensure adequate deep sedation and reassessment of NMBA indication.

We developed a system to adjust the rate of a continuous rocuronium (Rb) infusion to achieve 3 ≤ %T1 ≤ 10 with a closed-loop control. Samples were collected from 15 patients, and Rb blood concentrations were measured at the following time points: (1) when %T1 recovered to 3% or more after the initial Rb infusion; (2) when %T1 stabilized within the target range; (3) at the cessation of the Rb infusion; (4) 5 min after the sugammadex administration. The predicted Rb blood concentration at each time point was calculated and recorded using the pharmacokinetic parameters of Wierda et al. At time points (1), (2), and (3), the predicted blood concentrations were in good agreement with the measured values, but after the administration of sugammadex, the blood concentrations were higher than the predicted values because the Rb distributed in the tissues migrated into the blood. From the above, it was confirmed that the predicted blood concentration of Rb can be a good indicator for the automatic Rb administration control.