refractory

耐火材料
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:难治性或复发性AML(R/R-AML)患者的预后非常有限。(重新)达到完全缓解,最近有越来越多的证据表明,维奈托克(VEN)联合化疗可改善预后.
    方法:我们的回顾性研究,单中心研究纳入53例R/R-AML患者,中位随访时间为11.0个月,与标准挽救化疗(n=35例患者为FLAG-Ida或HAM)联合维奈托克(VEN)和FLAG-Ida(n=18例患者为FLAVIDA)的安全性和有效性比较.
    结果:关于主要终点,根据单变量对数秩检验和多变量Cox回归分析,与标准化疗患者相比,FLAVIDA组的无事件生存期(EFS)显著增加(HR0.22[95%CI0.05,0.97]).两组之间在发生发热性中性粒细胞减少症CTCAEIII°和IV°或血液学恢复延迟方面没有差异。此外,总体反应率提高的明显趋势(78%vs.51%)在FLAVIDA组中得到证实。
    结论:对于R/RAML患者,FLAVIDA方案是一种有希望的替代治疗方案,与标准化疗相比,具有较高的反应率和显着改善的EFS。
    BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with refractory or relapsed AML (R/R-AML) is very limited. To (re)achieve complete remission, there has recently been increasing evidence that the combination of venetoclax (VEN) with chemotherapy is associated with improved outcomes.
    METHODS: Our retrospective, single-center study of 53 R/R-AML patients with a median follow-up time of 11.0 months compared standard salvage chemotherapy (FLAG-Ida or HAM in n = 35 patients) with a combination of venetoclax (VEN) and FLAG-Ida (FLAVIDA in n = 18 patients) concerning safety and efficacy.
    RESULTS: Regarding the primary endpoints, there was a statistically significant increased event free survival (EFS) in the FLAVIDA group compared to patients with standard chemotherapy based on the univariate log-rank-test and in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (HR 0.22 [95% CI 0.05, 0.97]). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of patients developing febrile neutropenia CTCAE III° and IV° or a delay in hematological recovery. In addition, a clear trend towards an improved overall response rate (78% vs. 51%) was demonstrated in the FLAVIDA group.
    CONCLUSIONS: The FLAVIDA regimen represents a promising treatment alternative for R/R AML patients with a high response rate and significantly improved EFS compared to standard chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    滑膜炎,痤疮,脓疱病,骨增生,骨炎(SAPHO)综合征主要表现为影响肌肉骨骼系统和皮肤的持续炎症。SAPHO综合征的治疗仍然是一个挑战。Tofacitinib是一种Janus激酶(JAK)抑制剂,可抑制一系列细胞因子。这里,我们报告了1例被诊断为初次治疗难以治疗的SAPHO综合征,且对托法替尼反应良好的患者.一名18岁的男性因多发性关节炎被送到我们中心,与胸骨和锁骨疼痛有关。有9个月的皮肤病变影响他的胸部和背部,并被诊断为SAPHO综合征。非甾体抗炎药,常规疾病缓解抗风湿药,生物药物也无济于事。5周后开始服用托法替尼,每天两次5mg与甲氨蝶呤联合使用,患者报告皮肤和骨关节症状显著改善。JAK抑制剂,尤其是托法替尼,可作为治疗SAPHO难治性抗风湿药(DMARDs)和肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂的良好选择。
    Synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome is primarily manifested by persistent inflammation affecting the musculoskeletal system and the skin. The treatment of SAPHO syndrome remains a challenge. Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor that inhibits a range of cytokines. Here, we report a patient who had been diagnosed with SAPHO syndrome refractory to initial treatment and responded well to tofacitinib. An 18-year-old male was presented to our center with polyarthritis, associated with sternal and clavicular pain. There was a nine-month history of skin lesions affecting his chest and back and was diagnosed with a case of SAPHO syndrome. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic agents, and biological drugs were unhelpful. After five weeks of starting tofacitinib at 5mg twice daily in combination with methotrexate, the patient reported significant improvement in dermatological and osteoarticular symptoms. JAK inhibitors, especially tofacitinib, can be a good choice for the treatment of SAPHO refractory to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尚未确定严重再生障碍性贫血(SAA)患者的最佳治疗方法,这些患者在抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)加环孢素的初始疗程中失败。我们比较了2007年至2022年间异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)(n=36)与重复免疫抑制治疗(IST)(n=33)对复发/难治性SAA的有效性。在IST组中,患者接受ATG(n=16)或大剂量环磷酰胺(n=17)治疗.6个月时的总有效率为57.6%,12个月时为60.6%。在allo-HSCT组中,患者从匹配的同胞供体(n=6)接受移植,匹配的无关供体(n=7),或单倍体供体(n=23)。所有患者均获得中性粒细胞植入,并且没有原发性移植物失败的病例。在第100天,II-IV级和III-IV级急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的累积发病率(CI)分别为36.1%±0.7%和13.9%±0.3%。慢性GVHD(cGVHD)的4年CI为36.2%±0.7%,中度至重度cGVHD为14.9%±0.4%。与IST相比,HSCT受者在3、6和12个月时表现出更高的血液学恢复率(63.9%,83.3%,86.1%,分别,p<0.001)。估计的4年总生存率(OS)(79.8%±6.8%vs.80.0%±7.3%,p=0.957)相似;然而,HSCT组的无故障生存率(FFS)明显更好(79.8%±6.8%vs.56.6%±8.8%,p=0.049)。值得注意的是,HSCT队列中的儿童都活着,没有治疗失败,表现出卓越的操作系统(100%与50.0%±17.7%,p=0.004)和FFS(100%与50.0%±17.7%,p=0.004)比IST队列中的儿童。亚组分析显示,年轻患者(年龄≤35岁),尤其是儿童,难治性SAA患者从HSCT中受益更多。因此,对于这些患者来说,抢救HSCT可能比第二疗程的IST更可取。
    The optimal treatment for patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who fail an initial course of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) plus cyclosporine has not yet been established. We compared the effectiveness of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) (n = 36) with repeated immunosuppressive therapy (IST) (n = 33) for relapsed/refractory SAA between 2007 and 2022. In the IST group, patients were retreated with ATG (n = 16) or high-dose cyclophosphamide (n = 17). The overall response rate was 57.6% at 6 months and 60.6% at 12 months. In the allo-HSCT group, patients received a transplant from a matched sibling donor (n = 6), matched unrelated donor (n = 7), or haploidentical donor (n = 23). All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment, and there were no cases of primary graft failure. The cumulative incidences (CIs) of grades II-IV and III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 36.1% ± 0.7% and 13.9% ± 0.3% at day +100, respectively. The 4-year CI of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 36.2% ± 0.7%, with moderate to severe cGVHD at 14.9% ± 0.4%. Compared with IST, HSCT recipients showed much higher hematologic recovery rate at 3, 6, and 12 months (63.9%, 83.3%, and 86.1%, respectively, p < 0.001). The estimated 4-year overall survival (OS) (79.8% ± 6.8% vs. 80.0% ± 7.3%, p = 0.957) was similar; however, the failure-free survival (FFS) was significantly better in the HSCT group (79.8% ± 6.8% vs. 56.6% ± 8.8%, p = 0.049). Of note, children in the HSCT cohort were all alive without treatment failures, exhibiting superior OS (100% vs. 50.0% ± 17.7%, p = 0.004) and FFS (100% vs. 50.0% ± 17.7%, p = 0.004) than children in the IST cohort. Subgroup analysis revealed that younger patients (age ≤ 35 years), especially children, and those with refractory SAA benefited more from HSCT. Therefore, for these patients, salvage HSCT may be more preferable than a second course of IST.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尤文肉瘤(ES)是骨和软组织的恶性肿瘤,最常见于儿童,青少年,和年轻人。复发/难治性ES(RR-ES)的管理仍存在争议和争议。作者利用了国家尤因肉瘤肿瘤委员会的专业知识,多学科虚拟肿瘤委员会,每月开会讨论具有挑战性的ES病例。在这次审查中,他们专注于选择适用于RR-ES患者管理的主题.涵盖的具体主题包括此类患者的初始方法和对护理目标的讨论,分子检测的作用,要考虑的化疗方案和新药物,维持治疗的作用,以及使用大剂量化疗和自体干细胞抢救。引用的数据通常限于子组分析和/或从多个源编译。虽然不打算取代治疗医生的临床判断,这些指南旨在为临床医师提供支持,并为RR-ES患者的治疗提供一些明确的建议.尤因肉瘤(ES)是一种骨和软组织癌,最常见于青少年和年轻人。本文利用国家尤因肉瘤肿瘤委员会的经验,一个多机构,多学科虚拟肿瘤委员会每月开会,讨论具有挑战性的ES病例,并解决与复发性ES患者治疗相关的问题。虽然不打算取代治疗医生的临床判断,并且受现有数据的限制,这些共识建议将支持治疗这种具有挑战性的恶性肿瘤患者的临床医生,当它复发时变得更加困难。
    Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a malignant tumor of bone and soft tissue that most often occurs in children, adolescents, and young adults. Debate and controversy remain in the management of relapsed/refractory ES (RR-ES). The authors leveraged the expertise assembled by the National Ewing Sarcoma Tumor Board, a multidisciplinary virtual tumor board that meets monthly to discuss challenging cases of ES. In this review, they focus on select topics that apply to the management of patients with RR-ES. The specific topics covered include the initial approach of such patients and discussion of the goals of care, the role of molecular testing, chemotherapy regimens and novel agents to consider, the role of maintenance therapy, and the use of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue. The data referenced are often limited to subgroup analyses and/or compiled from multiple sources. Although not intended to replace the clinical judgement of treating physicians, these guidelines are intended to support clinicians and provide some clarity and recommendations for the management of patients with RR-ES. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a bone and soft tissue cancer that most often occurs in teenagers and young adults. This article uses the experience of the National Ewing Sarcoma Tumor Board, a multi-institution, multidisciplinary virtual tumor board that meets monthly to discuss challenging cases of ES and to address questions related to the treatment of patients with relapsed ES. Although not intended to replace the clinical judgement of treating physicians and limited by available data, these consensus recommendations will support clinicians who treat patients with this challenging malignancy, made even more difficult when it recurs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    FMS相关的酪氨酸激酶3(FLT3)抑制剂gilteritinib是复发性/难治性(R/R)FLT3突变(FLT3mut)急性髓性白血病(AML)的标准疗法,但总生存率(OS)仅为大约20%,很少患者达到深度和/或持久的反应。我们回顾性分析了29例接受三联疗法(gilteritinib+venetoclax[VEN]+阿扎胞苷[AZA])治疗的R/RFLT3mutAML患者。19例患者(65.5%)曾接受过FLT3抑制剂治疗。改良复合完全缓解(mCRc)率为62.1%(n=18;CR,4/29,13.8%;CRi,6/29,20.7%;MLFS,8/29,27.6%)。在获得mCRc的18例患者中,FLT3-PCR阴性为94.4%(n=17),流式细胞术阴性为77.7%(n=14)。10例无FLT3TKI暴露的患者的mCRc率为70%(n=7),19例有FLT3TKI暴露的患者的mCRc率为57.8%(n=11)(P=0.52)。在第一个周期结束时,在反应者中,ANC>0.5×109/L的中位时间为38天,血小板>50×109/L的中位时间为31天,但60天死亡率为0%。所有R/RFLT3mut患者的2年OS估计为60.9%。1年OS为80%和58.8%的患者没有和先前的FLT3TKI暴露,分别为(P=0.79)。在三联疗法后接受allo-HSCT的19例患者(65.5%)中,估计的2年OS为62%,在未接受allo-HSCT的10例患者中为37%(P=0.03)。总之,gilteritinib三联疗法,VEN,AZA是有效和安全的,是R/RFLT3mutAML的优秀前线选择。
    The FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib is standard therapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated (FLT3mut) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but the overall survival (OS) is only approximately 20 % and few patients achieve deep and/ or durable response. We retrospectively analyzed 29 R/R FLT3mut AML patients treated on triplet regimens (gilteritinib+ venetoclax[VEN] +azacitidine[AZA]). Nineteen patients (65.5 %) had received prior FLT3 inhibitor therapy. The modified composite complete remission (mCRc) rate was 62.1 % (n = 18; CR, 4/29,13.8 %; CRi, 6/29, 20.7 %; MLFS, 8/29, 27.6 %). Among 18 patients achieved mCRc, FLT3-PCR negativity was 94.4 % (n=17), and flow-cytometry negativity was 77.7 % (n=14). The mCRc rate was 70 % (n=7) in 10 patients without prior FLT3 TKI exposure and 57.8 % (n=11) in 19 patients with prior FLT3 TKI exposure (P=0.52). At the end of the first cycle, the median time to ANC > 0.5× 109/L was 38 days and platelet > 50× 109/L was 31 days among responders, but 60-day mortality was 0 %. The estimated 2-year OS was 60.9 % for all R/R FLT3mut patients. The 1-year OS was 80 % and 58.8 % in patients without and with prior FLT3 TKI exposure, respectively (P=0.79). The estimated 2-year OS was 62 % in 19 (65.5 %) patients who received allo-HSCT after triplet therapy and 37 % in 10 patients who did not receive allo-HSCT (P=0.03). In conclusion, triplet therapy with gilteritinib, VEN, and AZA is effective and safe and an excellent frontline option for R/R FLT3mut AML.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评价经肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合瑞戈非尼的疗效和安全性(以下,TACE-regorafenib)或camrelizumab(以下简称,TACE-camrelizumab)用于治疗TACE和索拉非尼治疗后无法治愈的肝细胞癌(HCC)。
    方法:回顾性评估2018年9月至2023年12月期间接受TACE-regorafenib或TACE-camrelizumab的HCC患者的病历。治疗反应,总生存期(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),比较两组患者的不良事件(AE)。
    结果:本研究共纳入76例患者,TACE-regorafenib和TACE-camrelizumab组中的41和35例患者,分别。TACE-regorafenib和TACE-camrelizumab组的客观缓解率分别为9.8%和8.6%,分别,两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.859)。同样,两组疾病控制率无统计学差异(61.0%vs68.6%,P=0.838)。TACE-regorafenib组的中位OS为11个月,TACE-camrelizumab组的中位OS为10个月,两组间无显著性差异(P=0.348)。TACE-regorafenib组的中位PFS为7个月,明显长于TACE-camrelizumab组(4个月,P=0.004)。两组间不良事件发生率差异无统计学意义(P=0.544)。
    结论:TACE-regorafenib是安全的,耐受性良好,并在索拉非尼难治性晚期肝癌患者中显示出有希望的疗效,而TACE-camrelizumab显示相似的生存获益.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with regorafenib (hereafter, TACE-regorafenib) or camrelizumab (hereafter, TACE-camrelizumab) for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with untreatable progression after TACE and sorafenib therapy.
    METHODS: The medical records of patients with HCC who received TACE-regorafenib or TACE-camrelizumab between September 2018 and December 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. Therapeutic response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were enrolled in this study, with 41 and 35 patients in the TACE-regorafenib and TACE-camrelizumab groups, respectively. The objective response rates in the TACE-regorafenib and TACE-camrelizumab groups were 9.8% and 8.6%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.859). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in disease control rates between the two groups (61.0% vs 68.6%, P = 0.838). The median OS was 11 months in the TACE-regorafenib group and 10 months in the TACE-camrelizumab group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.348). The TACE-regorafenib group had a median PFS of 7 months, which was significantly longer than that of the TACE-camrelizumab group (4 months, P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the two groups (P = 0.544).
    CONCLUSIONS: TACE-regorafenib was safe, well-tolerated, and showed promising efficacy in patients with sorafenib-refractory advanced HCC, whereas TACE-camrelizumab demonstrated similar survival benefits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    后象限癫痫手术,涉及枕叶,顶叶,或者颞叶的后边界,占药物难治性癫痫局部切除术的一小部分。先前研究后象限癫痫手术控制癫痫发作的研究是有限的。在这项研究中,我们分析了2008年8月至2021年4月在一个大型4级癫痫中心接受左侧后皮质癫痫手术患者的回顾性数据库,以描述癫痫控制结局.9例患者在左后皮质出现癫痫灶,皮质发育畸形被认为是除一名患者外的癫痫发作的病因。9例患者中有4例实现了绝对癫痫发作自由(EngelI),其余5例患者的癫痫发作频率有所改善(EngelII/III)。在Engel1结局的4例患者中的3例和II/III结局的5例患者中的1例进行了解剖和生理异常的完全切除。5例患者出现新的右侧视野缺损,所有这些都是基于子叶的预期,枕骨定位,被患者视为可接受的,并且不干扰日常生活活动。总的来说,我们的研究表明,手术切除有可能产生出色的癫痫发作控制结果,可忍受的神经功能缺损。此信息对于可能无法从姑息治疗中充分受益的致残性癫痫患者很重要。
    Posterior quadrant epilepsy surgery, involving the occipital lobe, parietal lobe, or the posterior border of the temporal lobe, accounts for a small percentage of focal resections for medically refractory epilepsy. Prior studies investigating seizure control from posterior quadrant epilepsy surgery are limited. In this study, a retrospective database of patients undergoing surgery for left sided posterior cortex epilepsy at a single large level 4 epilepsy center was analyzed between August 2008 to April 2021 in order to characterize seizure control outcomes. Nine patients presented with epileptogenic foci in the left posterior cortex with a malformation of cortical development deemed as the etiology of seizures for all but one patient. Absolute seizure freedom (Engel I) was achieved in 4 of 9 patients, with the remaining 5 patients achieving an improvement in the frequency of seizures (Engel II/III). Complete resection of the anatomic and physiologic abnormalities was performed in 3 of 4 patients with Engel 1 outcomes and 1 of 5 patients with Class II/III outcomes. Five patients developed new right sided visual field defects, all of which were expected based on the sub-lobar, occipital localization and were viewed as acceptable by the patients and did not interfere with activities of daily living. Overall, our study demonstrates the potential for surgical resection to yield excellent seizure-control outcomes with anticipated, tolerable neurological deficits. This information is important for patients with disabling seizures who may not benefit sufficiently from palliative procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    难治性肺炎支原体肺炎(RMPP)有严重的,快速进展,容易引起各种肺外并发症。因此,RMPP的早期识别至关重要。本研究旨在构建并验证基于临床表现的风险预测模型,实验室血液指标,和放射学检查结果,以帮助临床医生识别RMPP高危患者。
    我们回顾性分析了西安市儿童医院收治的369例肺炎支原体肺炎(MPP)患儿的病历,中国。人口统计,临床特征,实验室数据,比较RMPP组和普通肺炎支原体肺炎(GMPP)组之间的放射学结果,并进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析。
    与GMPP组(n=283)相比,RMPP组(n=86)患儿的发热高峰和持续时间更高(P<0.05)。两组肺部影像学检查大叶性肺炎和胸腔积液发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验室检测显示,RMPP患儿的血清尿酸(SUA)和白蛋白(ALB)均低于GMPP组(P<0.05)。白细胞(WBC),中性粒细胞计数(NEP),红细胞沉降率(ESR),降钙素原(PCT),C反应蛋白(CRP),RMPP组中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)较高(P<0.05)。二元logistic回归分析显示,发热持续时间,胸腔积液,WBC,NEP,乳酸脱氢酶(LDH),CRP,NLR,SUA水平是RMPP的独立预测因子(P<0.05)。受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线结果显示发热持续时间,WBC,NEP,CRP,LDH,SUA,NLR具有良好的预测价值。曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.861、0.730、0.758、0.837、0.868、0.744和0.713,最佳临界值分别为10.50、10.13、6.43、29.45、370.50、170.50和3.47。最后,发烧持续时间超过10.5天,胸腔积液,WBC>10.13×109/L,NEP>6.43×109/L,CRP>29.45mg/L,LDH>370.50U/L,NLR>3.47,SUA<170.5μmol/mL构建了RMPP的预测模型。根据内部验证,基于发展数据集的列线图的平均AUC为0.956[95%置信区间(CI):0.937-0.974],对于预测RMPP患者具有良好的辨别能力.预测模型的校准图和Hosmer-Lemeshow检验(P=0.70)显示出预测概率与实际概率之间的良好一致性。决策曲线分析(DCA)显示列线图在临床上有用。
    简单易用的列线图可以帮助临床医生,尤其是初级医生,对RMPP进行早期诊断。
    UNASSIGNED: Refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (RMPP) has a serious, rapid progression that can easily cause a variety of extra-pulmonary complications. Therefore, the early identification of RMPP is crucial. This study aimed to construct and validate a risk prediction model based on clinical manifestations, laboratory blood indicators, and radiological findings to help clinicians identify patients who are at high risk of RMPP.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 369 children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) admitted to Xi\'an Children\'s Hospital, China. The demographics, clinical features, laboratory data, and radiological findings between the RMPP group and the general Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (GMPP) group were compared and subjected to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.
    UNASSIGNED: The fever peak and duration of the children in the RMPP group (n=86) were higher and longer compared with those in the GMPP group (n=283) (P<0.05). There was a significant difference in the incidence of lobar pneumonia and pleural effusion in pulmonary imaging between the two groups (P<0.05). Laboratory tests showed that the children with RMPP had lower serum uric acid (SUA) and albumin (ALB) as compared with the GMPP group (P<0.05). White blood cells (WBCs), neutrophil count (NEP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were higher in the RMPP group (P<0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that the fever duration, pleural effusion, WBC, NEP, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), CRP, NLR, and SUA levels were independent predictors of RMPP (P<0.05). The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve results showed fever duration, WBC, NEP, CRP, LDH, SUA, and NLR had good predictive value. The areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.861, 0.730, 0.758, 0.837, 0.868, 0.744, and 0.713 and the best cutoff values were 10.50, 10.13, 6.43, 29.45, 370.50, 170.50, and 3.47, respectively. Finally, fever duration of more than 10.5 days, pleural effusion, WBC >10.13×109/L, NEP >6.43×109/L, CRP >29.45 mg/L, LDH >370.50 U/L, NLR >3.47, and SUA <170.5 µmol/mL constructed a prediction model of RMPP. According to internal validation, the mean AUC of the nomogram based on the development dataset was 0.956 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.937-0.974] with good discrimination ability for predicting RMPP patients. The calibration plot and Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P=0.70) of the prediction model showed good consistency between the predicted probability and actual probability. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the nomogram is clinically useful.
    UNASSIGNED: The simple and easy-to-use nomogram can help clinicians, especially primary doctors, to make early diagnoses of RMPP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    慢性炎性脱髓鞘性多发性神经根神经病(CIDP)是一种异质性但可治疗的免疫介导性神经病。Ofatumumab(OFA)是一种完全人抗CD20单克隆抗体,在中枢脱髓鞘疾病中显示出有希望的疗效,如多发性硬化症(MS)。然而,缺乏OFA在外周脱髓鞘疾病中的应用研究,特别是CIDP。一例复发性和难治性CIDP,对常规免疫疗法无效且对利妥昔单抗(RTX)不耐受,但对皮下注射OFA呈阳性反应。
    病人,一名46岁的男子被诊断患有CIDP,接受大剂量静脉注射甲基强的松龙,静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG),在疾病的急性期和血浆置换(PE),长期口服泼尼松,硫唑嘌呤(AZA),和霉酚酸酯(MMF)在缓解期。然而,该患者在五年内经历了六次复发,因为这些,以及对常规免疫疗法的无效反应,对RTX不宽容,选择皮下注射OFA作为预防复发的预防性治疗。在总共注射了六次OFA后,CD19+B细胞基本上被耗尽。患者已被随访超过23个月,没有复发。
    该病例证明了OFA治疗复发性和难治性CIDP的有效性和良好的耐受性。需要进一步的研究来研究OFA在复发性和难治性CIDP患者中的疗效和安全性,尤其是那些对常规免疫疗法无效且对RTX不耐受的患者.
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a heterogeneous but treatable immune-mediated neuropathy. Ofatumumab (OFA) is a fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that has shown promising efficacy in central demyelinating diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS). However, there is a lack of studies on the usage of OFA in peripheral demyelinating diseases, particularly CIDP. A case of relapsed and refractory CIDP with an ineffective response to conventional immunotherapy and intolerance to rituximab (RTX) but a positive response to subcutaneous injections of OFA is presented.
    UNASSIGNED: The patient, a 46-year-old man diagnosed with CIDP, received high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and plasma exchange(PE) during the acute phase of the disease, and long-term oral administration of prednisone, azathioprine (AZA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) during the remission phase. However, the patient suffered six relapses over a five-year period, and because of these, along with an ineffective response to conventional immunotherapy, and intolerance to RTX, subcutaneous injections of OFA were selected as a prophylactic treatment against relapses. After a total of six injections of OFA, CD19+B cells were substantially depleted. The patient has been followed for more than 23 months without relapse.
    UNASSIGNED: This case demonstrates the effectiveness and good tolerability of OFA in the treatment of relapsed and refractory CIDP. Further studies are needed to investigate the efficacy and safety of OFA in patients with relapsed and refractory CIDP, especially in those who have shown an ineffective response to conventional immunotherapy and are intolerant to RTX.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号