refractory

耐火材料
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尚未确定严重再生障碍性贫血(SAA)患者的最佳治疗方法,这些患者在抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)加环孢素的初始疗程中失败。我们比较了2007年至2022年间异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)(n=36)与重复免疫抑制治疗(IST)(n=33)对复发/难治性SAA的有效性。在IST组中,患者接受ATG(n=16)或大剂量环磷酰胺(n=17)治疗.6个月时的总有效率为57.6%,12个月时为60.6%。在allo-HSCT组中,患者从匹配的同胞供体(n=6)接受移植,匹配的无关供体(n=7),或单倍体供体(n=23)。所有患者均获得中性粒细胞植入,并且没有原发性移植物失败的病例。在第100天,II-IV级和III-IV级急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的累积发病率(CI)分别为36.1%±0.7%和13.9%±0.3%。慢性GVHD(cGVHD)的4年CI为36.2%±0.7%,中度至重度cGVHD为14.9%±0.4%。与IST相比,HSCT受者在3、6和12个月时表现出更高的血液学恢复率(63.9%,83.3%,86.1%,分别,p<0.001)。估计的4年总生存率(OS)(79.8%±6.8%vs.80.0%±7.3%,p=0.957)相似;然而,HSCT组的无故障生存率(FFS)明显更好(79.8%±6.8%vs.56.6%±8.8%,p=0.049)。值得注意的是,HSCT队列中的儿童都活着,没有治疗失败,表现出卓越的操作系统(100%与50.0%±17.7%,p=0.004)和FFS(100%与50.0%±17.7%,p=0.004)比IST队列中的儿童。亚组分析显示,年轻患者(年龄≤35岁),尤其是儿童,难治性SAA患者从HSCT中受益更多。因此,对于这些患者来说,抢救HSCT可能比第二疗程的IST更可取。
    The optimal treatment for patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who fail an initial course of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) plus cyclosporine has not yet been established. We compared the effectiveness of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) (n = 36) with repeated immunosuppressive therapy (IST) (n = 33) for relapsed/refractory SAA between 2007 and 2022. In the IST group, patients were retreated with ATG (n = 16) or high-dose cyclophosphamide (n = 17). The overall response rate was 57.6% at 6 months and 60.6% at 12 months. In the allo-HSCT group, patients received a transplant from a matched sibling donor (n = 6), matched unrelated donor (n = 7), or haploidentical donor (n = 23). All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment, and there were no cases of primary graft failure. The cumulative incidences (CIs) of grades II-IV and III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 36.1% ± 0.7% and 13.9% ± 0.3% at day +100, respectively. The 4-year CI of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 36.2% ± 0.7%, with moderate to severe cGVHD at 14.9% ± 0.4%. Compared with IST, HSCT recipients showed much higher hematologic recovery rate at 3, 6, and 12 months (63.9%, 83.3%, and 86.1%, respectively, p < 0.001). The estimated 4-year overall survival (OS) (79.8% ± 6.8% vs. 80.0% ± 7.3%, p = 0.957) was similar; however, the failure-free survival (FFS) was significantly better in the HSCT group (79.8% ± 6.8% vs. 56.6% ± 8.8%, p = 0.049). Of note, children in the HSCT cohort were all alive without treatment failures, exhibiting superior OS (100% vs. 50.0% ± 17.7%, p = 0.004) and FFS (100% vs. 50.0% ± 17.7%, p = 0.004) than children in the IST cohort. Subgroup analysis revealed that younger patients (age ≤ 35 years), especially children, and those with refractory SAA benefited more from HSCT. Therefore, for these patients, salvage HSCT may be more preferable than a second course of IST.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    FMS相关的酪氨酸激酶3(FLT3)抑制剂gilteritinib是复发性/难治性(R/R)FLT3突变(FLT3mut)急性髓性白血病(AML)的标准疗法,但总生存率(OS)仅为大约20%,很少患者达到深度和/或持久的反应。我们回顾性分析了29例接受三联疗法(gilteritinib+venetoclax[VEN]+阿扎胞苷[AZA])治疗的R/RFLT3mutAML患者。19例患者(65.5%)曾接受过FLT3抑制剂治疗。改良复合完全缓解(mCRc)率为62.1%(n=18;CR,4/29,13.8%;CRi,6/29,20.7%;MLFS,8/29,27.6%)。在获得mCRc的18例患者中,FLT3-PCR阴性为94.4%(n=17),流式细胞术阴性为77.7%(n=14)。10例无FLT3TKI暴露的患者的mCRc率为70%(n=7),19例有FLT3TKI暴露的患者的mCRc率为57.8%(n=11)(P=0.52)。在第一个周期结束时,在反应者中,ANC>0.5×109/L的中位时间为38天,血小板>50×109/L的中位时间为31天,但60天死亡率为0%。所有R/RFLT3mut患者的2年OS估计为60.9%。1年OS为80%和58.8%的患者没有和先前的FLT3TKI暴露,分别为(P=0.79)。在三联疗法后接受allo-HSCT的19例患者(65.5%)中,估计的2年OS为62%,在未接受allo-HSCT的10例患者中为37%(P=0.03)。总之,gilteritinib三联疗法,VEN,AZA是有效和安全的,是R/RFLT3mutAML的优秀前线选择。
    The FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib is standard therapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated (FLT3mut) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but the overall survival (OS) is only approximately 20 % and few patients achieve deep and/ or durable response. We retrospectively analyzed 29 R/R FLT3mut AML patients treated on triplet regimens (gilteritinib+ venetoclax[VEN] +azacitidine[AZA]). Nineteen patients (65.5 %) had received prior FLT3 inhibitor therapy. The modified composite complete remission (mCRc) rate was 62.1 % (n = 18; CR, 4/29,13.8 %; CRi, 6/29, 20.7 %; MLFS, 8/29, 27.6 %). Among 18 patients achieved mCRc, FLT3-PCR negativity was 94.4 % (n=17), and flow-cytometry negativity was 77.7 % (n=14). The mCRc rate was 70 % (n=7) in 10 patients without prior FLT3 TKI exposure and 57.8 % (n=11) in 19 patients with prior FLT3 TKI exposure (P=0.52). At the end of the first cycle, the median time to ANC > 0.5× 109/L was 38 days and platelet > 50× 109/L was 31 days among responders, but 60-day mortality was 0 %. The estimated 2-year OS was 60.9 % for all R/R FLT3mut patients. The 1-year OS was 80 % and 58.8 % in patients without and with prior FLT3 TKI exposure, respectively (P=0.79). The estimated 2-year OS was 62 % in 19 (65.5 %) patients who received allo-HSCT after triplet therapy and 37 % in 10 patients who did not receive allo-HSCT (P=0.03). In conclusion, triplet therapy with gilteritinib, VEN, and AZA is effective and safe and an excellent frontline option for R/R FLT3mut AML.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评价经肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合瑞戈非尼的疗效和安全性(以下,TACE-regorafenib)或camrelizumab(以下简称,TACE-camrelizumab)用于治疗TACE和索拉非尼治疗后无法治愈的肝细胞癌(HCC)。
    方法:回顾性评估2018年9月至2023年12月期间接受TACE-regorafenib或TACE-camrelizumab的HCC患者的病历。治疗反应,总生存期(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),比较两组患者的不良事件(AE)。
    结果:本研究共纳入76例患者,TACE-regorafenib和TACE-camrelizumab组中的41和35例患者,分别。TACE-regorafenib和TACE-camrelizumab组的客观缓解率分别为9.8%和8.6%,分别,两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.859)。同样,两组疾病控制率无统计学差异(61.0%vs68.6%,P=0.838)。TACE-regorafenib组的中位OS为11个月,TACE-camrelizumab组的中位OS为10个月,两组间无显著性差异(P=0.348)。TACE-regorafenib组的中位PFS为7个月,明显长于TACE-camrelizumab组(4个月,P=0.004)。两组间不良事件发生率差异无统计学意义(P=0.544)。
    结论:TACE-regorafenib是安全的,耐受性良好,并在索拉非尼难治性晚期肝癌患者中显示出有希望的疗效,而TACE-camrelizumab显示相似的生存获益.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with regorafenib (hereafter, TACE-regorafenib) or camrelizumab (hereafter, TACE-camrelizumab) for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with untreatable progression after TACE and sorafenib therapy.
    METHODS: The medical records of patients with HCC who received TACE-regorafenib or TACE-camrelizumab between September 2018 and December 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. Therapeutic response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were enrolled in this study, with 41 and 35 patients in the TACE-regorafenib and TACE-camrelizumab groups, respectively. The objective response rates in the TACE-regorafenib and TACE-camrelizumab groups were 9.8% and 8.6%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.859). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in disease control rates between the two groups (61.0% vs 68.6%, P = 0.838). The median OS was 11 months in the TACE-regorafenib group and 10 months in the TACE-camrelizumab group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.348). The TACE-regorafenib group had a median PFS of 7 months, which was significantly longer than that of the TACE-camrelizumab group (4 months, P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the two groups (P = 0.544).
    CONCLUSIONS: TACE-regorafenib was safe, well-tolerated, and showed promising efficacy in patients with sorafenib-refractory advanced HCC, whereas TACE-camrelizumab demonstrated similar survival benefits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    难治性肺炎支原体肺炎(RMPP)有严重的,快速进展,容易引起各种肺外并发症。因此,RMPP的早期识别至关重要。本研究旨在构建并验证基于临床表现的风险预测模型,实验室血液指标,和放射学检查结果,以帮助临床医生识别RMPP高危患者。
    我们回顾性分析了西安市儿童医院收治的369例肺炎支原体肺炎(MPP)患儿的病历,中国。人口统计,临床特征,实验室数据,比较RMPP组和普通肺炎支原体肺炎(GMPP)组之间的放射学结果,并进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析。
    与GMPP组(n=283)相比,RMPP组(n=86)患儿的发热高峰和持续时间更高(P<0.05)。两组肺部影像学检查大叶性肺炎和胸腔积液发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验室检测显示,RMPP患儿的血清尿酸(SUA)和白蛋白(ALB)均低于GMPP组(P<0.05)。白细胞(WBC),中性粒细胞计数(NEP),红细胞沉降率(ESR),降钙素原(PCT),C反应蛋白(CRP),RMPP组中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)较高(P<0.05)。二元logistic回归分析显示,发热持续时间,胸腔积液,WBC,NEP,乳酸脱氢酶(LDH),CRP,NLR,SUA水平是RMPP的独立预测因子(P<0.05)。受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线结果显示发热持续时间,WBC,NEP,CRP,LDH,SUA,NLR具有良好的预测价值。曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.861、0.730、0.758、0.837、0.868、0.744和0.713,最佳临界值分别为10.50、10.13、6.43、29.45、370.50、170.50和3.47。最后,发烧持续时间超过10.5天,胸腔积液,WBC>10.13×109/L,NEP>6.43×109/L,CRP>29.45mg/L,LDH>370.50U/L,NLR>3.47,SUA<170.5μmol/mL构建了RMPP的预测模型。根据内部验证,基于发展数据集的列线图的平均AUC为0.956[95%置信区间(CI):0.937-0.974],对于预测RMPP患者具有良好的辨别能力.预测模型的校准图和Hosmer-Lemeshow检验(P=0.70)显示出预测概率与实际概率之间的良好一致性。决策曲线分析(DCA)显示列线图在临床上有用。
    简单易用的列线图可以帮助临床医生,尤其是初级医生,对RMPP进行早期诊断。
    UNASSIGNED: Refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (RMPP) has a serious, rapid progression that can easily cause a variety of extra-pulmonary complications. Therefore, the early identification of RMPP is crucial. This study aimed to construct and validate a risk prediction model based on clinical manifestations, laboratory blood indicators, and radiological findings to help clinicians identify patients who are at high risk of RMPP.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 369 children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) admitted to Xi\'an Children\'s Hospital, China. The demographics, clinical features, laboratory data, and radiological findings between the RMPP group and the general Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (GMPP) group were compared and subjected to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.
    UNASSIGNED: The fever peak and duration of the children in the RMPP group (n=86) were higher and longer compared with those in the GMPP group (n=283) (P<0.05). There was a significant difference in the incidence of lobar pneumonia and pleural effusion in pulmonary imaging between the two groups (P<0.05). Laboratory tests showed that the children with RMPP had lower serum uric acid (SUA) and albumin (ALB) as compared with the GMPP group (P<0.05). White blood cells (WBCs), neutrophil count (NEP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were higher in the RMPP group (P<0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that the fever duration, pleural effusion, WBC, NEP, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), CRP, NLR, and SUA levels were independent predictors of RMPP (P<0.05). The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve results showed fever duration, WBC, NEP, CRP, LDH, SUA, and NLR had good predictive value. The areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.861, 0.730, 0.758, 0.837, 0.868, 0.744, and 0.713 and the best cutoff values were 10.50, 10.13, 6.43, 29.45, 370.50, 170.50, and 3.47, respectively. Finally, fever duration of more than 10.5 days, pleural effusion, WBC >10.13×109/L, NEP >6.43×109/L, CRP >29.45 mg/L, LDH >370.50 U/L, NLR >3.47, and SUA <170.5 µmol/mL constructed a prediction model of RMPP. According to internal validation, the mean AUC of the nomogram based on the development dataset was 0.956 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.937-0.974] with good discrimination ability for predicting RMPP patients. The calibration plot and Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P=0.70) of the prediction model showed good consistency between the predicted probability and actual probability. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the nomogram is clinically useful.
    UNASSIGNED: The simple and easy-to-use nomogram can help clinicians, especially primary doctors, to make early diagnoses of RMPP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    慢性炎性脱髓鞘性多发性神经根神经病(CIDP)是一种异质性但可治疗的免疫介导性神经病。Ofatumumab(OFA)是一种完全人抗CD20单克隆抗体,在中枢脱髓鞘疾病中显示出有希望的疗效,如多发性硬化症(MS)。然而,缺乏OFA在外周脱髓鞘疾病中的应用研究,特别是CIDP。一例复发性和难治性CIDP,对常规免疫疗法无效且对利妥昔单抗(RTX)不耐受,但对皮下注射OFA呈阳性反应。
    病人,一名46岁的男子被诊断患有CIDP,接受大剂量静脉注射甲基强的松龙,静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG),在疾病的急性期和血浆置换(PE),长期口服泼尼松,硫唑嘌呤(AZA),和霉酚酸酯(MMF)在缓解期。然而,该患者在五年内经历了六次复发,因为这些,以及对常规免疫疗法的无效反应,对RTX不宽容,选择皮下注射OFA作为预防复发的预防性治疗。在总共注射了六次OFA后,CD19+B细胞基本上被耗尽。患者已被随访超过23个月,没有复发。
    该病例证明了OFA治疗复发性和难治性CIDP的有效性和良好的耐受性。需要进一步的研究来研究OFA在复发性和难治性CIDP患者中的疗效和安全性,尤其是那些对常规免疫疗法无效且对RTX不耐受的患者.
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a heterogeneous but treatable immune-mediated neuropathy. Ofatumumab (OFA) is a fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that has shown promising efficacy in central demyelinating diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS). However, there is a lack of studies on the usage of OFA in peripheral demyelinating diseases, particularly CIDP. A case of relapsed and refractory CIDP with an ineffective response to conventional immunotherapy and intolerance to rituximab (RTX) but a positive response to subcutaneous injections of OFA is presented.
    UNASSIGNED: The patient, a 46-year-old man diagnosed with CIDP, received high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and plasma exchange(PE) during the acute phase of the disease, and long-term oral administration of prednisone, azathioprine (AZA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) during the remission phase. However, the patient suffered six relapses over a five-year period, and because of these, along with an ineffective response to conventional immunotherapy, and intolerance to RTX, subcutaneous injections of OFA were selected as a prophylactic treatment against relapses. After a total of six injections of OFA, CD19+B cells were substantially depleted. The patient has been followed for more than 23 months without relapse.
    UNASSIGNED: This case demonstrates the effectiveness and good tolerability of OFA in the treatment of relapsed and refractory CIDP. Further studies are needed to investigate the efficacy and safety of OFA in patients with relapsed and refractory CIDP, especially in those who have shown an ineffective response to conventional immunotherapy and are intolerant to RTX.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    微小病变(MCD)是成人肾病综合征的常见原因。大多数患有MCD的成年人在初始类固醇治疗后达到完全缓解(CR)。然而,大约30%的对类固醇有反应的成年人经常复发,成为类固醇依赖性和潜在发展难治性MCD。在成人中治疗难治性MCD提出了重大挑战。
    一位37岁的女性出现在肾脏病科,有6年的MCD病史。通过肾活检证实了MCD的诊断。她最初通过类固醇治疗获得CR,但在类固醇逐渐减少期间经历了复发。尽管发生了多次复发,但使用类固醇和他克莫司的方案实现了随后的CR。利妥昔单抗导致另一个CR,但它的维护只持续了6个月。对随后的利妥昔单抗治疗的反应不令人满意。最终,选择了obinutuzumab,导致CR的诱导和维持12个月。
    此病例证明了对频繁复发的成功治疗,类固醇依赖性,和利妥昔单抗耐药的MCD与奥比妥珠单抗。奥比妥珠单抗是利妥昔单抗耐药MCD的一种有前途的治疗选择。
    UNASSIGNED: Minimal change disease (MCD) is a common cause of adult nephrotic syndrome. Most adults with MCD achieve complete remission (CR) after initial steroid therapy. However, approximately 30% of adults who respond to steroids experience frequent relapses, becoming steroid-dependent and potentially developing refractory MCD. Treating refractory MCD in adults poses a significant challenge.
    UNASSIGNED: A 37-year-old woman presented to the nephrology department with a 6-year history of MCD. The diagnosis of MCD was confirmed via renal biopsy. She initially achieved CR with steroid treatment but experienced relapse during steroid tapering. Subsequent CR was achieved with a regimen of steroids and tacrolimus although multiple relapses occurred. Rituximab led to another CR, but its maintenance lasted only 6 months. The response to subsequent rituximab treatments was unsatisfactory. Ultimately, obinutuzumab was selected, resulting in the induction and maintenance of CR for 12 months.
    UNASSIGNED: This case demonstrates the successful treatment of frequently relapsed, steroid-dependent, and rituximab-resistant MCD with obinutuzumab. Obinutuzumab is a promising therapeutic option for rituximab-resistant MCD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这项前瞻性观察研究中,我们旨在研究癫痫患者血清沉默调节蛋白(SIRT)3的水平及其与疾病严重程度的关系.
    这项前瞻性观察性研究包括2019年11月至2022年11月到我院就诊的203例症状性癫痫患者和100例健康对照者。使用国家医院癫痫发作严重程度量表(NHS3)评估癫痫患者的疾病严重程度。采用酶联免疫吸附法检测血清SIRT3、白细胞介素(IL)-6、IL-1β、肿瘤坏死因子-α,所有患者的C反应蛋白。此外,采用简易精神状态检查法和蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MOCA)对所有研究参与者的认知功能进行评估.所有数据采用SPSS25.0软件进行分析。
    癫痫患者的MOCA评分明显低于健康志愿者(P<0.05)。与非难治性癫痫患者(199.00±18.68pg/mL)相比,难治性癫痫患者的血清SIRT3水平显着降低(183.16±17.22pg/mL)。此外,癫痫患者血清SIRT3水平与炎症因子IL-6(Pearson相关-0.221,P=0.002)和NHS评分(Pearson相关-0.272,P<0.001)呈负相关,与MOCA评分呈正相关(Pearson相关0.166,P=0.018)。此外,受试者工作特征曲线表明血清SIRT3可用于诊断癫痫,以及难治性癫痫。最后,Logistic回归分析显示SIRT3(OR=1.028,95CI:1.003-1.054,P=0.028),IL-6(OR=0.666,95CI:0.554-0.800,P<0.001),IL-1β(OR=0.750,95CI:0.630-0.894,P=0.001),NHS3(OR=0.555,95CI:0.435~0.706,P<0.001)是难治性癫痫的危险因素。
    总而言之,我们的研究结果表明,癫痫患者血清SIRT3水平显著降低,难治性癫痫患者血清SIRT3水平进一步降低.本研究可能为癫痫患者提供新的治疗靶点和综合治疗策略。
    UNASSIGNED: In this prospective observational study, we aimed to investigate the serum levels of sirtuin (SIRT)3 in epilepsy patients and its association with the severity of the disease.
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective observational study included 203 patients with symptomatic epilepsy and 100 healthy controls who visited our hospital from November 2019 to November 2022. The severity of the disease in epilepsy patients was assessed using the National Hospital Seizure Severity Scale (NHS3). We used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure the serum levels of SIRT3, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and C-reactive protein in all patients. In addition, the cognitive function of all study participants was evaluated using the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). All data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 software.
    UNASSIGNED: The MOCA scores of the epilepsy patients were significantly lower compared to the healthy volunteers (P < 0.05). The serum SIRT3 levels were decreased significantly in patients with refractory epilepsy (183.16 ± 17.22 pg/mL) compared to non-refractory epilepsy patients (199.00 ± 18.68 pg/mL). In addition, serum SIRT3 levels were negatively correlated with the inflammatory factors IL-6 (Pearson\'s correlation -0.221, P = 0.002) and NHS score (Pearson\'s correlation -0.272, P < 0.001) of epilepsy patients, while positively correlated with MOCA scores (Pearson\'s correlation 0.166, P = 0.018). Furthermore, the receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that serum SIRT3 could be used to diagnose epilepsy, as well as refractory epilepsy. Finally, logistic regression analysis showed that SIRT3 (OR = 1.028, 95%CI: 1.003-1.054, P = 0.028), IL-6 (OR = 0.666, 95%CI: 0.554-0.800, P < 0.001), IL-1β (OR = 0.750, 95%CI: 0.630-0.894, P = 0.001), and NHS3 (OR = 0.555, 95%CI: 0.435-0.706, P < 0.001) were risk factors for refractory epilepsy.
    UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, our findings demonstrated that serum SIRT3 levels were significantly decreased in epilepsy patients and further decreased in patients with refractory epilepsy. This study might provide new therapeutic targets and comprehensive treatment strategies for epilepsy patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞疗法已被证实可改善难治性患者或复发性B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(R/RB-ALL)的缓解率。然而,CAR-T治疗后接受异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)的额外益处仍是一个有争议的话题.在这项研究中,我们调查了CD19CAR-T桥接与allo-HSCT在R/RB-ALL患者中的效率和长期结果。共有42名患者被纳入队列研究。我们的发现显示,接受CAR-T和HSCT的患者的1年总生存率(OS)为70%,1年无白血病生存率(LFS)为95%。此外,与接受单独CAR-T治疗的患者相比,接受这种联合治疗的患者具有更高的OS和LFS率.总之,这项临床试验的结果为在R/RB-ALL患者中使用CAR-T疗法作为allo-HSCT的桥接策略的安全性和有效性提供了令人信服的证据.
    Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has been confirmed improving remission rates in refractory patients or relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). However, the added benefits of undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) following CAR-T therapy remain a subject of debate. In this research we investigated the efficiency and long-term outcomes of CD19 CAR-T bridging with allo-HSCT in R/R B-ALL patients. A total of 42 patients were brought into the cohort studies. Our findings revealed that patients who appected CAR-T followed by HSCT had a 1-year overall survival (OS) rate of 70 % and a 1-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) rate of 95 %. Moreover, patients who underwent this combined treatment had higher OS and LFS rates compared to those who received CAR-T therapy alone. In conclusion, the results of this clinical trial provide compelling evidence for the safety and efficacy of using CAR-T therapy as a bridging strategy to allo-HSCT in patients with R/R B-ALL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大约10%-30%的霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)患者在一线标准治疗后经历复发或难治性(R/R)疾病。Brentuximabvedotin(BV)和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在R/RHL的挽救治疗中具有重要作用。然而,BV和/或ICI治疗难治性HL的后续治疗具有挑战性.
    我们回顾性分析了两个机构的R/RHL患者,经历过BV或ICI治疗失败,此后接受放疗(RT)。总反应率(ORR),响应持续时间(DOR),无进展生存期(PFS),分析总生存期(OS)。
    总的来说,纳入19例患者。一线全身治疗包括阿霉素,博来霉素,长春碱,和达卡巴嗪(ABVD,84.2%);AVD加ICIs(10.5%);和博来霉素,依托泊苷,阿霉素,环磷酰胺,长春新碱,丙卡巴嗪,和泼尼松(BEACOPP,5.3%)。一线治疗后,15例(78.9%)和4例(21.1%)患者患有难治性疾病和复发,分别。R/RHL诊断后,六(31.6%),两个(10.5%),11例(57.9%)患者同时接受BV和ICIs,BV单药治疗,和ICI单一疗法,分别。所有患者均接受强度调节RT(n=12,63.2%)或体积调节电弧治疗(VMAT;n=7,36.8%)。ORR和完全缓解(CR)率为100%;DOR至RT的中位数为17.2个月(范围,7.9-46.7个月)。两名患者在辐射领域外表现出进展;一名患者在领域内广泛,场外,节点,结外复发.中位随访时间为16.2个月(范围,9.2-23.2个月),1年PFS和OS分别为84.4%和100%,分别。PFS与结外受累(P=0.019)和大体肿瘤体积(P=0.044)相关。所有患者耐受RT良好,无≥3级不良事件。
    RT对于治疗BV或ICIs难治性HL是有效且安全的,并且有可能成为HL综合策略的一部分。
    UNASSIGNED: Approximately 10%-30% of patients with Hodgkin\'s lymphoma (HL) experience relapse or refractory (R/R) disease after first-line standard therapy. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have important roles in the salvage treatment of R/R HL. However, subsequent treatment for HL refractory to BV and/or ICI treatment is challenging.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed patients in two institutions who had R/R HL, experienced BV or ICI treatment failure, and received radiotherapy (RT) thereafter. The overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, 19 patients were enrolled. First-line systemic therapy comprised doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD, 84.2%); AVD plus ICIs (10.5%); and bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP, 5.3%). After first-line therapy, 15 (78.9%) and four patients (21.1%) had refractory disease and relapsed, respectively. After R/R HL diagnosis, six (31.6%), two (10.5%), and 11 (57.9%) patients received BV and ICIs concurrently, BV monotherapy, and ICI monotherapy, respectively. All patients received intensity-modulated RT (n = 12, 63.2%) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT; n = 7, 36.8%). The ORR as well as the complete response (CR) rate was 100%; the median DOR to RT was 17.2 months (range, 7.9-46.7 months). Two patients showed progression outside the radiation field; one patient had extensive in-field, out-of-field, nodal, and extranodal relapse. With a median follow-up time of 16.2 months (range, 9.2-23.2 months), the 1-year PFS and OS were 84.4% and 100%, respectively. PFS was associated with extranodal involvement (P = 0.019) and gross tumor volume (P = 0.044). All patients tolerated RT well without adverse events of grade ≥ 3.
    UNASSIGNED: RT is effective and safe for treating HL refractory to BV or ICIs and has the potential to be part of a comprehensive strategy for HL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:再生障碍性贫血(AA)的特征是骨髓衰竭和血细胞减少。埃曲波帕(ELT)是有效和安全的治疗难治性/复发性AA;然而,有关输血依赖性非重度AA(TD-NSAA)长期结局的报道有限.
    方法:对免疫抑制治疗(IST)难以治疗或IST后复发的TD-NSAA患者,单独用ELT治疗,并随访至少12个月。患者的基线特征,ELT的疗效和不良反应,记录ELT后的复发和克隆进化率。
    结果:在55例TD-NSAA患者中,24(43.6%)为男性。诊断时的中位年龄为46(19-80)岁。24名患者复发TD-NSAA,31例患者患有难治性TD-NSAA。在28(12-48)个月的中位随访期内,ELT治疗3、6和12个月时的总体和完全缓解率为38.2%,60.0%,52.7%和9.1%,14.6%,和9.1%,分别。在中位随访28(12-48)个月后,21.2%(7/33)的患者出现复发,从ELT治疗到复发的中位持续时间为14(6-45)个月。
    结论:ELT对复发/难治性TD-NSAA患者有效,具有可容忍的不利影响。
    BACKGROUND: Aplastic anemia (AA) is characterized by bone marrow failure and cytopenia. Eltrombopag (ELT) is effective and safe for treating refractory/relapsed AA; however, reports on the long-term outcomes of transfusion-dependent non-severe AA (TD-NSAA) are limited.
    METHODS: Patients with TD-NSAA refractory to immunosuppressive therapy (IST) or relapsed after IST, treated with ELT alone, and followed up for at least 12 months were retrospectively enrolled. The baseline characteristics of patients, efficacy and adverse effects of ELT, and relapse and clone evolution rates after ELT were documented.
    RESULTS: Of the 55 patients with TD-NSAA included, 24 (43.6%) were men. Median age at diagnosis was 46 (19-80) years. Twenty-four patients had relapsed TD-NSAA, and 31 patients had refractory TD-NSAA. During the median follow-up period of 28 (12-48) months, the overall and complete response rates at 3, 6, and 12 months of ELT treatment were 38.2, 60.0, and 52.7 and 9.1, 14.6, and 9.1%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 28 (12-48) months, 21.2% (7/33) of patients experienced relapse, with a median duration from ELT treatment to relapse of 14 (6-45) months.
    CONCLUSIONS: ELT was effective in patients with relapsed/refractory TD-NSAA, with tolerable adverse effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号